SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

22,897 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

This is an unusual pairing: a 15 W ultra-low-power mobile CPU from AMD’s 6000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture, combined with NVIDIA’s top-tier Ada Lovelace mobile GPU, the RTX 4080 Mobile. The data shows a system that sits at the 79th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings, but the two components occupy very different performance strata — the CPU is a 6-core/12-thread part with a 76th percentile ranking, while the GPU reaches the 81st percentile. This imbalance is the central story of the build: the RTX 4080 Mobile is capable of far more than the Ryzen 5 6600U can feed it in many workloads, yet the CPU’s efficiency and modern platform features still make this a coherent laptop-class system.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 15 W TDP that marks it as an efficiency-focused mobile part. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool. This is not a high-core-count workstation chip; it is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power draw and thermals are paramount.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s positioning. In Cinebench R23, the 6600U scores 9,159.5 in multi-core and 1,456.5 in single-core. The multi-core figure is modest by desktop standards, but the single-core score is respectable for a 15 W part, indicating that the Zen 3+ cores can sustain solid performance in lightly threaded tasks. Geekbench results tell a similar story: 6,618 multi-core and 1,673 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 17,026 and a single-thread score of 3,132, with the integer math score of 61,723 far outpacing the floating-point math score of 33,991 — a typical pattern for a CPU with a 6-core configuration where integer workloads scale better with the available cores.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 22,897 places it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are instructive: the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X scores 22,823, a 0.3% delta, meaning the 6600U essentially matches a desktop Ryzen 5 2600X in aggregate benchmarks despite a fraction of the power envelope. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is 0.5% behind, which makes sense as it is a close relative in the same series. The AMD EPYC 4124P is 1.2% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-12500H is 1.2% behind. These deltas are all within a few percentage points, so the 6600U sits in a very tight cluster of mid-range CPUs from different generations and market segments.

For real workloads, the data implies a CPU that handles everyday productivity, office applications, and light content creation competently, but will struggle with sustained multi-core rendering or heavy compilation tasks. The PassMark physics score of 825 is low, indicating limited computational throughput for simulation-heavy applications. The data compression score of 201,364 is strong, suggesting good performance in archiving and storage-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 13,356 shows reasonable AVX/AVX2 throughput, but the find prime numbers score of 51 is very low, indicating that the CPU is not optimized for heavy integer iteration loops.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a striking contrast in raw benchmark numbers. The Ryzen 5 6600U achieves an average benchmark score of 22,897, while the RTX 4080 Mobile averages 38,135. The GPU’s percentile rank is 81, five points higher than the CPU’s 76th percentile. The combined system percentile is 79, which reflects the GPU’s heavier weight in overall system performance.

Delving into the GPU scores: the RTX 4080 Mobile posts 159,575 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145,807 in Geekbench Vulkan, both strong compute numbers. In PassMark, the G3D score is 24,926, which is the primary gaming metric, and the GPU compute score is 11,191. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are 286, 157, 244, and 96 respectively, showing that the GPU scales well with modern API workloads — the DirectX 12 score is comparatively lower but still functional. The G2D score of 929 is modest, reflecting that 2D desktop compositing is not where this GPU’s strength lies.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are notable for their diversity. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38,299, a 0.4% delta, which is surprising given that the MX570 is a budget laptop GPU — the data suggests the RTX 4080 Mobile’s average is dragged down by thermal or power constraints in some laptops, or the MX570’s score is boosted by specific test conditions. The RTX 5080 Mobile is 0.6% ahead, and the RTX 4070 (desktop) is 1.3% behind. The Tesla P4, a datacenter inference card, is 1.3% behind. This clustering around the 38,000 mark means the RTX 4080 Mobile is not decisively ahead of its closest competitors in aggregate, but its peak FPS in gaming would be far higher due to its 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU dominates the CPU in raw compute by a factor of roughly 1.67 (38,135 vs 22,897). This means that in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or single-threaded logic, the GPU will sit idle. The 79th combined percentile confirms that this pairing outperforms most laptops, but the delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (5 points) is a warning sign for potential bottlenecks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 6600U is built for AMD Socket FP7, which is a BGA (ball-grid array) package, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. There is no socket-based upgrade path for the processor itself; the data shows no multiplier unlock and no desktop equivalent socket. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is a modern standard but not the fastest available. ECC memory is not supported, which limits the platform for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the RTX 4080 Mobile’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s bus interface is listed as PCIe 4.0 x16, so the CPU’s lanes are fully compatible, though in a laptop the GPU is typically wired through the chipset or directly to the CPU with fewer lanes. The TDP of the CPU is 15 W, while the GPU has a 110 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but the combined thermal envelope of 125 W is modest for a laptop, meaning the system could be powered by a standard 180-230 W AC adapter — this is not stated in the data, so it remains an inference from the TDP figures.

A sensible next upgrade, given the platform constraints, would not be a CPU swap. Instead, the data suggests that the only meaningful upgrade path is to the GPU or to the entire platform. The RTX 4080 Mobile is already at the 81st percentile, so a GPU upgrade would only be worthwhile if a future mobile GPU (like the RTX 5080 Mobile, which is 0.6% ahead in average score) becomes available in the same laptop chassis, which is unlikely. The more realistic upgrade is to a system with a higher-TDP CPU, such as an Intel Core i5-12500H (which is 1.2% behind the 6600U in CPU score), but that would require a new motherboard and memory. The DDR5 memory support is a positive, as it is forward-compatible with newer AMD and Intel platforms, so a user could carry over the RAM modules.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions would benefit most, as the RTX 4080 Mobile’s high FPS capabilities are best utilized at those resolutions where the CPU can keep up. The 76th percentile CPU means that at 4K, the GPU would be the bottleneck for many titles, but at lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,456.5) is adequate for most game engines.

Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., video editing in Adobe Premiere with CUDA, or 3D rendering in Blender with OptiX) would see strong performance from the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, even if the CPU is slower for CPU-based encoding. Software developers would find the 6 cores and 12 threads sufficient for compilation of small-to-medium projects, but the low PassMark physics score (825) suggests that heavy simulation or scientific computing is not a fit. Students and small business workstations would benefit from the system’s overall 79th percentile performance, which handles office productivity, web browsing, and light multitasking with ease, while the GPU provides headroom for occasional gaming or media tasks.

The integrated Radeon 660M graphics on the CPU are irrelevant when a discrete RTX 4080 Mobile is present, but they could be useful for battery-saving tasks if the laptop supports hybrid graphics switching. The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so performance must be inferred from the benchmark scores rather than game-specific results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 6600U and the RTX 4080 Mobile is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 22,897 is roughly 60% of the GPU’s 38,135, and the percentile gap of 5 points (76 vs 81) indicates that in a purely CPU-bound workload, the system will underperform relative to its GPU potential. The data does not include measured FPS, but the PassMark G3D score of 24,926 for the GPU versus the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 17,026 suggests that in gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at high resolutions (1440p and above), while at 1080p, the CPU may become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9,159.5 for the CPU is a clear indicator that sustained multi-threaded workloads will not feed the GPU adequately. For example, in a game that uses 8 or more threads, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads could saturate, causing frame drops even if the GPU has headroom. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like ray tracing (the RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 RT cores) or high-resolution textures (12 GB VRAM), the CPU will be idle, and the GPU will deliver its full potential. The PassMark data encryption score of 12,783 and extended instructions score of 13,356 suggest that the CPU is competent for encryption and AVX workloads, but these are not typical gaming tasks.

The bottleneck analysis points to a system that is GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios at 1440p and above, but CPU-limited in esports titles or competitive shooters at 1080p with low settings. The 0.3% delta to the Ryzen 5 2600X (a desktop chip) reinforces that the 6600U is a capable CPU, but it is not designed to keep up with a flagship mobile GPU in all situations. Users who play at 1080p with high refresh rates should expect the CPU to be the constraining factor; users at 1440p or 4K will see the GPU fully utilized.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 6600U a good match for the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The data shows a 5-point percentile gap (76 vs 81) and a CPU average score that is 60% of the GPU’s, so the CPU will bottleneck in CPU-bound workloads, but the GPU will dominate in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance compared to its multi-core?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,456.5 and multi-core is 9,159.5, a ratio of about 1:6.3, which is typical for a 6-core/12-thread part. Single-core performance is adequate for daily tasks.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 Mobile support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, as listed in the data, so it is fully compatible with current games and applications.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is the bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), and the CPU is soldered to the motherboard (Socket FP7), so no user overclocking or upgrade is possible.

Q: What is the memory type and speed?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is "laptop," and the GPU’s slot width is "IGP" (integrated in the package), confirming a mobile form factor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The base clock is 1,290 MHz with a boost clock of 1,665 MHz, and the memory clock is 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 1440p gaming and even 4K in many titles, though not as wide as desktop RTX 4080 parts.

The GPU has 7,424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS upscaling. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 throughput both rated at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The TDP is 110 W, which is high for a mobile GPU but manageable in a larger laptop chassis.

In benchmark terms, the RTX 4080 Mobile posts a PassMark G3D score of 24,926, which places it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 and Vulkan score of 145,807 indicate strong compute performance, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering and machine learning inference. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11,191 is solid, but the DirectX 12 score of 96 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 244, which could indicate driver overhead or a test-specific anomaly.

The nearest rivals are clustered closely: the MX570 is 0.4% ahead, the RTX 5080 Mobile is 0.6% ahead, and the RTX 4070 (desktop) is 1.3% behind. This tight grouping suggests that the RTX 4080 Mobile’s average score is not dramatically higher than mid-range options, but in gaming, the extra VRAM and bandwidth provide headroom for higher resolution and texture quality. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is a key advantage over 8 GB parts, as modern games at 1440p can exceed 8 GB VRAM usage.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining AMD’s Ryzen 5 6600U (a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ processor) with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (an Ada Lovelace GPU with 12 GB GDDR6). The combined percentile rank is 79, putting it above the majority of systems, but the component split shows a CPU at the 76th percentile and a GPU at the 81st percentile. The CPU’s 15 W TDP and the GPU’s 110 W TDP sum to 125 W, which is a modest total for a laptop with this level of GPU performance.

The pairing is unusual: the CPU is an efficiency-first part typically found in ultraportables, while the GPU is a high-performance part usually paired with a 45 W or higher TDP CPU. This creates a system that is more powerful than a typical ultrabook but less balanced than a gaming laptop with a stronger CPU. The RTX 4080 Mobile is the clear performance driver, and the CPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion. The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core score of 1,456.5 (Cinebench R23) may limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s G3D score of 24,926 can push very high FPS in most games. Expect CPU-bound scenarios in competitive shooters, but GPU-bound performance in AAA titles.

Streaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 232 tensor cores and 58 RT cores enable NVENC encoding and real-time ray tracing, making it well-suited for streaming at high bitrates. The CPU’s 12 threads can handle encoding overhead, though the low PassMark physics score (825) suggests limited headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: GPU-accelerated effects and exports will be fast due to the 432 GB/s bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The CPU’s multi-core score of 9,159.5 (Cinebench R23) is sufficient for 1080p timelines but may struggle with 4K multi-layer projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s Vulkan score of 145,807 and OpenCL score of 159,575 indicate strong performance in GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (OptiX) or Octane. CPU-based rendering will be slower, as the CPU’s multi-thread score is only 17,026 in PassMark.

Software development: The 6 cores and 12 threads handle compilation of small projects, and the 16 MB L3 cache aids in code locality. The PassMark integer math score of 61,723 is decent, but the low prime numbers score (51) suggests poor performance in loop-heavy algorithms.

Student and office work: The 76th percentile CPU easily handles word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, with the GPU providing massive headroom for any graphics tasks. The system’s 79th combined percentile ensures it is not overkill for productivity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all FPS figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,456.5 are the primary references for these estimates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4080 Mobile should deliver 120-165 FPS in most AAA titles, with the CPU potentially capping frame rates in games that rely heavily on single-threaded physics or draw calls. At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and frame rates of 90-140 FPS are estimated, as the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth handle the higher resolution without issue. At 4K, the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS and 80 ROPs would produce 60-100 FPS in many titles, though the CPU’s low multi-core score (9,159.5 in Cinebench R23) could cause frame pacing issues in CPU-heavy scenes.

Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant would be CPU-bound at 1080p with low settings, potentially reaching 200+ FPS, but the CPU’s single-core performance is not exceptional, so expect 150-200 FPS rather than 300+. Ray-traced titles would see a significant GPU load, with the 58 RT cores providing solid performance but the 110 W TDP limiting sustained clocks. Overall, the system is best treated as a 1440p gaming machine where the GPU is fully utilized, and the CPU is sufficient but not exceptional.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds