SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 71st percentile of all combined system benchmarks. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, delivers an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, holds the 59th percentile position among all GPUs. This combination of a high-percentile CPU with a mid-range GPU creates a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with measured frame rates showing strong performance in esports titles and capable results in demanding AAA games.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400F is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. This 6-core, 12-thread processor operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 24 lanes from the CPU alone, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 is substantial for a 6-core part, while the single-core score of 3072 reflects the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 25645 and a single-thread score of 3689. Data compression results are particularly high at 289999 in PassMark, while encryption performance is scored at 16712 and extended instructions at 21747. The floating-point math score of 45799 and integer math score of 74745 indicate solid computational throughput for a range of workloads.

In the nearestRivals comparison, the Ryzen 5 7400F scores 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T (avgScore 32707) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (avgScore 32697). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2% (avgScore 32812) and leads the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by 0.3% (avgScore 32662). These deltas are negligible, meaning the 7400F performs essentially on par with these competing parts in aggregate benchmark scores. The 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it above the majority of processors, though it is not at the top tier for multi-core-heavy tasks like long-duration 3D rendering compared to higher-core-count parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and PassMark single-thread score of 3689, supports high frame rates in esports titles. Measured FPS at 1080p includes 438 FPS in Valorant, 227 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 191 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, which are well above the threshold for 144Hz displays.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 can handle game capture and encoding overhead, but the system's overall gaming FPS drops significantly at higher resolutions, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor for streaming at high quality settings.

Video editing: The multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141, provides reasonable rendering times for 1080p and 1440p video projects. The 83rd CPU percentile suggests it outperforms most processors, but it is not a top-tier workstation part for 4K or complex multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and R15 multi-core score of 2193 indicate that this CPU can handle light to moderate 3D rendering tasks. However, the 6-core limit means it will be slower than higher-core-count rivals for final frame rendering, and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking does not accelerate ray-traced workloads as effectively as higher-tier cards.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 74745 and data compression score of 289999 in PassMark. The single-thread performance is strong for code editing and IDE responsiveness, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds adequately for small to medium projects.

Student and office work: The single-core Cinebench R20 score of 1290 and PassMark single-thread score of 3689 deliver snappy responsiveness for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The 65 W TDP and AM5 platform support efficient operation, making it a capable system for daily academic use, though the GPU is overkill for these workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32750 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with nearestRivals showing a tight cluster: the Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.1% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.2% slower, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% faster, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% slower. This indicates the 7400F is competitively positioned within a narrow performance band.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearestRivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060, which is 0.7% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and RX 5700 XT, which are both 1.4% faster. The Radeon R9 370X is 1.7% slower. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20349 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 demonstrate its DirectX 12 capabilities, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 78927 and 47784, respectively, show compute performance.

Combined, the system achieves a 71st percentile ranking among all CPU+GPU pairs. The pair ranks 1895th out of 3732 pairs by FPS performance, with an average FPS of 122.6 across all tested games. This average FPS is a strong indicator of overall gaming capability, as it includes both lightweight esports titles and demanding AAA games, placing the system in the upper half of all configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile is significantly higher than the GPU's 59th percentile, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. This is confirmed by the FPS scaling across resolutions: for example, in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 191 at 1080p to 127 at 1440p and further to 71 at 4K, showing the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. Similarly, Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 143 at 1080p to 108 at 4K, a smaller percentage decline, suggesting the game is more CPU-bound at lower resolutions.

In CPU-intensive games, the balance shifts. For instance, Microsoft Flight Simulator shows 69 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 41 at 4K, which is a 40% decline, indicating a mix of CPU and GPU load. The 122.6 average FPS across all games, combined with the pair rank of 1895/3732, places this build in the upper-middle tier of gaming performance. The CPU has headroom for a more powerful GPU, as its 83rd percentile suggests it can feed higher-end graphics cards without becoming a significant limiting factor in most titles.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3060 Ti is based on the GA104 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The card has 38 ray tracing cores and 152 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU's benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 and a PassMark G3D score of 20349. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10006 indicates decent general-purpose compute performance. The 59th percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it below the top-tier cards but above the majority of discrete GPUs. Its nearestRivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% slower) and the RX 5700 XT (1.4% faster), showing it sits in a competitive mid-range segment. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor at 4K in texture-heavy titles, as evidenced by the measured FPS drops at 3840x2160 in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (28 FPS) and Ark: Survival Ascended (9 FPS).

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS in esports games is exceptional: 438 FPS in Valorant, 422 FPS in CS:GO, and 227 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p. For AAA gaming at 1080p, the system delivers playable results, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 143 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 56 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains capable, with Warzone at 127 FPS and Control at 60 FPS.

Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p video will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance useful, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 supports reasonable export times. Software developers benefit from the high integer math score of 74745 and strong single-thread performance for compilation. Students and office workers will find the system more powerful than needed, but the 65 W CPU TDP and efficient AM5 platform make it a reliable workstation for general tasks. Small business workstations that require occasional gaming or light rendering can use this build without exceeding typical power budgets, as the GPU's suggested PSU of 550 W is modest.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and does it support DDR5 memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with ECC support and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T's score of 32707.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair has an average FPS of 122.6 across all measured games, ranking 1895th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 21765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3072 in single-core.

Q: Is the GPU compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and die size?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti is built on an 8 nm process with a die size of 392 mm², containing 17,400 million transistors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is current and active. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for next-generation storage and graphics cards. The memory support for dual-channel DDR5, along with ECC capability, ensures compatibility with modern memory modules. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves significant thermal headroom in most systems, allowing for a potential upgrade to a higher-core-count AM5 processor without changing the motherboard.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, as the PSU requirement is modest. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 40 series, so a future upgrade would involve replacing the card with a newer generation model. The system's bottleneck, as indicated by the GPU's 59th percentile versus the CPU's 83rd percentile, means a GPU upgrade would provide the most significant performance gain in gaming workloads. The CPU has the single-thread and multi-thread performance to support a higher-tier GPU in most scenarios, though at 4K resolution, a stronger GPU would be necessary to improve frame rates beyond the current measurements.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 65 W TDP, representing the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 200 W TDP, sitting at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The system as a whole ranks in the 71st percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations.

The performance tier is solid upper-midrange. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by a margin of less than 0.3% in all cases, indicating it is well-positioned against comparable processors. The GPU is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is 1.4% faster, and outperforms the RX 9060 by 0.7%. The measured average FPS of 122.6 across all games, with a pair rank of 1895/3732, confirms that this build is capable of running the vast majority of games at playable frame rates, with the strongest performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, shows the system's performance across a wide range of games at three resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles: Valorant runs at 438 FPS, CS:GO at 422 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 191 FPS, and Roblox runs at 247 FPS. For AAA games at 1080p, Call of Duty: Warzone hits 143 FPS, Doom at 142 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 113 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 51 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is the most demanding, running at 56 FPS.

At 1440p, performance drops but remains playable for most titles. Valorant still runs at 374 FPS, CS:GO at 291 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 149 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 127 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 drops to 127 FPS. AAA titles see more significant reductions: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38 FPS, and Control at 60 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 56 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 18 FPS.

At 4K (3840x2160), the system struggles with the most demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 25 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. Lighter games remain playable: Valorant runs at 299 FPS, CS:GO at 172 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 82 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 108 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 62 FPS. The data shows that this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K performance being acceptable only for less demanding or older titles.