SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around AMD’s latest mainstream socket and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part based on the Raphael design, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The GPU is a 12 GB GDDR6X card built on the AD104 chip, also on a 5 nm process, with a boost clock of 2610 MHz and a 192-bit memory bus delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 84, placing this build in the upper tier of all desktop systems.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture. Its 5 nm process node, shared with the GPU, contributes to a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal and power demands modest for a desktop part. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz are typical for a mainstream Ryzen 5, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking headroom on supported AM5 motherboards.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a 6-core part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This arrangement supports both single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded scaling. Memory support is limited to DDR5, with a dual-channel bus providing 83.2 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is generous for connecting high-speed storage and the GPU.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21765 in multi-core and 3072 in single-core. The multi-core score is strong for a 6-core part, reflecting efficient Zen 4 scaling. The single-core score of 3072 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded workloads like many games. The Cinebench R20 scores are 9141 multi-core and 1290 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2193 multi-core and 309 single-core. These results are consistent across generations, showing a balanced design that does not sacrifice single-thread speed for multi-thread capability.

PassMark results add further context. The multithread score is 25645, with a single-thread score of 3689. The integer math score of 74745 and floating point math score of 45799 highlight strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores 289999, while encryption scores 16712, indicating solid performance in these specific workloads. The extended instructions score of 21747 and prime number finding score of 191 round out the picture. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a high position, showing the 7400F outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7400F is nearly identical in average score. It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. It is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and 0.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. These deltas are within noise, meaning the 7400F is effectively tied with these parts in aggregate performance. The practical implication is that the 7400F offers competitive performance in its class, but its advantage lies more in platform features and efficiency than in raw score dominance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is characterized by strong multi-core and single-core scores that place it in the 83rd percentile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 is a clear indicator of its capability in threaded workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 3072 is equally important, as it ensures fast response in everyday tasks and games that rely on a few fast threads. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 confirms this, while the single-thread score of 3689 shows that per-core performance is not a bottleneck.

The GPU, a GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024. This is a modern test that stresses the GPU’s compute and graphics capabilities. In PassMark, the G3D score is 31624, placing the GPU in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score is 18396, reflecting its parallel processing power. Other scores include Geekbench OpenCL at 176953 and Vulkan at 213808, which show strong cross-API performance. The older PassMark DirectX tests show scores of 352 for DX9, 288 for DX11, 187 for DX10, and 116 for DX12, with a G2D score of 1200.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 44795, which is 0.8% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, 1.3% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, and 1.7% lower than the Intel Arc A730M. It is 1.6% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A6000. These deltas place the 4070 Ti in a tight competitive band, with no single rival holding a significant edge. The combined picture is a system where both CPU and GPU sit in the low-to-mid 80th percentile, meaning it outperforms 83-84% of all components in the database.

In real-world gaming, the measured FPS data shows this pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being more demanding. The average FPS across all tested games is 181.6, which ranks 543rd out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 15% of all CPU+GPU combinations. This rank is consistent with the individual component percentiles, indicating a well-matched pair.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 4070 Ti is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s single-core strength is often the limiting factor in esports titles. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 298 FPS, dropping to 197 at 2560x1440 and 110 at 3840x2160. This scaling shows that at lower resolutions, the CPU can feed the GPU enough frames to reach high refresh rates, but the GPU becomes more relevant as resolution increases.

In more demanding titles, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 88 FPS at 1080p, 66 FPS at 1440p, and 43 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is 51%, showing that the GPU’s rendering load scales significantly with resolution. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 80 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, and 39 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that for AAA games, the 4070 Ti is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU is sufficient to avoid holding back performance.

The FPS data reveals that the CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 84th percentile are closely matched, which is ideal for avoiding severe bottlenecks. In CPU-intensive games like Valorant, the system achieves 461 FPS at 1080p, 437 FPS at 1440p, and 406 FPS at 4K. The small drop with resolution suggests the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU has enough headroom to keep up. Conversely, in GPU-intensive titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, the system only reaches 43 FPS at 1080p, 27 FPS at 1440p, and 14 FPS at 4K, showing a clear GPU limitation.

The pair rank by FPS of 543 out of 3732 pairs (top 15%) confirms that this combination is well-balanced for the games tested. The average FPS of 181.6 across all games is high, but the range is wide, from 14 FPS in Ark at 4K to 658 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p. This variability is expected, as different games stress different parts of the system. The data suggests that for most users, the CPU will not be a bottleneck below 4K, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in the most demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream socket for AMD desktop processors. This socket supports the 7000 series and later generations, providing a clear upgrade path. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for workstation tasks that require data integrity.

The platform provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is a significant feature. This allows for fast NVMe SSDs and future GPUs that may use PCIe Gen 5. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible and does not limit performance. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer headroom for the fastest available drives.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a desktop processor. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient, and power consumption is modest. The GPU has a TDP of 285 W and requires a 600 W power supply, according to the suggested PSU rating. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, which fits in most ATX cases. The dimensions are 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width, so case compatibility should be checked for smaller builds.

For a sensible next upgrade, the AM5 platform allows a future CPU swap to a higher-core-count Ryzen part without changing the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs storage and GPU connectivity. The memory support is limited to DDR5, so any new build must use this newer memory standard. The 600 W PSU recommendation provides headroom for the current GPU, but a future GPU with higher power draw may require a larger unit.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is excellent. At 1080p, the system delivers over 200 FPS in many esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (298 FPS), Valorant (461 FPS), and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (354 FPS). At 1440p, these games still run above 150 FPS in most cases, making this a strong choice for competitive players.

For streaming, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for encoding at 1080p, especially with the GPU’s NVENC capabilities, though the data shows the GPU’s compute score of 18396, which supports hardware encoding. The 65 W TDP keeps system power draw manageable during long streaming sessions.

For video editing, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 indicates strong performance in rendering tasks, though a higher-core-count CPU would be faster. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and high memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s help with effects and timeline scrubbing.

For 3D rendering, the GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 60 RT cores make it a capable renderer for real-time and offline workloads. The CPU’s multi-core score is adequate for scene setup and physics, but rendering will be GPU-bound in most cases.

For software development, the single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 supports fast compilation of smaller projects, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with code and data locality.

For student and office work, this build is overkill but provides a smooth experience. The single-thread PassMark score of 3689 ensures fast application launches, and the CPU’s low TDP keeps the system quiet and cool under light loads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on real testing, shows this system is a strong performer at 1080p and 1440p, with playable 4K in many titles. At 1920x1080, the system exceeds 100 FPS in the vast majority of games tested. Esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reach 658 FPS, Valorant hits 461 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 354 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 88 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play.

At 2560x1440, performance remains high. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 197 FPS, Valorant stays at 437 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 66 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 60 FPS. These numbers show that 1440p is the sweet spot for this build, offering high frame rates in most games.

At 3840x2160, the system is still capable but not as dominant. Valorant runs at 406 FPS, CS:GO at 267 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 108 FPS. However, AAA titles struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 14 FPS. These results indicate that 4K gaming is possible but requires lowering settings or using upscaling for the most demanding titles.

The data shows a wide range of performance across games. For example, Minecraft runs at 293 FPS at 1080p, while The Medium runs at 62 FPS at 1080p. This variability is due to different game engines and optimization levels. The average FPS across all games is 181.6, which is high, but the user should expect lower frame rates in the most graphically intensive titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, meaning this build outperforms 84% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s score of 32707.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, using 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p?

A: The system achieves 298 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1920x1080 resolution with ultra settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 Ti is 600 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 285 W.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the RTX A6000?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, which is 1.6% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A6000’s score of 44075.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture. The GPU is a 12 GB card from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations, outperforming 84% of all CPU+GPU pairs.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 84th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing. The system is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with playable 4K in many titles. The average FPS across all tested games is 181.6, ranking 543rd out of 3732 pairs, which is in the top 15% of all combinations.

The platform uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, providing a modern foundation. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, while the GPU’s 285 W TDP requires a 600 W power supply. This build is a high-performance desktop system that is suitable for gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates. The data shows that esports titles like Valorant run at 461 FPS at 1080p and 437 FPS at 1440p, while AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 88 FPS at 1080p and 66 FPS at 1440p. It is also a strong choice for 4K gaming in less demanding titles, but users should expect to lower settings in the most graphically intense games.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core score of 21765 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most creative workloads, and the GPU’s compute score of 18396 supports GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the single-core performance of 3072 in Cinebench R23, which speeds up compilation, and the 12 threads for parallel builds. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with code locality.

Students and office workers will find this build more than capable, though it is overkill for basic tasks. The low CPU TDP of 65 W keeps power consumption down, and the fast single-thread performance ensures a responsive system.

Small business workstations that require ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 for storage will find the platform suitable. The CPU’s support for ECC memory and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes makes it a solid foundation for a professional workstation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a high-end graphics card based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors and a die size of 294 mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz, providing 21 Gbps effective speed.

The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be a limiting factor at 4K in some titles. The GPU has 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. This hardware supports ray tracing and DLSS, which are key features for modern games.

The pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is notable for compute workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 5024 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 31624 in PassMark G3D, and 18396 in PassMark GPU Compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 176953, and Vulkan is 213808. These scores place the GPU in the 84th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU is now end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. Its launch MSRP was 799 USD. The card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a TDP of 285 W, requiring a 600 W PSU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU’s performance in rendering is strong, as shown by its high compute scores, making it suitable for both gaming and creative workloads.