SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing is a study in contrast: a value-oriented 6-core processor from the AM4 era paired with a flagship Ada Lovelace GPU. The benchmark data shows a desktop configuration that lands in the 80th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU pairs, with the GPU clearly serving as the dominant performance driver. The measured FPS figures across a wide range of titles indicate that this build is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming, strong 1440p performance, and playable 4K in many titles, though the CPU occasionally limits the absolute maximum frame rates the GPU can produce.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, with memory clocked at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). The base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. This memory configuration provides substantial headroom for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, making the card well-suited for 4K rendering workloads where capacity and bandwidth are critical.

Compute resources are extensive: 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The RTX 4080 includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features. Pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s, while FP32 performance sits at 48.74 TFLOPS with FP16 at 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1). These figures translate directly into strong rasterization and ray-traced rendering performance. In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 6567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 214739 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 263779 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score is 34457, with GPU compute at 20671.

The RTX 4080 sits in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% ahead). These deltas indicate that the RTX 4080 is positioned at the edge of a performance cluster where small percentage differences separate cards. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth allow for large scene data, while the 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, making this GPU a capable choice for professional 3D visualization and high-end gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this pair is 80, while the GPU alone sits at 86 and the CPU at 74, indicating that the processor is the weaker link in the chain. The data reveals a pattern where FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K varies significantly by title, highlighting where the CPU becomes a limiting factor. At 1080p, many games show very high frame rates—Counter-Strike 2 hits 325 FPS, CS:GO reaches 717 FPS, and Valorant runs at 408 FPS—which suggests the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's output at lower resolutions where the load is more CPU-bound.

However, the scaling behavior tells a clearer story. In Cyberpunk 2077, FPS drops from 83 at 1080p to 71 at 1440p to 47 at 4K, showing a typical GPU-bound progression. But in Valorant, the drop is much smaller: 408 at 1080p to 387 at 1440p to 359 at 4K. This minimal scaling indicates that the CPU is the primary constraint even at 1080p, as the GPU has plenty of headroom to render more frames if the processor could feed it faster. The average FPS across all games is 188.5, with a pair rank of 419 out of 3732 pairs, placing this build in the top 11% of tested configurations.

The CPU's 74th percentile against all CPUs, compared to the GPU's 86th percentile, reinforces that the Ryzen 5 5600 is the bottleneck in CPU-light scenarios. Titles like Minecraft (320 FPS at 1080p) and Roblox (420 FPS) show the GPU is capable of extremely high output, but the CPU's single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark limits how consistently it can maintain those rates in complex scenes. For GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming in Ark: Survival Ascended (16 FPS) or Microsoft Flight Simulator (70 FPS), the CPU's influence diminishes, and the RTX 4080's raw power becomes the deciding factor.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning this desktop build outperforms 80% of all tested CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a delta of 0.1%—essentially a statistical tie.

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS at 1080p across the tested games?

A: The highest 1080p FPS is 717 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, followed by 420 in Roblox and 408 in Valorant.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 supports ECC memory, with dual-channel DDR4 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the RTX 4080?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, while the GPU's TDP is 320 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU perform in Cinebench R23 multicore compared to single-core?

A: The CPU scores 18309 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2584 in single-core, showing strong scaling from 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The RTX 4080 has 716.8 GB/s bandwidth over a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that esports titles like CS:GO (717 FPS at 1080p), Valorant (408 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (386 FPS) run at extremely high frame rates, making this an ideal setup for competitive players with 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors. At 1440p, the same titles still deliver excellent numbers—Valorant hits 387 FPS, CS:GO 494 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 253 FPS—so users with high-refresh 1440p panels will see smooth performance.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering will benefit from the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The GPU's Passmark compute score of 20671 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 indicate strong parallel processing capability for video editing, 3D modeling, and machine learning inference tasks. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, while not the strongest multi-threaded performer, provide adequate support for encoding and asset management, with a Passmark multithread score of 21541.

Students and small business users building a workstation for CAD, simulation, or data analysis will find the combination of 16 GB GDDR6X and 32 MB L3 cache (shared across the CPU's cores) sufficient for moderate workloads. The CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. However, the 4K gaming numbers are mixed—Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 16 FPS—so 4K enthusiasts should temper expectations unless they use DLSS or lower settings, as the raw rasterization performance at 4K is good but not exceptional for the most demanding titles.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides solid single-threaded performance and reasonable multi-threaded throughput for a desktop processor.

Benchmark results place the CPU in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20468. In 3DMark tests, it scores 882 in single-thread, 1737 in 2-threads, 3313 in 4-threads, 4798 in 8-threads, and 5659 in max-threads. The scaling from 2 to 8 threads shows good efficiency, but the jump from 8-threads to max-threads is modest (4798 to 5659), indicating that the 6-core design reaches diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. Cinebench scores confirm this: R15 multicore is 1845, R20 multicore is 7689, and R23 multicore is 18309, with single-core scores of 260, 1085, and 2584 respectively.

Real-world workloads benefit from the strong single-core performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. Passmark single-thread score is 3256, and the CPU achieves 1936 in Geekbench single-core, making it responsive for everyday tasks. Multi-threaded workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering see moderate performance—Passmark multithread is 21541, with floating-point math at 38778 and integer math at 68396. Data compression (251687) and encryption (15531) scores indicate decent throughput for archival and security tasks. The nearest rivals show how close the competition is: the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20454 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425 (0.2% behind), and the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20422 (0.2% behind), meaning the Ryzen 5 5600 is effectively tied with these alternatives in average benchmark score.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature ecosystem supporting DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), allowing for fast NVMe storage and the RTX 4080's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface to run at full bandwidth. The platform supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation use. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking for users who want to extract more performance, though the 65 W TDP limits thermal headroom.

The RTX 4080 has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 700 W suggested PSU, which leaves headroom for the 65 W CPU and other components. The GPU is triple-slot wide, 310 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide, so case compatibility is a consideration for small form factor builds. The power connector is a single 16-pin, which modern PSUs support or can adapt to. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but the current card remains competitive as shown by its percentile ranking.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores on the AM4 platform, such as a Ryzen 5000 series part with higher core counts, since the socket and DDR4 memory support remain valid. This would improve multi-threaded performance in CPU-bound scenarios like 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, where the current 6-core CPU limits FPS in titles like Valorant and CS:GO. Alternatively, users could move to a newer platform with DDR5 support, but that would require replacing the motherboard and memory, which is a larger investment. The GPU, despite being end-of-life, still holds an 86th percentile position, so upgrading the CPU first would balance the system better.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20468, placing it in the 74th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, 0.1% behind), AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, 0.2% behind), AMD EPYC 9454P (20422, 0.2% behind), and AMD EPYC 7713 (20363, 0.5% behind). This tight clustering means the Ryzen 5 5600 is competitive with these processors despite being an older design, though it lacks the multi-core advantage of the EPYC server parts in heavily threaded workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 4080's nearest rivals are the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209, 0.1% behind), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, 1.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, 2.6% ahead), and AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, 2.7% ahead). The GPU maintains a clear performance edge over the CPU in relative terms, with an 86th percentile versus 74th, which creates the bottleneck situation noted earlier.

The combined picture shows a pair ranked 419th out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 188.5 across all tested games. The overall percentile is 80, meaning this build outperforms the majority of configurations. The GPU's benchmark scores—particularly the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 and Passmark G3D of 34457—demonstrate strong raster performance, while the CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 5659 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 18309 indicate it can support the GPU in most scenarios, though not at the absolute highest CPU-bound frame rates.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining a mid-range 6-core CPU from AMD's 5000 series with a high-end enthusiast GPU from NVIDIA's GeForce 40-series. The Ryzen 5 5600 was released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $199, while the RTX 4080 launched in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The GPU is now end-of-life, but its performance remains relevant, as evidenced by its 86th percentile rank.

The pairing sits in the 80th combined percentile, which places it in the upper tier of all tested builds. The GPU is clearly the stronger component, with a 12-percentage-point advantage over the CPU in percentile terms. This creates a system that excels in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming and compute-heavy rendering, but shows its limitations in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p, the build achieves over 300 FPS in several esports titles, but the CPU's single-thread limitations prevent it from reaching the GPU's full potential in those scenarios.

Overall, this is a high-performance desktop build with a lopsided balance toward the GPU. It is well-suited for users who prioritize graphics quality and resolution over raw CPU throughput, such as 1440p gamers who want maximum settings or content creators who rely on GPU acceleration. The CPU provides adequate support for most workloads, but users seeking maximum frame rates in competitive shooters would benefit from a stronger processor.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The measured FPS data, collected at ultra settings, shows strong performance across a wide range of titles at 1080p. Esports and lighter games run exceptionally well: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 717 FPS, Valorant 408 FPS, Roblox 420 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 386 FPS. Minecraft runs at 320 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 325 FPS. Single-player titles also perform well—Doom runs at 241 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 192 FPS, and Grand Theft Auto V at 148 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (83 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (87 FPS), and Microsoft Flight Simulator (117 FPS) remain playable at high frame rates.

At 1440p, performance scales down but remains strong. CS:GO still hits 494 FPS, Valorant 387 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 253 FPS. Minecraft runs at 202 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 215 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 71 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 65 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 95 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 30 FPS, which is borderline playable but indicates the game's extreme requirements. The 1440p numbers show this build is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at this resolution.

At 4K (3840x2160), the build delivers playable frame rates in most titles but shows its limits in the most demanding games. Valorant runs at 359 FPS, CS:GO at 292 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 140 FPS, making esports still highly playable. Minecraft hits 106 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 120 FPS. However, AAA titles drop significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 16 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 70 FPS. The Medium runs at 45 FPS, and The Flame In The Flood at 45 FPS. These 4K results indicate that the build is capable of 4K gaming in many titles, but users should expect to use DLSS or lower settings for the most demanding games to maintain smooth frame rates.