SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that ranks in the 90th percentile overall, combining a high-end workstation GPU with a capable mid-range processor. The CPU delivers a multi-thread score of 19,236 and a single-thread score of 2,872, while the GPU achieves an OpenCL score of 124,812 and a Vulkan score of 109,364, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from these benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 4.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip contains 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This cache hierarchy is substantial for a 6-core part, providing ample data locality for workloads that fit within the shared L3.

Benchmark results show a balanced profile across compute types. The integer math score of 59,339 and floating-point math score of 34,548 indicate strong general-purpose arithmetic performance. Data compression reaches 232,836 in the Passmark test, while data encryption hits 13,839, reflecting the presence of AES-NI instructions. Extended instructions score 16,266, and random string sorting finishes at 23,422, showing solid memory manipulation capabilities. The physics score of 1,043 and prime number finding score of 120 are lower relative to the other tests, suggesting that this CPU is better suited to mixed integer/float workloads than to pure single-threaded latency-sensitive tasks.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all processors places it in the upper tier of mid-range parts. It sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T (deltaPct -0.5), essentially matching that higher-tier part in average score. It is also within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, meaning these four chips are statistically indistinguishable in aggregate performance. The closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, differs by 0% in average score (36,938 vs. 36,945). This indicates that the 5600F is not a class leader but is squarely competitive with current-generation mainstream offerings.

For real workloads, the single-thread score of 2,872 drives responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications such as web browsing, office suites, and legacy software. The multi-thread score of 19,236 supports modern games that use 6-8 threads, and the 32 MB L3 helps in gaming scenarios where shared cache reduces memory traffic. The CPU's 65 W TDP means it generates modest heat, making it suitable for compact builds with efficient coolers. It is not a top-tier content creation chip, but its scores suggest it can handle 1080p gaming and mid-level productivity without becoming the primary constraint.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The GPU sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The combined percentile is 90, but this hides the fact that the GPU is the stronger component. In most gaming scenarios, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation will be waiting on the Ryzen 5 5600F to deliver draw calls and physics updates, particularly at lower resolutions.

The CPU's physics score of 1,043 and prime number finding score of 120 are the weak points. These tests measure single-threaded and low-threaded compute efficiency, which directly impacts frame pacing in games. At 1080p, the CPU will likely cap frame rates before the GPU reaches its full potential. At 1440p and above, the GPU's rendering load increases, shifting the bottleneck toward the GPU and allowing the CPU to keep up more often. The GPU's 20 GB memory and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle high-resolution textures and large scenes without memory pressure, so the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in high-refresh scenarios.

For productivity workloads, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's multi-thread score of 19,236 and floating-point score of 34,548 can feed the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput in tasks like video encoding or physics simulation that rely on CPU-side preprocessing. Data compression at 232,836 and integer math at 59,339 show that the CPU can manage large datasets without stalling the GPU. However, the GPU's 95th percentile ranking means it will finish rendering tasks faster than the CPU can generate new work, so the overall system throughput in heavily GPU-bound tasks will be limited by the CPU.

The absence of measured FPS data means these bottleneck conclusions are estimates based on benchmark scores. The percentile gap of 10 points (95 for GPU, 85 for CPU) is the clearest evidence of asymmetry. In a balanced system, the percentiles would be closer. This pairing is best suited for GPU-accelerated workloads where the GPU does the heavy lifting, rather than CPU-bound esports titles at low settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 36,945, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its strongest sub-scores are data compression at 232,836, integer math at 59,339, and floating-point math at 34,548. The single-thread score of 2,872 and multi-thread score of 19,236 define its overall capability. The GPU reaches an average benchmark score of 117,088, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its OpenCL score is 124,812 and Vulkan score is 109,364.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight cluster. The NVIDIA GB10 is 0.3% behind (117,393 vs. 117,088), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 1.6% ahead (118,976), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is 2.4% behind (114,395), and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is 2.8% behind (113,944). This means the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is positioned in the upper mid-range of workstation GPUs, within a few percentage points of much larger or more power-hungry parts.

The CPU's rivals are even closer. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 matches at 0% delta (36,938), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% ahead (37,018), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% ahead (37,093), and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% ahead (37,112). The 5600F is effectively tied with all four, meaning it offers comparable CPU performance to these alternatives despite being an older architecture.

Combining the two, the system has a combined percentile of 90. This is a high overall tier, but it is driven primarily by the GPU. The CPU is adequate, not exceptional. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU will hold back the GPU, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor and the system will perform closer to its 90th percentile ranking. For rendering or compute workloads, the GPU's 95th percentile position will deliver results that rival systems with much more expensive CPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F scores 19,236 in multi-threaded Passmark. Its average benchmark score of 36,945 is within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112), 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093), and 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37,018). It is exactly tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 at 36,938.

Q: How does the GPU's compute performance compare to the AMD Radeon PRO W7700?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 117,088, which is 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W7700's 118,976. In specific tests, the RTX 4000 SFF scores 124,812 in OpenCL and 109,364 in Vulkan.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600F supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The GPU has a 70 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 250 W. It does not require any power connectors, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The single-thread score is 2,872, while the multi-thread score is 19,236. The ratio of about 6.7x reflects the 6-core/12-thread design scaling well in parallel workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with broad compatibility. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with ECC capability, and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with this socket's PCIe Gen 4 support. The CPU's 65 W TDP means most AM4 motherboards can handle it without special VRM considerations, and the GPU's 70 W TDP with no power connectors means the system can run on a 250 W PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores, as the AM4 platform supports higher-core-count Ryzen parts that would better match the GPU's 95th percentile performance. The current CPU's 85th percentile is the main bottleneck, so upgrading to a 12-core or 16-core Zen 3 chip would narrow the percentile gap and improve multi-threaded throughput. Alternatively, adding more system memory would help feed the GPU's 20 GB frame buffer in memory-intensive workloads, though the dual-channel DDR4 controller supports up to the platform's maximum.

The GPU's successor, Blackwell PRO W, is listed as the next generation, but the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation remains an active product. The predecessor is Workstation Ampere. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 168 mm in length and 69 mm in height, fitting in most small-form-factor cases. It has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting multi-monitor workstation setups.

For PSU headroom, the suggested 250 W PSU is sufficient for this pairing, but the actual system power draw depends on the CPU's boost behavior and system peripherals. The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 70 W TDP sum to 135 W, leaving 115 W of headroom in the suggested PSU for motherboard, drives, and fans. This makes the system suitable for compact power supplies common in small-form-factor builds.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Memory consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a large capacity for a 70 W GPU, making it suitable for large datasets, machine learning inference, and high-resolution textures. The base clock is 720 MHz with a boost clock of 1560 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s and texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The OpenCL score of 124,812 is strong for compute workloads, while the Vulkan score of 109,364 shows solid graphics API performance. The GPU is 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile and 2.4% ahead of the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, both of which are larger or older parts. It is 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GB10.

For rendering, the 20 GB memory capacity allows loading large scenes and high-resolution textures without spilling to system memory. The 48 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores accelerate AI-based upscaling and denoising. The 280.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, but sufficient for the GPU's compute throughput. The 70 W TDP with no power connectors means it can be installed in systems with limited power delivery, and the dual-slot cooler handles the thermal load. The display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high-resolution monitors.

The GPU's 95th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of GPUs in the database, including many higher-power desktop gaming cards. Its compute-focused design, with 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 192 tensor cores, makes it particularly strong for scientific computing, AI inference, and 3D rendering, where the benchmark scores translate directly to reduced render times and faster model training.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need workstation-grade GPU compute in a compact desktop form factor, with a CPU that handles general tasks without bottlenecking professional applications. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile performance, though the CPU's 85th percentile will limit frame rates at 1080p. Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will find the 20 GB GPU memory and 19.17 TFLOPS compute throughput valuable, while the CPU's 19,236 multi-thread score handles encoding and asset preparation.

Software developers building AI or machine learning applications will use the 192 tensor cores for model training and inference, with the CPU's 12 threads compiling code and managing data. Students in engineering or computer science programs can run CAD, simulation, and deep learning workloads on a single desktop without needing a separate workstation. Small business workstations for architecture, media production, or scientific research will benefit from the GPU's 4x mini-DisplayPort outputs for multi-monitor setups and its 70 W TDP for low operating costs.

The CPU's ECC memory support makes this suitable for workstations where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing. The GPU's 20 GB memory allows handling datasets that exceed the 8-12 GB found in consumer cards, making it a practical choice for data analysis and visualization. The system's 90th combined percentile places it above most consumer gaming PCs, but below top-tier multi-GPU workstations, making it a mid-range professional build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part on Socket AM4, and the GPU is a 70 W workstation card on PCIe 4.0 x16. The combined percentile is 90, driven by the GPU's 95th percentile and the CPU's 85th percentile. This is a high-tier pairing, but not a flagship one.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 36,945 places it in a dead heat with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T, all within 0.5%. The GPU's average score of 117,088 places it in the upper echelon of GPUs, slightly behind the Radeon PRO W7700 and ahead of the Tesla V100 SXM2. The combination is best described as a professional workstation GPU paired with a mainstream CPU, creating a system that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks but is balanced by CPU limitations in CPU-bound scenarios.

The build uses DDR4 memory, which is older but still capable, and PCIe Gen 4 for both CPU and GPU. The 65 W CPU and 70 W GPU make this a low-power system, suitable for compact cases and efficient operation. The GPU's lack of power connectors simplifies installation, and its dual-slot size fits most small-form-factor cases. This is a sensible choice for users who prioritize GPU compute over CPU throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 2,872 and physics score of 1,043 will limit frame rates, likely preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 95th percentile performance takes over, and the system can deliver high frame rates in most titles, though the RTX 4000 SFF is a workstation card, not a gaming-optimized part.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and multi-thread score of 19,236 can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU's tensor cores can offload encoding tasks via NVENC, though this is not explicitly measured in the data. The GPU's 20 GB memory allows running streaming software alongside games without memory pressure.

Video editing: The CPU's data compression score of 232,836 and integer math score of 59,339 handle codec operations and timeline processing, while the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and color grading. The 20 GB GPU memory allows editing 4K or 8K timelines without proxy files.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI denoising, with an OpenCL score of 124,812 indicating strong compute throughput. The CPU's 32 MB L3 cache and 6 cores provide adequate scene preparation, though render times will be GPU-dominated.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 2,872 ensures fast compilation of small projects, while the multi-thread score of 19,236 handles parallel builds. The GPU's 20 GB memory is useful for running local development models or testing GPU-accelerated code, and the ECC memory support on the CPU's platform ensures data integrity.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's low 70 W power draw make this an efficient system for daily tasks such as document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 4x mini-DisplayPort outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups, and the 250 W suggested PSU keeps energy costs low.