SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

28,940 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This desktop pairing combines the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, landing at the 88th combined percentile. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 28,940, while the GPU reaches the 95th percentile with an average score of 131,938. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600XT is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It runs on AMD Socket AM4 and is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 4,150 million transistors packed into a 74 mm² die. Base clock is 3.70 GHz, boost clock is 4.70 GHz, and TDP is 65 W. The cache layout consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, has no integrated graphics, and has an unlocked multiplier.

Benchmark results show a balanced single- and multi-core profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 18,724 multi-core and 2,643 single-core. Cinebench R20 gives 7,864 multi-core and 1,110 single-core, while R15 shows 1,887 multi-core and 266 single-core. PassMark multithread score is 22,283, and single-thread score is 3,469. Integer math hits 71,063, floating point math reaches 40,537, data compression scores 257,118, data encryption scores 15,944, extended instructions score 17,450, random string sorting scores 26,693, physics scores 1,322, and prime number finding scores 143. These scores indicate a processor that handles multi-threaded workloads well for its 6-core design while retaining strong single-thread responsiveness for interactive tasks.

The CPU’s average score of 28,940 puts it near a cluster of Intel mobile processors. It is 0.2% above the Intel Core i9-13900H and the Intel Core i5-12600H, 0.4% above the Intel Core i7-12650H, and 0.5% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H. That means the 5600XT’s performance is effectively in the same class as those parts, despite being a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP. The unlocked multiplier also gives overclocking headroom, while the active production status suggests continued availability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,940, placing it at the 81st percentile. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 131,938, placing it at the 95th percentile. The combined percentile is 88. The CPU’s nearest rival scores are tightly clustered, all within 0.5% of its average, so small clock or workload changes can shift its standing. The GPU, by contrast, sits clearly above the median but not at the absolute top of the GPU pool.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633. The GPU’s average score is 0.7% above the NVIDIA L4, 2.4% below the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, 2.4% below the NVIDIA A10M, and 2.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W6800. That puts the RTX 3090 Ti in the same performance tier as professional workstation GPUs, while the CPU sits in the upper-mid range of all desktop processors.

The combined picture is of a GPU-heavy system. The GPU percentile is far higher than the CPU percentile, and the combined 88th percentile reflects a system whose overall performance is pulled upward by a very strong graphics card.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 5 5600XT use?

A: It uses AMD Socket AM4, with a Zen 3 architecture, 6 cores, 12 threads, a 3.70 GHz base clock, a 4.70 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integrated graphics field is marked N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory support does the CPU have?

A: It supports DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 21 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The GPU TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. The CPU TDP is 65 W, so the suggested PSU provides headroom.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU average score is 131,938. It is 0.7% above the NVIDIA L4, 2.4% below the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, 2.4% below the NVIDIA A10M, and 2.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W6800.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Any frame-rate estimates are based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build This

This is a desktop build intended for users who want a very strong GPU paired with a capable 6-core CPU. The GPU is the headline component, with a 95th percentile ranking and 24 GB of GDDR6X VRAM. That amount of memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth makes the system suited to workloads that load large textures, big datasets, or multi-layer rendering scenes. The CPU, at the 81st percentile, provides 6 cores and 12 threads, 32 MB of shared L3 cache, and ECC memory support, which can appeal to small business workstations where data integrity matters.

Content creators will find the 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 compute and OpenCL score of 174,441 useful for GPU-accelerated tasks. Developers benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 71,063 and data compression score of 257,118. Students and office workers can work with the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,469 and 65 W TDP, but they must pair the system with the GPU because there is no integrated graphics. The overall build is a desktop-class machine that targets high-end graphics and compute rather than a low-power office box.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 95th percentile and 24 GB GDDR6X frame buffer, combined with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, provide the memory headroom needed for high-resolution textures and high frame-rate rendering. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,643 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,469 help keep game logic responsive. These are estimates, not measured FPS.

Streaming: A streaming workload adds CPU load on top of rendering. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a PassMark multithread score of 22,283 can handle concurrent tasks, and the data compression score of 257,118 suggests strong throughput for data-heavy encoding. The GPU’s 40 TFLOPS FP32 and 84 RT cores handle the visual workload while the CPU manages background tasks.

Video editing: Video editing benefits from both CPU multi-core performance and GPU compute. The CPU scores 18,724 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the GPU scores 174,441 in Geekbench OpenCL. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide room for large frame buffers and previews during editing.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 84 RT cores and 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 compute are aimed at rendering, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 shows strong DirectX 12 performance. The CPU’s 18,724 Cinebench R23 multi-core score helps with scene preparation and physics calculations.

Software development: Compilers and build tools rely on integer and multi-threaded performance. The CPU’s integer math score of 71,063, data compression score of 257,118, and multithread score of 22,283 make it a reasonable choice for code compilation. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow fast storage and peripheral connectivity.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,469 and 65 W TDP make it efficient for everyday tasks. However, the lack of integrated graphics means the RTX 3090 Ti must be active at all times, which is not necessary for basic office work but is required for this build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM4 with DDR4 dual-channel memory and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU uses 16 Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU TDP is 65 W, the GPU TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W, so the power supply provides headroom above both components. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier and is listed as Active in production, while the GPU is End-of-life and has a successor in the GeForce 40 series.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a GeForce 40-series card, since the current GPU is already end-of-life. The CPU is still in production, and the AM4 platform supports DDR4 memory, so a CPU upgrade to a higher-core AM4 part would be possible without changing the motherboard or memory. The 850 W suggested PSU should cover the existing TDPs and leave some room for future components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile. That difference means the CPU is the weaker component in this pairing and is more likely to be the bottleneck in workloads that depend on CPU throughput, such as high-refresh game logic, streaming, or data compression. The GPU is the stronger component and should be the primary driver in GPU-bound workloads like rendering, video editing, and compute.

No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so any FPS scaling claim is estimated. Based on the benchmark scores, the CPU’s 6-core design and 12 threads should handle multi-threaded tasks, but in CPU-heavy scenes the CPU’s lower percentile could limit overall performance. The GPU, with 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most rendering workloads. The combined 88th percentile reflects a system where the GPU is the dominant component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a mid-to-high-range 6-core CPU with a top-tier GPU. The CPU is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, a Zen 3 part with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, an Ampere-based card with 24 GB of GDDR6X. The combined percentile is 88, with the CPU at 81 and the GPU at 95. This is a GPU-heavy build: the GPU is near the top of the GPU pool, while the CPU is only slightly above the median. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so its real-world gaming performance should be estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The architecture is Ampere, the base clock is 1560 MHz, and the boost clock is 1860 MHz. Memory runs at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective, over a 384-bit bus. The card has 24 GB of GDDR6X with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. There are 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. The GPU has 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, with pixel rate 208.3 GPixel/s, texture rate 625 GTexel/s, and FP32/FP16 performance of 40.00 TFLOPS.

The TDP is 450 W, it is a triple-slot card with a single 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU is 336 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its launch MSRP was 1,999 USD.

The GPU scores 5,741 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 174,441 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 215,633 in Geekbench Vulkan. These numbers, combined with the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, point to strong performance for rendering workloads. The 84 RT cores support ray tracing, and the 40 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles shading and compute tasks. The GPU sits at the 95th percentile, and its average score is 0.7% above the NVIDIA L4, 2.4% below the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, 2.4% below the NVIDIA A10M, and 2.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W6800. It is a high-end GPU that is close to professional workstation performance but not the absolute highest tier.