SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

28,940 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop configuration that sits in the 88th percentile overall, indicating a high-performance pairing. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part on the mature AM4 socket, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace accelerator. Benchmark results place the CPU at the 81st percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 95th percentile among all graphics cards, showing that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing. No measured frames-per-second data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, one of the most enduring sockets in recent memory, supporting the Ryzen 5 5600XT with DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Memory bandwidth is rated at 51.2 GB/s, and the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation tasks that demand data integrity. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth GPU like the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU can run at full bandwidth without bottlenecking from the interface.

The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is modest for a 6-core part, and the GPU has a 130W TDP. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 300W, which is a low requirement for a card of this performance class. This suggests that a system with this pairing does not require an oversized PSU, leaving ample headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The GPU is a single-slot design, 245 mm in length, and requires a single 16-pin power connector, making it physically compact and easy to fit into most ATX or even smaller form-factor cases.

The upgrade path from this platform is straightforward: the AM4 socket has been a long-lived platform, but the 5000 series is near the end of its lifecycle. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count AM4 CPU within the same series, assuming the motherboard BIOS supports it, since the 65W TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for a more powerful chip. Alternatively, the GPU could be swapped for a newer workstation adapter, as the PCIe 4.0 slot is forward-compatible. However, the data shows that the current CPU scores 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i7-12650H and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i5-12600H, so it is not a weak link that demands immediate replacement. The platform is well-balanced for its intended use, with the primary limitation being the dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth, which is sufficient for the CPU's 51.2 GB/s rating but not expandable to quad-channel.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 indicate a very high level of compute capability, which translates to strong rasterization and compute performance in games. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,643 is competitive, suggesting that the system can handle high-refresh-rate gaming in esports titles where CPU speed matters.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU is likely to be the primary performance driver, as the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is far above what most games require at that resolution. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking means it is faster than most processors, so it should not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. However, in CPU-intensive games with many physics calculations or AI agents, the 6-core/12-thread configuration might show its limits, given that the CPU is only 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900H in average benchmark score.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth become more relevant, as higher resolutions require more memory and bandwidth. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile GPU score means it outperforms 95% of all GPUs, so it should deliver playable frame rates at this resolution in most titles. The GPU's 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects and DLSS, which can boost performance in supported games. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, as many high-end games at 4K can exceed 16 GB of usage, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 64 ROPs and 192 TMUs.

It is important to note that these are estimates, not measured results, and real-world gaming performance can vary based on driver optimizations, game engine quirks, and CPU-GPU scaling. The pairRankByFps field is null, meaning there is no comparative FPS data against other pairings, so the estimates should be treated with caution. The data does show that the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,469 is strong, which is a good indicator for games that rely on single-core performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process node. The chip contains 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, which is a high transistor density for a mainstream part. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 cache, which is a large pool for a 6-core CPU and helps with gaming and productivity workloads.

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across various tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18,724 in multi-core and 2,643 in single-core, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms 81% of processors, which is impressive for a 6-core part. The multi-core score of 18,724 indicates that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, though it will be slower than 8-core or 12-core parts. The single-core score of 2,643 is competitive with many higher-core-count parts, making it suitable for tasks that are latency-sensitive, such as gaming and certain scientific simulations.

PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 22,283 and a single-thread score of 3,469. The integer math score of 71,063 and floating point math score of 40,537 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the data compression score of 257,118 and data encryption score of 15,944 suggest good performance in file archiving and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 17,450 shows that the CPU handles AVX-512-like workloads well, which is relevant for scientific computing and some content creation apps. The physics score of 1,322 and prime number finding score of 143 are lower relative to other tests, which is typical for a 6-core part in these specific workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900H and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i5-12600H, but 0.5% slower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the Ryzen 5 5600XT is effectively on par with these mobile and desktop processors in average benchmark score. The 65W TDP is low, making the CPU easy to cool with a capable air cooler, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking if the user has adequate cooling.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a strong CPU for general productivity and a much stronger GPU for compute-heavy workstation tasks. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and 95th percentile ranking make it ideal for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific visualization, where large datasets and high-resolution textures are common. The CPU's 32 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support these workloads by providing fast access to frequently used data.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution with ultra settings are a primary audience, as the GPU is the dominant component and can handle demanding graphics loads. The CPU's 81st percentile performance is sufficient for gaming at these resolutions, where the GPU is typically the bottleneck. Content creators who use applications that leverage both CPU and GPU, such as video editing suites that use hardware encoding, will benefit from the 12 threads and the GPU's tensor cores for AI-accelerated effects.

Developers working on large codebases will find the CPU's multi-thread score of 18,724 in Cinebench R23 useful for compilation, while the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS can accelerate machine learning training and inference. Students in engineering or computer science fields can use the ECC memory support for data integrity in long-running simulations. Small business workstations that need to run CAD software, financial modeling, or database applications will find the combination of 6 fast cores and a workstation GPU with 20 GB VRAM to be a robust solution. The single-slot GPU design is also beneficial for multi-GPU setups or dense server environments, although the data only covers a single-GPU configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU has an average benchmark score of 28,940 and sits at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H with an average score of 29,093, which is 0.5% higher, while the Intel Core i9-13900H at 28,886 is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-12600H and Intel Core i7-12650H also have average scores of 28,882 and 28,815, respectively, placing them 0.2% and 0.4% lower. These small deltas mean the Ryzen 5 5600XT is competitively positioned against a wide range of rival processors.

The GPU has an average benchmark score of 135,218 and sits at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M at 135,230, which is statistically tied with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135,396 is 0.1% higher, the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135,774 is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136,472 is 0.9% higher. The GPU is thus at the very top of its class, outperforming 95% of all graphics cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 88, which is lower than the GPU's 95th percentile but higher than the CPU's 81st percentile. This indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of overall system performance, and the CPU is a secondary factor. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 for the GPU show strong compute performance, while the CPU's Cinebench scores of 18,724 multi-core and 2,643 single-core provide a balanced picture of a system that is heavily weighted toward GPU compute but has a capable CPU for general tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,500 MHz with a boost clock of 2,175 MHz, and the memory operates at 2,250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps.

The memory configuration is 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. This is a large amount of VRAM for a workstation card, which is crucial for rendering large scenes, training large neural networks, or processing high-resolution video. The 160-bit bus width is narrower than some competitors, but the high effective memory speed helps compensate. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, which are high figures that support high-resolution rendering.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 26.73 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and beneficial for workloads that can use FP16 precision. The ray tracing cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI-based features like DLSS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

In terms of benchmark performance, the GPU scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores are at the 95th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M with a score of 135,230, which is a 0% delta, so the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is essentially tied with that card. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo are 0.1% and 0.4% higher, respectively, while the Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% higher. These small deltas show that the GPU is at the top of the workstation GPU hierarchy, with only a few cards marginally ahead.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the GPU is clearly the dominant component, with a 95th percentile ranking compared to the CPU's 81st percentile. In GPU-intensive workloads such as 3D rendering, machine learning, or high-resolution gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have enough headroom to feed it. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is far above what the CPU's 6 cores can generate in terms of vertex or geometry processing, so the system is well-balanced for tasks that rely on GPU compute.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation, data compression, or single-threaded applications, the CPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,469 is strong, but the 6-core/12-thread configuration means that heavily threaded tasks will not scale as well as they would on an 8-core or 12-core part. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724 is respectable but lower than what high-core-count parts achieve, so tasks like video encoding that use all threads will be limited by the CPU.

The FPS scaling in gaming is a useful indicator of balance. While no measured FPS data exists, the CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 95th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the GPU might not be fully utilized in CPU-light games, as the CPU could become the bottleneck. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, which is ideal because the GPU is the stronger component. The 20 GB VRAM on the GPU ensures that memory capacity is not a bottleneck at any resolution, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the GPU's compute units.

The combined percentile of 88 is higher than the CPU's 81st percentile but lower than the GPU's 95th percentile, showing that the CPU drags down the overall system score slightly. This is not a problem for most users, as the CPU is still faster than 81% of all processors, but it does mean that in a few scenarios, the CPU will limit the GPU's performance. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 130W TDP of the GPU are both low, so thermal throttling is unlikely to be an issue, and the 300W suggested PSU provides ample power headroom.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop configuration that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, a 6-core Zen 3 processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, a workstation-class GPU based on Ada Lovelace. The CPU is a mainstream part with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is a high-end workstation accelerator with a 130W TDP, making the pairing unbalanced in favor of the GPU. The combined percentile of 88 indicates that this system outperforms 88% of all configurations, placing it in the upper tier of desktop builds.

The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and the GPU's 95th percentile ranking show that the GPU is the star of the show, and the CPU is a supporting player. This is a common configuration for workstation systems where GPU compute is the primary workload, such as 3D rendering, scientific simulation, or AI development. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM is a standout feature, providing ample capacity for large datasets, and its 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is among the highest in its class. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for most productivity tasks, but not for heavy multi-threaded workloads where a higher-core-count CPU would be better.

The system is well-suited for users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU performance, and the single-slot GPU design makes it easy to integrate into a variety of cases. The platform is mature, using AM4 and DDR4, which are well-supported and cost-effective. The 300W suggested PSU requirement is low, making the system easy to power. Overall, this is a high-tier desktop build with a strong focus on GPU compute, and it is a sensible choice for professionals who need workstation-class graphics performance without the expense of a full high-core-count CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 88, meaning it outperforms 88% of all configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 28,940, which is 0.5% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H at 29,093, but 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i5-12600H.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to the AMD Radeon PRO W6800?

A: The GPU sits at the 95th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 135,218 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon PRO W6800's score of 135,396.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for gaming performance?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU, and why is it significant?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s, which is significant for handling large datasets and high-resolution textures in workstation and gaming workloads.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts, and what is its boost clock?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU, and what is the CPU's TDP?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 300W and a TDP of 130W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65W.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds