SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, with the AMD Radeon RX 9070, a 16 GB RDNA 4 discrete GPU based on the Navi 48 die. Together they land at a combined percentile of 79 against all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, which positions the build firmly in the upper-mainstream tier of the database: strong enough for serious gaming and sustained creative work, but not an enthusiast flagship. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 69th percentile among all GPUs — a deliberate asymmetry that shapes everything about how this machine behaves in real workloads.

Gaming Performance

An important caveat up front: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Every frame-rate statement below is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measured figure, and should be treated as such.

What the scores indicate is a GPU-bound gaming experience at higher resolutions. The RX 9070's PassMark G3D score of 25,381 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 place it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs — essentially tied with cards such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (deltaPct -1.2), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (deltaPct -0.8), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (deltaPct 0.6). Frame expectations should be framed against that class of hardware: at 1440p and 4K in modern AAA titles at ultra settings, the GPU is the ceiling, and the Ryzen 5 7400's single-thread PassMark score of 3,248 — 88th-percentile territory — is more than sufficient to feed it.

At 1080p, where the CPU begins to matter more, the picture holds up. The 7400's single-thread performance sits near the i9-12900K's class of chips in aggregate average score (its avgBenchmarkScore of 42,055 is within a fraction of a percent of that Intel flagship's 42,335), which implies the processor will not be the limiting factor in most esports and competitive titles until frame rates climb into high-refresh territory. The passmark_physics score of 1,150 is the relevant indicator for game-simulation-heavy scenes, and it is consistent with a modern 6-core part: capable, not record-setting. Estimated high-refresh 1080p gaming is realistic; estimated 4K ultra gaming is achievable but will lean entirely on the RX 9070's 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 128 ROPs to hold frame times steady.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a GPU-limited build at graphics-heavy settings and a CPU-limited build only at the extremes. The percentile gap is the clearest evidence: 88th percentile CPU versus 69th percentile GPU means the processor is, relative to the full database population, the stronger of the two components. In practice this means the RX 9070 saturates before the Ryzen 5 7400 does in almost every rasterized workload.

Where the CPU does become the constraint is heavily threaded, non-graphics work. The passmark_multithread score of 21,712 reflects six cores and twelve threads — a mid-pack result for a modern desktop. Content creation pipelines that scale across many cores (video encodes, code compilation, 3D batch renders on CPU) will finish slower here than on higher-core-count rivals; the nearest-rivals list makes the calibration explicit: the 7400 scores within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-14700T, within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-12850HX, and sits 0.7% behind the Intel Core i9-12900K on average benchmark score. Those are competitive placements, but they describe chips that win on efficiency or legacy positioning rather than raw throughput kings.

Memory bandwidth is another balance lever: 83.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 on the CPU side against 644.6 GB/s on the GPU side. Textures and render targets live comfortably in GPU memory; the system memory path is adequate but not lavish, which reinforces the conclusion that this build is tuned for GPU-driven workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is one of the strongest arguments for this pairing. The Ryzen 5 7400 uses AMD Socket AM5, supports DDR5 in dual-channel, offers 24 CPU-only PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and has an unlocked multiplier — meaning faster memory and a meaningful CPU upgrade are both available on the same motherboard. ECC memory support is listed as true, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop part and matters for workstation-minded builders.

Power headroom is generous. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 220 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the RX 9070 is 550 W. That 550 W figure already accounts for the card's 2x 8-pin power connectors, so a system built on this guidance has room for a future CPU upgrade within the same TDP envelope without replacing the power supply. The GPU occupies a dual-slot footprint, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface — fully matched to the CPU's Gen 5 lanes — and offers one HDMI 2.1b plus three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, giving modern display connectivity that will not need revisiting.

A sensible next upgrade, given the 88th-versus-69th percentile split, is the GPU: lifting the graphics card raises the weaker percentile directly, while the 6-core CPU would remain adequate for most games. Alternatively, an AM5 CPU with more cores addresses the multithread score of 21,712 without a platform change. Either path is open; the socket makes the CPU path cheap in terms of rework.

Who Should Build It

The measured data points to four clear audiences. First, 1440p and 4K gamers: the GPU's percentile and bandwidth make it the natural fit for high-resolution ultra-settings play, and the CPU will not hold it back. Second, content creators whose work is GPU-accelerated — the RX 9070's Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 and Vulkan score of 58,705 indicate strong compute throughput for effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated encoding previews, while the 16 GB of GDDR6 gives large timelines breathing room. Third, software developers and students: the single-thread score of 3,248 handles IDE responsiveness and compile-adjacent tooling well, and the 88th-percentile placement means the machine will feel fast in everyday interactive work. Fourth, small-business workstation builders: ECC support, dual-channel DDR5, and a 65 W processor TDP combine into a stable, cool-running, quiet-capable office machine that can also double as a capable GPU box when needed. What this build is not, per the multithread data, is a rendering workstation for users who need many-core throughput above all.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400 is a Zen 4 (Raphael) part built on TSMC's 5 nm node, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It runs a 3.30 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.30 GHz, with 64 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache per core plus 16 MB of shared L3. The small die and 65 W TDP define its character: an efficient six-core, not a throughput monster.

The benchmark profile confirms that character. The passmark_single_thread score of 3,248 is the headline — it is what puts the chip in the 88th percentile overall and what makes day-to-day desktop use, game logic, and lightly threaded applications feel quick. The passmark_integer_math score of 64,733 and passmark_floating_point_math score of 40,784 show solid per-core muscle, while passmark_data_compression at 261,749 and passmark_random_string_sorting at 31,110 indicate snappy file and data operations. By contrast, passmark_multithread at 21,712 and passmark_find_prime_numbers at 79 show the ceiling of twelve threads: competitive with the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (0.2% delta) and i7-14700T (0.3% delta), but behind higher-core flagships in absolute terms. The unlocked multiplier means the 4.30 GHz boost clock is not a hard limit for users who want to push further. Integrated Radeon Graphics are present, giving display output even without the discrete card — useful for troubleshooting.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 9070 is a Navi 48 chip on TSMC's 4 nm process, carrying 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die at a density of 151.0M per mm². It is an RDNA 4.0 design with 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 56 RT cores — a genuine ray-tracing-capable configuration with dedicated hardware for it, though tensor cores are listed as null, so AI-assisted workloads should be evaluated against the OpenCL and Vulkan compute numbers rather than a dedicated tensor pipeline.

Clocks run from a 1,330 MHz base through a 2,070 MHz game clock to a 2,520 MHz boost, with 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 644.6 GB/s at 20.1 Gbps effective memory speed. The throughput figures are substantial: 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio), a 322.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, and a 564.5 GTexel/s texture rate. For rendering, the PassMark G3D score of 25,381 and GPU compute score of 14,737 describe a card that handles modern game engines and GPU compute workloads comfortably; the Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6,290 confirms sustained heavy-load stability in a modern API suite. The API support — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6 — covers the full current feature set. It launched with a launch MSRP of 549 USD, and its 220 W TDP keeps it within a dual-slot, dual-8-pin envelope.

FAQ

Q: Are the frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the PassMark G3D, Steel Nomad, and single-thread scores.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400 compare to rival CPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 42,055 sits within 0.2% of the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, 0.3% of the Core i7-14700T, and 0.7% of the Core i7-12850HX, and 0.7% behind the Core i9-12900K.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to rival GPUs?

A: Its average score of 23,877 places it 0.6% ahead of the GTX TITAN Z, 1.1% ahead of the RTX 3080 Mobile, 0.8% behind the RX 6800S, and 1.2% behind the RTX 2080 SUPER.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 9070 is 550 W, covering its 220 W TDP and 2x 8-pin connectors alongside the 65 W CPU.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked, and the chip boosts to 4.30 GHz from a 3.30 GHz base.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC is supported, on a dual-channel DDR5 platform with 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What display outputs does the GPU have?

A: One HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing an upper-mainstream 88th-percentile CPU with a mid-to-upper 69th-percentile GPU for a combined percentile of 79. In tier terms, it is a well-balanced mainstream gaming and creation machine: the processor over-delivers relative to the graphics card, which is the preferred direction for a gaming-first pairing since it avoids CPU bottlenecks. The platform fundamentals — AM5 socket, DDR5, PCIe Gen 5 on both the CPU lanes and the GPU's x16 interface — mean the build is current rather than legacy, with room to grow on the CPU side without a motherboard change. Its class is best described as a high-efficiency 1440p/4K-capable desktop with workstation credentials courtesy of ECC support.

Benchmark Performance

The exact scores tell a coherent story. On the CPU side: 64,733 integer math, 40,784 floating point, 261,749 data compression, 31,110 string sorting, 14,865 encryption, 19,924 extended instructions, 21,712 multithread, 3,248 single-thread, and 1,150 physics, averaging 42,055 for the 88th percentile. On the GPU side: 25,381 PassMark G3D, 6,290 Steel Nomad DX12, 131,539 Geekbench OpenCL, 58,705 Geekbench Vulkan, 14,737 GPU compute, plus DirectCompute-family results of 141 (DX10), 281 (DX11), 74 (DX12), 343 (DX9), and 1,280 G2D, averaging 23,877 for the 69th percentile.

The combined picture is a machine whose interactive performance is excellent — the single-thread score is the single most important number for perceived speed — and whose GPU delivers solidly above-mid-pack rendering throughput. The gap between 88 and 69 percentile is small enough that neither component embarrasses the other, but large enough that a GPU upgrade would be the highest-leverage change. Against its nearest rivals on both sides, the deltas are all within roughly one percent, meaning this pairing trades blows with well-known alternatives rather than dominating or trailing them.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. The single-thread score of 3,248 and physics score of 1,150 indicate the CPU can drive high frame rates, while the GPU's 564.5 GTexel/s texture rate and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth sustain ultra settings at 1440p. Estimated frame rates at 1080p will frequently be GPU-bound rather than CPU-bound, which is the correct configuration for a gaming rig.

4K ultra gaming. The 16 GB of GDDR6 and 128 ROPs (322.6 GPixel/s pixel rate) make 4K viable, with the Steel Nomad score of 6,290 supporting that expectation. Frame rates at this resolution will be entirely GPU-determined, and the CPU's headroom goes unused — acceptable for image-quality-focused players.

Streaming. Encoding alongside gaming stresses both components. The 21,712 multithread score shows twelve threads can absorb an encode workload without collapsing gaming performance, though six cores leave less spare capacity than higher-core rivals. A practical, mid-tier streaming configuration.

Video editing. The 131,539 OpenCL score and 58,705 Vulkan score indicate strong GPU-accelerated timeline and effects performance, and 16 GB of VRAM handles high-resolution footage well. CPU-side exports are constrained by the multithread score — fast enough for most projects, not for deadline-crunch batch encodes.

3D rendering. GPU rendering benefits from 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and the compute scores; CPU rendering is capped by six cores. Viewport work will feel fluid; final renders on the GPU are the right workflow for this build.

Software development. Compilation that scales across threads sits at the 21,712 multithread level, while IDE responsiveness, debuggers, and test-driven inner loops benefit from the 3,248 single-thread score. The 88th-percentile CPU makes this a genuinely comfortable development machine.

Student and office work. A 65 W TDP CPU, ECC support, dual-channel DDR5, and quiet-capable thermics make this an efficient everyday system that also runs modern games — a strong do-everything desktop for a shared household or small office.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds