SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile — Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 4-core/8-thread AMD mobile CPU with a high-end NVIDIA laptop GPU, resulting in a system that sits at the 73rd percentile overall among all tracked builds. The CPU, based on Zen 3+ architecture on a 6nm TSMC process, delivers solid single-threaded performance but its modest core count limits multi-threaded workloads. The GPU, however, is the dominant component here — a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip that outperforms the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti in aggregate benchmark scores. This is a laptop-class build where the graphics card clearly outclasses the processor, creating a pronounced imbalance that favors gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks over CPU-bound productivity workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, drawing 45W of TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a dual-channel DDR5 memory platform with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory — a feature often associated with professional or workstation use cases. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback display solution, though the discrete RTX 5070 Mobile will handle all demanding graphics workloads.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10418 in multi-core and 1470 in single-core. The single-core result is competitive, placing the chip within striking distance of modern desktop processors in lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score, however, reveals the limitation of having only 4 physical cores. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 4375 multi-core and 617 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core. These results indicate a processor that handles everyday responsiveness, web browsing, and office productivity with ease, but will struggle in heavily multithreaded workloads like video rendering, 3D simulation, or large-scale code compilation.

PassMark results paint a similar picture. The multithread score of 12243 and single-thread score of 2873 demonstrate competent general-purpose performance. The integer math score of 40174 and floating-point math score of 23091 show balanced arithmetic capability. Data compression scores 152168, while data encryption achieves 9051. The extended instructions score of 10887 suggests reasonable SIMD throughput. The find prime numbers test, however, scores only 31 — a low number that reflects the CPU's limited core count and older Zen 3+ architecture compared to newer designs. The physics score of 574 and random string sorting score of 15294 round out a profile that is clearly optimized for single-threaded and moderately threaded tasks rather than extreme parallel workloads.

The CPU's 70th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper-middle tier of processors. Its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 7702 (avg score 16932, 0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-1240U (avg score 16957, 0.3% higher), the Intel Core i3-12100E (avg score 16853, 0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (avg score 16827, 0.4% lower). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the 7235HS sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw core counts. The EPYC 7702 comparison is particularly telling — a server-class chip with many more cores scores nearly identically on aggregate benchmarks, but that aggregate figure masks the 7702's massive multithreaded advantage in real server workloads.

For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for tasks that are latency-sensitive and lightly threaded: web development, document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and light photo editing. It will handle these with authority. For video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing that scales across cores, the 4-core limit becomes a bottleneck that no amount of clock speed can fully compensate for.

Benchmark Performance

The overall system combined percentile is 73, placing this build in the upper quartile of all tracked configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 16902, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 29928. This disparity — the GPU scoring roughly 77% higher than the CPU in their respective average benchmarks — is the defining characteristic of this pairing.

The GPU's benchmark results are impressive across the board. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 122238, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 116960. PassMark G3D scores 20355, while PassMark GPU Compute scores 8279. The DirectX tests show 129 for DirectX 10, 192 for DirectX 11, and 93 for DirectX 12 — the lower DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 is unusual and may indicate driver optimization priorities. The G2D score of 896 is modest, reflecting that 2D desktop rendering is not where this GPU's strength lies.

The GPU's 75th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above the RTX 3070 Ti (avg score 29945, 0.1% higher than this GPU's 29928) and the RTX 2080 Ti (avg score 29783, 0.5% lower). The AMD Radeon RX 6800 (avg score 30095, 0.6% higher) and RX 6700 (avg score 30433, 1.7% higher) are also in close competition. These deltas are small — well under 2% — meaning the RTX 5070 Mobile trades blows with these desktop-class GPUs from previous generations. For a laptop GPU at 50W TDP to match desktop GPUs that consumed two to three times that power budget confirms the efficiency of the 5nm Blackwell architecture.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the star and the CPU is a supporting actor. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, rendering, or machine learning inference, this build will perform at a high level. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation, data compression, or file encryption, the CPU's 4-core limit will cap performance well below what the GPU can deliver.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense — it is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs. The memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for the CPU's needs but is not a limiting factor for the GPU, which has its own dedicated memory. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface — the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds without significant performance loss in most workloads.

The GPU's TDP is 50W, and it has no power connectors, drawing power directly from the motherboard — typical for a mobile IGP-class solution. The CPU's TDP is 45W, meaning the combined CPU+GPU power draw is approximately 95W, plus overhead for memory, storage, and display. This is a moderately power-hungry laptop configuration that will require a substantial battery and cooling solution.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the user's priorities. For GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 5070 Mobile is already a strong performer, and the next meaningful GPU upgrade would be to a higher-tier mobile GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. For CPU-bound workloads, the 4-core limit is the primary constraint, and any upgrade would require a new motherboard and CPU — effectively a new laptop. The 8 MB of L3 cache and 45W TDP suggest this CPU is designed for thin-and-light gaming laptops where power efficiency is prioritized over raw core counts.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 16902, which is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (16827), 0.3% of the Intel Core i3-12100E (16853), and 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-1240U (16957).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU ranks at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29928.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 6nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm².

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, placing it in the upper quartile of all tracked builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is stark. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29928 is roughly 77% higher than the CPU's 16902 average. In practical terms, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost no scenario — instead, the CPU will cap performance in many workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's 4 cores may bottleneck the GPU in CPU-intensive titles, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the CPU can feed. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 70th percentile ranking suggests the GPU is the stronger component, but the gap is not enormous — both are in the upper-middle tier. The combined percentile of 73 is close to both individual percentiles, indicating a reasonably balanced system at the aggregate level, but the workload-specific balance is heavily skewed toward the GPU.

For GPU-compute workloads like machine learning training, video encoding with NVENC, or ray tracing, the GPU will dominate performance, and the CPU will simply need to feed data fast enough. The CPU's 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and PCIe Gen 4 support are sufficient for this. For CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation, data compression, or single-threaded productivity tasks, the GPU will sit idle while the CPU works at its 4-core limit.

The PassMark data illustrates this split clearly: the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20355 dwarfs the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 12243. The GPU's compute score of 8279 is also substantial. In any workload that can leverage the GPU, the CPU will not be the primary constraint. In workloads that cannot, the system will underperform relative to its 73rd percentile combined ranking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's performance level — sitting between the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti in aggregate benchmarks — this system should deliver high frame rates in most modern titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth should handle demanding games well, with the CPU potentially limiting frame rates in CPU-heavy scenes. At 1440p, the GPU will become the more significant factor, and the CPU's 4 cores may be sufficient to keep up. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint, and the CPU's limitation will be less noticeable.

The GPU's 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores indicate strong ray tracing and DLSS performance, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. The 8 GB of GDDR7 memory is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but may become a limiting factor at 4K with ultra texture packs in some titles. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck for the GPU, even at higher resolutions.

The CPU's single-thread performance — Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1470 — should provide adequate gaming responsiveness, but games that utilize more than 4 cores may see reduced performance compared to systems with higher core counts. The 8 MB of L3 cache is modest by modern standards, which may impact performance in open-world games with large streaming budgets.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for gamers who prioritize graphics quality at 1080p or 1440p and are willing to accept CPU limitations in exchange for GPU performance. The RTX 5070 Mobile's 75th percentile GPU ranking makes it a strong choice for competitive gaming at high frame rates and for visually demanding single-player titles.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications — video editing with GPU encoding, 3D rendering with CUDA, or machine learning inference — will find this system well-suited to their needs. The 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide substantial acceleration for these workloads. However, content creators who rely heavily on CPU rendering will be frustrated by the 4-core processor.

Developers writing code that compiles across multiple cores will find the CPU limiting, but developers working with GPU compute APIs like CUDA or OpenCL will benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities. Students in STEM fields who need GPU acceleration for simulations or data analysis will find this system capable, while students who primarily use CPU-bound applications may be overspending on the GPU.

Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated applications — CAD, video editing, data visualization — will see strong performance. Businesses running CPU-bound applications like database servers or large spreadsheet calculations will not benefit from the GPU's power and would be better served by a CPU-focused build.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. The system's combined percentile of 73 places it in the upper quartile of all tracked builds, indicating a high-performance configuration overall. The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile rankings are closely aligned, suggesting a well-matched pair at the aggregate level, though individual workloads will see significant variance.

This is a GPU-first build. The RTX 5070 Mobile is the headline component, offering performance comparable to desktop GPUs from the previous generation at a fraction of the power consumption — 50W TDP for the GPU versus the 200W+ power draws of the desktop GPUs it rivals. The CPU is a capable partner that will not embarrass the system in everyday use, but it is clearly the secondary component. This build is best understood as a portable gaming or GPU-compute workstation that prioritizes graphics performance over CPU throughput.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB206 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process node. The die contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. This configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The clocks are 907 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost, producing 13.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and matching FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores show a GPU that performs well above its mobile-class designation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 places it in the upper tier of all GPUs, while the GPU compute score of 8279 demonstrates solid parallel processing capability. The DirectX 12 score of 93 is notably lower than DirectX 11's 192, which may indicate driver maturity issues or architectural differences in how the GPU handles newer API workloads.

In rendering terms, this GPU is well-suited for real-time graphics at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, and it can handle 4K in less demanding titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current games but may be a limitation for future titles with high-resolution textures. The 50W TDP with no power connectors means this GPU is designed for thin-and-light gaming laptops, trading some raw performance for efficiency — yet it still matches desktop GPUs like the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti in aggregate benchmarks, which is a remarkable achievement for a mobile chip.