SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations, with measured frame rates averaging 121.7 FPS across a wide game library. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory; the data shows a system that handles high-refresh 1080p gaming comfortably, with 1440p still viable and 4K reserved for lighter titles.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600F is built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) using TSMC's 7 nm process, with a transistor count of 4,150 million on a 74 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 4.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This configuration delivers a PassMark multithread score of 19,236 and a single-thread score of 2,872, with an average benchmark score of 36,945.

The CPU's percentile rank of 85 among all processors puts it in the upper tier for general compute. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores 36,938 (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (-0.2%), meaning the 5600F is statistically tied with both. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 (-0.5%), again a negligible difference. For integer math, the 5600F scores 59,339, and for floating-point math it reaches 34,548; these numbers indicate solid throughput for scientific and engineering workloads that rely on parallel arithmetic.

The 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock are modest by modern standards, but the Zen 3 architecture extracts strong instructions-per-clock. The data shows a single-thread score of 2,872, which is competitive for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark data compression score of 232,836 suggests the CPU handles archiving and file compression tasks efficiently, while the encryption score of 13,839 indicates adequate security workload performance. The extended instructions score of 16,266 points to good SIMD processing, beneficial for multimedia encoding.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread layout means the 5600F will not choke on background tasks while gaming, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps with frame pacing in titles that are cache-sensitive. The physics score of 1,043 from PassMark is a weak point relative to the rest of the results, so heavy physics simulations in games or professional tools will see lower performance than the multithread score alone suggests. The prime number finding score of 120 is similarly low, indicating that purely sequential integer loops are not a strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600F uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with extensive motherboard availability. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is a bonus for workstation use where data integrity is critical. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, giving the GPU a full x16 connection and leaving headroom for an NVMe SSD.

The GPU requires a 550 W suggested PSU, which is moderate for a modern system. With the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system draw is well within the PSU's capacity, leaving overhead for additional drives, fans, or USB devices. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design measuring 267 mm in length, so case compatibility is straightforward for most mid-tower enclosures.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be a higher-tier AM4 CPU, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 part from the same 5000 series, which would drop into the same socket without a motherboard change. However, the data shows the current CPU is already performing near its rivals, so the gain would be marginal for gaming. For the GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means a future card upgrade is unconstrained by bandwidth. The 16 GB of video memory on the RX 7700 is already generous, so a GPU swap would only be needed for 4K or ray-tracing-heavy workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 72 for this CPU+GPU pair indicates the system is well-matched overall, but the data reveals where each component becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's multithread score of 19,236 is strong for a 6-core part, yet the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,974 is also robust, so neither is a clear bottleneck at 1080p. Looking at measured FPS, the system averages 121.7 FPS across all games, which suggests the pairing is balanced for high-refresh gaming.

At 1080p, the GPU is often the limiting factor in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, where the system hits 58 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS. These numbers are below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating the GPU cannot fully saturate the CPU's capabilities in these heavy workloads. Conversely, in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (195 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (351 FPS), the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to drive frame rates far beyond the GPU's output, meaning the GPU is the bottleneck there.

At 1440p, the GPU's load increases, and the CPU becomes less of a factor; for instance, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, while the lighter Allods Online hits 53 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck, with even Valorant dropping to 305 FPS (still high) but most games falling below 60 FPS. The pair rank of 1,933 out of 3,732 pairs (top 48%) confirms that the system is neither CPU-bound nor GPU-bound on average, but individual games will favor one component depending on their threading and graphics demands.

Who Should Build It

The data points to several clear audiences for this build. Gamers at 1080p who play competitive shooters will find the system highly capable: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 195 FPS, Valorant at 351 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS, all with ultra settings. These frame rates are well above 144 Hz monitor thresholds, making this a strong choice for esports enthusiasts. At 1440p, the system still delivers 129 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 152 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, so high-refresh 1440p is also achievable for lighter titles.

Content creators working with video editing will see mixed results. The CPU's multithread score of 19,236 supports smooth timeline editing and export tasks, while the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering in applications that use GPU acceleration. However, the PassMark GPU compute score of 10,963 is modest, so heavy 3D rendering or machine learning workloads will not be class-leading. For software developers, the 6-core/12-thread CPU handles compilation and testing effectively, and the ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers.

Students and small business workstations will appreciate the balance: the CPU's 85th percentile rank means everyday office tasks are snappy, while the GPU's 58th percentile rank provides enough power for light CAD or data visualization. The 16 GB VRAM is future-proof for memory-intensive applications, and the system's overall 72nd percentile suggests it can handle a variety of professional software without severe compromises.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 5600F achieves an average benchmark score of 36,945, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered within 0.5%: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 at 36,938 (0%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D at 37,018 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37,093 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37,112 (-0.5%). This means the 5600F is effectively tied with these parts, and any performance difference is within measurement noise.

The Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (-1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15,679 (1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (-1.7%). The GPU is thus slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti, but ahead of the Pro W5500, indicating it sits in the upper-midrange tier of graphics cards.

The combined picture shows a system that is CPU-strong relative to the GPU: the CPU sits 27 points above the 50th percentile, while the GPU is only 8 points above. This means the CPU has more headroom for future GPU upgrades. The pair rank of 1,933 out of 3,732 (with an average FPS of 121.7) confirms that the system delivers smooth gameplay across a broad range of titles, with the weakest performance in AAA titles at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F uses the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) on TSMC's 7 nm process, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s and an effective speed of 19.5 Gbps.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile rank?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing is in the 72nd percentile of all combinations, with an average measured FPS of 121.7 across games.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has 40 ray tracing cores, though the data does not include dedicated RT benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 2,872, which is competitive for gaming and lightly-threaded tasks.

Q: What PSU is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU suggests a 550 W power supply, which is sufficient for the 65 W TDP CPU and 200 W TDP GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers 195 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 351 FPS in Valorant, making it ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. At 1440p, these drop to 129 FPS and 333 FPS, respectively, still above the 144 Hz threshold for esports.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a multithread score of 19,236 can handle game capture and encoding while maintaining frame rates, as evidenced by 94 FPS in Fortnite and 98 FPS in Fivem at 1080p, leaving headroom for streaming software.

Video editing: The GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects, while the CPU's integer score of 59,339 handles codec processing. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers, though the GPU's compute score of 10,963 suggests render times will be moderate.

3D rendering: The CPU's multithread score of 19,236 is adequate for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's compute score of 10,963 is not class-leading, so GPU-accelerated renders will be slower than high-end cards.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 2,872 and multithread score of 19,236 allow for fast compilation and test runs, with the ECC memory support adding stability for long build processes.

Student and office work: The system's 85th percentile CPU rank ensures responsive multitasking, while the GPU's 58th percentile rank handles spreadsheet-heavy tasks with integrated graphics disabled; the 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office but future-proofs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 CPU) with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 GPU). The system sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPU+GPU pairs, with a CPU percentile of 85 and a GPU percentile of 58. The measured FPS across games averages 121.7, indicating a strong 1080p gaming machine that can handle 1440p in many titles.

The pairing is notable for its CPU strength relative to the GPU: the CPU is near its rivals (within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D), while the GPU is slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7%. This makes the system more future-proof on the CPU side, as a GPU upgrade would be the logical next step for higher resolutions. The 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature, providing headroom for texture-heavy mods or VR workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 32 chip) using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a boost clock of 2459 MHz, and a game clock of 2041 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth with an effective speed of 19.5 Gbps.

The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, with 40 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W and two 8-pin power connectors.

In benchmarks, the RX 7700 scores 20,974 in PassMark G3D and 10,963 in PassMark GPU compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865. Its percentile rank of 58 places it in the upper-midrange, with the RTX 3060 Ti scoring 16,129 in average benchmark (1.7% higher). The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing for large texture packs and high-resolution assets without memory pressure.

For rendering workloads, the 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports real-time previews, while the 40 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, though the data does not show RT-specific scores. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the GPU's compute power becomes the limiting factor, as seen in the measured FPS drops.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (ultra settings) shows the system's performance across three resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 431 FPS, Valorant at 351 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. In AAA titles, Cyberpunk 2077 hits 58 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 70 FPS, indicating that 60 FPS is achievable in most games with some settings adjustments.

At 1440p, the system maintains playable frame rates in most titles: Counter-Strike 2 drops to 129 FPS, Valorant to 333 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 152 FPS. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, which are below the 60 FPS target but still playable on adaptive sync monitors. The lighter titles like Barony (104 FPS) and Dave The Diver (122 FPS) remain smooth.

At 4K, the system struggles with modern AAA games: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and The Medium at 27 FPS. However, esports titles remain playable, with Valorant at 305 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 72 FPS. Lighter games like Minecraft (63 FPS) and Roblox (95 FPS) still hit playable levels. The data confirms this is a 1080p-focused gaming system with 1440p capability in less demanding titles, and 4K limited to esports or older games.