SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) using TSMC's 5 nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series and runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The chip has a 65 W TDP, making it a relatively low-power option for the AM5 platform. The processor integrates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, and it has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The benchmark data positions this CPU at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 21765, while the single-core score is 3072. The R20 results show 9141 multicore and 1290 single-core, and R15 shows 2193 multicore and 309 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 25645, a single-thread score of 3689, and specific workloads like integer math at 74745, floating point math at 45799, and data compression at 289999. The extended instructions score is 21747, and data encryption hits 16712.

The nearest rivals tell a clear story about positioning. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, which is just 0.1% behind the 7400F. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% ahead of the 7400F, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.3% deficit. These delta values are remarkably tight, meaning the 7400F sits in a performance band where small architectural differences, not raw core counts, decide the winner. The 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for most modern workloads, and the high single-thread score of 3689 in PassMark suggests strong responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 indicates that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded rendering tasks, though it is not a workstation-class part. The single-core score of 3072 in R23 is more telling for everyday use, where the Zen 4 architecture's efficient instruction pipeline shines. The PassMark physics score of 1660 and prime number finding score of 191 reflect decent integer performance, which matters for scientific computing and simulation tasks that are not GPU-accelerated. The random string sorting score of 35096 points to strong memory-side performance, which benefits database operations and text processing.

The CPU's 5 nm process and 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die indicate a dense, efficient design. The launch MSRP is $229, which positions it as a mid-range part, though pricing discussions end there. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is technically possible, but the modest TDP of 65 W suggests limited thermal headroom for aggressive tuning without a capable air cooler.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket and platform for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: How does the 7400F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, while the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707. The delta is 0.1% in favor of the 7400F, making the two effectively equal in multi-threaded performance. The single-thread scores are not listed for the rival, but the overall average indicates a near-parity situation.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and does it support ECC?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also has ECC memory support, which is rare on consumer desktop CPUs and could appeal to users running unregistered ECC modules for data integrity.

Q: What are the key Cinebench R23 scores for this CPU?

A: The multicore score is 21765, and the single-core score is 3072. The multicore result is around 7 times higher than the single-core result, which is typical for a 6-core, 12-thread processor with good scaling efficiency.

Q: Is the 7400F a good choice for overclocking?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, so manual overclocking is possible. However, the base TDP is 65 W, and the boost clock is already 4.70 GHz. The data does not include thermal or power headroom details, so overclocking gains are uncertain but likely modest given the efficiency-focused design.

Q: What is the production status and release date of the 7400F?

A: The production status is Active, and the release date is January 8, 2025. This makes it a current-generation part, despite being based on the Zen 4 architecture that launched earlier in the 7000 series.

Q: How does the 7400F perform in PassMark data compression and encryption?

A: The data compression score is 289999, and the data encryption score is 16712. The compression score is notably high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and data transfer tasks. Encryption is more modest, which is common for consumer CPUs without dedicated encryption accelerators.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70, meaning the system outperforms 70% of all tracked configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This gap is significant: the processor is a high-mid-range part, while the graphics card is closer to the middle of the pack.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32750. Its nearest rivals all hover within 0.3% of that figure, which shows how competitive the mid-range CPU market is. The Intel Core i5-14600T at 0.1% behind is essentially a tie, so buyers should not choose between these two on raw performance alone. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% ahead, but that is a mobile chip, so the comparison is academic for a desktop build.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, has an average benchmark score of 15199. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (0.2% behind the 3050 OEM), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.5% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (0.5% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 at 15290 (0.6% ahead). The fact that an integrated GPU like the Radeon 680M scores comparably to a discrete OEM card is notable. It indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM is not a high-end part; it is a capable entry-level discrete GPU that trades blows with modern integrated graphics.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740, and Vulkan is 57103. PassMark G3D (DirectX 12) is 11857, while DirectX 11 is 86 and DirectX 12 is 58 in the older PassMark tests. The GPU compute score is 5779. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, which is modest for modern gaming but sufficient for 1080p.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The 83rd percentile CPU paired with a 57th percentile GPU means that in CPU-bound tasks, the system will feel fast, but in GPU-bound tasks, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. This is a balanced pairing only if the user prioritizes productivity and moderate gaming over high-end graphics.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a strong CPU for multi-threaded productivity but do not require top-tier gaming performance. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking makes it suitable for developers compiling code, students running simulations, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and light virtualization. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 indicate that the CPU can handle concurrent workloads without stuttering.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM acceptable, given its 57th percentile GPU ranking. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is enough for modern titles at 1080p, but not for 1440p with high textures. Content creators who work in 1080p video editing will benefit from the CPU's strong compression score of 289999 and integer math score of 74745, which speed up encoding and file operations. The GPU's 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores provide some hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, but the low FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS limits heavy 3D rendering work.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes this an efficient build for office environments where noise and heat are concerns. The GPU's 130 W TDP and suggested 300 W PSU keep power requirements modest. The platform's DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it future-proof for storage and expansion, even if the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system can deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile position means it will struggle with AAA games at maximum settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3689 in PassMark ensures the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what high-refresh monitors can display in demanding titles.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 can handle x264 encoding at moderate presets while gaming, but the GPU's 8 GB memory and modest compute may cause frame drops in GPU-intensive titles. The 72 tensor cores could offload encoding via NVENC, but the OEM variant's performance is not specified for that task.

Video editing in 1080p is a strong suit for this build. The CPU's data compression score of 289999 speeds up file transcoding, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM can hold 1080p preview buffers, though 4K editing would strain the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinebench will be CPU-bound. The R23 multicore score of 21765 is respectable for a 6-core part, but the GPU's FP32 of 8.087 TFLOPS is too low for GPU rendering to provide a significant speedup. Users should expect CPU rendering to be the primary path.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-thread score of 3072 in R23, which reduces compile times for single-file changes. The 12 threads handle parallel builds well, and the PassMark integer math score of 74745 indicates strong number-crunching for test suites. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running build servers.

Student and office work is where this build shines. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures snappy response in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but the low 65 W CPU and 130 W GPU TDPs keep electricity costs down. The system is quiet and cool enough for shared spaces.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggest that the GPU will be the primary limiter in gaming.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and its nearest rival comparison to the RTX 2060 (which is 0.6% ahead), the RTX 3050 OEM should deliver playable 1080p performance at medium settings in most modern games. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should exceed 60 FPS at high settings, given the strong CPU single-thread performance. AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will likely require low-to-medium settings to maintain 30-60 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but it may cause stuttering in games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage at higher settings.

Ray tracing is available via the 18 RT cores, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced effects will be heavy. DLSS via the 72 tensor cores can help recover performance, but the OEM card's specific DLSS implementation is not detailed. The GPU's memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is below the average for modern gaming GPUs.

At 1440p, the system is not recommended for gaming. The GPU's pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s are too low to maintain high frame rates at that resolution. Users should stick to 1080p for a consistent experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform is the foundation here. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The PCIe 5.0 support means future NVMe SSDs and GPUs can run at full bandwidth, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The motherboard will support future AM5 CPUs, so a CPU upgrade is possible without changing the board.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and the CPU TDP is 65 W, so the total system draw is low. A 300 W PSU is sufficient for this build, but upgrading to a higher-end GPU later will require a more powerful PSU. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design at 242 mm in length, so case compatibility is broad.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the CPU has headroom. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it can drive a faster GPU without bottlenecking in most games. Moving to a GPU in the 75th percentile or higher would balance the system. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (if the system has less than 32 GB) would benefit productivity tasks.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, but the 65 W TDP caps sustained power. Users with a capable air cooler might gain 5-10% performance, but the data does not include thermal headroom figures. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that may appeal to workstation users.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 Ampere card with a 130 W TDP. The combined percentile is 70, meaning this system outperforms 70% of tracked configurations. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile, and the GPU sits in the 57th percentile.

The system is best described as a productivity-first desktop with entry-level gaming capability. The CPU is strong enough for demanding multi-threaded workloads like video encoding and software compilation, while the GPU handles 1080p gaming at medium settings. The platform is modern, with DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5, making it a good foundation for future upgrades. The build is efficient in terms of power draw, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $229, and the GPU has no listed MSRP. The overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU punching above its class and the GPU holding the system back in graphics-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is 26 percentile points higher than the GPU. This means the GPU will be the bottleneck in gaming and other GPU-accelerated workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, and single-threaded office work, the CPU will deliver its full potential. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-settings gaming, the GPU will limit frame rates and performance.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available because no measured FPS data exists. However, the benchmark scores indicate that the RTX 3050 OEM's performance is comparable to an integrated GPU like the Radeon 680M (which is 0.5% ahead in average score). This is a red flag for gaming: a discrete GPU that barely beats an iGPU is not going to drive high frame rates in demanding titles.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show it is a solid performer, but the GPU's nearest rivals include the GTX 580, a card from over a decade ago. This puts the GPU's performance in perspective. The system is balanced for productivity, where the CPU does most of the work, but it is unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU is the weak link.

For users who want a balanced 1080p gaming system, the GPU should be upgraded first. The CPU can handle a much faster GPU without bottlenecking, based on its 83rd percentile ranking. For users who primarily do CPU-heavy work and game occasionally at low settings, this build is acceptable. The bottleneck is the GPU, and the upgrade path is clear.