SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile form a laptop pairing where the data reveals a significant performance hierarchy. The CPU, a 4-core Zen 3+ part, sits at the 70th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace mobile part, ranks at the 73rd percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 72, placing it in the upper tier of laptop hardware, yet the stark contrast in their individual benchmark profiles suggests a system designed for graphics-intensive tasks where the processor is a supporting actor rather than the lead.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the undisputed powerhouse of this pairing. Built on the 5 nm Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, it packs 22,900 million transistors into a 188 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and boosts to 1695 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s.

For compute, the GPU offers 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 36 dedicated RT cores, while 144 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The FP32 throughput is 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1). This is a substantial amount of raw compute for a mobile part, and the benchmark scores reflect it. In PassMark G3D testing, the GPU scores 19587, which places it at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 27435 is remarkably close to that of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which scores 27425 (a 0% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27565 (a -0.5% delta). This means the mobile RTX 4070 is performing in the same league as desktop flagship cards from a previous generation, an impressive feat for a laptop component.

The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 109197 in OpenCL and 108367 in Vulkan. PassMark scores show DirectX 10 at 116, DirectX 11 at 179, DirectX 12 at 85, and DirectX 9 at 223. The 2D graphics score is 763, while GPU compute is 8399. These numbers indicate that the card is well-balanced across different rendering APIs, with the DirectX 12 score being notably lower relative to DirectX 11, suggesting potential driver optimizations or architectural preferences. For rendering workloads, the combination of 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p content creation, though the 128-bit bus width may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with large texture loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform for this build is defined by the CPU's socket and memory support. The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means upgrades are limited to replacing the entire laptop or, in rare cases, swapping the CPU within the same board if the manufacturer supports it. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms, adding a layer of reliability for data-intensive tasks.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, a bus interface that provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 4070 Mobile. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The system's TDP is 45 W for the CPU and 115 W for the GPU, totaling 160 W of thermal design power. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined TDP suggests a power adapter in the 200 W to 240 W range is typical for such a laptop. There is no launch MSRP for either component, so pricing cannot be discussed.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity, as DDR5 is supported and dual-channel operation is already in place. Storage expansion via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives is also viable, given the available lanes. However, the socket and mobile form factor mean that CPU and GPU upgrades are not practical. The data shows this is a closed platform, and the only meaningful upgrades are memory and storage, which can improve load times and multitasking but will not change the fundamental performance ceiling set by the CPU and GPU.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, boosting up to 4.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 45 W, which is standard for a high-performance mobile processor.

Benchmark results for the CPU are modest compared to the GPU. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10418 in multi-core and 1470 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 4375 multi-core and 617 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core. The PassMark scores are more varied: multithread is 12243, single-thread is 2873, integer math is 40174, floating-point math is 23091, data compression is 152168, data encryption is 9051, extended instructions is 10887, physics is 574, find prime numbers is 31, and random string sorting is 15294. The average benchmark score is 16902, placing it at the 70th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals highlight the CPU's positioning. The AMD EPYC 7702 scores 16932 (a -0.2% delta), the Intel Core i3-12100E scores 16853 (a 0.3% delta), the Intel Core i5-1240U scores 16957 (a -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U scores 16827 (a 0.4% delta). This means the 7235HS is performing on par with entry-level desktop and low-power mobile processors, despite being a 45 W part. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration is limiting in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418, which is below what higher-core-count processors achieve. The single-core performance of 1470 in Cinebench R23 is respectable but not class-leading. For real workloads, this CPU is adequate for everyday tasks, office productivity, and light coding, but it will struggle with heavy multi-threaded rendering or compilation tasks where more cores are beneficial.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor in this build. The GPU sits at the 73rd percentile, while the CPU is at the 70th percentile, but the gap in raw performance is much wider. The GPU's average benchmark score of 27435 is nearly identical to desktop cards like the RTX 3090, while the CPU's average score of 16902 is comparable to low-end desktop i3s. This imbalance means that in scenarios where both components are stressed, the CPU will likely bottleneck the GPU's performance.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1470 in Cinebench R23 and 2873 in PassMark single-thread suggests it can handle modern game engines, but the 4-core limit may cause frame drops in CPU-intensive scenes. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19587 indicates it can push high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the CPU may prevent the GPU from reaching its full potential in games that are not well-optimized for multi-threading. In rendering workloads, the CPU's multi-core score of 10418 in Cinebench R23 is a clear bottleneck, as rendering tasks scale with core count. The GPU's compute score of 8399 in PassMark shows it is capable of accelerating rendering, but the CPU must feed it data, and a slower CPU will reduce overall throughput.

The combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance. It is higher than the CPU's 70th percentile but lower than the GPU's 73rd, indicating that the CPU drags down the overall system performance. For workloads that are GPU-bound, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system performs well. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the 4-core CPU will be the limiting factor, and the GPU's power will be underutilized.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is best suited for users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU compute. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit from the GPU's high percentile, as the RTX 4070 Mobile's score of 19587 in PassMark G3D and its proximity to desktop RTX 3090 performance in average benchmark score (27435 vs 27565) suggest it can handle modern titles at high settings. The CPU's single-core performance of 1470 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for most games, though it may limit frame rates in CPU-heavy titles.

Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated applications, such as video editors using NVIDIA CUDA or 3D artists using ray tracing, will find the GPU's 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores valuable. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering projects. However, content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering or heavy multitasking may be frustrated by the 4-core CPU, which scores 10418 in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Developers and students in computer science will find the CPU adequate for coding, compiling small projects, and running virtual machines, but large builds will be slow. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity. Small business workstations that run office applications, web browsing, and light database tasks will perform well, as the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 12243 is sufficient for these workloads. The integrated Radeon 660M GPU provides a fallback for display output, but the discrete GPU is the main workhorse.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19587 and its average benchmark score of 27435, which rivals the desktop RTX 3090, indicate it can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's single-core score of 1470 in Cinebench R23 is adequate, but the 4-core limit may cause stuttering in games that use many threads.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder, implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture and tensor cores, can handle video encoding without taxing the CPU. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 9051 and integer math score of 40174 suggest it can handle stream overlays and chat, but multitasking may be constrained by the 8 threads.

Video editing: GPU-accelerated effects will be fast, as the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 shows strong compute performance. However, CPU-based timeline scrubbing and rendering will be limited by the 10418 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, making export times longer than on higher-core CPUs.

3D rendering: The GPU's 36 RT cores and FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS make it excellent for GPU rendering engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderate scenes, but the CPU's 8 MB of L3 cache and 4 cores will slow down scene preparation and physics simulations.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 2873 is fine for code editing and IDE responsiveness, but compilation times will be longer due to the 4-core limit. The ECC memory support is a benefit for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for typical office tasks. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 12243 handles spreadsheets and web browsers easily, and the GPU is idle most of the time. The 45 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP mean battery life may be shorter than lower-power alternatives.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count, and how does it affect multi-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS has 4 cores and 8 threads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 is on par with the Intel Core i3-12100E, which scores 16853 in average benchmark score, indicating limited multi-threaded capability.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it sufficient for modern games?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 128-bit bus width may limit performance at higher resolutions with large textures.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build, and what does it indicate?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning this laptop outperforms 72% of all builds in the database. It is higher than the CPU's 70th percentile but lower than the GPU's 73rd, indicating the CPU is a bottleneck.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing, and how many RT cores does it have?

A: Yes, the GPU has 36 dedicated RT cores based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support, and is ECC available?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile processor.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the desktop RTX 3090 in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435, while the RTX 3090 scores 27565, a delta of -0.5%. This means the mobile GPU performs within 0.5% of the desktop RTX 3090 on average.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process, also by TSMC. The GPU has a higher transistor density at 121.8M per mm².

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs a 4-core AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS CPU with a high-end NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile GPU. The overall tier is upper-midrange, with a combined percentile of 72. The GPU is the standout component, ranking at the 73rd percentile, while the CPU ranks at the 70th percentile. This is a system designed for graphics-intensive work and gaming, where the GPU's power can be fully utilized. The CPU is adequate but not exceptional, and users who require heavy multi-threaded CPU performance will find it lacking. The build is best described as a graphics-first laptop that sacrifices CPU compute for GPU performance, making it a niche product for gamers and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 16902, placing it at the 70th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7702 (16932, -0.2%), Intel Core i3-12100E (16853, 0.3%), Intel Core i5-1240U (16957, -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (16827, 0.4%). Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 10418 and single-core at 1470, and PassMark multithread at 12243. The GPU's average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, 0%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565, -0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135, 1.1%), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, -1.5%). Key GPU scores include PassMark G3D at 19587, Geekbench OpenCL at 109197, and Geekbench Vulkan at 108367.

The combined picture shows a significant imbalance. The GPU is performing at a level comparable to desktop flagship cards from the previous generation, while the CPU is performing at the level of entry-level desktop processors. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this, being a weighted average that is dragged down by the CPU. In GPU-bound tasks, this system will excel, but in CPU-bound tasks, it will underperform. The data suggests that the GPU is the primary investment, and the CPU is a cost-saving measure that may cause bottlenecks in certain workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's high percentile and average benchmark score of 27435, which is within 0.5% of the desktop RTX 3090, suggest it can deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most modern games. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for ultra settings at these resolutions. The CPU's single-core score of 1470 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for most games, but the 4-core limit may cause frame drops in CPU-intensive titles or when background tasks are running. In GPU-bound scenarios, the system should maintain high FPS, but in CPU-bound scenarios, performance may be inconsistent. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra would be high, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in esports titles and 60-80 FPS in AAA games, though these are estimates and actual performance will vary. At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit bus width may become a limiting factor, potentially reducing frame rates compared to wider-bus competitors. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 85, which is lower than DirectX 11's 179, suggests that the card may perform better in older APIs or that drivers are not fully optimized for newer titles. Overall, this is a capable gaming laptop for 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU being the primary concern for maintaining consistent frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds