SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing places a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 desktop processor with a flagship 32 GB Blackwell GPU. The result is a system that is profoundly GPU-bound in gaming but CPU-limited in multi-threaded productivity. The benchmark data shows the CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 92nd percentile among all graphics cards, and the combined system ranks at the 89th percentile. The measured average FPS across all tested games is 189.3, placing this pairing at rank 402 out of 3,732 pairs, which is a top 11% finish. This is a configuration built for maximum graphical fidelity, not for CPU-heavy computation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a clear and consistent division of labor. In gaming, the GPU is the dominant component, and the CPU rarely becomes the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,872 and multi-thread score of 19,236 are sufficient to feed the RTX 5090 in most titles. For example, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system hits 812 FPS at 1080p, which is a scenario where a weaker CPU would typically choke the frame rate. The fact that it reaches 812 FPS suggests the Ryzen 5 5600F’s Zen 3 architecture is not a significant hindrance at this resolution.

However, the bottleneck shifts as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload rises sharply, and the CPU’s role diminishes. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 71 FPS at 1080p to 53 FPS at 4K, a 25% reduction that is almost entirely attributable to the GPU’s rendering load. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 19,236 is a mid-range result, and in heavily threaded scenarios like data compression (232,836 score) or integer math (59,339), it performs adequately but not exceptionally. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores 36,938 on average, which is virtually identical (0% delta), indicating the 5600F is competitive but not ahead in CPU-bound tasks.

The real bottleneck is in multi-threaded non-gaming workloads. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 19,236 places it well below the GPU’s compute muscle. While the GPU can deliver 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, the CPU’s floating-point math score is only 34,548. This means in physics simulations or complex AI workloads that rely on the CPU, the system will be held back by the processor. The GPU’s compute score of 26,756 and OpenCL score of 334,370 show that offloading to the GPU is the preferred path for heavy math, but not all software is optimized for that. The data suggests that for pure gaming, the CPU is sufficient, but for any CPU-bound productivity, it will be the limiting component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system excels here, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. Measured FPS shows 368 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p and 243 FPS at 1440p, which easily saturates a 240Hz or 360Hz monitor. The GPU’s 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensure that texture-heavy scenes do not cause stutters.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores (680) and dedicated RT cores (170) can handle encoding and ray tracing simultaneously. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for streaming while gaming, but the PassMark multi-thread score of 19,236 suggests that heavy background tasks may impact frame pacing. The measured 109 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p leaves headroom for encoding overhead.

Video editing: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,872 is decent for timeline scrubbing, but the multi-thread score of 19,236 is modest. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 GB VRAM will accelerate exports and effects, but the CPU may bottleneck in multi-track projects. The extended instructions score of 16,266 indicates good AVX-512-like performance for codecs.

3D rendering: This is a mixed bag. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS and 32 GB VRAM are exceptional for GPU rendering engines, but the CPU’s 6 cores will lag in CPU-based rendering. The CPU’s integer math score of 59,339 and floating-point score of 34,548 are mid-pack, so expect long CPU renders. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 334,370 is a strong indicator for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are workable for compilation, but the multithread score of 19,236 is not class-leading. The single-thread score of 2,872 is more important for code editing and IDE responsiveness. The system’s 32 GB of GPU memory is useful for large dataset processing, but the CPU’s 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for some workloads.

Student and office work: This is grossly overkill. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,872 is more than enough for office suites, and the GPU’s G2D score of 1,413 handles 2D acceleration easily. The system will idle through spreadsheets and web browsing, but the 575 W TDP GPU and 950 W suggested PSU make this an impractical choice for a dorm room.

Gaming Performance

The measured data confirms that this is a gaming powerhouse, with the caveat that the CPU can limit frame rates in esports titles at 1080p. The average FPS across all games is 189.3, which is high, but the variance is significant. In esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system delivers 812 FPS at 1080p, 559 FPS at 1440p, and 330 FPS at 4K. This shows the GPU is capable of massive frame rates, but the CPU’s 4.00 GHz boost clock is enough to sustain them.

In AAA titles, the results are strong but not always 4K-capable at ultra settings. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K. This is a playable experience, but not a locked 60 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows a similar pattern: 99 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, and 49 FPS at 4K. The RTX 5090’s 32 GB VRAM is not the limiting factor here; the raw rasterization performance is.

The most demanding title in the list is Ark: Survival Ascended, which runs at 54 FPS at 1080p, 34 FPS at 1440p, and 18 FPS at 4K. This shows that some games are simply too heavy for even this GPU at ultra settings. Conversely, Valorant runs at 351 FPS at 1080p, 333 FPS at 1440p, and 309 FPS at 4K, showing that lighter titles are not CPU-bound at higher resolutions. The data indicates that for most games, this system is best suited for 1440p high-refresh or 4K at high (not ultra) settings.

Who Should Build It

This build is for gamers who prioritize maximum graphical fidelity and have a monitor that can show it. The measured FPS at 2560x1440 shows 152 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 116 FPS in Control, which are excellent for 144Hz monitors. At 3840x2160, the system delivers 92 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 78 FPS in Control, making it viable for 4K gaming if settings are tuned.

Content creators who rely on GPU acceleration will benefit, but they must accept the CPU’s limitations. The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM is ideal for 8K video editing or large 3D scenes, and the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 is a workhorse for renders. However, developers or engineers who compile large codebases or run CPU-bound simulations should look elsewhere, as the CPU’s 19,236 multi-thread score is not in the top tier.

Students and small business users should not build this. The 575 W GPU TDP and 950 W PSU requirement are wasteful for office tasks, and the CPU’s performance is not the selling point. This is a specialist tool for gamers and GPU-centric professionals who want the fastest graphics card available, paired with a competent but not exceptional CPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, using a 7 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it features 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results show a single-thread score of 2,872, which is a strong result for gaming and general responsiveness. The multi-thread score of 19,236 is respectable for a 6-core part, but it is 0% different from the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D. This indicates that the 5600F is a mid-pack performer in multi-threaded tasks, not a leader. The integer math score of 59,339 and floating-point score of 34,548 are solid for a 6-core chip, but they lag behind higher-core-count rivals.

The CPU’s extended instructions score of 16,266 and data encryption score of 13,839 show it handles modern instruction sets well. The data compression score of 232,836 is high, suggesting good memory bandwidth utilization. The physics score of 1,043 is a moderate result, meaning that in CPU-bound physics simulations, the system will not be at the top. The CPU’s percentile of 85th among all CPUs confirms it is above average, but it is not a halo product. The 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die make it a dense and efficient design, but the 4.00 GHz boost clock is not extreme.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a flagship GPU based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs. The GPU features 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI tasks. The memory subsystem is 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s raw compute power is staggering: 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance. This translates to a PassMark G3D score of 39,650, which is a top-tier result. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 show it excels in compute workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s mean it can fill frames at very high resolutions.

The GPU’s percentile of 92nd among all GPUs places it near the top, and its average benchmark score of 79,842 is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB. However, the nearest rivals are older Tesla cards, which highlights that the RTX 5090 is in a class of its own for consumer gaming. The 32 GB VRAM is double what most games need, but it ensures future-proofing and enables massive texture packs. The 575 W TDP and 950 W suggested PSU indicate this is a power-hungry component that requires a serious power supply.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks at the 89th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile.

*Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K ultra settings?*

A: The measured FPS at 3840x2160 is 53 FPS, which is playable but not a locked 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, it runs at 65 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36,945, which is 0% different from the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 1,999 USD.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, which provides 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for 4K gaming.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck in esports titles?

A: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,872 allows for very high frame rates, such as 812 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 368 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. The CPU is not a bottleneck at these settings.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games is 189.3, placing this pairing at rank 402 out of 3,732 pairs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is a 32 GB Blackwell 2.0 flagship. The combined system percentile is 89th, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of configurations. The GPU is the star of the show, with a 92nd percentile ranking, while the CPU is a competent but not dominant 85th percentile. This is a system for users who want the fastest graphics performance available, with a CPU that can keep up in gaming but lags in heavy multi-threaded productivity. The measured FPS data confirms it is a top-tier gaming machine, especially at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s massive VRAM and bandwidth shine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 36,945, with a multi-thread score of 19,236 and a single-thread score of 2,872. It ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, with a PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and a compute score of 26,756. It ranks in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 89th.

In gaming, the measured FPS across all games averages 189.3. The best results are in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 812 FPS (1080p) and Valorant at 351 FPS (1080p). The worst results are in Ark: Survival Ascended at 54 FPS (1080p) and 18 FPS (4K). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and Vulkan score of 376,728 indicate strong API performance. The CPU’s data compression score of 232,836 and integer math score of 59,339 show it handles common tasks well, but its floating-point score of 34,548 is a reminder that it is not a compute monster. This pairing is a 4K-capable gaming system with a CPU that is good enough for most tasks, but it is not a balanced workstation.