SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 pairing represents a desktop build centered on the AM4 platform, combining a six-core Zen 3 processor with a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The data shows this combination lands at the 66th combined percentile, with measured gaming performance averaging 123.7 FPS across the tested game suite. This analysis examines the benchmark results to determine what this pairing offers for specific workloads and where its performance boundaries lie.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on a 7 nm TSMC process with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip carries 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy comprising 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, plus 32 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications place it as a mainstream desktop part, and the benchmark scores reflect a processor that performs well above entry-level territory.

In synthetic workloads, the CPU achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 882 and a max-thread score of 5659. Scaling from 2-thread (1737) to 4-thread (3313) to 8-thread (4798) scores shows reasonably linear gains, with the jump from 8 threads to max threads adding only 861 points. This indicates that the six physical cores with simultaneous multithreading provide solid scaling in heavily threaded tasks, though the architecture does not exhibit the exponential gains seen in higher-core-count parts. Cinebench results reinforce this: R23 multicore scores 18309, while single-core hits 2584, producing a multicore-to-single-core ratio of roughly 7.1x, which is consistent with a six-core part that scales efficiently.

The Geekbench multicore score of 9158 and single-core score of 1936, alongside a Passmark multithread score of 21541 and single-thread score of 3256, show a balanced profile. The Passmark integer math score of 68396 and floating-point math score of 38778 indicate that the CPU handles both general-purpose and compute-heavy instructions competently. The data compression score of 251687 and encryption score of 15531 suggest that archival and security workloads will be handled without bottlenecks. The processor sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20468, placing it within 0.5% of rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, 0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, 0.2% delta). This tight clustering indicates that the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers performance essentially on par with these newer or more power-efficient alternatives, despite being an earlier release.

For real workloads, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5641 and max-thread score of 5659 show that heavily threaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering will use all available resources effectively. The single-thread score of 882, however, is the weaker link; tasks that depend on one or two cores, such as older games or certain spreadsheet operations, will not see the same level of performance headroom.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The memory controller includes ECC support, which is a relevant feature for workstation-oriented builds. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and a full-bandwidth graphics card connection.

The platform's memory support for DDR4 is a key consideration. While DDR4 is mature and widely available, the bandwidth ceiling of 51.2 GB/s is lower than what newer DDR5 platforms offer, which can be a limiting factor in memory-intensive workloads. However, the dual-channel configuration is sufficient for the six-core processor, as the benchmark scores do not indicate memory bandwidth starvation. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for small business workstations or data-sensitive tasks.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, meaning that a capable air cooler is sufficient for sustained operation. The motherboard selection for AM4 varies widely, from budget boards to high-end models, allowing flexibility in feature selection without requiring a platform change. The graphics card, which has a 200 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W, drives the system's power requirements more than the processor. A system assembled with a quality 550 W power supply would have headroom for the combined load of the CPU and GPU, assuming no additional high-power peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade path from this pairing would be to increase memory capacity or speed, given that the AM4 platform is at the end of its lifecycle for new CPU releases. Alternatively, the CPU could be swapped for a higher-core-count AM4 part without changing the motherboard, though the exact performance gains would depend on the specific replacement. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast SSDs, which can improve load times in games and applications.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows strong results. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 195 FPS, Valorant at 408 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS, all at 1920x1080 with ultra settings. These frame rates exceed the refresh rates of most high-refresh monitors, making this pairing suitable for competitive esports titles.

For streaming, the six-core CPU with twelve threads provides enough headroom to encode gameplay while running a game. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 indicates that the CPU can handle simultaneous encoding and gaming workloads, though the Passmark data encryption score of 15531 suggests that encryption-heavy streaming protocols will be processed without major slowdowns. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM also helps when using hardware-accelerated encoding.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's multicore performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5641 and max-thread score of 5659 show that timeline rendering and export tasks will be processed efficiently. The Geekbench multicore score of 9158 further supports this, indicating that the CPU can handle the parallel workloads common in editing software. The GPU's FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS also accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering workloads are well-served by the combination of CPU and GPU. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7689 and R23 score of 18309 show strong CPU rendering performance for its class. The GPU's 2560 shading units and 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide complementary GPU-accelerated rendering capabilities. The Radeon RX 7700's 40 ray accelerators also support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible renderers.

Software development tasks, including compilation and code analysis, benefit from the CPU's balanced performance. The Passmark integer math score of 68396 and floating-point score of 38778 indicate that both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads are handled well. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the 12 threads allow parallel builds to proceed efficiently.

Student and office work is more than adequately handled. The single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark and 3256 in Passmark ensure responsive application performance, while the CPU's low 65 W TDP keeps power consumption and heat output minimal. The ECC memory support and active production status make this a reliable choice for long-term use in academic or professional settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing's balance can be assessed by comparing the CPU and GPU percentiles. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy suggests that the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU, meaning that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor.

The benchmark data supports this in several cases. In CPU-intensive games like Counter-Strike 2, the 1080p frame rate of 195 FPS is high, but the 1440p and 4K results drop to 129 and 72 FPS respectively, showing that the GPU begins to limit as resolution increases. In contrast, in GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p frame rate of 58 FPS drops to 43 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint across all resolutions.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides further evidence. For example, in Valorant, the 1080p score of 408 FPS drops to 381 FPS at 1440p and 305 FPS at 4K, showing that the CPU can maintain very high frame rates but the GPU still causes some scaling. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the frame rates are 70 FPS at 1080p, 57 FPS at 1440p, and 42 FPS at 4K, indicating a more balanced workload where both components contribute to the performance envelope.

The combined percentile of 66 suggests that this pairing is well-matched for its tier, with neither component drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other. The average FPS across all games of 123.7, with a rank of 1864 out of 3732 pairs, places this configuration slightly above the median in the database, confirming that the balance is reasonable for a mainstream build.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is marked as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance at ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the pairing delivers high frame rates in most titles. Esports games excel: Valorant runs at 408 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. Roblox reaches 252 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 192 FPS. These results indicate that competitive players will have no issues achieving high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain playable in most cases. Valorant still runs at 381 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 297 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 113 FPS, and Ready or Not at 99 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold but still playable with adjustments. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 18 FPS, indicating that this title is too demanding for ultra settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the pairing struggles with demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. Lighter titles remain playable: Valorant runs at 305 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 175 FPS, and Roblox at 95 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 95 FPS, showing that some AAA titles are still playable at 4K. The data indicates that 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding titles, with most modern AAA games requiring lower settings.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer who primarily plays at 1080p or 1440p and wants high frame rates in competitive titles. The data shows that at 1080p, the pairing delivers over 100 FPS in nearly all tested games, with several titles exceeding 200 FPS. At 1440p, most games remain above 60 FPS, with esports titles maintaining high triple-digit frame rates. This makes it suitable for gamers with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multicore performance adequate, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s support large textures and complex 3D scenes. The FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's balanced performance across integer and floating-point workloads, as shown by the Passmark scores. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds or server-like workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support allows for fast storage, reducing compilation times.

Students and office workers will find this pairing more than sufficient for their needs. The single-thread performance is strong enough for responsive application use, and the low TDP of the CPU keeps the system quiet and cool. The GPU's capabilities are overkill for office tasks, but the 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for any graphics-accelerated applications.

Small business workstations that use CAD or similar software can benefit from the GPU's 2560 shading units and the CPU's multicore performance. The ECC memory support and active production status of both components make this a viable option for professional use, though the lack of a launch MSRP for the GPU makes cost assessment difficult.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, using a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial. FP32 performance is listed at 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The 40 ray accelerators provide hardware support for ray tracing, which is reflected in the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support. The GPU supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

In benchmarks, the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028, and a Passmark G3D score of 20974. The Passmark GPU Compute score is 10963. These scores place it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, has an average score of 15862, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the RX 7700 is essentially tied. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has a score of 16129, a 1.7% delta, indicating the RX 7700 trails by a small margin.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's high bandwidth and FP32 performance are key strengths. The 16 GB VRAM is notable for its capacity, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the compute units efficiently. The 40 ray accelerators provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance in ray-traced games will depend on the specific implementation. The GPU's dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors require a 550 W power supply, which is a standard requirement for this performance class.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, placing this configuration above the median in the benchmark database, with an average FPS across games of 123.7.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454) and 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: Does this pairing support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600 CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature relevant for workstation and small business applications.

Q: What is the peak measured FPS in an esports title at 1080p?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1920x1080 is 431 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, followed by 408 FPS in Valorant.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, which is 1.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz and a TDP of 65 W.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20468, placing it at the 74th percentile among all CPUs. The individual scores show a profile that is strong in multithreaded workloads, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 5659 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309. The single-thread performance is moderate, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 882 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3256.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15852, placing it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and Passmark G3D score of 20974 show that the GPU is capable in both synthetic and compute workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 indicates strong compute performance for general-purpose tasks.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative terms. The CPU's 74th percentile is 16 points higher than the GPU's 58th percentile, suggesting that the GPU is the more limiting component in this pairing. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this balance, with the system performing above average in the overall database. The measured gaming data confirms this, with the average FPS of 123.7 across all games and resolutions, and a rank of 1864 out of 3732 pairs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is "desktop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is a six-core, twelve-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 platform, while the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 card. The combined percentile of 66 places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all recorded builds.

The CPU's 74th percentile and the GPU's 58th percentile combine to create a system that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the measured FPS data showing strong performance in esports and competitive titles. The pairing is also capable of handling content creation and development workloads, as indicated by the CPU's multicore scores and the GPU's compute performance. The overall tier is solidly mainstream, with the 66th combined percentile indicating that this build outperforms the majority of systems in the database while remaining accessible in terms of power requirements, given the 65 W CPU TDP and 550 W suggested PSU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds