SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and AMD Radeon RX 7600M form a mobile pairing aimed at balancing CPU-heavy productivity with discrete-class graphics in a laptop chassis. The processor is a 4-core/8-thread part based on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R), manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 210 mm². It runs a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The GPU is a Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0, also on 6 nm TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors and a 204 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The combination targets a laptop build class, with a combined benchmark percentile of 80 among all tested systems. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7235HS is a compact quad-core processor with simultaneous multithreading, providing 8 threads. The architecture is Zen 3+, a refinement of the Zen 3 design that focuses on power efficiency in mobile parts. The base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz are moderate for a 45 W TDP, which is typical for a high-performance laptop chip. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB L3 cache — a modest amount compared to desktop parts, but adequate for a mobile workload profile. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC support, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip.

Benchmark results show a CPU that punches near its weight class. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 10418, while the single-core score is 1470. The multicore figure is strong for a 4-core part, indicating efficient scaling across threads. The single-core score is competitive, suggesting solid IPC for everyday tasks. Cinebench R20 scores are 4375 multicore and 617 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 1050 multicore and 148 single-core. Passmark results are more granular: multithread score is 12243, single-thread is 2873, and integer math hits 40174, floating-point math 23091, data compression 152168, and data encryption 9051. The extended instructions score is 10887, and find prime numbers is 31. Physics score is 574, and random string sorting is 15294.

The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 70, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tested processors. Its average benchmark score is 16902, which places it in close company with several rivals. The nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7702 with an average score of 16932, a delta of -0.2% (the Ryzen is slightly behind). The Intel Core i3-12100E scores 16853, a +0.3% delta (the Ryzen is ahead). The Intel Core i5-1240U scores 16957, a -0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U scores 16827, a +0.4% delta. The differences are within one percent across the board, meaning the 7235HS sits in a tightly clustered performance band. For real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness for office tasks, spreadsheet crunching, and light code compilation, where the 8 threads and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth avoid obvious bottlenecks. The 8 MB L3 cache is small, so workloads that rely on large working sets — like some database queries or complex simulations — may see less benefit than a chip with more cache.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip. It has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores — a notable difference from NVIDIA rivals, meaning AI-accelerated workloads will rely on standard compute paths rather than dedicated tensor hardware. Clock speeds are a base of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2410 MHz. The memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, delivering 256.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus. The GPU’s TDP is 90 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The only benchmark score provided is Geekbench OpenCL at 63775. This places the GPU in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, which is a high ranking. Its average benchmark score is 63775, and the nearest rivals are clustered tightly. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, a -0.1% delta (the 7600M is slightly behind). The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842, a -0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, a +0.1% delta (the 7600M is ahead). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, a -0.7% delta. The spread is again under one percent, showing the 7600M performs at a specific tier. For rendering, the 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) figures indicate strong raw compute, which translates to capable 3D rendering and video encoding. The 8 GB VRAM is enough for 1080p gaming with high textures and for moderate 3D scenes, but 4K texture-heavy workloads may exceed it. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the 128-bit bus, but larger data sets will rely on the PCIe link.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all tested laptop configurations. The CPU’s percentile is 70, while the GPU’s is 89, indicating the graphics card is a stronger relative performer than the processor. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 16902 is closely matched by rivals: the EPYC 7702 is 0.2% ahead, the i3-12100E is 0.3% behind, the i5-1240U is 0.3% ahead, and the Ryzen 3 7335U is 0.4% behind. The GPU’s average score of 63775 is similarly tight: the RX 9060 XT LP is 0.1% ahead, the CMP 30HX is 0.1% ahead, the Pro Vega 56 is 0.1% behind, and the Pro WX 9100 is 0.7% ahead. The combined picture is a system where the GPU boosts the overall standing, while the CPU holds its own but does not dominate. In practical terms, the CPU will handle general computing without complaint, but the GPU will be the star in graphics-bound tasks. The 89th percentile GPU means this laptop is designed for gaming and GPU-accelerated work, not for heavy multi-threaded CPU crunching where the 4-core limit becomes apparent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU’s 89th percentile versus the CPU’s 70th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads — such as video encoding with x264, physics simulations, or software compilation — the 4-core/8-thread processor will be the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10418 is respectable for a quad-core, but it will lag behind 6-core or 8-core rivals in heavily threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 12243 reinforces this: it is a mid-range result, not a high-end one. For gaming, the bottleneck depends on the title. In GPU-heavy games at high settings, the RX 7600M will be the primary driver, and its 89th percentile means it can push high frame rates at 1080p. In CPU-heavy games — like strategy titles or simulators that rely on single-thread performance — the CPU’s R23 single-core score of 1470 may hold back the GPU. The single-thread Passmark of 2873 is solid, but not exceptional for a modern laptop chip. The FPS scaling data is absent, so we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck. However, the percentile gap suggests that for maximizing frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU has headroom; for CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will be waiting on the processor. A sensible builder would pair this GPU with a stronger CPU for pure gaming, but for a balanced laptop that does both productivity and gaming, this pairing works.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning upgrades are limited to the laptop’s design — you cannot swap the processor in most cases. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC capability. PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and an NVMe SSD. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU’s TDP is 90 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 45 W, for a combined 135 W of core power draw. There is no suggested PSU rating provided, and no launch MSRP exists. The platform’s memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is a potential upgrade point if you find a laptop that allows memory overclocking, but the architecture limits are fixed. For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be to move to a CPU with more cores — such as a 6-core or 8-core Zen 3+ part on the same socket — if the laptop BIOS supports it. However, with Socket FP7 being mobile-only, the practical upgrade path is limited to the GPU or memory in a future laptop purchase. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is adequate for current titles, but future games may require more. The 45 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP suggest a cooling solution that can handle sustained loads, but thermal headroom is a design constraint.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop builders and buyers who need a machine for gaming at 1080p and light-to-moderate content creation. The GPU’s 89th percentile makes it a strong choice for gamers who want high settings at 1080p without stepping up to a larger, heavier laptop. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current titles at that resolution, and the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high texture loads. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, which accelerates render times in GPU-accelerated applications like Blender or Premiere Pro. The CPU’s 4 cores are sufficient for timeline scrubbing and basic encoding, but heavy multi-layer edits may feel sluggish. Software developers will appreciate the 8 threads for compilation tasks and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth for data-intensive workloads. Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, with the GPU providing headroom for occasional gaming or CAD work. The 70th CPU percentile ensures it handles everyday tasks without frustration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600M’s 89th percentile and 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can drive 1080p high-refresh displays in most esports titles, though the CPU’s single-core score of 1470 in R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games. Expect smooth 60+ FPS in most titles at high settings, with dips in heavy simulation games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are a limitation for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 12243 suggests you can handle a single-stream encode, but you may need to drop to medium settings or use GPU encoding to avoid frame drops. The GPU has no tensor cores, so NVIDIA-style NVENC is not available; AMD’s encoding is functional but less efficient.

Video editing: The GPU’s 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates effects and color grading, and the 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p timelines with ease. The CPU’s 10418 R23 multicore score means export times are moderate, not fast — expect longer renders for 4K projects.

3D rendering: The GPU is the workhorse here, with 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 64 ROPs providing strong rasterization. The 89th percentile indicates it competes with desktop mid-range cards. The 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity; large textures will spill to system memory, which the 76.8 GB/s bandwidth helps but does not solve.

Software development: The 8 threads and 2873 single-thread Passmark score handle code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The 8 MB L3 cache is a minor bottleneck for incremental builds, but the overall performance is adequate for a mobile developer machine.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 70th percentile means it outperforms most office laptops. Spreadsheets, word processing, and web apps run effortlessly. The GPU is overkill for this use, but it provides future-proofing for part-time gaming or data visualization.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 5 7235HS have?

A: It has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with a 6 nm process.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM size and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of tested laptop configurations. The CPU is at 70th percentile, and the GPU is at 89th.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 4.20 GHz, while the base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC capability.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-12100E?

A: The Ryzen 5 7235HS has an average benchmark score of 16902, while the i3-12100E scores 16853, a +0.3% delta, meaning the Ryzen is slightly ahead.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and the data is marked as not measured. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775, its 89th percentile ranking, and the CPU’s benchmark scores. The GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest strong 1080p performance. At 1080p ultra settings, expect around 60-80 FPS in modern AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, based on the GPU’s tier. Esports titles like Valorant or CS:GO will likely exceed 144 FPS, limited by the CPU’s single-core score of 1470 in R23. At 1440p, frame rates will drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding games, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become limiting factors. At 4K, expect 20-30 FPS in most titles, which is playable but not ideal. The CPU’s 70th percentile ensures that in GPU-bound scenarios, it will not be the primary bottleneck, but in CPU-bound games, the 4-core limit may cap FPS below what the GPU can deliver. These are estimates, not measured results, so actual performance may vary by up to 10% depending on the laptop’s cooling and power delivery. For a more accurate assessment, look for reviews of laptops with the same GPU and a similar CPU. The GPU’s 89th percentile is a strong indicator that it will handle 1080p gaming well, but the lack of measured data means you should treat these figures as a planning guide, not a guarantee.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds