SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on TSMC's 5 nm node with the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It belongs to the 7000 series and fits into AMD Socket AM5. The chip runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The die is 71 mm² and packs 6,570 million transistors. Cache is organized as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support covers dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes is available, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The benchmark data places this CPU at the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32,750. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32,707 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662 (0.3% ahead). This means the Ryzen 5 7400F sits in a performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate it from several strong competitors across both AMD and Intel lineups.

Cinebench results show strong multi-threaded throughput. The R15 multi-core score is 2,193, while single-core is 309. R20 multi-core reaches 9,141 with single-core at 1,290. R23 multi-core hits 21,765 and single-core 3,072. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in lightly-threaded workloads thanks to the high boost clock, while still delivering respectable multi-threaded performance for a 6-core part. The single-core scores are particularly notable, as they sit near the top of what the Zen 4 architecture can achieve at this power envelope.

PassMark results corroborate the mixed workload picture. Integer math scores 74,745, floating point math scores 45,799, and extended instructions score 21,747. Data compression hits 289,999, encryption reaches 16,712, and random string sorting scores 35,096. Physics tests produce 1,660, while find prime numbers yields 191. The multithread score is 25,645, and single-thread is 3,689. These figures suggest a processor that handles integer-heavy code better than floating-point-heavy code, which is typical for a mainstream desktop chip with 6 cores rather than a high-core-count workstation part.

For real workloads, the Ryzen 5 7400F delivers a balanced profile. The 4.70 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks, while the 6 cores and 12 threads provide enough parallelism for moderate content creation. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and database-style workloads that benefit from larger caches. The 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, and the unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to push beyond stock clocks if thermals permit.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this pairing shows a CPU at the 83rd percentile and a GPU at the 67th percentile among all parts, with the overall build landing at the 75th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, which places it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856, 1% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379, 1.2% behind), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237, 1.8% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153, 2.3% behind). This is a GPU that performs at roughly the level of a mid-range consumer card from several generations ago, despite its professional Quadro branding.

The CPU's average score of 32,750 is essentially tied with its nearest rivals, with deltas of only 0.1% to 0.3% in either direction. This means the Ryzen 5 7400F offers no meaningful performance advantage or disadvantage compared to the Intel Core i5-14600T, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, or AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in aggregate benchmarks. The choice between these parts should be driven by platform features, power efficiency, and price rather than raw benchmark performance.

On the GPU side, the Geekbench scores are more flattering. OpenCL scores 78,999 and Vulkan scores 92,309. These are compute-oriented workloads, and the Quadro RTX 5000 shows strength there. However, the PassMark DirectX scores tell a different story: DirectX 9 scores 195, DirectX 10 scores 113, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 12 scores 59. The G3D score is 15,616, while G2D is 709 and GPU compute is 6,525. The low DirectX 12 score suggests that this Turing-era GPU does not handle modern graphics APIs well, which is a significant limitation for current gaming titles.

The combined picture reveals a significant mismatch. The CPU is a modern, high-percentile part capable of driving demanding workloads, while the GPU is an aging professional card that performs near mid-range consumer levels from years past. The build's 75th percentile combined ranking is dragged down by the GPU, which sits 16 percentile points below the CPU. This imbalance will manifest in GPU-bound scenarios where the CPU's capabilities go underutilized.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pronounced bottleneck in the GPU for most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile — a 16-point gap. In gaming and 3D rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor, as its DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15,616 indicate it cannot keep pace with the CPU's output in modern graphics workloads. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,689 and multi-thread score of 25,645 are more than sufficient to feed a GPU at this performance level.

However, in compute-heavy workloads that leverage the GPU's OpenCL or Vulkan capabilities, the balance shifts. The OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309 show that the GPU can deliver strong compute performance, and in those scenarios the CPU may become the bottleneck, particularly in tasks that require both high CPU throughput and GPU compute simultaneously. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate but not exceptional for parallel compute workloads, and the PassMark multithread score of 25,645 reflects this.

FPS scaling in games will be governed by the GPU's performance, as the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor at any reasonable resolution. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that the card will deliver better frame rates in older titles using legacy APIs, while modern games that rely heavily on DirectX 12 will see substantially lower performance. This is a critical consideration for anyone planning to use this build for current-generation gaming.

The practical implication is that users should focus upgrade efforts on the GPU first. The CPU has headroom to support a significantly faster graphics card, and any bottleneck in gaming will be entirely attributable to the Quadro RTX 5000. In productivity workloads, the balance is more even, with the CPU's 83rd percentile positioning providing solid performance for compilation, office work, and moderate content creation, while the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate certain tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark DirectX scores, gaming performance will be heavily dependent on the API used by each title. The DirectX 11 score of 140 indicates playable performance in older games, particularly esports titles and games from the early-to-mid 2010s. The DirectX 12 score of 59, however, suggests that modern games leveraging DirectX 12 will see significantly reduced frame rates, potentially making many current titles unplayable at high settings.

The G3D score of 15,616 places this GPU near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which historically delivered 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in its era. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory capacity and bandwidth for high-resolution textures, but the raw compute throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 limits the card's ability to drive modern game engines at high frame rates.

For 1080p gaming, the estimate is that older titles and less demanding esports games will run at high frame rates, while newer AAA games will struggle, particularly at higher detail settings. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop further due to the card's modest pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low DirectX 12 performance suggests that ray-traced workloads will be particularly demanding.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the R23 single-core score of 3,072 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,689, ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will cap overall frame rates. For users prioritizing gaming, this pairing is not recommended for modern titles at high settings; it is better suited for older games or titles with lower graphics demands.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at modern settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15,616 will cap frame rates well below the 144 Hz or 240 Hz targets that high-refresh monitors require. The CPU, with its 83rd percentile ranking, is capable of driving high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU cannot keep up.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 25,645, can handle software encoding for streaming at moderate bitrates. The GPU's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores can assist with encoding offload, but the low DirectX 12 performance may limit the GPU's ability to run modern games while encoding simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 and single-core score of 3,072 provide solid performance for video editing timelines, particularly for 1080p and 1440p footage. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth help with effects and color grading, and the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute can accelerate rendering in GPU-accelerated applications.

3D rendering: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 indicates strong compute performance for 3D rendering workloads that leverage GPU acceleration. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for large scenes, and the 384 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based denoising. The CPU's 6 cores will be a limiting factor for CPU-based rendering, where higher core counts would be beneficial.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 74,745 and data compression score of 289,999 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and database workloads. The 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means this is a capable development machine, though the 6-core limit may slow parallel builds compared to higher-core-count parts.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for student and office workloads. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,689 and the GPU's G2D score of 709 provide smooth performance for web browsing, document editing, and productivity applications. The 65 W TDP CPU and 230 W TDP GPU make for a relatively power-hungry system compared to what these tasks require.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, built on TSMC's 12 nm process. The TU104 chip contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It is configured with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. There are 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1). The card draws 230 W TDP, requires a 550 W power supply, and uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 21,629. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (1% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (1.2% behind), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (1.8% behind), and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (2.3% behind). This positioning indicates that the Quadro RTX 5000 performs at roughly the level of a mid-range consumer GPU from 2016, not a modern high-end card.

The Geekbench scores of 78,999 (OpenCL) and 92,309 (Vulkan) suggest that the GPU retains strong compute capabilities for professional workloads. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are poor: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. These low DirectX scores, particularly the 59 for DirectX 12, indicate weak gaming performance in modern titles. The G3D score of 15,616 and GPU compute score of 6,525 further confirm that this is a compute-focused card rather than a gaming card, despite its 16 GB memory capacity.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantial, and the 384 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for AI-based tasks like denoising and inference. The 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though the low DirectX 12 performance suggests that ray-traced game workloads will be severely constrained. This GPU is best suited for professional applications that leverage CUDA-based compute, OpenCL, or Vulkan, rather than for gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals who need CPU performance at the 83rd percentile for general productivity and moderate compute workloads, combined with a GPU that offers 16 GB of VRAM and strong OpenCL/Vulkan compute for workstation tasks. The Ryzen 5 7400F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 and single-core score of 3,072 provide a solid foundation for software developers, data analysts, and content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications.

Gamers should not choose this build for modern titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15,616 place it well below what is needed for contemporary AAA gaming at high settings. Users who primarily play older games, esports titles, or indie games that use DirectX 11 or earlier APIs will find the GPU adequate, but the 67th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a gaming-focused system.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated renderers will benefit from the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, along with the OpenCL score of 78,999. The 384 tensor cores accelerate AI-based workflows, and the 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing for professional visualization. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for these tasks, though users with heavier CPU rendering needs would benefit from a higher-core-count processor.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 74,745 and data compression score of 289,999, which indicate strong performance for compilation and data processing. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all processors ensures that most development tasks will run smoothly. The GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate machine learning inference and data processing workloads that leverage CUDA or OpenCL.

Students and office workers will find this build more than sufficient for their needs, though it is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive everyday use, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for any GPU-accelerated applications. Small business workstations running databases, financial modeling, or engineering software will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's professional compute features.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,750.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21,629, placing it at the 67th percentile. It is 1% behind the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, 1.2% ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% ahead of the Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega M GL.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 3,072.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which provide hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, with the GPU itself rated at 230 W TDP.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this build?

A: The overall build sits at the 75th percentile among all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and GPU at the 67th percentile.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, including ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is a modern interface that will not bottleneck current or near-future graphics cards. The 65 W TDP means that the CPU has thermal headroom for upgrades to higher-TDP processors within the same socket family, should users wish to increase core counts in the future.

The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface. This means that upgrading to a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 or PCIe 5.0 support will require a compatible motherboard, though most AM5 motherboards support PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 slots. The GPU's 230 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU indicate that the power supply has headroom for a more powerful GPU, provided the PSU has sufficient wattage and the appropriate connectors.

The most sensible upgrade path is to replace the GPU first, as it is the primary bottleneck in gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it can support a significantly faster GPU without becoming the limiting factor. A modern GPU with better DirectX 12 support would dramatically improve gaming performance, given the current GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59.

For users who need more CPU performance, the AM5 platform supports higher-core-count processors within the same socket. The 65 W TDP of the current CPU suggests that the cooling solution may have headroom for a higher-TDP processor, though this depends on the specific cooler installed. Memory is already at DDR5, so the primary upgrade path is CPU and GPU, with the platform being future-proof for several more generations of AMD processors.

The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that storage and expansion cards can take advantage of the latest bandwidth standards. The 24 CPU lanes provide ample connectivity for multiple NVMe drives and a high-bandwidth GPU. For a balanced upgrade, users should focus on the GPU, as the CPU and platform are already well-positioned for modern workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds