SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 to form a desktop build that sits at the 75th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. The processor, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part on Socket AM5, delivers an average benchmark score of 42055, placing it in the 88th percentile against all CPUs. The graphics card, an Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4060, achieves an average benchmark score of 17639 and lands in the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This is a balanced mid-range pairing where the CPU is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, a dynamic that shapes every workload from gaming to content creation. The data indicates no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. This is a desktop-class chip with a 65 W TDP, making it a low-power option relative to its performance tier.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multithreaded throughput. The multi-thread score of 21712 and the average benchmark score of 42055 place it just ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963 average, 0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914 average, 0.3% delta). It also leads the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779 average, 0.7% delta) but trails the Intel Core i9-12900K (42335 average, -0.7% delta). In single-thread performance, the score of 3248 indicates strong per-core capability, which is crucial for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

For real workloads, the data shows the following: a 6-core design with 12 threads is sufficient for most productivity tasks, but the 16 MB shared L3 cache and 64 KB L1 per core are modest. The floating point math score of 40784 and integer math score of 64733 suggest solid compute for scientific simulations and financial modeling. The encryption score of 14865 and data compression score of 261749 indicate that the CPU can handle security and storage tasks without becoming the bottleneck. The physics score of 1150 is lower than the multi-thread score would suggest, which may indicate that physics calculations do not scale perfectly with all 12 threads, but it remains adequate for most games. The extended instructions score of 19924 and random string sorting score of 31110 point to strong performance in workloads using SIMD instructions and sorting algorithms, useful for database operations and scientific computing.

The 5 nm process node is a key advantage, delivering these scores at a low 65 W TDP. This means the CPU can sustain high clocks without heat issues, making it suitable for small form factor builds. The single-thread score of 3248 is competitive with the 7000-series rivals, and the multi-thread score of 21712 shows it beats the i7-14700T by less than 1 percent in average score, which is effectively a razor-thin margin. The 88th percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier CPU in the broader market, not just within its own generation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is asymmetric. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This means the CPU is a much stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads—such as physics simulations, data compression, or single-threaded tasks—the CPU will not be the limiting factor, as its benchmark scores are high. The GPU, however, will limit performance in graphics-intensive scenarios.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 is much lower than the CPU’s multi-thread score of 21712, indicating that compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference or CUDA workloads will be constrained by the GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 is a direct measure of gaming performance, and that score sits below the CPU’s percentile, confirming the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming. For example, in a game that relies heavily on vertex processing, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 can keep up, but the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit the frame rate.

The 8 GB of VRAM on the GPU is another potential bottleneck in high-resolution gaming, but the 128-bit bus width and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p. For productivity, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads will handle multi-threaded applications like video encoding, but the GPU’s compute score of 9213 means that GPU-accelerated tasks will not be as fast as with a higher-tier card. The overall picture is that the CPU has headroom to support a faster GPU, but the GPU itself is the primary constraint in most gaming and graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a PassMark multi-thread score of 21712 and a single-thread score of 3248. Its average benchmark score is 42055, with a percentile of 88. This puts it ahead of the AMD Ryzen9 PRO 8945HS (41963 average, 0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914, 0.3% delta), and also ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, 0.7% delta). The Intel Core i9-12900K is slightly faster at 42335 average, but the Ryzen 5 7400 is only 0.7% behind. This places the CPU in the top 12% of all CPUs, which is a strong result for a 6-core part.

The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, has a PassMark G3D score of 19545 and a PassMark G2D score of 1037. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302. The average benchmark score is 17639, with a percentile of 61% against all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% delta). This shows the RTX 4060 is a mid-tier GPU, roughly 0.2% behind the HD 7790 but 0.3% ahead of the 780M, which is a newer integrated solution.

The combined percentile of 75% indicates that the CPU+GPU pairing is better than three-quarters of all tested configurations. The CPU is a clear strength, but the GPU pulls the overall percentile down. In practical terms, the CPU can handle high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions, but the GPU will struggle at 4K. The combined picture is a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, and for productivity work that is CPU-bound, but not for maxing out graphics at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is a modern platform. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is a plus for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), meaning the CPU can support a high-bandwidth GPU or NVMe drives directly. The integrated Radeon Graphics are a basic fallback, but the discrete RTX 4060 will be the primary display output.

The RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the lanes of a typical x16 GPU. This is a potential bottleneck if the motherboard only provides Gen 4 lanes, but in practice the x8 bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU’s 272 GB/s memory bandwidth. The GPU’s TDP is 115 W, and the suggested power supply is 300 W, which is low. This means the system has ample headroom for a PSU upgrade if a stronger GPU is added later. The GPU is end-of-life, so a sensible next upgrade would be to a more powerful card in the GeForce 50 series, but only if the CPU can keep up.

The CPU is also unlocked, so overclocking is possible, but the 65 W TDP suggests there is thermal headroom. The platform is relatively new, with the CPU released in 2025, so AM5 will likely support future processor generations. A sensible next upgrade is to add a higher-tier GPU, but note the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread limit may become the bottleneck for future games that use more threads. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 RAM (the system supports dual-channel) would help memory-intensive tasks, but the current 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is already decent.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel and ECC support, running at a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900K?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 has an average benchmark score of 42055, which is 0.7% lower than the i9-12900K’s 42335, so it is nearly identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU’s performance percentile higher than the CPU’s?

A: No, the CPU is in the 88th percentile, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile, meaning the GPU is weaker relative to its peers.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 86, which means it is better than 86% of all CPU+GPU pairings.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon Graphics, which can be used for basic display output or troubleshooting.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 24 lanes of Gen 5 PCIe, which is a fast interface for the GPU and storage.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the figures listed are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, which is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark, and its PassMark G3D score of 19545. For a 1080p resolution at ultra settings, the RTX 4060 should deliver smooth frame rates in most AAA titles, likely above 60 FPS. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will start to limit performance, but the 61st percentile suggests it can still handle many games at high settings. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and users should expect lower frame rates or reduced settings.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 is more than enough for modern gaming, which typically uses 4-6 cores. The 12 threads of the CPU will handle background tasks and streaming without a significant dip. For competitive gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s 88th percentile means it can support 144+ Hz refresh rates in games like esports titles, but the GPU will limit the maximum frame rate in more demanding titles. Overall, the gaming performance is expected to be strong for 1080p and playable at 1440p, but not ideal for 4K gaming. The RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for most games, but the 8 GB memory is a limit for future titles.

Who Should Build It

This build is intended for desktop users who want a well-rounded system for gaming and productivity. The CPU’s 6-core/12-thread design is suitable for gamers, content creators, and developers. For gamers, the CPU’s 88th percentile ensures it will not hold back a GPU, and the RTX 4060 is capable for 1080p gaming at high settings. For content creators, the CPU’s multi-thread score of 21712 can handle video editing in 1080p and light 4K, while the GPU’s CUDA support accelerates rendering in software like Adobe Premiere. Software developers will benefit from the single-thread performance and the 5 nm process, which allows for fast compilation times. The build is also good for a student or a small business workstation, as the 65W CPU and 115W GPU keep power consumption low, and the entire system is silent.

The CPU’s integrated graphics provide a backup, which is useful for troubleshooting or office work. The 8 GB GPU is enough for most productivity tasks, but not for large machine learning models. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across the cores, which is a bit small for a 2024 CPU, but the high clock speeds compensate. This is a good build for someone who wants a fast desktop for gaming and work, but does not need the absolute top-tier performance of a 16-core or 20-core CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 115 W TDP. The overall class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 86, which means it is better than 86% of all builds. The CPU is the stronger component of the two, with an 88th percentile, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile.

This pairing is a well-balanced mid-range system. The CPU is powerful enough to avoid being a bottleneck for the GPU, but the GPU is not as strong as the CPU, so the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming. The build is a good match for 1080p gaming, and it can handle 1440p with some settings reduced. For productivity, the CPU’s 12 threads are sufficient for most tasks, but the GPU’s 8 GB memory is a limit for 3D rendering. The TDP of the CPU and GPU are both low, at 65 W and 115 W, so the system is power-efficient and easy to cool. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the combined percentile and the CPU’s high scores making it a solid choice for many users.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 and the GPU’s 3DMark score of 2302 indicate the system can push high frame rates in most games. The 61st percentile GPU is adequate for 144 Hz monitors in less demanding titles, but may drop below that in AAA games.

For streaming, the CPU’s 12 threads can handle encoding, but the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 is too low for real-time ray tracing at high settings. The CPU’s 88th percentile ensures live streaming will not cause frame drops, but the GPU will be the limit for the game itself.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 21712 is solid for rendering 1080p video, and the GPU’s CUDA acceleration helps with effects. 4K editing is possible, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a limit for large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 6 cores can handle modeling, but the RTX 4060’s 8 GB memory is a bottleneck for high-poly models. The GPU’s compute score of 9213 is moderate, so rendering will be slower than a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 and its 65 W TDP make it a strong choice for compilation and code analysis. The 12 threads allow for concurrent builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 88th percentile ensures it will be responsive for web browsing, office suite, and coding tasks. The integrated graphics are a fallback if the GPU fails, but the discrete GPU is not needed for these tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is more than enough for these workloads, and the overall system is quiet under low load.