SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

21,088 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 creates a striking contrast in hardware tiers. The data shows a processor designed for mainstream efficiency paired with a flagship-class graphics card built for maximum performance. This combination results in a desktop system whose overall capability is defined by the GPU, while the CPU provides a solid foundation for everyday tasks. The benchmark results reveal a complex picture of what this pairing can and cannot do, and the analysis below interprets those numbers to understand the real-world implications for a potential owner.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a high-end graphics card based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It carries 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, which provides a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The card’s base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz, and its memory operates at an effective speed of 22.4 Gbps. This memory configuration is substantial for modern rendering workloads, allowing large textures and complex scenes to be handled without running out of video memory.

The RTX 4080 includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. With 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation processors, the card is built for high-throughput rendering. Its pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities. The FP32 performance is listed at 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 48.74 TFLOPS, showing a 1:1 ratio. These specifications position the GPU as a capable tool for both gaming and compute-heavy applications like 3D rendering.

In benchmark scores, the RTX 4080 achieves a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 20671. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 214739, and the Vulkan score is 263779. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 6567. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54247, and it sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight grouping: the RTX 4080 SUPER is 0.1% ahead, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% behind, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% behind, and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% behind. This suggests the RTX 4080 is competitively placed at the high end, with only a marginal performance gap to its immediate successor.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth means the GPU can handle 4K textures and complex shaders effectively. The RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and AI-based upscaling, which are common in modern rendering pipelines. The benchmark scores indicate that this GPU is not a bottleneck for most creative tasks; instead, it is a primary driver of performance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G achieves an average benchmark score of 21088, placing it at the 74th percentile among all CPUs. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, which puts it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy highlights a significant imbalance: the GPU is far more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU. The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, reflecting that the system overall sits in the upper tier of performance, but the CPU is the weaker link.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 5600G scores 10551 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1409 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 8428 multi-core and 1801 single-core. The 3DMark tests show scores of 5451 for 16 threads, 1705 for 2 threads, 3258 for 4 threads, 4694 for 8 threads, 5455 for max threads, and 872 for single thread. The Passmark multi-thread score is 19717, and single-thread is 3177.

The GPU benchmarks, as noted, show a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567. When these are viewed together, the picture is clear: the system’s gaming and rendering performance will be dominated by the RTX 4080, while the CPU’s lower scores may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The nearest CPU rivals are closely matched: the Intel Core i3-1220P is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is 0.2% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is 0.4% behind. This indicates the 5600G is in a competitive mid-range CPU segment, but it is not a top-tier performer.

The measured FPS data across games shows an average of 180.6 FPS across all games and resolutions for this pair. The pair ranks 561 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, which is in the top 15% of all CPU-GPU combinations. This suggests that despite the CPU’s lower percentile, the overall gaming experience is strong, particularly at lower resolutions.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with the codename Cezanne. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The base clock is 3.90 GHz, boosting up to 4.40 GHz, and it has a TDP of 65 W. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and it includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics.

The cache hierarchy is 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking, which could provide some performance headroom. Its release date is April 12, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $259.

In real workloads, the CPU’s single-thread performance is modest. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1409 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1801 indicate it can handle everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications without issue. However, for demanding single-threaded applications, it is not a leader. The multi-core scores are more respectable: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10551 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 19717 suggest it can manage moderate content creation tasks, such as video editing or software compilation, but it will not excel at heavy multi-threaded rendering.

The Passmark tests show specific strengths and weaknesses. Data compression scores 249302, which is high, while data encryption scores 15247. Extended instructions score 17334, and floating-point math scores 37830. Integer math scores 67344, and random string sorting scores 25354. The physics score is 900, and find prime numbers is 57. These numbers indicate a balanced CPU that is competent for general productivity but does not have the raw throughput of higher-core-count processors.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the measured FPS across games averages 180.6, with titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 717 FPS and Minecraft reaching 320 FPS. This indicates the system can drive high-refresh-rate monitors, though the CPU’s 74th percentile may cap performance in lighter titles.

Streaming: The RTX 4080’s tensor cores can handle encoding tasks, and its 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for simultaneous game and stream rendering. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for streaming at 1080p, but the GPU’s high scores (Passmark G3D 34457) suggest it will carry most of the load.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10551 and Passmark multi-thread score of 19717 indicate it can handle 1080p editing, but 4K timelines may be slower. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and high compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 214739) will accelerate effects and exports.

3D rendering: The RTX 4080’s FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS and 76 RT cores make it a strong renderer for GPU-accelerated engines. The CPU’s lower multi-core scores will be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, but for GPU-based workflows, the system is highly capable.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 threads and Passmark integer math score of 67344 are adequate for compiling code and running virtual machines. The GPU’s compute power can be used for parallel workloads, but the CPU’s 74th percentile suggests it is not a top-tier development machine.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3177 in Passmark and 1801 in Geekbench are more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Vega 7 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, though the system is overkill for this class of work.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly shows a bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU’s 74th percentile versus the GPU’s 86th percentile indicates the CPU is the limiting factor in many tasks. In gaming, this is evident from the FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 81 at 1080p to 47 at 4K, but the CPU’s limitation is more apparent in lighter titles like Counter-Strike 2, where 1080p FPS is 152, but 4K drops to 55, showing the GPU is not the primary constraint at lower resolutions.

In contrast, GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering will be limited by the RTX 4080’s performance, but the CPU’s lower multi-core scores may still cause stalls in scene preparation. The avg FPS across games is 180.6, which is high, but the pair rank of 561 out of 3732 suggests that many other CPU-GPU combinations achieve higher frame rates, likely due to more balanced processors.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K in most games shows a typical pattern where the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. For instance, in Call of Duty: Warzone, FPS goes from 124 at 1080p to 93 at 4K, a 25% drop, indicating GPU limits. However, in Fortnite, the drop is from 156 to 52, a 67% reduction, which suggests the CPU is holding back performance at 1080p, and the GPU is only being fully utilized at 4K.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The measured FPS data is provided for ultra settings across three resolutions for a comprehensive list of games. At 1080p, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leads with 717 FPS, followed by Roblox at 420 FPS and Minecraft at 320 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 achieve 81 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 87 FPS. This indicates excellent 1080p performance, with most games exceeding 100 FPS.

At 1440p, performance remains strong. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive drops to 494 FPS, Roblox to 280 FPS, and Minecraft to 202 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 65 FPS. The average across games is still high, suggesting 1440p is a sweet spot for this pairing.

At 4K, the GPU’s limits become apparent. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive still hits 292 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43 FPS. Some titles like Inside maintain 126 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 93 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is playable but not always at high refresh rates, depending on the title’s demands.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 320 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This leaves headroom for minor overclocking or additional components. The CPU uses PCIe Gen 3, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible but may limit bandwidth slightly if the CPU is the bottleneck.

The RTX 4080 is listed as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. The CPU is still active in production, but the AM4 platform is at the end of its upgrade path. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count AM4 part, such as a Ryzen 7 or 9, to better match the GPU’s performance. Alternatively, moving to a newer platform with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 memory would provide more headroom, but that would require a motherboard and memory upgrade as well.

The GPU’s power connector is a single 16-pin, and the card is triple-slot wide, measuring 310 mm in length. The PSU headroom of 700 W is sufficient for this configuration, and the 65 W CPU TDP means total system power draw is manageable.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, indicating it performs better than 80% of all CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080’s score of 54247, meaning the two are effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G scores 1409 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is modest compared to its multi-core score of 10551.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but at varying frame rates. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS at 4K, while Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 93 FPS, showing 4K is playable but not always at high refresh rates.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 has a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and the suggested PSU for the system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W, which provides enough headroom for the 320 W GPU.

Q: How many RT cores does the RTX 4080 have?

A: The RTX 4080 includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. Gamers at 1440p will see excellent frame rates, with most titles exceeding 100 FPS, and 4K gaming is viable for less demanding games. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering will benefit from the RTX 4080’s 16 GB VRAM and high compute scores, though CPU-bound tasks like video encoding may be slower. Developers working on parallel compute workloads can leverage the GPU’s power, but the CPU’s 12 threads are adequate for typical coding tasks. Students and office workers will find the system overkill, but the integrated graphics provide a backup. Small business workstations requiring high-end graphics for CAD or visualization would also benefit, but the CPU may be a bottleneck for multi-threaded workloads.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, a 5000-series desktop processor with 6 cores and 12 threads, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, a GeForce 40-series desktop graphics card. The CPU is based on the Zen 3 architecture, while the GPU uses Ada Lovelace. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper tier of desktop performance, but the imbalance between the CPU’s 74th percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile is notable. The system is classified as a desktop build, and the measured FPS data confirms it is a strong gaming machine, especially at 1080p and 1440p. The overall tier is high, but the CPU is the limiting factor for tasks that require more processing cores.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Hard West

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Hard West

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Hard West

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds