SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

28,940 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 pairing is a desktop build that combines a six-core Zen 3 processor with a current-generation Blackwell 2.0 graphics card. The benchmark data places this combination at the 82nd percentile overall, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the majority of configurations tracked in the database. Because there are no measured frames-per-second rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 263 mm² containing 31,100 million transistors. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, which yields a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth for a 12 GB frame buffer, making it suitable for high-resolution texture streaming and compute tasks that require rapid data movement. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 28 Gbps effective, and the base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz.

The shader configuration includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The RT cores number 48, and there are 192 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads respectively. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These specifications indicate a GPU that is not just for rasterization but is heavily geared toward hybrid rendering pipelines that mix traditional shading with ray-traced effects and DLSS-style upscaling.

In benchmark terms, the RTX 5070 scores 5077 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses the GPU’s overall rendering capability. The Geekbench scores are strong: 172,660 in OpenCL and 178,923 in Vulkan, suggesting robust compute and API-specific performance. The PassMark G3D score is 29,137, while the GPU compute score is 15,787. The GPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,377. The nearest rivals are professional and mobile workstation cards: the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (deltaPct 0.8), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (deltaPct -1.2). This context shows the RTX 5070 is performing in the same league as these pro cards, which is notable because those are often optimized for compute and stability rather than raw gaming throughput.

For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are the key differentiators. The 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for heavy 3D rendering in applications that leverage CUDA or OptiX, and the 672 GB/s memory bandwidth will help when working with large scenes or high-resolution textures that exceed the 12 GB frame buffer. However, the 12 GB VRAM capacity is the limiting factor for extreme 4K texture packs or massive simulations. The benchmark scores suggest the GPU handles DirectX 12 and Vulkan workloads with high efficiency, which is critical for modern game engines and rendering APIs.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT show a mature Zen 3 design. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1887 points in multi-core and 266 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 7864 multi-core and 1110 single-core. In Cinebench R23, which is a more sustained workload, the multi-core score is 18,724 and the single-core score is 2,643. The PassMark suite reveals a multi-threaded score of 22,283, a single-thread score of 3,469, and a physics score of 1,322. Data compression in PassMark is 257,118, data encryption is 15,944, and extended instructions score 17,450. Floating point math is 40,537, integer math is 71,063, and random string sorting is 26,693. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 28,940, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals for the CPU are all mobile processors, which is an interesting data point. The Intel Core i9-13900H has an average score of 28,886, a deltaPct of 0.2, meaning the Ryzen 5 5600XT is slightly ahead. The Intel Core i5-12600H is at 28,882 (deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core i7-12650H is at 28,815 (deltaPct 0.4). The only rival ahead is the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H at 29,093 (deltaPct -0.5), which means the Ryzen is behind that chip by half a percent. This is a notable finding: a desktop six-core CPU is essentially trading blows with higher-tier mobile processors from Intel, which speaks to the efficiency of the Zen 3 architecture at 65 W TDP.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 40,377 places it at the 82nd percentile. The combined percentile for the build is also 82, which suggests that the CPU and GPU are well-matched in terms of their overall benchmark standings. The CPU is at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 82nd, so neither component is drastically pulling the system down or holding the other back in synthetic benchmarks. The combined picture is a system that is above average in every metric, with the GPU providing the majority of the raw compute power for graphics-intensive tasks while the CPU holds its own in multi-threaded productivity.

The data shows that the CPU is roughly 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900H and i5-12600H in average score, and 0.4% ahead of the i7-12650H. The GPU is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% ahead of the Radeon Pro WX 7100, but 1.2% behind the Radeon Pro 5300. These deltas are small, indicating that the components are positioned in a competitive performance tier where small architectural advantages matter more than raw clock speeds.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Given the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 and its 82nd percentile ranking, the RTX 5070 should be capable of handling demanding titles at high settings. The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672 GB/s bandwidth suggest that 1440p is the sweet spot for this card, with the memory capacity sufficient for high-resolution textures without immediate stuttering. At 1080p, the GPU should be able to push very high frame rates in most games, likely exceeding 120 FPS in esports titles and staying above 60 FPS in AAA games with ray tracing enabled. At 4K, the 12 GB VRAM may become a constraint in the most VRAM-hungry titles, but the 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should still deliver playable frame rates in less demanding scenarios.

The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads boosting to 4.70 GHz, should not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most games, though some highly threaded titles might show limitation. The single-core performance is strong, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,643, which is critical for game logic and physics. In CPU-bound scenarios like large multiplayer battles or strategy games, the Ryzen 5 5600XT should keep frame times stable, but the 6-core limit will show its age in the most modern games that are starting to scale beyond eight threads. The estimates suggest that this pairing is best suited for 1440p gaming, where the GPU is the primary performance driver, and the CPU provides enough headroom to avoid major frame pacing issues.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 82 is directly between the CPU’s 81st percentile and the GPU’s 82nd percentile, indicating a balanced pairing. In synthetic benchmarks, neither component is significantly outclassing the other. However, the real-world bottleneck depends on the workload. For GPU-intensive tasks like rendering at 4K or ray tracing, the RTX 5070 will be the limiting factor, as the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus are the ceiling for extreme resolutions. The CPU, with its 65 W TDP and 6 cores, will be the bottleneck in lightly threaded or CPU-bound tasks like physics simulations or strategy games that rely on single-core speed.

The FPS scaling estimates support this: at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,643) is strong enough to feed the GPU, but the GPU will still dictate the maximum frame rate. At 1440p, the balance shifts to the GPU, and the CPU’s 6 cores should be sufficient to avoid major dips. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the 12 GB memory capacity may cause texture thrashing, and the 80 ROPs will limit pixel throughput. The PassMark physics score of 1,322 is relatively low, which suggests that the CPU will struggle in workloads that rely heavily on physics calculations, potentially causing frame rate drops in games with complex destructible environments.

The deltaPct values against rivals are telling. The CPU is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900H, but that rival is a mobile chip with different power characteristics. The GPU is 2% behind the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, which is a professional mobile card. This suggests that the desktop RTX 5070 is not significantly faster than a high-end mobile workstation GPU, which could mean that in a desktop chassis, the GPU is not being fully utilized in terms of power delivery, or that the benchmark scores reflect a card that is thermally constrained. For most gaming, the CPU will be the limiting factor at 1080p, while the GPU becomes the limit at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is a modest 65 W. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. It has no integrated graphics, which means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

In real workloads, the benchmark scores paint a clear picture. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724 is strong for a 6-core part, indicating that the Zen 3 architecture extracts high performance per core. The single-core score of 2,643 is excellent, suggesting that lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and older games will run with minimal latency. The PassMark integer math score of 71,063 and floating point score of 40,537 indicate good general-purpose compute, while the data compression score of 257,118 shows proficiency in archive management and compression tasks. The data encryption score of 15,944 is moderate, reflecting the lack of dedicated hardware encryption accelerators, but it is sufficient for everyday use.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking means it outperforms 81% of all CPUs in the database, which is remarkable for a mid-range part. The nearest rivals being mobile processors (i9-13900H, i5-12600H, i7-12650H, Core Ultra 5 135H) suggests that this desktop CPU is competing with high-end laptop chips that often have higher boost clocks but are power-limited. For content creators, the 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for video encoding and photo editing, though the lack of more cores will be felt in long renders. For software developers, the 32 MB L3 cache and strong single-thread score are beneficial for compilation and code analysis. The 65 W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice for always-on workstations.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop system for gaming and productivity, but the data points to specific niches. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 82nd percentile ranking make it ideal for gamers playing at 1440p with high refresh rates, as the memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s is sufficient for high-quality textures, and the 48 RT cores handle ray tracing without tanking frame rates. Users who play at 1080p will find the system overkill in most titles, but it will provide a future-proofing buffer for upcoming game engines that rely more heavily on GPU compute.

Content creators who work with 3D rendering, video editing, or graphic design will benefit from the GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 compute and the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724 means it can handle 4K video transcoding and After Effects composition, while the GPU accelerates rendering in Blender or DaVinci Resolve. However, the 12 GB VRAM is a limit for very large scenes, so users working with 8K assets or massive simulations should look elsewhere.

Software developers and students will find the system capable for compiling code, running virtual machines, and handling general coursework. The CPU’s 32 MB L3 cache and 12 threads are sufficient for parallel build tasks, and the ECC memory support is a boon for data integrity in long-running compute jobs. Small business workstations that run accounting software, database management, or CAD tools will benefit from the system’s responsiveness, but the lack of integrated graphics means a GPU failure requires a replacement rather than a simple switch to onboard video.

Gamers at 1440p are the primary target. The estimated FPS at that resolution should be high enough for competitive play in titles like shooters and MOBAs, while still allowing for cinematic settings in single-player games. The 82nd combined percentile puts this build in the top 18% of all systems, making it a solid choice for users who want a single machine that does everything well without chasing the absolute top-tier parts.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance percentile of the combined build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 82, putting it in the top 18% of all tracked systems.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 5600XT support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5070?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, using GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the RTX 5070 have?

A: The RTX 5070 has 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 192 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 250 W.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600XT faster than the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600XT has an average benchmark score of 28,940, which is 0.2% higher than the Core i9-13900H’s score of 28,886.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 5070 is 549 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU is on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket that supports a wide range of Ryzen processors. The Ryzen 5 5600XT is part of the 5000 series, and users have the option to upgrade to higher-core-count parts within the same generation, such as an 8-core or 12-core Ryzen 5000 series CPU, without changing the motherboard. The memory support is DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, so users can upgrade from a smaller capacity to 32 GB or 64 GB, though the memory bandwidth is capped at 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU and a fast NVMe SSD.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 slots, so the RTX 5070 will run at PCIe Gen 4 speeds without a significant performance penalty in most workloads. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the total system power draw is around 315 W under full load, leaving ample headroom in a 600 W power supply for additional drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so the power supply must have that connector or an adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be to increase the CPU core count, as the RTX 5070 is already a high-tier GPU. Moving from the 6-core Ryzen 5 5600XT to an 8-core or 12-core Ryzen 5000 series CPU would provide a significant boost in multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and software compilation, which are currently limited by the 6-core design. The motherboard and DDR4 memory would not need to be changed, making this a cost-effective upgrade path. Alternatively, adding more DDR4 memory would help with memory-intensive tasks, given the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed platform limit.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build class configuration, combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile of 82 indicates that this system outperforms 82% of all tracked configurations, placing it in the upper tier of mid-range to high-end desktop systems.

The CPU’s 81st percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile are closely aligned, which is the hallmark of a balanced build. There is no single component that is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other. The CPU provides strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,643) and respectable multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18,724), while the GPU offers robust rasterization and ray tracing performance (3DMark Steel Nomad 5077). This pairing is suitable for a wide range of tasks, from 1440p gaming to content creation, and represents a solid investment for users who want a single system that handles both work and play without compromise.

The lack of measured FPS data means that the gaming performance is an estimate, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable system. The 12 GB VRAM is the most likely constraint for future high-end gaming at 4K, but for the vast majority of users targeting 1440p or 1080p, this build offers a strong performance tier with room for incremental upgrades in the CPU and memory without changing the platform. The system is a well-considered pairing that leverages the efficiency of Zen 3 and the raw compute of Blackwell 2.0.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds