SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D

25,365 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component rather than direct gameplay captures. The data shows the RTX 4090 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600X3D rests at the 77th percentile among CPUs. For a pairing like this, the GPU’s raw rasterization throughput (82.58 TFLOPS FP32) and the CPU’s strong single-thread score (2,626 in Cinebench R23) suggest that at 1080p, the CPU will frequently act as the pacing factor in esports and lightly-threaded titles. At 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint, and the system should deliver frame rates that track closely with RTX 4090 review averages — typically very high triple-digit or low quadruple-digit figures in less demanding games, with heavier titles falling into the 60–120 FPS range depending on settings.

Because the 5600X3D has only 6 cores and 12 threads, games that scale well beyond six threads may show less headroom than a modern 8-core or 16-core processor. However, the 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a notable asset: it helps mitigate memory latency and can boost minimum frame rates in simulation-heavy or physics-heavy games, even if average FPS doesn’t move much. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,086 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3,187 both indicate the CPU is capable of feeding the RTX 4090 in most scenarios, but the delta between the CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile hints that the processor will be the first to saturate in CPU-bound scenes. The estimated FPS picture is therefore one where 4K gaming is GPU-limited and excellent; 1440p is balanced; and 1080p high-refresh gaming may leave performance on the table compared to a newer, higher-core-count CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each component?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D has a launch MSRP of $229, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600X3D supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip and useful for error-checking workloads like long renders or data processing.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which aligns perfectly with the CPU’s capability.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 120?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X3D has an average benchmark score of 25,365, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core 5 120’s 25,362 — a delta of 0%. The two are performance peers in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is exceptionally high and supports heavy 4K textures and large datasets.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. Users cannot freely adjust the clock multiplier, though base clock adjustments may be possible on some motherboards.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 83, meaning this pairing outperforms roughly 83% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) using TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The standout feature is the 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is significantly larger than typical Zen 3 parts and is designed to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and includes 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. It has been marked end-of-life, with a release date of July 2023.

Benchmark results show a balanced profile: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,603 and single-core of 2,626, while Geekbench reports 9,386 multicore and 2,086 single-core. PassMark multithread score is 21,888, with single-thread at 3,187. The 77th percentile ranking means it sits above the median CPU but below top-tier parts. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 120, scores 25,362 on average — a 0% delta, indicating near-identical aggregate performance. The Intel Core i7-11700KF trails by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U by 0.3%, and the Intel Core i5-13400F leads by 0.3%. These narrow margins show the 5600X3D is competitive with mid-range and older high-end processors, but it is not a flagship.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is adequate for gaming and general productivity but may feel constrained in heavily multithreaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, where 8+ cores are common. The large L3 cache helps with database workloads and certain scientific simulations that exhibit high cache reuse. The PassMark data compression score of 247,365 and encryption score of 15,170 indicate solid performance in data handling, while the floating-point math score of 37,464 and integer math score of 65,587 show respectable compute capability. The CPU’s memory bandwidth is lower than newer platforms (DDR5-based), but the cache mitigates this in many scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 4K or high-detail 1440p gaming, where the RTX 4090 can stretch its legs and the CPU’s cache helps maintain fluid frame pacing. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 4K texture-heavy titles and VR workloads. Content creators who work with large video files, 3D scenes, or AI inference will benefit from the GPU’s 512 tensor cores and 128 RT cores, while the CPU provides enough single-thread performance for application responsiveness. Software developers compiling code or running tests will find the 6-core/12-thread setup serviceable, though not optimal for massive parallel builds. Students in engineering or data science programs who need strong compute for simulations or machine learning experiments can leverage the GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, though the CPU may bottleneck some CPU-bound tasks. Small business workstations that run moderate multi-threaded applications (e.g., financial modeling, CAD) can use this build, but the GPU is overkill for office tasks — the CPU alone would suffice.

The 5600X3D’s 96 MB L3 cache is a boon for games that stream large world data, making this a strong choice for open-world titles at high resolutions. However, the CPU’s end-of-life status and locked multiplier mean it is not a future-proof investment for overclockers. The RTX 4090, despite being end-of-life too, remains a top-tier GPU for rendering, video editing, and 4K gaming. For users who want a single system that can handle both serious gaming and GPU-accelerated work without compromise, this build is compelling — provided the workload is not reliant on 8+ CPU cores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the GPU’s 88th percentile versus the CPU’s 77th percentile. In GPU-bound workloads (e.g., 4K gaming, rendering, CUDA compute), the RTX 4090 will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom. In CPU-bound workloads (e.g., 1080p high-refresh gaming, single-threaded productivity, light spreadsheets), the 5600X3D will cap performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,626 is respectable but not elite; newer CPUs like the Intel Core 5 120 match it, and the deltaPct of 0% against that rival confirms parity. The Geekbench multicore score of 9,386 is modest compared to 12-core or 16-core parts, so any application that scales across threads will show a bottleneck.

FPS scaling estimates support this: at 1080p, many games are CPU-limited with a GPU this fast, so frame rates may not increase much over a cheaper CPU. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and at 4K, the RTX 4090 is almost always the constraint. The PassMark physics score of 2,453 is low relative to the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 38,194, reinforcing that the CPU is the weaker link in physics-heavy simulations. The GPU’s memory bandwidth (1.01 TB/s) vastly exceeds the CPU’s (51.2 GB/s), so any workload that requires moving data between CPU and GPU will be limited by the CPU’s memory bus. The 105 W TDP of the CPU versus the 450 W TDP of the GPU also shows where power is being spent: the GPU dominates the system’s power draw, and the suggested PSU is 850 W.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. Base clock is 2,235 MHz with a boost of 2,520 MHz, and memory runs at 1,313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) across 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. Pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card is triple-slot, 304 mm long, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested 850 W PSU.

Benchmark scores are mixed: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL is 255,416, and Vulkan is 271,631. PassMark G3D is 38,194, but DirectX 11 and 12 scores are low (326 and 150, respectively), which is unusual and likely reflects driver or test quirks rather than real-world performance. The GPU compute score is 26,613, and G2D is 1,299. The 88th percentile ranking places it above most GPUs, but its nearest rivals are professional-grade parts: the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (+0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (-2.5%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (+2.9%). This suggests the RTX 4090’s aggregate score is comparable to workstation GPUs, but its gaming and rendering capabilities are far beyond those parts.

For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM is critical for large scenes, and the 512 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising and DLSS. The 128 RT cores handle ray tracing with high efficiency, and the 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports heavy compute. The high bandwidth (1.01 TB/s) prevents memory bottlenecks in 4K textures and large datasets. The card is end-of-life, but it remains a top-tier option for any GPU-accelerated workflow.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,365, placing it at the 77th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 120, scores 25,362 (0% delta), so the two are statistically tied. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, at the 88th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Arc Pro A60 at 60,326 (0% delta). The combined percentile of this pairing is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of all recorded builds.

The CPU’s best scores are in PassMark multithread (21,888) and Cinebench R23 multicore (18,603), while its weakest are in PassMark find prime numbers (181) and PassMark physics (2,453). The GPU’s strongest scores are in Geekbench Vulkan (271,631) and OpenCL (255,416), with PassMark G3D at 38,194. The combined picture is one of a GPU that dominates aggregate performance, while the CPU is adequate but not exceptional. In real terms, the GPU contributes roughly 70% of the system’s overall benchmark weight, meaning any workload that leverages the GPU will see massive gains, but CPU-only tasks will be merely average for the price.

The deltaPct values against rivals show that the CPU is on par with mid-range Intel and AMD parts, while the GPU is on par with professional workstation cards. This makes the build unusual: it pairs a mid-range CPU with an uber-high-end GPU, creating a lopsided but effective configuration for GPU-intensive tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which is an older platform that supports DDR4 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck on the interface. The TDP is 105 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 850 W, which leaves headroom for overclocking or additional drives.

A sensible next upgrade would be to a newer CPU on a different platform (e.g., AM5 or Intel LGA1700/1851) that supports DDR5 and more PCIe lanes, but that would require a motherboard and memory change. Alternatively, adding more cores via a used AM4 8-core or 12-core Zen 3 chip could improve multithreaded performance while keeping the same board and RAM. The GPU is already at the top of its class, so the next GPU upgrade would be to the GeForce 50 series, which is the successor, but that is likely unnecessary given the 4090’s performance. The PSU headroom (850 W suggested) is sufficient for most upgrades, but a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for dual-GPU setups, which are uncommon. The platform’s end-of-life status means no new CPU releases, so the upgrade path is limited to used parts or a full platform swap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 3, 96 MB L3 cache) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (24 GB GDDR6X, Ada Lovelace). The CPU is a mid-range part at the 77th percentile, while the GPU is a top-tier part at the 88th percentile, giving the build a combined percentile of 83. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $229, and the GPU’s is 1,599 USD. The pairing is best described as a GPU-first system: it excels at 4K gaming, GPU rendering, and AI workloads, but the CPU will limit performance in CPU-bound tasks. The 96 MB L3 cache on the CPU helps with game frame pacing, and the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle the most demanding visual workloads. Overall, this is a high-tier desktop build that prioritizes GPU performance over CPU balance, making it ideal for users who know their workload is GPU-bound.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds