SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 67th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations, with a measured average of 109.5 FPS across the tested game suite. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 platform, delivers strong single-threaded performance that keeps pace with much newer silicon, while the GPU, an RDNA 4.0 part, offers a balanced 1080p and 1440p experience that falls just short of its nearest competitor in raw compute. This is a pairing that prioritizes consistency over extremes, and the data reflects a system built for smooth mainstream gaming and productive multitasking rather than flagship 4K pushing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting to 4.40 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This is a design that favors low latency and high frequency over raw core counts, and the benchmark data supports that characterization.

In single-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 882 in 3DMark single-thread, 260 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1,085 in R20, and 2,584 in R23. The Geekbench single-core score is 1,936, and PassMark single-thread is 3,256. These are competitive numbers for a mid-range desktop part, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, has an average score of 20,454 versus the 5600's 20,468, a delta of just 0.1%. That means the 5600 is effectively tied with a modern hybrid architecture part in overall CPU performance, which confirms the efficiency of the Zen 3 core design at high clocks.

Multi-threaded performance scales as expected with 6 cores and 12 threads. The CPU scores 5,641 in 3DMark 16-thread, 4,798 in 8-thread, and 5,659 in max-thread tests. Cinebench R23 multicore is 18,309, Geekbench multicore is 9,158, and PassMark multithread is 21,541. The PassMark integer math score of 68,396 and floating-point math of 38,778 indicate solid throughput for compute-heavy tasks. Data compression in PassMark hits 251,687, while encryption scores 15,531. These figures show a CPU that handles compilation, rendering, and archival tasks respectably, though it will not lead in heavily threaded professional workloads against higher-core-count parts.

The memory bandwidth is dual-channel DDR4 at 51.2 GB/s, with ECC support enabled. This is a mature platform limitation, but for gaming and general productivity, the practical impact is minimal. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the paired GPU and a fast NVMe drive. The 5600 is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and its 74th percentile overall ranking means it sits above the median but below the top 25% of desktop processors. The architecture's strength lies in its ability to deliver high IPC per clock, which translates to strong frame rates in games that are not heavily core-scaled.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 67, with an average FPS across all tested games of 109.5 at the given resolution settings. The pair ranks 2,279th out of 3,732 possible pairs, placing it in the upper 39% of all combinations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,468, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,014, which is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700.

Looking at specific gaming metrics at 1920x1080, the pair delivers strong esports performance: Valorant runs at 391 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 377, and Counter-Strike 2 at 171. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 203 FPS, and Roblox runs at 221. For triple-A titles, the numbers are more moderate: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127 FPS, Doom at 127, and Assetto Corsa at 101. Cyberpunk 2077 is the most demanding at 50 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 sits at 46 FPS. At 1440p, these numbers drop by about 20-30%: Warzone runs at 113, CS2 at 113, and Valorant at 334. Cyberpunk drops to 38, and Red Dead 2 to 34. At 4K, the pair starts to struggle, with Cyberpunk at 25 FPS and Red Dead 2 at 23 FPS, though less demanding games like Valorant still hold 267 FPS.

The combined picture is a system that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming, handles 1440p well for most titles, and is only suitable for 4K in lighter games. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking means it is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, as its single-thread performance is strong enough to feed the GPU at 1080p in esports titles. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as it lacks the raw throughput for 4K gaming in modern AAA releases.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The chip, codenamed Navi 44, features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It has 28 ray tracing cores, though tensor core data is not listed, indicating a focus on traditional rasterization with RT support rather than dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a boost clock of 2990 MHz and a game clock of 2400 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration for a modern GPU, and it shows in high-resolution textures. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio. The TDP is 132 W, and the card uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 3,322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark G3D is 17,631, and GPU Compute is 9,919. The DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 12 score of 44 are lower than expected, but these are older API tests that do not reflect modern game engines. The GPU's percentile ranking is 59, placing it just above the median. Its nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti, has an average score of 16,129 versus the RX 9060's 16,014, a delta of -0.7%. The Radeon R9 370X is 1% behind, and the Radeon RX 7700 is 1% ahead.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS is competitive for mid-range 3D rendering and GPU compute tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large scenes or high-resolution textures, but for 1080p and 1440p rendering, it is adequate. The 28 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance in RT-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 suggests it is not a primary strength. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad compatibility with modern APIs.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who play at 1080p with high refresh rates, as the data shows over 170 FPS in CS2 and over 200 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at that resolution. It is also suitable for 1440p gaming for those who are willing to adjust settings, as the average FPS across the suite at 1440p is around 65-70 for AAA titles. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking means it is a strong choice for content creators who need fast single-thread performance for tasks like video encoding previews or web development, while the GPU handles CUDA-accelerated workloads adequately.

Developers will find the 6-core/12-thread CPU useful for compiling code, as the PassMark integer math score of 68,396 indicates solid throughput. Students and small business users building a workstation will benefit from the ECC memory support and the low 65 W TDP, which allows for a compact and quiet system. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking means it is not suited for professional 3D rendering at scale, but for light CAD work or photo editing, the 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance is more than sufficient.

The build class is desktop, and the combined 67th percentile suggests a mid-tier system. This is not an entry-level build, nor is it a high-end enthusiast setup. It sits firmly in the "serious mainstream" category, appealing to users who want a reliable, well-rounded machine without chasing the absolute highest frame rates or resolution targets.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the pair exceeds 144 FPS in Valorant (391), CS:GO (377), and Rainbow Six Siege (203), making it ideal for competitive shooters. At 1440p, these numbers drop to 334, 260, and 133 respectively, still well above 120 FPS for smooth play on high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU handles encoding overhead while gaming, as evidenced by the 5,659 max-thread score in 3DMark. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth allow for simultaneous game capture and output, though the 59th percentile GPU ranking means streamers should keep games at 1080p to avoid frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,309 and PassMark multithread of 21,541 support 1080p timeline editing and 4K proxy workflows. The GPU's FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex multi-layer composites.

3D rendering: The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is capable for Blender Cycles or similar engines at moderate sample counts. The 28 RT cores help with ray-traced previews, but render times will be longer than with higher-tier GPUs. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,584 in R23 ensures fast scene preparation.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 68,396 and data compression score of 251,687 indicate strong performance for code compilation and database operations. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency in iterative builds, and the 65 W TDP allows for sustained all-core loads without thermal throttling.

Student and office work: The 74th percentile CPU ranking means day-to-day tasks like browsing, spreadsheets, and document editing are handled effortlessly. The GPU's 1,002 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D acceleration for large monitors, and the low power draw keeps electricity costs minimal.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20,468, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20,454) and 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20,425).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16,129. This places them effectively in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the expected FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the pair delivers 50 FPS. At 1440p, this drops to 38 FPS, and at 4K to 25 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU good for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost of 4.40 GHz, and the 65 W TDP provides headroom for increased voltages.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, running at 18 Gbps effective speed, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory with the appropriate motherboard, which is useful for workstation reliability in data-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the overall percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined CPU+GPU pair ranks in the 67th percentile of all tested configurations, with an average FPS of 109.5 across the game suite.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU holds up well at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the CPU's single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark and 3,256 in PassMark single-thread is sufficient to push high frame rates in esports titles, as evidenced by 377 FPS in CS:GO and 391 FPS in Valorant. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking is the limiting factor in these scenarios, as it cannot translate the CPU's headroom into even higher frame rates.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth become stressed, and frame rates drop by 20-30% across the board. The CPU remains underutilized in many cases, as its 12 threads are not fully engaged in most games. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, with Cyberpunk 2077 falling to 25 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 23 FPS, while the CPU idles at lower usage.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent pattern: the pair loses roughly 25% performance going from 1080p to 1440p and another 30% going from 1440p to 4K. This is a classic GPU-limited curve. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile confirms that the GPU is the weaker link. For users targeting 1080p high-refresh, the balance is good. For 1440p high-refresh, the GPU will need to be upgraded first. For 4K, this system is not viable for modern AAA titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket with support for DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the RX 9060's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, though the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds. The 65 W TDP means the CPU can be cooled by a low-profile or stock cooler, and the system has significant headroom for a more powerful CPU in the same socket, such as a higher-core-count Zen 3 part.

The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and has a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaving ample room for upgrades. The card is dual-slot and uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 4 lanes. For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU would be the first component to replace, as its 8 GB VRAM is the main limitation for 1440p and 4K gaming. A move to a GPU with more VRAM and higher FP32 throughput would immediately improve 4K performance, as the CPU would not bottleneck in most games.

Memory support is DDR4, which is an older standard, so a platform upgrade to AM5 would require a new motherboard and DDR5 RAM. However, the current CPU's performance is still competitive, so a GPU upgrade alone could extend the system's life for another 2-3 years. The PSU headroom of 300 W suggests that a higher-tier GPU with a higher TDP could be installed without a PSU change, as long as it uses a single 8-pin connector or less.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $199, and it ranks in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an RDNA 4.0 part from the RX 9000 series, released in August 2025, ranking in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 67, placing it above the majority of tested configurations.

The pair's average FPS across the game suite is 109.5, with a rank of 2,279 out of 3,732 pairs. This is a mid-tier desktop system that excels at 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, handles 1440p well for most titles, and is not suited for 4K gaming in demanding releases. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures it will not be a bottleneck for the GPU at standard resolutions, while the GPU's modest VRAM and compute throughput make it the limiting factor for higher resolution and ray-traced workloads.

This is a balanced, sensible build for a mainstream user who wants a reliable machine for gaming, productivity, and light creative work. It is not an enthusiast-class system, but it offers a solid foundation that can be upgraded in stages, starting with the GPU. The data indicates a well-matched pairing that delivers consistent performance without thermal or power concerns, making it a practical choice for a broad range of users.