SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

28,940 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It uses the 7 nm process node from TSMC, with 4,150 million transistors packed into a 74 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This is a substantial L3 allocation for a 6-core part, which benefits workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets.

Benchmark scores for the CPU place it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28,940. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 18,724 points in multi-core and 2,643 points in single-core. These are strong figures for a 6-core processor. The single-core result of 2,643 in Cinebench R23 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is crucial for lightly-threaded applications like legacy games, spreadsheet calculations, and scripting. The multi-core score of 18,724 shows that the 12 threads scale well under full load, making the chip capable in modern multi-threaded titles and productivity suites.

Cinebench R20 results show 7,864 multi-core and 1,110 single-core. The R15 results are 1,887 multi-core and 266 single-core. PassMark tests reveal a multithread score of 22,283 and a single-thread score of 3,469. The integer math score is 71,063, while floating-point math scores 40,537. Data compression scores 257,118, and encryption scores 15,944. The extended instructions score is 17,450. These values indicate a balanced processor: integer-heavy code (compilation, data processing) and floating-point-heavy code (scientific simulation, 3D rendering) both execute efficiently.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context. The Intel Core i9-13900H has an average score of 28,886, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 5600XT. The Intel Core i5-12600H also scores 28,882, again 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12650H scores 28,815, 0.4% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H scores 29,093, which is 0.5% higher. This means the Ryzen 5 5600XT sits in a tightly contested band; it is essentially tied with these mobile-class Intel parts in aggregate CPU performance. For a desktop chip, this is notable — it matches high-end laptop processors while consuming significantly less power (65 W TDP vs. their higher mobile TDPs, though exact mobile TDPs are not in the data). The practical implication is that the Ryzen 5 5600XT offers desktop-grade sustained performance in a power envelope that is easy to cool.

Real-world workload interpretation: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724 suggests the CPU can handle video encoding (x264/x265), 3D scene rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D, and software compilation without stalling. The single-core score of 2,643 means the CPU excels in tasks like web browsing, office document processing, and gaming physics updates that rely on a few fast threads. The PassMark data compression score of 257,118 indicates quick file archiving and compression tasks. The encryption score of 15,944 is moderate, so disk encryption (BitLocker, LUKS) will work, but it is not the primary strength of this chip.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class setups. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is a mature platform — AM4 has been widely used, and DDR4 is well-established, meaning memory kits are plentiful and compatible.

The TDP of the CPU is 65 W. The GPU TDP is 350 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W. For the combined system, the data indicates that a quality 750 W power supply is the baseline recommendation. Since the CPU draws 65 W and the GPU draws 350 W, the remaining headroom for the rest of the system (motherboard, drives, fans) is substantial within a 750 W budget. The data does not specify a combined TDP, so the sensible reading is that the 750 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for the entire build. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 12-pin, so the PSU must have the appropriate cable or adapter.

The CPU is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked is true), which means overclocking is possible. Given the 65 W TDP, there is thermal headroom for overclocking with a capable air cooler. The production status is Active, and the release date is late October 2024. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4, so a modern GPU (including the RTX 3080 Ti) will run at full bandwidth. A sensible next upgrade path would be to add more DDR4 memory if the current capacity is insufficient, or to upgrade the GPU to a newer generation (the successor to the RTX 3080 Ti is the GeForce 40 series, but that is a separate consideration). For CPU upgrades, the AM4 socket supports other Zen 3 parts, but the exact list of compatible CPUs is not in the data. The key takeaway is that the platform is mature, stable, and has a clear power supply recommendation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a desktop GPU based on the GA102 chip, using the Ampere architecture from the GeForce 30-series. It is built on an 8 nm process from Samsung, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The transistor density is 45.1 million per mm². The GPU has 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It features 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. The base clock is 1365 MHz, with a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The memory clock is 1188 MHz, with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. This is a very high bandwidth figure, which is critical for 4K textures, high-resolution rendering, and compute workloads. The pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance (FP32) is 34.10 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The card is dual-slot, 285 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide.

Benchmark scores place the GPU at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41,187. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,077. Geekbench OpenCL scores 170,037, and Vulkan scores 192,697. PassMark G3D scores 26,896, with GPU compute at 15,282. The DirectX 12 PassMark score is 110, DirectX 11 is 223, DirectX 10 is 184, and DirectX 9 is 274. The G2D score is 1,091.

The nearest rivals show the RTX 3080 Ti in a specific performance tier. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 has an average score of 40,870, which is 0.8% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41,707, which is 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 scores 41,897, 1.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40,377, 2% lower. This is an interesting comparison: the RTX 3080 Ti outperforms a modern RTX 5070 by 2% in average benchmark score, despite being from an older generation. It also edges out the Radeon Pro 5300. The Tesla M40 parts score slightly higher, but those are compute-focused data center cards without modern display features.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are the standout features. A 3D artist working with large scenes, high-res textures, or GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., in Blender or Octane) will find the memory capacity sufficient for complex projects. The 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which speeds up realistic lighting and shadow calculations. The 320 tensor cores enable DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), which can boost frame rates in supported games by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling with AI. For content creation, the FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS is strong, meaning video effects processing and GPU-based filters in editing software will respond quickly.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is at the 81st percentile, and the GPU is at the 83rd percentile. The combined percentile is 82. This is a well-matched pairing: both components sit within two percentile points of each other. In most workloads, neither component will severely bottleneck the other. The data shows that the CPU's average benchmark score is 28,940, while the GPU's is 41,187. These are different metrics (CPU vs. GPU), so direct comparison is not straightforward, but the percentile positions suggest balance.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,643) will be the primary driver of frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's raw power (34.10 TFLOPS) is more than sufficient for high frame rates, but the CPU may limit performance in games that rely heavily on a single thread. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the resolution increases the GPU workload. The GPU's 912.4 GB/s bandwidth is particularly helpful at 4K, where large texture loads are common.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. Multi-threaded CPU tasks (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18,724) and GPU compute tasks (Geekbench OpenCL 170,037) will each run at their respective strengths. A video editor using both CPU encoding and GPU effects will see a balanced system with no single component dragging the other down. The PassMark multithread score of 22,283 for the CPU, combined with the GPU compute score of 15,282, indicates that mixed workloads (e.g., streaming while gaming) will have adequate resources.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available in the data (no measured FPS rows). Therefore, bottleneck analysis is based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The data suggests that this is a balanced build, with the GPU having a slight edge in percentile (83 vs. 81). The practical implication is that for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the user should expect CPU-related frame limits in some titles, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be the primary performance driver. For rendering and compute, the GPU will dominate the workload, and the CPU will provide adequate data preparation and scene management.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a desktop user who needs strong performance in both gaming and productivity. The CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 83rd percentile indicate a top-tier system. Specific user profiles include:

Gamers at 1440p or 4K: The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The CPU's single-core score of 2,643 (Cinebench R23) ensures that game logic and physics are processed without stutter.
Content creators: Video editors using GPU acceleration (OpenCL score 170,037) and CPU encoding (multi-core 18,724) will find this a capable system. 3D artists using ray-traced rendering will benefit from the 80 RT cores.
Software developers: The CPU's integer math score of 71,063 and data compression score of 257,118 speed up compilation and code analysis. The 12 threads allow parallel builds.
Students and small business workstations: The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and easy to cool, while the GPU provides acceleration for data visualization and GPU-accelerated applications. ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running tasks.

The build class is desktop, and this is a fixed pairing of CPU and GPU. The user is not expected to upgrade soon, given that the GPU is end-of-life (production status) and the CPU is active. This is a system for someone who wants high performance today without needing the absolute latest hardware.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 41,187 and its 83rd percentile position suggest that it is a high-end card capable of running modern games at high settings. The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,643) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO and Valorant, where CPU speed is the limiting factor. The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates it can handle heavy graphical loads at 1440p and 4K.

For AAA titles with ray tracing (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077, Control), the 80 RT cores will provide hardware acceleration. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures. The memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s ensures that texture streaming does not cause stutters. The 320 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles.

The CPU's multi-core score of 18,724 (Cinebench R23) means that games using multiple threads (e.g., Battlefield, Call of Duty) will have enough CPU headroom. However, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is a limiting factor compared to higher-core CPUs. In the most CPU-intensive games at 1080p, the user may see lower frame rates than with a 16-core part, but at 1440p and above, the GPU will be the bottleneck.

Estimates: At 1080p with ultra settings, the system should achieve high refresh rates (likely over 100 FPS) in esports titles and over 60 FPS in most AAA games. At 1440p ultra, expect 60-100 FPS in demanding titles, with DLSS enabling higher frame rates. At 4K ultra, the GPU will be challenged, with 30-60 FPS in the most demanding games, but DLSS can push this higher. These are estimates, not measured figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is at the 81st percentile, meaning it outperforms approximately 81% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600XT has an average benchmark score of 28,940, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900H's score of 28,886.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 Ti have?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 Ti is 750 W. The GPU TDP is 350 W, and the CPU TDP is 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT has ECC memory support, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score relative to the RTX 5070?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41,187, which is 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's score of 40,377.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is desktop. The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, and the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 285 mm length.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (6-core, 12-thread, Zen 3) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (Ampere, 12 GB GDDR6X). It is a desktop-class system. The combined percentile is 82, meaning this pairing outperforms 82% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is at the 81st percentile, and the GPU is at the 83rd percentile, indicating a balanced, high-end system. The CPU is an active product (released late October 2024), while the GPU is end-of-life (released mid-2021). This is a pairing of a new mid-range CPU with a previous-generation high-end GPU. The result is a system that excels in both gaming and productivity, with the GPU providing the majority of raw computational throughput for graphics and compute, while the CPU provides strong single-thread and adequate multi-thread performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 28,940. The GPU's average benchmark score is 41,187. The combined percentile is 82.

CPU scores:

Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,724
Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,643
Cinebench R20 multi-core: 7,864
Cinebench R20 single-core: 1,110
PassMark multithread: 22,283
PassMark single-thread: 3,469

GPU scores:

3DMark Steel Nomad DX12: 5,077
Geekbench OpenCL: 170,037
Geekbench Vulkan: 192,697
PassMark G3D: 26,896
PassMark GPU compute: 15,282

The CPU is at the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals being the Intel Core i9-13900H (+0.2%), Intel Core i5-12600H (+0.2%), Intel Core i7-12650H (+0.4%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (-0.5%). The GPU is at the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (-0.8%), NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (+1.2%), NVIDIA Tesla M40 (+1.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (-2%).

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU is competitive with high-end mobile chips. The GPU outperforms the current-generation RTX 5070 by 2%, which is a significant finding for a card that is end-of-life. For a user, this means the system will handle demanding graphical workloads with ease, while the CPU provides a solid foundation for system responsiveness and moderately-threaded tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth support high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's single-core score of 2,643 (Cinebench R23) ensures that frame times remain low in esports titles. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary driver, with ray tracing enabled, frame rates will be lower but playable with DLSS.

Streaming: The CPU has 12 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724. This is sufficient to handle game capture and encoding overhead while gaming. The GPU's NVENC (not explicitly listed but implied by the tensor cores and architecture) would offload encoding, but the data does not specify NVENC. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 22,283 indicates enough headroom for x264 encoding at moderate presets.

Video editing: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 170,037 and 12 GB VRAM accelerate effects, transitions, and color grading. The CPU's multi-core score of 18,724 handles timeline preview and export encoding. The 912.4 GB/s bandwidth allows for smooth scrubbing of high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The 80 RT cores and 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 12 GB VRAM holds large scenes. The CPU's role is scene preparation and final frame compositing, which the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles adequately, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,724.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 71,063 and data compression score of 257,118 speed up code compilation and data processing. The 12 threads allow parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,469 (PassMark) ensures responsive web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations. The 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and energy-efficient. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but it provides future-proofing for any GPU-accelerated applications the student or office worker may encounter.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds