SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a balanced mid-range desktop build, achieving a combined percentile of 73 across all benchmarked systems. The combination of a six-core Zen 3 processor with a 61st-percentile GPU in a desktop form factor delivers a versatile platform, with measured average FPS across games at 115.6, ranking 2081st out of 3732 pairs. This analysis details the component capabilities, workload suitability, and system balance based on the available benchmark data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU packs 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. The core clocks are set at a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 2460 MHz, while the memory runs at 2125 MHz, translating to 17 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 15.11 TFLOPS. For hardware acceleration, the card includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores for this GPU show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2302, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 95057 and 48643, respectively. PassMark tests reveal a G3D score of 19545 and a GPU compute score of 9213. The percentile ranking against all GPUs is 61, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Notably, the nearest rivals are older or integrated parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (delta 0.3%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (delta 0.5%). This data indicates the RTX 4060 performs at a level comparable to these older discrete cards and modern integrated graphics, but its advantage lies in the feature set—RT cores and tensor cores—rather than raw rasterization dominance.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS is the key metric for traditional shading, while the tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. The RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the limited memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s and 8 GB VRAM may constrain highly complex scenes. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 175, suggesting that the architecture's performance in newer APIs may depend heavily on driver optimization and specific workload characteristics. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but 4K output will stress the memory bus and ROPs, as evidenced by the FPS scaling in games.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This system excels at 1080p high-refresh gaming, with measured FPS showing 184 in Counter-Strike 2, 219 in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, and 351 in Valorant at 1920x1080. The CPU's single-thread score of 2872 supports high frame rates, while the GPU's G3D score of 19545 ensures smooth rendering. At 1440p, the system maintains playable rates in esports titles, with 122 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 143 in Rainbow Six Siege, though demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 41 FPS at this resolution.

Streaming: For streaming workloads, the RTX 4060's tensor cores (96 total) provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced features, which offloads the CPU. The CPU's multithread score of 19236 and 12 threads handle encoding overhead when not using NVENC, though the GPU's dedicated hardware is more efficient. The measured FPS in Fortnite at 88 FPS (1080p) suggests headroom for simultaneous streaming, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor when running the game and encoding software concurrently.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU's floating-point math score of 34548 and the GPU's compute score of 9213 indicates solid performance for video editing tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines, and the tensor cores accelerate effects like denoising. The CPU's integer math score of 59339 handles codec processing, and the 32 MB shared L3 cache aids in timeline scrubbing. However, 4K editing with heavy effects may exceed the VRAM capacity, leading to slower previews.

3D Rendering: The RTX 4060's 24 RT cores and FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS make it capable for entry-level 3D rendering. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 shows reasonable compute throughput, while the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide the necessary geometry processing. For rendering, the system achieves a passmark multithread score of 19236, which is adequate for moderate scenes but may struggle with complex, time-intensive renders that benefit from more cores.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 232836 and encryption score of 13839 are strong for compilation and code processing tasks. The single-thread score of 2872 ensures responsive IDE performance, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds. The GPU is less critical here, but its compute capability supports local machine learning testing, with the 96 tensor cores providing acceleration for inference tasks.

Student and Office Work: For productivity, this system is overqualified but efficient. The CPU's extended instructions score of 16266 and random string sorting score of 23422 show quick data manipulation, making spreadsheet and document tasks snappy. The GPU's G2D score of 1037 ensures smooth 2D rendering for multiple monitors. The 65W TDP CPU and 115W TDP GPU keep power consumption low, and the system's 73rd combined percentile places it well above average for general use.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q:... A:...)

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, placing it above 73% of all tested systems. This is supported by the CPU's 85th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, while the Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, a delta of -0.2%. This means the RTX 4060 is essentially performance-equivalent to the older card in average benchmarks, despite its newer architecture.

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in Valorant at 1080p?

A: The measured FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080 is 351, making it the highest FPS recorded among the tested games for this system. At 1440p, this drops to 333 FPS, and at 4K it remains playable at 288 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect power requirements?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has a TDP of 65W. The GPU's TDP is 115W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300W, indicating a low overall power draw that is suitable for efficient builds.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing. This is part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and the CPU?

A: The RTX 4060 has 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Ryzen 5 5600F has 51.2 GB/s of system memory bandwidth. The GPU's higher bandwidth is critical for texture streaming and frame buffer operations.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multithread performance?

A: The CPU's single-thread score is 2872, while the multithread score is 19236. This indicates strong scaling across 12 threads, with the multithread score being approximately 6.7 times higher, which is typical for a 6-core/12-thread processor.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 5 5600F and the RTX 4060 is skewed toward CPU capability in terms of percentile ranking. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile, suggesting that the processor has more headroom relative to the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the FPS scaling across resolutions reveals where the bottleneck shifts. At 1080p, many games show high FPS, such as 184 in Counter-Strike 2 and 407 in CS:GO, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. However, in more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p FPS of 54 suggests the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU's performance is not the constraint.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. For example, in Red Dead Redemption 2, the FPS drops from 49 at 1080p to 37 at 1440p and 24 at 4K, which is a clear sign of GPU limitation due to the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's performance remains relatively constant, as evidenced by the single-thread score of 2872, which is sufficient for most game logic. In lighter esports titles, the system is well-balanced, with the GPU able to push high frames at 1080p without CPU stalling. The average FPS across games is 115.6, which is a strong indicator that the pairing is well-matched for 1080p gaming, but at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, limiting performance in graphically intensive scenarios.

The pair rank of 2081 out of 3732 pairs (56th percentile) further confirms that this is a mid-tier combination, not a top performer. The CPU's 85th percentile suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield better gaming performance at higher resolutions, while the GPU's 61st percentile means that CPU-heavy workloads like data compression (score 232836) are not fully utilized by the graphics card. For productivity tasks, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU's lower percentile does not hinder these workloads, but in gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and above.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65W. The CPU is manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. The processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, and it has no integrated graphics.

Benchmark scores reveal a strong single-thread performance of 2872, which is competitive for gaming and office tasks. The multithread score of 19236 shows good scaling, with the data compression score of 232836 indicating excellent throughput for file archiving. The integer math score of 59339 and floating-point math score of 34548 are robust for scientific and financial calculations. The encryption score of 13839 is moderate, while the extended instructions score of 16266 supports modern SIMD workloads. The physics score of 1043 is lower, but this is a synthetic test that may not reflect real-world gaming physics.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking places it above 85% of all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36945. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with a score of 36938 (delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D with 37018 (delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 with 37093 (delta -0.4%). This indicates the 5600F is performance-equivalent to these parts, but it lacks the 3D V-Cache of the 5500X3D, which could impact gaming in cache-sensitive titles. For real workloads, the 6 cores and 12 threads are ideal for gaming, streaming, and moderate productivity, but the 4.00 GHz boost clock limits peak performance in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, where a higher core count would be beneficial.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is targeted at gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want high refresh rates in esports titles. The measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (184), Valorant (351), and Rainbow Six Siege (219) at 1080p demonstrates that the system can drive 144Hz or 240Hz monitors in these games. For 1440p, the system is still capable, with 122 FPS in CS2 and 143 in R6, but demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (41 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (37 FPS) will require settings adjustments. 4K gaming is not a strength, with most titles falling below 60 FPS, so this build is not suitable for 4K enthusiasts.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will find the system adequate. The CPU's multithread score of 19236 and the GPU's compute score of 9213 support editing and rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits complex 4K projects. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's single-thread score of 2872 for compilation speed and the 12 threads for parallel builds, while the GPU's tensor cores (96) enable local AI model testing. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the low power draw (65W CPU, 115W GPU) makes it an efficient choice for daily use.

Small business workstations that require occasional gaming or light GPU acceleration will find this pairing suitable. The CPU's data compression score of 232836 is useful for database operations, and the GPU's DirectX 12 support ensures compatibility with modern business applications. However, industries requiring high-end 3D rendering or scientific computing would be better served by a higher-tier GPU, as the RTX 4060's 61st percentile ranking indicates it is not a top performer. The build's combined percentile of 73 suggests it is a solid mid-range option, but not for professionals needing maximum compute throughput.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark performance is anchored by its average score of 36945, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The key scores include a single-thread score of 2872, a multithread score of 19236, and an integer math score of 59339. The floating-point math score is 34548, and the data compression score is 232836. The CPU also achieves a data encryption score of 13839 and an extended instructions score of 16266. These scores indicate a balanced processor that excels in single-threaded tasks and handles multithreaded workloads competently, but it is not a top-tier performer for heavily parallelized tasks.

The GPU's performance is defined by its average score of 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, while the Geekbench OpenCL score is 95057 and the Vulkan score is 48643. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 19545 and a GPU compute score of 9213. The DirectX 11 score of 175 is higher than the DirectX 12 score of 76, which is an interesting anomaly. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (score 17666, delta -0.2%) and the AMD Radeon 780M (score 17588, delta 0.3%), showing that the RTX 4060 is competitive with these parts but not significantly ahead.

The combined picture shows a system that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side. The CPU's 85th percentile versus the GPU's 61st percentile means that the processor is capable of driving a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking. The measured average FPS across games is 115.6, which is respectable, but the pair rank of 2081 out of 3732 (56th percentile) indicates that this is a mid-range system. The combined percentile of 73 reflects the overall balance, with the CPU boosting the system's standing. In gaming, the GPU limits performance at higher resolutions, but at 1080p, the CPU and GPU work well together, as shown by high FPS in esports titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The system's power requirements are modest, with the CPU at 65W TDP and the GPU at 115W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300W. This leaves considerable headroom for upgrades, as a more powerful GPU with a higher TDP could be accommodated with a PSU upgrade, but the current 300W suggestion is sufficient for the existing components.

A sensible next upgrade would be to improve the GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile indicates it can handle a more powerful graphics card. However, the AM4 platform is mature, and the CPU is near the top of its generation, so upgrading the CPU would likely require a new motherboard and memory. The memory support for DDR4 means that faster RAM could be added, but the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is already adequate for most tasks. The PCIe Gen 4 support is current, but the GPU's x8 interface means that a future GPU with a x16 interface would not be fully utilized on this platform.

Given the GPU's end-of-life status and the CPU's active production status, the most logical upgrade path is to replace the RTX 4060 with a newer GPU from the GeForce 50 series, which is the successor. The 300W PSU would need to be upgraded if a higher-TDP GPU is chosen, but the current headroom allows for a modest increase. The CPU's 65W TDP means that a stronger CPU cooler is not necessary for the current processor, but if upgrading the GPU, the system's overall power draw would increase. The AM4 socket limits future CPU upgrades, but for the current build, the balance is good, and the next upgrade should focus on the GPU to improve gaming performance at higher resolutions.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a desktop-class system featuring the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3 architecture, and is currently in active production, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace, and is end-of-life. The pairing represents a mid-range configuration, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 73. This places the system in the upper-mid tier of all tested builds, indicating it is a capable performer for most mainstream workloads.

The measured data shows an average FPS across games of 115.6, with a pair rank of 2081 out of 3732, meaning it performs better than 56% of all pairs. The system excels at 1080p gaming, as evidenced by high FPS in esports titles like Valorant (351 FPS) and CS:GO (407 FPS), but struggles at 4K, where most games fall below 60 FPS. The CPU's strong single-thread and multithread scores make it a versatile processor for productivity, while the GPU's feature set (RT cores, tensor cores) provides value for content creation and AI workloads, despite its mid-tier rasterization performance.

Overall, this is a balanced desktop build for users who want solid 1080p gaming performance and capable productivity without breaking the bank in terms of power consumption. The 65W CPU and 115W GPU with a 300W suggested PSU make it an efficient system, and the AM4 platform offers a clear upgrade path for the GPU. The combined percentile of 73 confirms that this is a reliable, mid-range choice for gamers and professionals who prioritize 1080p or 1440p performance over 4K capability.