SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + AMD Radeon RX 9060: A Mainstream Desktop Pairing with Clear Priorities

This build pairs AMD's 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with a RDNA 4.0 graphics card, landing at a combined percentile of 74 across all tested desktop configurations. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 59th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a processor-heavy pairing where the Ryzen 5 7400 carries the performance banner. The data shows a system aimed at responsive everyday computing and solid 1080p gaming, with the CPU offering substantial headroom for productivity tasks that the GPU cannot fully match in graphics-bound workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is AMD Socket AM5, a platform designed for longevity with DDR5 memory support. The Ryzen 5 7400 uses a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which makes the platform suitable for users who prioritize data integrity in workstation-style tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself, while the Radeon RX 9060 connects via a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring the graphics card has full bandwidth available for future upgrades without platform bottlenecks.

The CPU's thermal design power is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 132 W, with a suggested power supply of 300 W. This modest power requirement means the system can run on a wide range of existing power supplies, making it an attractive upgrade for users moving from older, less efficient builds. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, so physical compatibility with most mid-tower cases is straightforward.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary limiter in gaming scenarios. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile suggests that swapping the RX 9060 for a more powerful graphics card would yield the largest performance gains in graphics-bound workloads. The AM5 socket supports future Ryzen processors, and the PCIe 5.0 lanes on the CPU mean that storage and GPU upgrades will not be constrained by interface bandwidth. Users could also consider adding more DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel configuration already provides adequate bandwidth for the CPU's 6-core/12-thread design. The platform's ECC support is a differentiator for small business workstations that require error-checking memory without moving to a server platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 42,055, placing it in the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkable clustering: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41,963 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41,914 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779 (0.7% behind). The only rival ahead is the Intel Core i9-12900K at 42,335, which leads by a mere 0.7%. This tight grouping indicates that the Ryzen 5 7400 delivers performance nearly identical to a range of higher-tier mobile and desktop chips, making it a strong value in raw compute terms.

The GPU, meanwhile, posts an average benchmark score of 16,014, placing it in the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129, which is 0.7% faster, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862) and AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15,852) trail by 1% each. The Radeon Pro W5500 sits 2.1% behind at 15,679. This positions the RX 9060 as a mid-pack graphics solution, competitive with last-generation mid-range cards but clearly not a high-end performer.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its direct rivals in multithreaded and single-threaded workloads, while the GPU lands within a few percentage points of established mid-range cards. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3,322, and its PassMark G3D score is 17,631, with a GPU compute score of 9,919. These numbers suggest the system excels at CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, while graphics performance is adequate for mainstream gaming but not for pushing extreme frame rates at high resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The chip contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is modest by modern standards, but the benchmark results show it is sufficient for competitive performance. The PassMark multithread score is 21,712, while single-thread performance scores 3,248. Integer math scores 64,733, floating-point math scores 40,784, and extended instructions score 19,924. Data compression scores 261,749, data encryption scores 14,865, and random string sorting scores 31,110. Physics simulation scores 1,150, and finding prime numbers scores 79.

These results place the CPU in the 88th percentile, and the near-identical scores to the Intel Core i9-12900K (within 0.7%) are striking given the Ryzen 5's lower core count. The data suggests that Zen 4's architectural efficiency compensates for the fewer cores in many workloads. For real-world use, the 21,712 multithread score indicates strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the 3,248 single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and gaming. The 65 W TDP is particularly notable, as it achieves this performance level with low power draw, making it suitable for compact builds and quiet systems.

Who Should Build It

Given the CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile, this build targets users who prioritize processing power over graphics fidelity. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the pairing adequate, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU handles most mainstream games at medium-to-high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multithreaded prowess, with the PassMark multithread score of 21,712 indicating solid export times and render performance, though the GPU's compute score of 9,919 may limit GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the 6-core/12-thread configuration for compilation tasks and virtual machines, with the 261,749 data compression score supporting fast archive operations. Students and small business workstations are also well-served, as the 65 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU allow for efficient, low-noise systems that handle office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and web development with ease. The ECC memory support is a specific draw for small businesses running file servers or databases where data corruption is unacceptable. Users seeking high-refresh 1440p gaming or 4K content creation should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 59th percentile ranking will be the limiting factor in those scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU, and what PCIe version does it use?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The Radeon RX 9060 connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900K in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42,055 on average, while the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42,335, making the i9-12900K 0.7% faster. The Ryzen 5 7400 is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest rival, and how much faster or slower is it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the nearest rival, scoring 16,129 versus the RX 9060's 16,014, making the RTX 3060 Ti 0.7% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 1% slower than the RX 9060.

Q: Does this build have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400 includes integrated Radeon Graphics, which can be used for display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, with the CPU at the 88th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, based on the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 132 W TDP. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,248 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's passmark G3D score of 17,631 provides enough throughput for competitive shooters and esports titles at high refresh rates. The system will not sustain maximum settings in the latest AAA releases, but it handles medium-to-high presets comfortably.

Streaming benefits from the 6-core/12-thread configuration, as the CPU can handle encoding overhead while gaming, though the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means software encoding via the CPU is more practical. The multithread score of 21,712 supports x264 encoding at reasonable quality settings without tanking game performance.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong CPU performance for timeline scrubbing and export, with the 40,784 floating-point math score aiding color grading and effects. GPU acceleration will be limited by the RX 9060's 9,919 compute score, so heavy GPU effects may slow down.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools favors the CPU, with the 64,733 integer math score providing solid performance for geometry processing and the 21,712 multithread score reducing render times. GPU rendering with the RX 9060 is possible but will be slower than dedicated render cards.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 261,749 data compression score for fast build artifacts and the 19,924 extended instructions score for SIMD-optimized code. Compilation of large codebases will be efficient with 12 threads, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long builds.

Student and office work is more than adequately served, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring snappy application launches and the integrated graphics providing a backup. The 300 W PSU requirement makes this an easy system to power in dorms or small offices, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for spreadsheet and database work.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 and its PassMark G3D score of 17,631 place it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% faster), which is a known 1080p gaming card. In practical terms, users can expect playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most titles, dipping to medium settings for the most demanding AAA releases.

At 1440p, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggests that users will need to lower settings to maintain 60 FPS in modern games, and the 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,248 ensures that the processor will not be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the combination of fast CPU and mid-range GPU should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, though the lack of measured data means these figures are indicative rather than definitive.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor on Socket AM5, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, an RDNA 4.0 graphics card based on the Navi 44 chip. The CPU is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors, while the GPU uses a 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-midrange of tested configurations, with the CPU at the 88th percentile dominating the GPU's 59th percentile.

The system's overall tier is defined by this asymmetry: it is a CPU-first build where processing power exceeds graphics capability. The CPU's average benchmark score of 42,055 rivals the Intel Core i9-12900K, while the GPU's 16,014 average score matches the RTX 3060 Ti generation. This makes the build ideal for users who need strong compute performance for productivity tasks and are willing to accept mid-range gaming performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W suggested PSU indicate an efficient system that does not require exotic cooling or high-capacity power supplies.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the processor at the 88th percentile and the graphics card at the 59th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (261,749 score), integer math (64,733), and multithreaded tasks (21,712), the Ryzen 5 7400 performs exceptionally, matching or exceeding chips like the Intel Core i9-12900K. The GPU's compute score of 9,919 and G3D score of 17,631, however, place it in the mid-range tier, meaning that graphics-intensive workloads will be limited by the GPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck is predominantly the GPU. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,248 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the RX 9060's performance relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% slower) caps the frame rates at 1080p and below at 1440p. The FPS scaling from the GPU's benchmark scores indicates that lowering resolution or settings will yield diminishing returns beyond 1080p, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU's role is secondary. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus may also constrain performance in VRAM-heavy applications, further emphasizing the GPU as the system's limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. Users looking to balance this pairing should prioritize a GPU upgrade first, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck.