SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing is a desktop configuration that lands in the 68th combined percentile overall, with measured frame rates available across a wide range of titles. The data shows a system that delivers strong 1080p performance, remains capable at 1440p, and begins to show its limits at 4K, where the GPU’s 8GB memory and mid-range positioning become more apparent.

Gaming Performance

Measured frame rates at ultra settings show a consistent pattern: this pairing excels at 1080p, remains competent at 1440p, and struggles at 4K for demanding titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates across most genres. Competitive shooters see exceptional results: Counter-Strike 2 hits 210.2 FPS, Valorant reaches 405.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 250.8 FPS. Older esports titles perform even better, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 461.9 FPS. Even heavy single-player games hold up well at 1080p: Cyberpunk 2077 manages 59.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 56 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 75 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the picture shifts. The same competitive titles remain playable—Counter-Strike 2 drops to 140.8 FPS, Valorant stays at 388.5 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X delivers 163.9 FPS. However, demanding titles begin to show strain. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 46.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 42 FPS, and Control runs at 66 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly punishing, dropping to 19 FPS at this resolution. The 4K results at 3840x2160 confirm the GPU is the limiting factor: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 32.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 10 FPS. Even moderately demanding games like Warzone (92.4 FPS) and Fortnite (34 FPS) show the resolution scaling penalties typical of an 8GB card.

The average FPS across all tested games is 135.7, which places this pairing at rank 1526 out of 3732 pairs. The data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for ultra settings, 1440p is viable with some adjustments for demanding games, and 4K is only suitable for less graphically intense titles or with significant settings reductions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system is well-suited for 144Hz and even 240Hz displays in competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 at 210.2 FPS, Valorant at 405.6 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 250.8 FPS all exceed common high-refresh thresholds. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 882 in 3dmark single-thread and 2584 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures that frame pacing remains stable in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The GPU’s inclusion of 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores provides dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-assisted features, though specific encoding benchmarks are not included in the data. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads should handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads, as evidenced by the 3dmark_16_threads score of 5641 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 5659, which show consistent multi-threaded throughput.

Video editing: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309, which supports reasonably responsive 1080p and 1440p video editing timelines. The passmark_multithread score of 21541 and floating point math score of 38778 indicate solid performance for export tasks and effects processing. The GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate rendering in compatible applications.

3D rendering: The combination of 6 CPU cores and the GPU’s compute capabilities provide a balanced entry-level rendering workstation. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7689 and Geekbench multicore score of 9158 show adequate performance for scene assembly and simulation, while the GPU’s 11195 passmark_gpu_compute score and 112821 Geekbench OpenCL score handle GPU-accelerated rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s passmark_data_compression score of 251687 and data encryption score of 15531 indicate strong performance for build processes and code compilation. The 32MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory throughput for typical development workloads. The 74th percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it above most mainstream processors.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this pairing is substantially over-powered. The CPU’s passmark_single_thread score of 3256 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 1737 handle daily tasks effortlessly, while the GPU’s 1001 passmark_g2d score for 2D operations ensures smooth desktop rendering. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption modest for all-day operation.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and is manufactured on TSMC’s 7nm process, with 4,150 million transistors packed into a 74 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and the 65W TDP makes it an efficient choice for air cooling. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support.

Benchmark results show a processor that is strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 3dmark single-thread score of 882 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2584 demonstrate excellent per-core performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-threaded results scale well: 3dmark_4_threads scores 3313, 3dmark_8_threads scores 4798, and 3dmark_max_threads reaches 5659, showing that the 6 cores scale efficiently up to 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 represents solid sustained performance for rendering tasks.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 74 versus all CPUs places it above the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (which scores 20454, a 0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, 0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 9454P (20422, 0.2% delta). The 32MB shared L3 cache is well-suited for gaming, as it keeps frequently accessed data close to the cores. The passmark integer math score of 68396 and extended instructions score of 16993 indicate robust general-purpose computational ability.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers are the primary audience. The measured frame rates show that this system delivers 100+ FPS in nearly all tested titles at 1920x1080 ultra settings, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors. Competitive players will benefit most, given the 210.2 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 405.6 FPS in Valorant.

1440p gamers who are willing to adjust settings in demanding titles will find this pairing viable. Many games run above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, including Warzone (110.9 FPS), Control (66 FPS), and Assetto Corsa (86 FPS). Users should expect to lower settings in the most demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Content creators who work primarily with 1080p or 1440p footage will appreciate the balanced CPU and GPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 handles export tasks, while the GPU’s compute capability accelerates effects and rendering in compatible applications.

Software developers will find the CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread performance suitable for compilation and testing. The data encryption score of 15531 and data compression score of 251687 suggest efficient handling of common development workflows.

Students and office workers who also game will find this system capable of handling both workloads without compromise, though it is more powerful than needed for text processing or spreadsheet work. The 65W CPU TDP and 220W GPU TDP suggest moderate system-level power draw.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU is sufficient at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (882 in 3dmark single-thread) keep up with the GPU’s output, as evidenced by high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking versus all GPUs becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop by an average of 30-40% compared to 1080p, which is consistent with GPU-bound scaling. At 3840x2160, the GPU’s 8GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting, with many titles falling below 60 FPS. The GPU’s pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for sustained 4K performance in demanding titles.

The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads do not appear to bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles, given the high frame rates achieved. However, in CPU-intensive scenarios like Ark: Survival Ascended (30 FPS at 1080p), the CPU may contribute to the low performance, as this title is known to be demanding on both CPU and GPU. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 5641 versus 3dmark_max_threads of 5659 shows minimal scaling beyond 8 threads, suggesting that the 6-core configuration is well-matched to the GPU’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 135.7, placing this pairing at rank 1526 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 32.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Users would need to reduce settings significantly for playable 4K performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V’s score of 20454.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 is 550 W, with the GPU’s TDP rated at 220 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 supports ECC memory, which can be useful for workstation-style builds.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, indicating that this system outperforms 68% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20468, placing it in the 74th percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20454 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425 (0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20422 (0.2% delta). The 3dmark results show a progression from 1737 in 2-thread to 5659 in max-thread tests, demonstrating efficient multi-core scaling. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 and single-core score of 2584 provide a clear picture of its rendering capabilities. Geekbench results show 9158 multicore and 1936 single-core.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17208, placing it in the 61st percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083, 0.7% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 1% delta), and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 1.1% delta). The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and passmark_g3d score of 22214 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 and Vulkan score of 21022 show strong compute and graphics API performance. The passmark_gpu_compute score of 11195 reflects the GPU’s compute capabilities.

The combined picture shows a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, with the CPU ranking higher than the GPU in their respective percentiles (74th vs 61st). This suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, which becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The platform supports ECC memory, which is an advantage for workstation use.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, and its TDP is 220 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the total system power draw is well within the suggested PSU rating. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has headroom to support higher frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance suggest it would not bottleneck a faster GPU in most gaming scenarios. Alternatively, adding a second NVMe drive would take advantage of the PCIe Gen 4 lanes, though the specific storage interface is not detailed in the data. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, so users seeking future driver support may consider that path, though the current GPU remains production-status active.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor on the AM4 socket, released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $199. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8GB GDDR6 memory, released in August 2020 with a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The combined percentile ranking is 68, meaning this system outperforms 68% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The data characterizes this as a mid-to-upper-tier desktop configuration. The CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 61st percentile rankings place both components above the median, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The measured average FPS of 135.7 across all games confirms that this is a capable gaming system, particularly at 1080p resolution. For users seeking a balanced desktop that handles modern games at high frame rates without the expense of top-tier components, this pairing represents a well-considered combination of mainstream CPU and upper-midrange GPU performance.