SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
72%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS

3,122 Benchmark Score
Top 28% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile pairing represents a mid-range laptop configuration. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ part on a 6 nm TSMC process, sits at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, ranks higher at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Together, they form a balanced system for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, though the data shows the GPU is the stronger component. The following analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark scores, architectural specifications, and comparative data to detail the system's capabilities, limitations, and ideal use cases.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 35 W, a figure typical for high-performance thin-and-light laptops. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the middle of the pack. In Cinebench R23, it scores 9131 points in multi-core and 1465 points in single-core tests. The single-core score of 1465 is modest, reflecting the 4.50 GHz boost clock, while the multi-core score of 9131 benefits from the 6-core/12-thread configuration. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3122, which places the CPU at the 52nd percentile of all CPUs tracked. This means the 6600HS outperforms slightly more than half of all processors in the database.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are tight. The AMD Ryzen 3 5425U scores 3124, a delta of -0.1%, making it essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i3-13100TE scores 3111, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U scores 3096, 0.8% lower, and the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 scores 3154, which is 1% higher. These sub-1% differences indicate that the 6600HS sits in a crowded performance band where architectural differences translate to negligible real-world impact.

For real workloads, the 6600HS handles multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering competently for a 35 W part. The 12 threads provide enough parallelism for productivity applications. However, the single-core performance of 1465 in Cinebench R23 suggests that lightly-threaded tasks, such as web browsing or office document editing, will not feel sluggish but will not stand out against higher-clocked competitors. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which aids in gaming scenarios where data reuse is common. The DDR5 memory support, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, ensures the CPU is not starved for data in memory-intensive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this build is 60, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 60% of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 52nd percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile reveal a clear imbalance: the GPU is the stronger component. This is typical for gaming laptops, where the discrete GPU is prioritized over the CPU.

In gaming workloads, the RTX 4060 Mobile is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU may become a bottleneck at lower resolutions with high frame rates. The CPU's single-core score of 1465 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can sustain high frame rates in most titles, but extremely CPU-intensive games may see the processor cap out before the GPU reaches its full potential. The GPU's 67th percentile versus the CPU's 52nd percentile indicates a 15-percentile-point gap, which is substantial. In practical terms, this means that in GPU-bound scenarios, such as 1440p or 4K gaming, the RTX 4060 Mobile will be fully utilized while the CPU idles. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p e-sports titles with low graphical settings, the CPU may limit frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. However, the percentile gap strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of gaming performance. For content creation, the CPU's 9131 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 will handle moderate rendering tasks, but the GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6816, can accelerate certain workflows. The balance favors gaming over heavy CPU multi-threading, as the GPU's higher percentile means it will deliver a larger share of the system's overall capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific socket. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard, and upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense. Users are limited to the CPU they purchase. The memory support is DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus. The maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is fixed by the platform, so memory upgrades will not increase bandwidth beyond this figure. The system supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the RTX 4060 Mobile's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU, as the x8 link is not a bottleneck for this class of graphics card.

The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 35 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 150 W. The suggested PSU field is null, but the TDP figures indicate that a typical laptop power adapter of around 180-200 W would be sufficient. No PSU headroom numbers are provided, so a sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity, as the DDR5 standard supports higher capacities. The CPU's integrated graphics, Radeon 660M, can serve as a fallback for light tasks when the discrete GPU is disabled, but it is not suitable for gaming. The platform is otherwise locked, with no unlocked multiplier on the CPU, preventing overclocking. The production status for both components is active, meaning they are still in the market, but the release date for the GPU is January 2, 2023, making it a recent but not current generation part.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets mobile users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a laptop form factor. The build class is "laptop," confirming this is a portable system. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile GPU performance sufficient for high settings in most titles. The CPU's 52nd percentile ensures that frame rates will not be severely limited in most games. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6816, and the CPU's 9131 multi-core Cinebench R23 score. Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads for compilation tasks, though the single-core score of 1465 is not exceptional for rapid iterative builds.

Students and small business workstations will find this configuration more than adequate for productivity tasks, given the CPU's 52nd percentile ranking. The system is not designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads like professional 3D rendering or scientific computing, where higher-core-count CPUs would be preferable. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light creative work but may limit texture-heavy workloads at higher resolutions. The 60th combined percentile suggests this is a mainstream system, not a high-end enthusiast machine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 1656, single-core scores 235. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 9131, single-core scores 1465. The average benchmark score is 3122, placing the CPU at the 52nd percentile. The GPU benchmarks include Geekbench OpenCL at 89420, Geekbench Vulkan at 89569, and Passmark scores: DirectX 10 at 107, DirectX 11 at 157, DirectX 12 at 73, DirectX 9 at 216, G2D at 730, G3D at 17469, and GPU Compute at 6816. The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The GPU's average score of 22729 is over seven times higher than the CPU's 3122, though this is expected given the different benchmark suites. The CPU's percentile of 52 is near the median, while the GPU's 67th percentile is above average. This means that in gaming, the system will perform better than a typical laptop in its class, but the CPU may hold back the GPU in CPU-intensive titles. The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22549 (0.8% lower), the Intel Arc B580 at 23021 (1.3% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 22435 (1.3% lower). These deltas indicate that the RTX 4060 Mobile is performance-competitive with a previous-generation desktop flagship, which is a strong result for a mobile part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 67th percentile and the CPU's 52nd percentile suggest that 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable. The RTX 4060 Mobile's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for frame rates above 100 FPS in many titles at medium-to-high settings. The CPU's 1465 single-core score should not bottleneck at these frame rates in most games.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, offloads video encoding from the CPU. The CPU's 9131 multi-core Cinebench R23 score can handle the game and streaming overhead simultaneously, but the 6-core/12-thread configuration may struggle with very demanding games while encoding. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for streaming at 1080p.

Video editing: The GPU's Passmark GPU Compute score of 6816 accelerates effects and rendering in applications like Premiere Pro. The CPU's 12 threads handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The 9131 multi-core score is adequate for 1080p editing, but 4K projects may see slower export times compared to higher-core CPUs.

3D rendering: The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance is competitive with a desktop RTX 2080, as evidenced by the -0.7% delta. The CPU's 9131 multi-core score is a secondary factor in GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles.

Software development: The CPU's 12 threads compile code efficiently, with a multi-core score of 9131. The single-core score of 1465 is adequate for interactive IDEs. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development tasks unless running CUDA-based workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's 52nd percentile is more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The integrated Radeon 660M can handle basic graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, saving power. The 8 GB VRAM on the discrete GPU is irrelevant for these tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is at the 52nd percentile, meaning it outperforms 52% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile scores an average of 22729, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 2080's 22895, making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 115 W.

Q: What is the build class for this configuration?

A: The build class is "laptop," indicating a mobile system.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 115 W TDP. The combined percentile is 60, placing this system above average but not in the high-end tier. The GPU's 67th percentile dominates the CPU's 52nd percentile, making this a GPU-first configuration. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming and light-to-moderate creative work, where the GPU's capabilities are fully utilized. The CPU is adequate for most tasks but will not excel in heavily multi-threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 159 mm², containing 18,900 million transistors, for a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. It features 24 RT cores for ray tracing and 96 tensor cores for AI acceleration. Clock speeds are 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with an effective speed of 16 Gbps and a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The average benchmark score is 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile.

Benchmark results show strong compute performance: Geekbench OpenCL scores 89420, and Vulkan scores 89569. Passmark G3D scores 17469, with GPU Compute at 6816. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scores 22895, a delta of -0.7%, meaning the mobile 4060 is essentially a match for the desktop 2080. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is 0.8% slower, and the Intel Arc B580 is 1.3% faster. For rendering, the 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 96 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for 1440p or 4K textures, but the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 67th percentile and the CPU's 52nd percentile suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely in the 60-100 FPS range for AAA games and higher for e-sports. The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary drivers of gaming performance. The CPU's 9131 multi-core Cinebench R23 score ensures that most games will not be CPU-limited at 1080p, but at lower resolutions with high frame rates, the CPU may become a bottleneck. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the 8 GB VRAM may require reduced texture quality in some games. The system is not designed for 4K gaming, as the GPU's performance tier is insufficient for consistent 60 FPS at that resolution. These figures are estimates, as no measured FPS data is available.