SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

21,771 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) using TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal requirements modest. The chip integrates 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, and its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB L3 pool. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21,771. Single-thread performance is strong: the 3DMark single-thread score is 917, the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,541, and Geekbench single-core reaches 1,989. Multi-threaded results are equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multicore scoring 11,838, Geekbench multicore at 9,173, and PassMark multithread at 21,858. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (1,793) to 16 threads (5,582) and max threads (5,588) shows near-linear expansion up to 8 threads (4,811), indicating the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles parallel workloads efficiently without significant contention.

The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H scores 21,749 (0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U scores 21,874 (0.5% faster), the Intel Core i7-11700 scores 21,891 (0.5% faster), and the AMD EPYC 9554P scores 21,899 (0.6% faster). These deltas are negligible, meaning the 5600X trades blows with a laptop-oriented 8-core, a low-power mobile chip, a desktop 8-core, and a server-grade processor. For real workloads, the 5600X delivers a balanced mix: the PassMark integer math score of 71,161 and floating-point math score of 39,487 indicate strong computational throughput for productivity tasks, while the data compression score of 252,306 and encryption score of 15,685 show capable handling of archival and security workloads. The physics score of 1,316 and extended instructions score of 16,991 round out a profile that favors responsive single-threaded apps and moderately threaded creative software.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600X compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11700?

A: The two CPUs are nearly identical in average benchmark score. The Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,771 while the Intel Core i7-11700 scores 21,891, a delta of -0.5%, meaning the 5600X is marginally slower but within statistical noise.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance, and why does it matter?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,541, and the 3DMark single-thread score is 917. This matters for applications like legacy software, some game engines, and tasks that rely on one primary thread, where the 5600X's Zen 3 architecture excels.

Q: Does the 5600X support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported. This makes the platform viable for entry-level workstation builds where data integrity is prioritized, though the motherboard must also support ECC to take advantage.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the RX 7600 GPU, and where does it rank?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score is 16,634, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 88,051.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The RX 7600 scores 15,171 versus the RTX 3050 OEM's 15,199, a delta of -0.2%. They are effectively equivalent in average benchmark terms, though the RX 7600 has higher raw compute (21.75 TFLOPS FP32).

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, meaning the build outperforms 66% of all recorded system pairings in the database. This reflects a balanced mid-range desktop configuration.

Q: Is the measured FPS data reliable for this build?

A: Yes, the data is measured (dataIsMeasured is true), with an average FPS of 104.1 across all tested games at various resolutions, placing the pair at rank 2,526 out of 3,732 pairs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing delivers strong 1080p performance in competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 hits 158.5 FPS, Valorant reaches 356.2 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 185 FPS at 1920x1080. At 1440p, these drop to 103.3, 305.4, and 121 FPS respectively, still comfortably above 100 FPS for smooth high-refresh monitors. The CPU's single-thread strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,541) supports high frame rates in esports titles.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread configuration handles concurrent gaming and encoding, though the data does not include dedicated streaming benchmarks. The 3DMark max-thread score of 5,588 and PassMark multithread of 21,858 suggest sufficient headroom for software encoding alongside gaming, while the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth handle the graphical load.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 11,838, Geekbench multicore 9,173) accelerates export and rendering tasks in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's compute capability (PassMark GPU compute 8,790, Geekbench OpenCL 88,051) assists with effects and timeline rendering. The data compression score of 252,306 indicates solid performance for handling video codecs.

3D rendering: The RX 7600's FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS provides substantial raw compute for GPU-based renderers, while the CPU's Cinebench scores (R15 multicore 1,968, R23 multicore 11,838) handle CPU-bound scenes. The 32 MB L3 cache on the CPU reduces memory latency in complex scenes. For 4K workloads, the GPU's 8 GB memory may limit very large scenes, but 1080p and 1440p rendering is viable.

Software development: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (PassMark multithread 21,858, 3DMark 16-thread 5,582) accelerate parallel builds, while the single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3,364) handles IDE responsiveness and compilation of single translation units. The extended instructions score of 16,991 suggests good SIMD performance for scientific computing, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The 5600X's efficiency (65 W TDP) and the GPU's modest 165 W TDP make for a low-heat system suitable for dorm rooms or small offices. The PassMark integer math score of 71,161 handles spreadsheet calculations, and the random string sorting score of 26,256 manages database-like operations. The G2D score of 984 on the GPU ensures responsive 2D desktop compositing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-matched pairing where the CPU and GPU complement each other without severe imbalance. The CPU sits in the 75th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 57th percentile, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In gaming, this manifests as GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions: FPS scales downward more steeply from 1080p to 1440p to 4K across most titles. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 158.5 to 103.3 to 55.5 FPS, and Fortnite drops from 78 to 48.6 to 27.1 FPS, indicating the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

In CPU-light, GPU-heavy games, the bottleneck shifts. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains high FPS across resolutions (128.6 at 1080p, 117.2 at 1440p, 101.5 at 4K), showing the GPU can sustain high output when the CPU keeps up. Conversely, in CPU-intensive titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rate at 1080p is only 40.8 FPS and drops to 32.5 at 1440p, suggesting the CPU's 6 cores may struggle to feed the GPU in open-world titles with heavy simulation. The average FPS across all games is 104.1, with the pair ranking 2,526 out of 3,732 — slightly below the median, indicating that this build is not a top-tier performer but delivers playable frame rates in most scenarios.

The CPU's 3DMark scaling (2 threads 1,793 to 16 threads 5,582) shows a 3.1x increase, meaning dual-thread performance is strong but not perfectly linear, which is typical for 6-core chips. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16,634 versus the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1,316 suggests that in gaming, the CPU rarely bottlenecks the GPU except in the most demanding CPU-bound titles. The combined percentile of 66 reinforces that neither component consistently drags the other down.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, a platform with a long upgrade history. The 5600X is part of the 5000 series, and its 65 W TDP means the socket's power delivery is not stressed. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4, 20-lane configuration. For memory, the platform supports dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is a rarity in consumer platforms.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, so a 450 W power supply provides headroom for the combined 230 W of component power draw (though the data does not specify total system draw). The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. For a sensible next upgrade, the data shows the CPU is the stronger component (75th percentile vs 57th for GPU). Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card would better balance the system, as the CPU has headroom to drive faster graphics. Alternatively, adding more cores via a higher-end AM4 CPU (though not specified in the data) would benefit CPU-bound workloads like the 40.8 FPS seen in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1080p. The platform's DDR4 support means memory upgrades are straightforward, and the 32 MB L3 cache on the CPU suggests it benefits from faster memory speeds, though specific scaling data is not provided.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This is the primary audience. The build delivers 158.5 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 349 FPS in CS:GO, and 185 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p, making it ideal for high-refresh competitive play. For AAA titles, 1080p performance is playable: Cyberpunk 2077 at 46 FPS and Control at 66.7 FPS, though demanding games may require settings adjustments.

Gamers at 1440p: The build remains viable but with compromises. Warzone runs at 117.2 FPS, and Valorant at 305.4 FPS, but heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 34 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32.5 FPS. This targets gamers who prioritize esports at 1440p over maxing AAA visuals.

Content creators: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,838 and the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 make this viable for 1080p video editing and 3D rendering. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long rendering jobs, and the 8 GB GPU memory is sufficient for most 1080p creative projects.

Developers and small business: The multi-threaded performance (Geekbench multicore 9,173) accelerates compilation and data processing. The PassMark encryption score of 15,685 and data compression score of 252,306 support secure file handling and backups. The low TDPs (65 W CPU, 165 W GPU) keep power costs manageable for office environments.

Students: The balanced performance covers coursework, light gaming, and general productivity without the thermal or acoustic demands of high-end components. The 65 W CPU TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, and the platform's maturity (AM4) means stable drivers and broad software compatibility.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 21,771, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, scores 21,749 (0.1% slower), while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U scores 21,874 (0.5% faster) and the Intel Core i7-11700 scores 21,891 (0.5% faster). The CPU excels in single-threaded tests: Cinebench R23 single-core 1,541, Geekbench single-core 1,989, and PassMark single-thread 3,364. Multi-threaded scores include Cinebench R23 multicore 11,838, Geekbench multicore 9,173, and PassMark multithread 21,858.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15,199, 0.2% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15,082, 0.6% slower), AMD Radeon 680M (15,270, 0.7% faster), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15,063, 0.7% slower). The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 16,634, and Geekbench OpenCL is 88,051. The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 75% of all processors and a GPU that outperforms 57% of all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 66. The pair's average FPS across games is 104.1, ranking 2,526 out of 3,732 pairs, which indicates that while the components are individually above average, the gaming performance is slightly below the median for all pairings—likely due to the GPU's mid-range positioning.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 processor with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.0-based card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 165 W TDP. The combined percentile of 66 places this system above the majority of recorded builds, but the CPU's 75th percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile shows a processor-leaning configuration. The pair ranks 2,526 out of 3,732 in gaming FPS, with an average of 104.1 FPS across all tested titles. This is a mid-range desktop build suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and light-to-moderate content creation, with the CPU providing ample headroom for future GPU upgrades. The launch MSRP for the CPU was $299, and the GPU launched at 269 USD.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a detailed picture across 49 games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the build excels in esports: Valorant leads at 356.2 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 349 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege X at 186.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 158.5 FPS. Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 156.3 FPS, and Roblox at 200.8 FPS. For AAA titles, performance is playable but not maxed: Call of Duty: Warzone hits 128.6 FPS, Doom 116.6 FPS, and Assetto Corsa 93.7 FPS. Heavier titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 at 46 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22.8 FPS.

At 2560x1440, esports remain strong: Valorant 305.4 FPS, CS:GO 235.8 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege X 122.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 103.3 FPS. Warzone drops to 117.2 FPS, and Assetto Corsa to 64.6 FPS. AAA titles become marginal: Cyberpunk 2077 at 34 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32.5 FPS, and Control at 48 FPS. At 3840x2160, only esports remain smooth: Valorant 244.4 FPS, CS:GO 140.5 FPS, and Warzone 101.5 FPS. Most other titles drop below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 6.5 FPS. The data shows this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding or esports titles.