SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

22,897 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a specific configuration within the laptop market segment, combining a 6-core mobile processor with an integrated graphics solution based on a newer architecture. The data provided contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct empirical testing. This analysis relies solely on the provided benchmark indices, percentile rankings, and architectural specifications to characterize the system's capabilities.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, meaning the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all frame rate expectations presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both the CPU and GPU, not direct measurements from game testing.

The Radeon 860M's benchmark performance provides the primary basis for gaming estimates. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 indicate a level of compute capability that, in the integrated graphics space, places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 positions it nearly identically to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the Radeon 860M is essentially on par with that discrete entry-level laptop GPU.

For modern titles, the combination of the Ryzen 5 6600U's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1456.5) and the Radeon 860M's 512 shading units suggests playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in many esports and older titles. At ultra settings, frame rates would likely drop significantly, with the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute limiting performance in graphically demanding scenes. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but given the overall compute throughput, ray-traced effects would likely require reduced resolutions or significant upscaling to maintain playable frame rates.

At 1440p, the estimates become more conservative; the GPU's memory bandwidth being "System Dependent" means performance scales with the laptop's DDR5 memory configuration. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the system shares memory bandwidth between CPU and GPU workloads, which would particularly impact frame rates at higher resolutions where memory pressure increases. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support serves as the ceiling for the GPU's memory access, which is modest compared to discrete GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22897 places it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, indicating solid mid-range performance for a mobile processor. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, scores 22823, with the 6600U leading by 0.3%. The Ryzen 5 7535U trails by 0.5%, while the AMD EPYC 4124P leads the 6600U by 1.2%, and the Intel Core i5-12500H trails by 1.2%. These tight margins, all within approximately 1.2% of each other, place the 6600U in a competitive performance band where architectural differences, rather than raw score advantages, likely determine workload suitability.

Specific CPU benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9159.5, which is approximately 6.3 times the single-core score of 1456.5, indicating strong multi-threading scaling from the 6 cores and 12 threads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 6618 versus a single-core score of 1673 similarly reflects this scaling pattern. PassMark results show a multithread score of 17026, with integer math at 61723 and floating-point math at 33991, suggesting balanced ALU and FPU performance for mixed workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs places it in a different competitive context. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26421, with the Radeon 860M trailing by just 0.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331, meaning the Radeon 860M leads it by 0.3%, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (leading by 0.6%) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26683 (leading by 1.1%). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, suggesting the system as a whole outperforms the majority of laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Radeon 860M's performance level, estimated near the GeForce MX550 based on the 0.1% delta, would likely support frame rates exceeding 60 FPS in esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings, but the 3.072 TFLOPS compute limit suggests that maintaining 144Hz or higher in demanding titles would require substantial graphical compromises.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9159.5 providing the headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming software running in the background. The 12 threads allow for dedicated encoding tasks without completely saturating the CPU, though the 15W TDP limits sustained all-core boost behavior.

Video editing in applications that leverage GPU acceleration would see mixed results. The Radeon 860M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 suggests it can accelerate effects and rendering, but the system-shared memory architecture means large 4K timelines could experience memory bandwidth bottlenecks. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 201364 handles codec operations efficiently, while the floating-point math score of 33991 supports color grading computations.

3D rendering workloads, particularly CPU-based rendering, would rely heavily on the 6600U's multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1493 and R23 score of 9159.5 indicate that while the processor is capable, it is not a workstation-class chip. GPU-accelerated rendering would be limited by the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, making this configuration suitable for light preview renders rather than final production output.

Software development benefits from the balanced CPU scores: the PassMark single-thread score of 3132 handles code compilation of single translation units, while the multithread score of 17026 accelerates parallel builds. The data encryption score of 12783 supports secure development workflows, though the lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory: false) may be a consideration for certain enterprise development environments.

Student and office work is well-served by this configuration. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking and the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking ensure smooth operation for document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web-based applications. The 6 cores handle multitasking across multiple office applications, and the integrated graphics, while not gaming-focused, provide ample performance for 2D interfaces and video playback.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Ryzen 5 6600U and Radeon 860M reveals distinct workload-dependent bottleneck characteristics. In gaming, the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics solution, meaning frame rates would be constrained by the Radeon 860M's compute throughput rather than the CPU's ability to feed it. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest, and the system-shared memory bandwidth, capped at the CPU's 76.8 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 support, further restricts GPU performance.

In CPU-bound scenarios such as physics calculations, video encoding, or software compilation, the Ryzen 5 6600U becomes the limiting factor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9159.5, while competitive for a 15W mobile chip, is not high in absolute terms. The PassMark physics score of 825 indicates limited computational physics throughput, which would bottleneck game physics or simulation workloads.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU bottleneck dominates in most gaming scenarios, while at lower resolutions (720p), the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1456.5) becomes relatively more important. The deltaPct between the CPU and its rivals, all within 1.2%, indicates that the 6600U is not a meaningful bottleneck compared to similar-class processors, but the GPU's performance relative to the RTX 5060 (leading by 0.3%) and RTX A4000 (trailing by 1.1%) shows it holds its own in its segment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 6600U uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket not designed for user upgrades. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating that overclocking is not a supported feature. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum theoretical memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is shared between the CPU and the integrated Radeon 860M, meaning that upgrading to faster DDR5 modules could improve both CPU and GPU performance, though the specific speed support is not detailed in the data.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This bandwidth allocation is sufficient for the integrated GPU, but a discrete GPU upgrade would require a laptop with a compatible slot, which is not applicable to this specific configuration.

The GPU has a TDP of 15W and requires no power connectors, with no suggested PSU listed. The CPU's TDP is also 15W, meaning the combined thermal and power envelope for both components is approximately 30W, though dynamic power sharing between CPU and GPU in a laptop platform is common. The GPU's "System Shared" memory type means there is no dedicated VRAM to upgrade; memory capacity is determined by the system's DDR5 configuration.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be increasing the system's DDR5 memory capacity and speed, as this would directly benefit both CPU memory bandwidth and GPU performance. Given the GPU's "System Dependent" bandwidth specification, faster memory would likely yield measurable improvements in GPU-bound workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users seeking a balanced laptop for everyday computing and light gaming. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings in less demanding titles would find the Radeon 860M's performance, estimated near the GeForce MX550, sufficient for playable frame rates. The 72nd percentile GPU ranking means it outperforms the majority of integrated solutions.

Content creators working with photos and light video editing would benefit from the CPU's 76th percentile ranking and the GPU's OpenCL acceleration. The PassMark data compression score of 201364 supports efficient file handling, while the 6 cores handle multitasking between creative applications.

Software developers would find the balanced CPU performance adequate for compilation tasks, with the PassMark multithread score of 17026 and single-thread score of 3132 providing a reasonable mix. The lack of ECC memory support might be a drawback for certain professional workflows.

Students and office workers represent the primary target audience, as the configuration handles document processing, web browsing, and productivity applications without strain. The 15W TDP of both CPU and GPU indicates efficient operation, suitable for all-day battery life in a laptop form factor. Small business workstations would find this configuration sufficient for standard office software, with the integrated graphics handling display outputs without requiring a separate GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, indicating this laptop configuration outperforms the majority of systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 860M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, which is 0.1% lower than the GeForce MX550's score of 26421, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U scores 9159.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is approximately 6.3 times its single-core score of 1456.5.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU's eccMemory field is false, meaning ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 5 6600U use?

A: The processor uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's release date?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has a release date of 2025-02-28.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 6600U mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper quarter of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking and the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking indicate a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically outperforms the other, though the CPU holds a slight relative advantage. This is not a high-end gaming or workstation machine; rather, it represents a competent mid-range laptop configuration suitable for general computing, light content creation, and casual gaming at modest settings.

The Radeon 860M is notable for being a newer architecture (RDNA 3.5) integrated into the system, released in early 2025, while the Ryzen 5 6600U is based on the Zen 3+ architecture. The 4nm process node for the GPU versus the 6nm node for the CPU reflects the generational difference between the components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 6000 series, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename. It operates at a base clock of 2.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, within a 15W TDP. The CPU is fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process with a die size of 208 mm².

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics, though the system uses the separate Radeon 860M GPU.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1493 and single-core score of 233. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9159.5 and single-core score of 1456.5 indicate strong multi-threading efficiency. Geekbench scores of 6618 (multi-core) and 1673 (single-core) confirm this pattern. PassMark results show a multithread score of 17026, with specific workloads including data compression at 201364, data encryption at 12783, and floating-point math at 33991.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22897 places it at the 76th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X at 22823 (0.3% lower). The Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22625, trailing by 1.2%. These close margins suggest the 6600U is competitively positioned within its performance class, though the 15W TDP means sustained workloads may not achieve the same performance as higher-power rivals.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, with the chip codename Krackan Point, part of the Navi III IGP generation. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4nm process and features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, with no dedicated tensor cores listed.

The base clock is 600 MHz with a boost clock of 3000 MHz. Memory is system shared, with the bus width and bandwidth listed as "System Dependent," meaning performance varies based on the host system's DDR5 memory configuration. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 3.072 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043. The average benchmark score of 26401 places the GPU at the 72nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26421, with the Radeon 860M trailing by just 0.1%. The GPU leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (scoring 26331) by 0.3% and trails the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (scoring 26553) by 0.6%. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's TDP is 15W with no power connectors required, and its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its laptop-integrated nature. The 3.072 TFLOPS compute performance, while modest compared to discrete GPUs, represents a significant capability for an integrated solution, supporting the 72nd percentile ranking.