SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER form a desktop pairing that sits at the 87th combined percentile among all builds, driven by a CPU that reaches the 88th percentile and a GPU at the 86th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 42055 places it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-12900K, while the GPU’s average score of 54209 lands it just 0.1% behind the standard RTX 4080, making this a high-end combination where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds an 87th combined percentile across all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile, indicating a well-matched high-tier system.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900K in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 on average, while the Core i9-12900K scores 42335, a delta of -0.7%. This means the Ryzen 5 7400 trails the older flagship by less than one percent in overall CPU benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s nearest rival and how close is the performance gap?

A: The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which scores 54247 on average versus the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54209, a delta of -0.1%. The SUPER is effectively identical to the non-SUPER model in average benchmark terms.

Q: Does this CPU support DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400 supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU’s suggested PSU is 700 W, meaning a power supply in that range is recommended for the whole system.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER still in production?

A: No, the GPU’s production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-01-30 and a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so it is a previous-generation product.

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 uses Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 6 cores and 12 threads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400 is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current desktop socket for AMD’s 7000 series and beyond. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support, which is a useful feature for workstation-style builds that require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 24 lanes from the CPU, so the platform is ready for the fastest NVMe storage and expansion cards available, though the RTX 4080 SUPER itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible and does not bottleneck the GPU’s bandwidth.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a 6-core part, and the multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking headroom exists for users who want to push performance beyond the 3.30 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost clocks. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 320 W and requires a suggested PSU of 700 W, so any upgrade path should start with ensuring the power supply meets that recommendation. Given that the CPU is already at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 86th, the most sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU (such as a Ryzen 9 part) if multi-threaded workloads become the bottleneck, since the platform’s DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 support will remain relevant. Alternatively, a GPU upgrade to a next-generation card is possible when available, but the current pairing shows no immediate weak link, as both components sit within a few percent of their nearest rivals.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, this pairing is more than capable, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 indicating that frame rates will be limited by the display rather than the hardware in most titles. Streaming while gaming is also viable because the GPU’s 320 Tensor Cores and 80 RT Cores handle encoding and ray tracing concurrently, though the CPU’s 12 threads (from 6 cores) are sufficient for a game plus a streaming encoder, as evidenced by its multithread score of 21712. Video editing workloads benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 64733 and floating-point score of 40784, which speed up codec processing, while the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, making this a strong all-around creator machine.

3D rendering, particularly in GPU-accelerated engines, is dominated by the RTX 4080 SUPER’s compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 19822 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065, allowing CPU-bottlenecked tasks to offload to the GPU. Software development sees mixed benefits: the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 261749 and encryption score of 14865 help with build tools and secure connections, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 260075 supports graphics programming and testing. For student and office work, the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3248 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw low, though the GPU’s 320 W TDP makes this an overkill configuration for basic productivity, so such users would rarely utilize the full potential.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K with ultra settings are the primary audience, since the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory provide ample headroom for demanding titles, while the CPU’s 88th percentile ensures that even CPU-heavy games will not lag behind. Content creators who work with 4K video editing, 3D modeling, or GPU-accelerated rendering will find the combination of the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread layout and the GPU’s 10240 shading units a balanced fit for both timeline scrubbing and final renders. Developers building games or graphics applications benefit from the CPU’s data compression and encryption scores (261749 and 14865, respectively) alongside the GPU’s Vulkan score of 260075, which supports modern API development.

Students in engineering or computer science programs might use this system for simulation software that leverages the CPU’s physics score of 1150 (in PassMark) and the GPU’s compute power, though the cost and power draw are excessive for basic coursework. Small business workstations that handle financial modeling, database queries, or light CAD work will appreciate the CPU’s multithread score of 21712 and ECC memory support, while the GPU’s triple-slot design and 310 mm length require a full-tower case, making this a less suitable choice for compact office builds. Industries such as video production, architectural visualization, and scientific computing that rely on CUDA-accelerated tasks will see the most value, as the GPU’s FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS and 320 Tensor Cores are directly applicable to those workflows.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct test results. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 suggest that most modern titles will exceed 144 FPS, with the CPU rarely becoming the limiting factor due to its high percentile ranking. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth should keep frame rates above 100 FPS in most games, as the memory capacity prevents texture-related stuttering in large open worlds.

At 4K ultra, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 80 RT cores are sufficient for 60+ FPS in many titles, though ray tracing workloads may see lower numbers; the GPU’s nearest rival (RTX 4080) has a delta of only -0.1%, so the SUPER offers no measurable advantage over its predecessor in average terms. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1150 indicates that complex physics simulations in games could slightly bottleneck the GPU at high frame rates, but this is unlikely to be noticeable at 4K where the GPU is the primary workload driver. For competitive shooters at 1080p, the CPU’s data compression score of 261749 helps with asset loading, but the overall frame rate will be determined more by the GPU’s raw fill rate (285.6 GPixel/s) than by the CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42055, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 41963 (delta 0.2%) and the Intel Core i7-14700T at 41914 (delta 0.3%), meaning the Ryzen 5 7400 outperforms both by less than a third of a percent. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54209, at the 86th percentile, with the closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 at 54247 (delta -0.1%), which is effectively a tie. The combined percentile of 87 confirms that this pairing is well above the median but not at the very top, because the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration limits its multithreaded ceiling while the GPU’s performance is near the previous generation’s flagship.

In specific CPU tests, the single-thread score of 3248 (also listed as passmark_singlethread) is strong for a mid-range part, while the multithread score of 21712 reflects the 12 threads; the integer math score of 64733 and floating-point math score of 40784 show balanced arithmetic capability. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 and DirectX 12 score of 134 (in PassMark) are less intuitive but indicate that the card excels in real-world gaming benchmarks, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 and Vulkan score of 260075 demonstrate immense compute throughput that benefits non-gaming tasks. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 provides a modern gaming metric, but without measured FPS, these scores only serve as a relative ranking against other GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP, making it power-efficient for its performance class. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest compared to higher-core-count Ryzen 9 parts but adequate for a 6-core design.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 42055 places it at the 88th percentile, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900K, scores 42335, meaning the Ryzen 5 7400 trails by only 0.7% despite having fewer cores (6 vs 8+8) — this indicates that Zen 4’s IPC advantage compensates for the core count deficit in many workloads. The data compression score of 261749 is particularly high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance for file archiving and compression tasks, while the encryption score of 14865 shows adequate AES capability for secure communications. The find prime numbers score of 79 is low in absolute terms but is normalized to a specific test, so it should not be interpreted as a weakness; instead, the integer math (64733) and floating-point (40784) scores provide a better picture of general processing power. With an unlocked multiplier and ECC memory support, this CPU is suitable for enthusiasts who want to overclock and for professionals who require error-correcting memory, though its 6-core limit means it will struggle against 12-core or 16-core rivals in heavily threaded rendering or compilation tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, a mainstream 6-core processor from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, a high-end graphics card from the GeForce 40-series. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of all desktop configurations, though not in the top 10%, because the CPU’s 88th percentile is strong but not elite, while the GPU’s 86th percentile is similarly high but below the absolute fastest cards like the RTX 4090. The CPU was released in September 2025, while the GPU was released in January 2024 and is now end-of-life, so this build leverages a current CPU with a previous-generation GPU.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 320 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 700 W, mean the system requires a mid-range to high-end power supply but does not demand exotic cooling; the GPU’s triple-slot design and 310 mm length mandate a full tower case with sufficient clearance. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than enough for 4K gaming and most creative workloads, while the CPU’s DDR5 dual-channel support at 83.2 GB/s is standard for the platform. Overall, this pairing represents a balanced high-end desktop that excels in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, with the CPU providing solid single-thread and multi-thread performance without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows that this pairing is well balanced, with the CPU and GPU percentiles within 2 points of each other (88th vs 86th), meaning neither component is dramatically stronger than the other. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (261749 score) or single-threaded applications (3248), the Ryzen 5 7400 holds its own against rivals like the Intel Core i9-12900K (delta -0.7%), so gaming at lower resolutions where CPU matters most will not see major stutters. In GPU-bound workloads such as 4K gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s performance (G3D 34245) is the limiting factor, but it is still at the 86th percentile, so the system will deliver high frame rates without the CPU holding back the GPU.

The potential bottleneck appears in heavily multithreaded tasks like video encoding or software compilation, where the CPU’s 6 cores (12 threads) produce a multithread score of 21712, which is lower than higher-core-count rivals, but the GPU’s compute power (PassMark GPU compute 19822) can offload some of that work. The FPS scaling (estimated, not measured) suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may cap frame rates in esports titles due to its 4.30 GHz boost clock, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, which is the expected and desired behavior for a gaming system. The GPU’s nearest rival (RTX 4080) has a delta of -0.1%, so the SUPER offers no meaningful performance advantage, meaning any bottleneck analysis applies equally to both cards. Overall, the system is balanced for gaming at 1440p and 4K, with the CPU limiting only in extreme multithreaded scenarios and the GPU limiting only at very high resolutions with ray tracing enabled.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds