SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines a 6-core, 12-thread AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (Zen 3, Vermeer, 7 nm TSMC process) with NVIDIA’s RTX 5000 Ada Generation workstation GPU (AD102, Ada Lovelace, 5 nm TSMC). The CPU holds a 74th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs; together, the combination ranks at the 86th percentile overall. The data shows a workstation-class GPU paired with a mid-range desktop CPU, producing a system that is heavily GPU-bound in most scenarios, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance but limited multi-thread headroom for extreme parallel workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process. The chip contains 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. It connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor has a 65 W TDP, is multiplier-unlocked, and was released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $199.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 18,309 in multi-core and 2,584 in single-core; the multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score, which is close to the theoretical scaling of 6 cores with simultaneous multithreading. Cinebench R20 results show 7,689 multi-core and 1,085 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1,845 multi-core and 260 single-core. Geekbench scores are 9,158 multi-core and 1,936 single-core. In 3DMark threaded tests, the CPU scales from 882 in single-thread to 5,659 in max-threads, indicating efficient utilization of all 12 threads; the jump from 8 threads (4,798) to max threads (5,659) is only 18%, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multi-thread score is 21,541, while single-thread is 3,256. Integer math scores 68,396, floating-point math 38,778, and extended instructions 16,993. Data encryption scores 15,531, data compression 251,687, and random string sorting 25,943. The physics score is 1,285, and prime number finding is 137. These figures indicate that the CPU handles integer-heavy tasks well but is modest in floating-point and physics simulations, typical for a 6-core part.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,468, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20,454 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20,425 (0.2% behind), the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20,422 (0.2% behind), and the AMD EPYC 7713 scores 20,363 (0.5% behind). This means the Ryzen 5 5600 performs essentially identically to these larger or newer chips in aggregate benchmarks, despite having fewer cores than the EPYC parts — a reflection of its strong per-core efficiency.

For real workloads, the 3.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clocks translate to responsive single-threaded performance, as seen in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,584. The 32 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which benefits workloads with shared data sets. The DDR4 dual-channel memory at 51.2 GB/s is adequate for gaming and general productivity but will not feed the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth in memory-heavy compute tasks, making the CPU a potential bottleneck in some data-intensive scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 76,300 million transistors across 609 mm², with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU has 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation units. It includes 100 ray tracing cores and 400 tensor cores, making it fully equipped for RT and AI-accelerated workloads.

Memory configuration is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective data rate. Base clock is 1155 MHz, boosting to 2550 MHz. Pixel fill rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a 250 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends a 600 W PSU. It occupies a dual-slot form factor, measures 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, and outputs via 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports PCIe 4.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores show strong compute capability. Geekbench OpenCL scores 175,286, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 194,041. The average benchmark score is 184,664, placing the GPU at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183,725 (0.5% behind), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187,147 (1.3% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182,109 (1.4% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D at 178,050 (3.7% behind). The RTX 5000 Ada Generation essentially trades blows with A100-class accelerators, while edging out a high-end consumer card like the RTX 4090 D by 3.7%.

For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM is a standout feature, allowing large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-model compositions to reside entirely in GPU memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports this capacity, though it is lower than some competing workstation parts with wider buses. The 100 RT cores handle ray-traced rendering, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-based upscaling. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is well-suited for scientific computing and simulation. The 1:1 FP16 ratio means half-precision workloads run at full speed, which is advantageous for machine learning inference and training where FP16 is common.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a CPU at the 74th percentile and a GPU at the 98th percentile, with the overall system at the 86th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,468, while the GPU’s is 184,664 — a ratio of roughly 9:1 in raw aggregate scores, underscoring the GPU’s dominance in this pairing.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,309 is competitive with its nearest rivals: it is within 0.5% of the EPYC 7713’s average score and within 0.2% of the Ryzen 5 8500G. The single-core score of 2,584 is strong for a 2022-era desktop chip, and the Geekbench single-core of 1,936 confirms solid per-thread performance. In 3DMark, the max-threads score of 5,659 is only 0.3% higher than the 16-thread score of 5,641, indicating that the 12-thread CPU is already saturated at 16 threads and gains nothing from additional thread allocation.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 is 10.7% higher than its OpenCL score of 175,286, suggesting that Vulkan compute paths are more efficient on this architecture. The 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D in average score positions it as a top-tier performer, just behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%. The data shows the GPU is the clear performance driver, with the CPU providing adequate but not exceptional support.

For real-world workloads, this means the system will excel in GPU-bound tasks like rendering, video encoding, and AI inference, while CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulation or heavy multi-threaded compilation will be limited by the 6-core CPU. The 86th combined percentile reflects a system that is faster than most but not at the absolute top, primarily due to the CPU’s mid-range positioning.

Who Should Build It

The data points to a system for professionals who need workstation-grade GPU compute without a top-tier CPU. The 98th-percentile GPU with 32 GB VRAM is suited for 3D rendering, video editing with high-resolution timelines, scientific computing, and machine learning workloads. The 74th-percentile CPU handles everyday tasks and single-threaded applications competently but will not lead in multi-core CPU benchmarks.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video, large 3D scenes, or complex simulations will benefit most. The 32 GB VRAM allows entire scenes to fit in GPU memory, reducing reliance on slower system memory. Software developers compiling large codebases will see adequate performance from the 6-core CPU, though build times will be longer than with higher-core-count alternatives. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the GPU capable for coursework involving CUDA or TensorFlow, while the CPU suffices for general productivity.

Small business workstations for CAD, architectural visualization, or medical imaging would also fit this pairing. The GPU’s 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI-based tools, while the CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps power demands modest. Gamers at high resolutions — 1440p or 4K — will see GPU-bound frame rates, but the CPU may limit performance at lower resolutions or high refresh rates due to its 6-core limit.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,584 will cap frame rates in CPU-limited scenes. The system is better suited for 4K gaming where the GPU dominates.

Streaming: The GPU’s 400 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture can handle encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU’s 12 threads can manage chat and overlays, though simultaneous game + stream + encoding may approach CPU limits.

Video editing: The 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow smooth scrubbing and rendering of 4K and 8K timelines. The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU handles timeline management adequately.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 are ideal for ray-traced renders and GPU-accelerated engines. The 32 GB VRAM holds large scenes, and the 98th-percentile GPU ranking ensures render times are short.

Software development: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads compile code effectively, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 21,541. The GPU accelerates parallel workloads like unit testing or data processing, but the CPU is the limiting factor for build times.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,256 in PassMark ensures responsive daily use. The GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for future compute-heavy projects.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured frame data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The GPU’s 98th-percentile ranking and its 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D — a known high-end consumer card — suggest it will deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. The 32 GB VRAM eliminates memory capacity as a limitation, even with ultra-texture packs at 4K. The 100 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, though the exact FPS depends on the game’s engine and the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU.

At 1080p, the CPU’s 6 cores may become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, potentially capping FPS below what the GPU can deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and frame rates should scale with the GPU’s compute capability. The measured Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 indicates strong driver-level performance for Vulkan-based titles, while the OpenCL score of 175,286 suggests adequate performance for OpenGL legacy titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU at the 98th percentile versus the CPU at the 74th percentile. In GPU-bound workloads — rendering, video encoding, AI inference — the GPU will operate near full utilization, and the CPU will keep up adequately. In CPU-bound workloads — physics simulation, heavy multi-threaded compilation, or 1080p gaming at high refresh rates — the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads will limit performance.

Evidence from the 3DMark tests shows the CPU’s thread scaling flattens after 8 threads: the 8-thread score of 4,798 is 85% of the max-threads score of 5,659, and the 16-thread score of 5,641 is essentially identical to max-threads. This means adding more threads does not help beyond 12, and the CPU will not feed the GPU in scenarios requiring high single-thread throughput beyond its 4.40 GHz boost.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is far below the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s. In workloads where data must be transferred between system memory and GPU memory, this disparity can cause stalls. The PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface reduces this issue, but the CPU’s 20 lanes total limit expansion. The GPU’s 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU leave headroom for the CPU’s 65 W TDP, so power is not a limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 98th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 184,664.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V?

A: The CPU’s average score of 20,468 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V’s 20,454.

Q: What is the system’s combined percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 86th among all systems.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU wattage?

A: The GPU has a 250 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 600 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, including ECC support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 250 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU leave room for additional drives or expansion cards. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, allowing overclocking within the AM4 platform’s capabilities.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM4 CPU, such as a 12-core or 16-core Zen 3 part, to address CPU-bound workloads. This would improve multi-threaded performance without changing the platform. The GPU is already at the 98th percentile, so upgrading it would yield diminishing returns unless specific features like higher FP64 or larger VRAM are needed. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4, so future GPUs using PCIe Gen 4 will run at full bandwidth. Memory is DDR4, so upgrading to higher-capacity or higher-speed DDR4 modules is possible, though the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth remains fixed by the dual-channel controller.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 processor at the 74th CPU percentile, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU at the 98th GPU percentile. The pairing ranks at the 86th combined percentile, reflecting a system that leads in GPU-centric tasks but is held back by a mid-range CPU in multi-threaded CPU workloads. The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it a professional-grade compute device, while the CPU’s 65 W TDP and $199 launch MSRP position it as an accessible desktop processor. This is a workstation-oriented configuration for users who prioritize GPU compute and rendering over CPU multi-threading, with the understanding that CPU-bound tasks will not reach the same performance tier.