SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation: A Desktop Workstation Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with NVIDIA's top-tier workstation GPU, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, placing the overall build at the 93rd combined percentile. The data shows a significant imbalance in raw compute capability between the two components, with the GPU vastly outperforming the CPU in their respective benchmark fields.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component individually.

Given the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041, both of which rank at the 98th percentile, this system should deliver exceptional frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3248 and multi-thread score of 21712 suggest it can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, though the gap between the 88th percentile CPU and 98th percentile GPU hints that the processor may become the limiting factor at 1080p in CPU-bound scenarios.

At ultra settings, the RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample headroom for modern game engines. The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures texture streaming and high-resolution assets load without stutter. For competitive esports titles that favor high refresh rates, the CPU's 4.30 GHz boost clock and 16 MB shared L3 cache should support frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p, though the exact numbers depend on the specific title and engine.

At 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the RTX 5000 Ada's 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate positions it strongly for demanding AAA titles. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, which can substantially boost effective frame rates in supported games. However, since no measured FPS data exists, these remain estimates based on the component scores rather than verified results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 42055, placing it at the 88th percentile of all processors. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, scores 41963 (0.2% higher), while the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42335 (0.7% higher). The Ryzen 5 7400 trails the i9-12900K by a negligible margin, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for a 6-core part. In single-thread workloads, the score of 3248 reflects solid Zen 4 efficiency, while multi-thread at 21712 demonstrates good scaling across the 12 threads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183725 (0.5% higher), while the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050 (3.7% lower). The RTX 5000 Ada outperforms the RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, which is notable given the latter's reputation as a high-end gaming card. The gap between the 88th percentile CPU and 98th percentile GPU creates a combined percentile of 93, reflecting a system where the GPU significantly outclasses the CPU in relative performance.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the GPU scores 175286, and in Vulkan it scores 194041, showing a 10.7% advantage for Vulkan in that synthetic workload. The CPU's PassMark sub-scores include floating point math at 40784, integer math at 64733, and data compression at 261749, all of which indicate balanced compute capabilities for general-purpose tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 98th percentile GPU can drive frame rates far beyond 144 Hz at 1440p in most titles, while the 88th percentile CPU with a 4.30 GHz boost clock supports high FPS in CPU-light scenarios. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3248 may cap frame rates in esports titles, making 1440p the sweet spot for maximizing the GPU's potential.

Streaming: The RTX 5000 Ada's 400 tensor cores provide hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, offloading streaming overhead from the CPU. The 6-core/12-thread CPU can handle game logic and encoding simultaneously, though the 65W TDP limits sustained all-core boost under heavy loads.

Video editing: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates rendering and effects, while 32 GB VRAM handles 8K timelines and multiple layers without memory pressure. The CPU's multi-thread score of 21712 supports timeline scrubbing and export tasks, though the 16 MB L3 cache may limit performance in cache-heavy workflows compared to larger-cache rivals.

3D rendering: With 12,800 shading units and 400 tensor cores, the GPU excels at both rasterization and AI-accelerated denoising. The CPU's floating point score of 40784 handles scene preparation and physics, while the GPU takes over for actual render passes, making this a balanced system for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 64733 and data encryption score of 14865 support compilation, code analysis, and encryption workloads efficiently. The 6-core configuration with 12 threads handles parallel builds adequately, though developers working with massive codebases may want more cores for faster incremental compilation.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP and DDR5 memory support with ECC capability make this a reliable workstation for academic and professional use. The CPU's single-thread score of 3248 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's compute power handles any data visualization or simulation tasks a student might encounter.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced imbalance: the GPU sits at the 98th percentile while the CPU sits at the 88th percentile, a 10-point gap. In GPU-bound workloads such as 4K gaming, 3D rendering, and machine learning inference, the RTX 5000 Ada will operate at near-full utilization, with the CPU providing adequate feeding. The 65.28 TFLOPS compute throughput requires a steady stream of data, and the CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth via dual-channel DDR5 can supply it in most scenarios.

However, in CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation, data compression (PassMark score 261749), or single-threaded applications, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The 6-core/12-thread configuration, while efficient for its class, cannot match the parallel throughput of higher-core-count rivals like the Intel Core i9-12900K, which scores 0.7% higher in average benchmarks. At 1080p gaming with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU's single-thread score of 3248 will likely cap frame rates below what the GPU can physically render.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K would show increasing GPU utilization as resolution rises, with the bottleneck shifting from CPU at 1080p to GPU at 4K. The 32 GB VRAM ensures no memory-related bottlenecks at any resolution, even with ultra texture packs. The 250W GPU TDP versus 65W CPU TDP further emphasizes that the GPU dominates power and thermal considerations, making adequate cooling and a 600W suggested PSU critical for stable operation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, with headroom for future storage or accelerator additions. The 65W TDP of the CPU means the AM5 platform's power delivery is not stressed, allowing for potential CPU upgrades to higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series parts within the same socket.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the AM5 platform's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the interface runs at Gen 4 speeds. The 600W suggested PSU provides headroom for the 250W GPU and 65W CPU, with room for additional drives or peripherals. The GPU's 1x 16-pin power connector requires a compatible PSU cable, and the dual-slot design with a 267mm length fits most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve moving to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a Ryzen 9 series, to better match the GPU's 98th percentile performance. The platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability make it suitable for workstation use, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes future-proof the system for next-generation storage devices. The GPU's successor, Blackwell PRO W, is already listed as a rival, suggesting that the RTX 5000 Ada remains competitive but has a clear upgrade path for those needing even more compute power.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU compute performance over CPU multi-threading. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions with ultra settings will benefit from the 98th percentile GPU, while the 88th percentile CPU provides sufficient single-thread performance for game logic. Content creators working with 8K video, complex 3D scenes, or AI-accelerated workflows will leverage the 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores effectively.

Software developers working on GPU-accelerated applications, machine learning engineers, and data scientists will find the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suitable for training and inference tasks. Students in engineering, architecture, or digital arts programs can use this system for CAD, rendering, and simulation coursework, with the ECC memory support providing data integrity for long-running computations.

Small business workstations that need reliable, high-throughput GPU compute for tasks like financial modeling, medical imaging, or scientific visualization will appreciate the combination of the 98th percentile GPU and the 88th percentile CPU. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power costs manageable, while the 250W GPU TDP is acceptable for professional environments. The system is less suited for users who need extreme multi-threaded CPU performance for tasks like video encoding or 3D scene simulation, where the 6-core CPU would become a bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the AD102 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU features 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units, delivering 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1). The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Memory consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong rasterization throughput for gaming and rendering workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184664 places it at the 98th percentile, outperforming the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 show strong cross-API performance. The 250W TDP with a 600W suggested PSU and 1x 16-pin power connector require a suitable power supply, and the dual-slot design with 267mm length fits standard ATX cases. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 93, reflecting the 88th percentile CPU and 98th percentile GPU.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada compare to the GeForce RTX 4090 D in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada scores 184664 on average, which is 3.7% higher than the RTX 4090 D's score of 178050.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU provide for data-intensive workloads?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory for data integrity?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and compute workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread PassMark scores?

A: The CPU scores 3248 in single-thread and 21712 in multi-thread PassMark tests.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which accounts for the GPU's 250W TDP and CPU's 65W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1).

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The 65W TDP makes it an efficient part for desktop use.

Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated Radeon Graphics for basic display output. The multiplier is unlocked, and the part number is 100-000001900, with production status active and release date of 2025-09-15.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 42055, at the 88th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, scores 41963 (0.2% higher), while the Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41914 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42335 (0.7% higher). The 6-core configuration with 12 threads delivers strong single-thread performance (3248) and respectable multi-thread (21712), but the 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some rivals, which may affect cache-sensitive workloads.

The PassMark sub-scores show data compression at 261749, data encryption at 14865, extended instructions at 19924, find prime numbers at 79, floating point math at 40784, integer math at 64733, physics at 1150, and random string sorting at 31110. These scores indicate balanced performance across integer and floating-point workloads, making the CPU suitable for general-purpose computing, though the 6-core limit is evident in heavily threaded tasks.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, creating a system where the GPU dramatically outclasses the CPU in relative performance. The CPU at the 88th percentile and GPU at the 98th percentile yield a combined percentile of 93, indicating a high-tier system overall, but one where the CPU is the clear bottleneck in compute-heavy scenarios.

The build class is desktop, and the components target workstation and high-end gaming use cases. The 65W CPU TDP and 250W GPU TDP require a 600W power supply, with the GPU's dual-slot design and 267mm length fitting standard cases. The platform supports DDR5 memory with ECC, and the AM5 socket provides an upgrade path for future Ryzen 7000 series CPUs.

For gaming, this system excels at 1440p and 4K resolutions where the GPU's compute power dominates. For professional workloads, the 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores make it suitable for AI, rendering, and video editing, though the 6-core CPU limits multi-threaded CPU performance. The system represents a GPU-centric build that prioritizes graphics and compute throughput over CPU multi-threading, making it ideal for users whose workloads are GPU-bound.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds