SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation pairing is a study in contrasts: a mainstream 65W desktop CPU paired with a compact, 70W workstation GPU that commands a 95th-percentile standing. This combination targets users who need professional-grade compute and rendering acceleration in a space-constrained chassis, but it requires careful scrutiny regarding gaming expectations. The data shows a system with a combined percentile of 85, yet the absence of measured frame rate data means all gaming conclusions are estimates derived from synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 "Vermeer" architecture. Fabricated on TSMC's 7nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, it operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The chip features a 65W TDP, making it a low-heat option that pairs well with modest cooling solutions. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running dual-channel with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for stability in professional workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 74th percentile among all processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18,309 in multi-core and 2,584 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it outperforms the nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, by a negligible 0.1% in average benchmark score. This indicates that the 5600, despite being a generation older, still holds its own against newer mobile-derived silicon. In Geekbench, it scores 9,158 multi-core and 1,936 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling is instructive: 2-thread score of 1,737, 4-thread score of 3,313, 8-thread score of 4,798, and max-thread score of 5,659. The scaling from 4 to 8 threads shows a 44.8% improvement, and from 8 to 12 threads only an 18.0% gain, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads—a characteristic of a 6-core design where the last two cores provide less marginal benefit.

PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 68,396, while floating-point math hits 38,778. Data encryption scores 15,531, and data compression reaches 251,687. These numbers suggest the CPU handles integer-heavy tasks like database queries and compression algorithms more efficiently than floating-point-heavy scientific simulations. Single-thread PassMark score of 3,256 confirms strong per-core performance, which matters for legacy applications and lightly threaded games.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation-focused card based on the AD104 chip, built on a 5nm process by TSMC. It packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU runs at a modest base clock of 720 MHz and a boost clock of 1560 MHz. Memory consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s. The memory clock is set at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

Compute resources include 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. RT hardware comprises 48 RT cores, and tensor hardware includes 192 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card has a 70W TDP, requires no power connectors, and is a dual-slot design measuring 168 mm in length. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is exceptionally low for a GPU of this capability.

Benchmark data shows the GPU at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 124,812, and in Vulkan, it scores 109,364. The average benchmark score is 117,088. Compared to the nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, it is 0.3% slower; against the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, it is 1.6% slower; versus the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, it is 2.4% faster; and compared to the RTX A5500 Mobile, it is 2.8% faster. This places it in a competitive tier with upper-midrange workstation GPUs, despite its small physical footprint and low power draw. The 20 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large datasets and high-resolution textures, while the 280 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for professional workloads but not exceptional compared to wider-bus alternatives.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 2,584 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 95th percentile standing suggest capable performance, but the lack of measured FPS data means estimates only. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance could drive 1080p high-refresh in many titles, but the 720 MHz base clock and 1560 MHz boost are conservative, potentially limiting raw gaming throughput compared to higher-clocked consumer cards.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads handle encoding workloads reasonably, evidenced by a multithread score of 21,541 in PassMark. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based streaming features, though the workstation-oriented drivers may not prioritize consumer streaming optimizations. The 65W CPU and 70W GPU keep system power low, reducing heat in compact streaming rigs.

Video editing: The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timelines and effects-heavy projects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,309 provides adequate processing for codec conversions, while the FP16 1:1 ratio of 19.17 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects. The combination excels in proxy-free editing of high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced and AI-denoised renders. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads deliver a PassMark physics score of 1,285, which is modest for CPU-based rendering. For GPU-accelerated renderers, this system is strong; for CPU-only renders, it is merely adequate.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 251,687 and integer math score of 68,396 indicate solid performance for compilation and build tools. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency in iterative compilation loops. The GPU's compute capability accelerates testing of CUDA-based applications, making this a viable developer workstation.

Student and office work: The 65W CPU and 70W GPU produce minimal heat and noise, ideal for dorm rooms or shared offices. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,256 in PassMark handles spreadsheet and document tasks effortlessly. The GPU's low power draw means a 250 W PSU suffices, reducing overall system cost and energy use.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional working in space-constrained environments—SFF workstations, lab benches, or media carts—who requires workstation-grade GPU compute without the thermal and power burden of full-size cards. Content creators working with 20 GB VRAM-heavy workloads, such as large 3D scenes or high-resolution video compositions, benefit directly from the GPU's memory capacity. Developers writing CUDA or TensorRT applications gain access to 192 tensor cores in a 70W package, which is rare in this form factor.

Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the low power draw and ECC memory support on the CPU, which reduces errors in long-running computations. Small business workstations needing silent, cool operation for CAD or light rendering should consider this pairing. Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p performance should look elsewhere, as the GPU's conservative clocks and workstation drivers are not optimized for consumer gaming metrics. The system is not ideal for multi-threaded CPU rendering, given the 6-core limit and the 74th CPU percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,468, placing it at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V at 20,454 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G at 20,425 (0.2% faster), the AMD EPYC 9454P at 20,422 (0.2% faster), and the AMD EPYC 7713 at 20,363 (0.5% slower). This clustering shows the 5600 sits in a dense performance band where differences are noise-level. The GPU's average score is 117,088, at the 95th percentile. Its rivals include the NVIDIA GB10 at 117,393 (0.3% faster), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 at 118,976 (1.6% faster), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114,395 (2.4% slower), and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113,944 (2.8% slower).

The combined percentile of 85 indicates that the GPU carries the system's performance weight. The CPU's 74th percentile is respectable but not elite, while the GPU's 95th percentile is near the top. This asymmetry suggests the system is built for GPU-accelerated workloads. In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 124,812, which is 12.4% higher than its Vulkan score of 109,364, indicating better optimization for compute APIs. The CPU's Cinebench R20 scores are 7,689 multi-core and 1,085 single-core, showing a 7.1x ratio between multi and single-thread performance, typical for a 6-core part.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination—the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows for any game. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores. The data is not measured; it is inferred. The GPU's 95th percentile standing suggests it can handle most games at high settings. The CPU's 74th percentile single-thread score of 2,584 in Cinebench R23 should not bottleneck modern titles at standard resolutions.

At 1080p, the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate could deliver 60+ FPS in esports titles and moderate settings in AAA games. At 1440p, the 280 GB/s bandwidth and 20 GB VRAM may sustain high textures, but the modest 1560 MHz boost clock could limit frame rates in GPU-bound scenes. At 4K, the 64 ROPs become a bottleneck, as pixel throughput is limited. Ray tracing at any resolution will be constrained by the 48 RT cores, which are fewer than consumer RTX 40-series cards with similar compute. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative expectations; users should consult game-specific benchmarks before purchasing for gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is GPU-heavy, with the GPU at the 95th percentile versus the CPU's 74th. In GPU-accelerated workloads like rendering or machine learning, the GPU is the clear driver, and the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck. However, in CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulation or data compression, the CPU's 74th percentile becomes the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 1,285 is low, suggesting the CPU cannot feed the GPU in physics-heavy games.

The 3DMark thread scaling shows the CPU's 6 cores provide diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, meaning games using 8+ threads will see the CPU max out before the GPU. Conversely, the GPU's low base clock of 720 MHz means it relies heavily on boost behavior, which can be inconsistent in sustained loads. The 280 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not luxurious; in memory-intensive workloads like 4K texture streaming, this could become a secondary bottleneck. The 250 W suggested PSU indicates the entire system draws very little power, so thermals are unlikely to cause throttling in either component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform. Memory support is DDR4 dual-channel, allowing for easy capacity upgrades up to the motherboard's limits. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, providing sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's x16 interface and an additional NVMe drive. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible. The 65W CPU TDP and 70W GPU TDP mean the 250 W suggested PSU leaves no headroom for significant upgrades without also replacing the power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM4 CPU, such as a 12-core or 16-core Ryzen 5000 series part, which would directly address the CPU's 74th percentile limitation. However, this would increase TDP, potentially requiring a new cooler and a more robust PSU. For the GPU, an upgrade to a full-size workstation card with a wider memory bus would improve bandwidth-limited workloads, but this would require a larger chassis and higher power supply. The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support is current, so storage and GPU bandwidth are not limiting. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, but users needing HDMI may require adapters.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 sits at the 74th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 20,468.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance compared to the AMD Radeon PRO W7700?

A: The GPU is 1.6% slower than the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, reflecting the low 65W CPU TDP and 70W GPU TDP.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures available for gaming performance?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this combination; all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock, and what architecture does it use?

A: The CPU boosts to 4.40 GHz and uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, on a 7nm process.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds