SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation pairing represents a compact desktop workstation combination with a combined performance percentile of 92. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 platform, while the GPU is a 70 W SFF workstation card with 20 GB of VRAM. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning the following FPS expectations are qualitative projections from synthetic workloads rather than empirical game testing.

Based on the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. This places it in the upper echelon of workstation-class hardware, but its 70 W TDP and dual-slot SFF design prioritizes power efficiency over raw rasterization throughput. For 1080p gaming, the data suggests this card can handle most titles at high settings, though the 1560 MHz boost clock and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate it is not designed for maximum frame rates at 4K ultra settings.

The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3248 and multithread score of 21712 provide context for gaming workloads. The Ryzen 5 7400’s 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it has sufficient single-core performance to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 4.30 GHz boost clock on 6 Zen 4 cores delivers responsive frame pacing, but the 16 MB shared L3 cache is modest compared to larger desktop parts.

At 1440p, the combination likely delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with the GPU’s 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 GB GDDR6 buffer preventing VRAM-related stutters in modern games. At 4K, the data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as its 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly half of what high-end desktop gaming cards offer. The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the 70 W power envelope constrains sustained ray-traced workloads.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s 6144 shading units should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with reduced graphical settings. The overall picture is a system capable of 60+ FPS at 1080p in most titles, with 1440p requiring settings adjustments for demanding games.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This VRAM capacity is substantial for a 70 W card, enabling large dataset loading in professional applications.

Clock speeds are conservative: 720 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost. The 1750 MHz memory clock translates to 14 Gbps effective, which is modest by current standards. The card’s compute capabilities include 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, producing 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate and 299.5 GTexel/s texture rate. FP32 throughput is 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at 1:1 ratio (19.17 TFLOPS).

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores respectively. The RT core count is significant for a low-power card, suggesting the architecture prioritizes specialized workloads over raw rasterization. The tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated rendering features, though the 70 W TDP limits sustained performance in these workloads.

The card’s benchmark scores reflect its workstation positioning. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 places it at the 95th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GB10 (117393, -0.3% delta) and AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118976, -1.6% delta). The 2.4% advantage over the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114395) shows modern architecture efficiency, while the 2.8% lead over the RTX A5500 Mobile (113944) indicates this SFF card competes with larger mobile workstation GPUs.

The 160-bit memory bus is a notable constraint, capping bandwidth at 280.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for the card’s compute density but limits performance in bandwidth-sensitive rendering tasks. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate host communication, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-display workstation setups. The lack of power connectors, drawing entirely from the PCIe slot, reinforces its SFF design philosophy.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 92, placing this desktop build in the top 8% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 117088, which is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GB10 (117393) and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118976).

Q: What is the CPU’s multithreaded performance relative to the Intel Core i9-12900K?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 scores 21712 in PassMark multithread, while the Intel Core i9-12900K averages 42335, meaning the i9-12900K is 0.7% ahead in average benchmark score.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 scores 3248 in PassMark single-thread tests, contributing to its 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, and the GPU has a 70 W TDP with no power connectors, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400 supports ECC memory and uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Ryzen 5 7400 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation depends on workload type. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking show the GPU is relatively stronger, meaning the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios.

In multithreaded workloads, the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 21712 and its 0.2% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963) indicate balanced performance. However, the GPU’s compute density in FP32 and tensor operations suggests that rendering and AI workloads will scale with GPU utilization. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU configuration may bottleneck heavily threaded GPU workloads that require frequent CPU-side command submission.

Memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck point. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is sufficient for gaming but may limit data-intensive applications that feed the GPU’s 280.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 16 MB shared L3 cache helps mitigate this by caching frequently accessed data.

The 70 W GPU TDP versus the 65 W CPU TDP creates a balanced power profile, but the GPU’s lack of power connectors means it cannot draw additional power for boost headroom. This may cause the GPU to throttle under sustained load, making the CPU relatively stronger in extended workloads. The 250 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for both components and system peripherals.

For gaming, the CPU’s 3248 single-thread score should prevent major bottlenecks at 1080p, but at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU’s 6 cores may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck due to its 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Overall, the system is well-balanced for workstation tasks but slightly GPU-constrained for high-resolution gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a 65 W TDP, making it a power-efficient mainstream part. The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process, the CPU contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. This cache configuration is typical for a 6-core Zen 4 part, providing adequate data locality for most workloads.

Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage. Integrated Radeon Graphics are included, providing basic display output for systems without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show strong single-thread performance with a PassMark single-thread score of 3248. Multithreaded performance is solid at 21712, with specific workloads showing: integer math at 64733, floating point math at 40784, extended instructions at 19924, and data encryption at 14865. The data compression score of 261749 indicates strong throughput for compression workloads.

The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963, 0.2% ahead) and Intel Core i7-14700T (41914, 0.3% ahead). The Intel Core i9-12900K (42335) is 0.7% faster in average benchmark score. This positioning shows the Ryzen 5 7400 competes with higher-tier mobile and lower-tier desktop parts from previous generations.

The 5 nm process and 65 W TDP make this CPU highly efficient for desktop use. The 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than larger Zen 4 parts, which may impact cache-sensitive workloads, but the 4.30 GHz boost clock provides responsive performance for single-threaded tasks. The 2025 release date indicates this is a current-generation part.

Who Should Build It

This desktop pairing targets users who need workstation-grade GPU compute in a compact, power-efficient form factor. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation’s 20 GB VRAM and 95th percentile GPU ranking make it suitable for professionals working with large datasets, 3D rendering, and AI inference. The 70 W TDP allows for small-form-factor builds where space and cooling are constrained.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, though the 280.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit 4K timeline performance. The 20 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes without out-of-memory errors. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads provide adequate multithreaded performance for rendering tasks, though heavy multi-tasking may show limitations.

Developers working on AI or machine learning models can leverage the tensor cores for inference tasks, while the 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles general compute. The 95th percentile GPU ranking means this card outperforms 95% of all GPUs in the database, making it a capable compute accelerator. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking ensures balanced system performance for code compilation and data preprocessing.

Students and researchers in engineering or scientific fields will appreciate the ECC memory support and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth for numerical simulations. The small form factor allows for lab environments with limited desk space. Small business workstations requiring reliable, quiet operation benefit from the 65 W CPU and 70 W GPU power envelopes, which minimize heat output and cooling requirements.

For gaming at 1080p, this system provides solid performance with the ability to run most titles at high settings. The 20 GB VRAM future-proofs against increasing texture sizes, but the 70 W GPU TDP caps maximum frame rates in demanding titles. Users seeking 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as this pairing is optimized for professional workloads rather than maximum gaming performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a desktop system with a 92nd percentile ranking, meaning it outperforms 92% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42055, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 117088, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals demonstrate its competitive positioning. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963) is 0.2% slower, while the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914) is 0.3% slower. The Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779) is 0.7% slower, and the Intel Core i9-12900K (42335) is 0.7% faster. These narrow deltas indicate the Ryzen 5 7400 sits in a highly competitive performance band among desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show similar clustering. The NVIDIA GB10 (117393) is 0.3% faster, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118976) is 1.6% faster. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114395) is 2.4% slower, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113944) is 2.8% slower. This places the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation in the upper mid-range of workstation GPUs, trading raw performance for power efficiency.

Specific CPU benchmarks highlight strengths in data compression (261749) and integer math (64733). The floating point math score of 40784 shows moderate FP32 performance, while the extended instructions score of 19924 and data encryption score of 14865 indicate capable cryptography and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 1150 and find prime numbers score of 79 are lower, suggesting less optimized performance in physics simulation and prime number calculations.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 significantly exceeds its Vulkan score of 109364, indicating stronger performance in compute-oriented workloads compared to graphics rendering. The 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput provides balanced compute for professional applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 CPU with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 7000 series Zen 4 (Raphael) part with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture workstation card with 20 GB GDDR6 memory.

The build’s overall tier is defined by its percentiles: 88th for CPU, 95th for GPU, and 92nd combined. This places it in the upper tier of desktop workstations, though not at the absolute top of performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 70 W GPU TDP make this a low-power build that can run in compact chassis with modest cooling requirements.

The CPU’s 5 nm process and the GPU’s 5 nm process (both TSMC) represent current-generation manufacturing technology. The CPU’s 71 mm² die size and 6,570 million transistors contrast with the GPU’s 294 mm² die size and 35,800 million transistors, reflecting the GPU’s higher compute density. The combined transistor count of 42,370 million provides substantial compute resources within a 135 W total power envelope.

This pairing is designed for professional workstation tasks requiring GPU compute, rather than gaming. The 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth support large models and datasets, while the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores enable ray tracing and AI acceleration. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 support ensure adequate data flow to the GPU.

The build class is explicitly desktop, distinguishing it from mobile or server configurations. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 168 mm length (6.6 inches) allow installation in most desktop cases, while the lack of power connectors simplifies installation in SFF systems with limited cabling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory and provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform’s memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable future upgrades to high-speed NVMe storage or newer GPUs.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The 250 W suggested PSU provides 180 W of headroom above the combined 135 W TDP of CPU and GPU, leaving room for additional drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU draws power entirely from the PCIe slot, eliminating the need for power cables.

For a sensible next upgrade, users could increase CPU cores by moving to a higher-core-count AM5 processor within the same socket. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier enables overclocking to extract additional performance from the 4.30 GHz boost clock. The 16 MB L3 cache could be upgraded by selecting a CPU with larger cache, though this requires replacing the CPU.

On the GPU side, the 70 W TDP and SFF design limit upgrade options within the same power envelope. Users seeking more compute performance would need to move to a larger GPU with higher TDP, requiring a more powerful PSU and potentially a larger case. The 20 GB VRAM provides headroom for future workloads, but the 160-bit bus limits memory bandwidth scaling.

The platform’s DDR5 support allows memory upgrades to higher-capacity or faster kits, potentially improving CPU memory bandwidth beyond the 83.2 GB/s baseline. The ECC memory support is valuable for data integrity in professional workloads. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide connectivity for multiple NVMe drives or other high-bandwidth peripherals.

For a balanced upgrade path, users should consider the CPU as the primary bottleneck in multithreaded workloads, given its 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 95th percentile. Upgrading to a higher-core AM5 CPU would improve multithreaded performance, while GPU upgrades would require a larger power budget and chassis.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds