SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

26,748 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. This is a massive chip, and the specifications reflect its professional positioning. It packs 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, which is a substantial boost headroom for sustained professional workloads. Memory configuration is a defining feature: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. This capacity and bandwidth combination is tailored for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex scenes that would exceed the VRAM limits of consumer cards.

Ray tracing and tensor core hardware are central to the RTX 5000 Ada's capabilities. The GPU includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. These are not just marketing counts; they enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS and denoising in rendering applications. The FP32 compute throughput is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not halve throughput for half-precision work, which is beneficial for mixed-precision scientific computing and AI inference. Pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s, both of which are extremely high figures that support heavy rasterization and texture-heavy workloads. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs and future-proofing for upcoming titles and applications.

The benchmark scores for this GPU are represented by Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results. The OpenCL score is 175,286, and the Vulkan score is 194,041. These scores place the GPU at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, which is a top-tier position. The average benchmark score is 184,664. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5000 Ada is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (which scores 183,725), 1.3% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147), 1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109), and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050). This data indicates that the RTX 5000 Ada is competitive with data-center-class accelerators and high-end consumer cards, but its real value is in the 32 GB VRAM and professional driver support, which are not captured in raw compute scores alone. For rendering, the combination of 32 GB VRAM and high FP32 throughput means it can handle massive scenes, high-poly models, and 8K textures without memory spills, while the RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders significantly compared to non-RT GPUs.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is an empty object. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct gameplay testing.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, the RTX 5000 Ada is an exceptionally fast graphics card that sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286 are strong indicators of raw graphics throughput. In gaming terms, this GPU is likely to deliver very high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles, even with ultra settings. However, the CPU pairing is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 5500GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which is adequate for gaming but not top-tier. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at lower resolutions or games with heavy single-threaded physics, the CPU may bottleneck the GPU. At 4K resolution, where the GPU is more likely to be the primary bottleneck, the RTX 5000 Ada should be able to push high frame rates in AAA games, but exact numbers are impossible to state without measured data.

The absence of measured FPS data means we must rely on the percentile positions. The GPU's 98th percentile suggests it is faster than 98% of all GPUs, which would place it in the top tier for gaming performance. The CPU's 79th percentile is still respectable but indicates it is not in the top 20% of processors. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU could hold back the GPU in some titles. At 4K, the GPU's power will dominate, and frame rates will be limited primarily by the GPU's rendering capabilities rather than the CPU. The estimate is that this pairing is capable of high-refresh 1440p gaming and smooth 4K gaming, but the CPU is more suited to 60-100 FPS ranges at 1440p, while the GPU could push 100+ FPS at 4K in less demanding titles. These are estimates and should be treated as such.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, using the Zen 3 architecture on the Cezanne codename. It is fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. This is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is modest and indicates good power efficiency for a desktop chip. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 shared across the cores. This is a standard configuration for a mid-range Zen 3 desktop part.

The benchmark results for the CPU are comprehensive. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1597 and the single-core score is 225. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 6656 and the single-core score is 939. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 15,848 and the single-core score is 2237. These scores show a strong single-threaded performance, which is typical for Zen 3, and a solid multicore performance for a 6-core part. PassMark results further detail the workload characteristics: data compression scores 243,904, data encryption scores 14,754, extended instructions score 17,027, find prime numbers scores 54, floating point math scores 36,694, integer math scores 64,218, multithread scores 19,000, physics scores 840, random string sorting scores 24,583, and single-thread scores 3,066. The integer and floating-point math scores are strong, indicating good scientific and general-purpose compute ability. The data encryption score is lower relative to some rivals, but still adequate for typical encryption tasks.

The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 79, meaning it is faster than 79% of all processors. The average benchmark score is 26,748. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 9554 (score 26,743, delta 0%), Intel Core i7-12700H (26,717, 0.1% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 7545U (26,849, 0.4% slower), and Intel Core i9-11900K (26,639, 0.4% faster). This places the 5500GT in a competitive position against older high-end desktop parts and newer mid-range mobile parts. The Core i9-11900K is a notable comparison: it is an 8-core desktop processor, yet the 6-core 5500GT is only 0.4% behind in average score, highlighting the efficiency of Zen 3. The EPYC 9554 is a server-class chip, and the 5500GT matches it in average score, which is remarkable for a 65 W desktop part. For real workloads, this CPU handles everyday productivity, software compilation, and moderate content creation with ease. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for most games and office applications, but heavy multitasking or all-core rendering will show its limits compared to 8-core or more processors.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 5500GT and the RTX 5000 Ada is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is at the 79th percentile. This 19-percentage-point gap is significant and indicates that the CPU is the clear bottleneck in many workloads, particularly those that are not heavily GPU-bound. In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions (1080p, 1440p), the CPU's single-threaded performance will limit the frame rate before the GPU can reach its maximum output. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2237 is good, but not exceptional for a modern part; the boost clock of 4.40 GHz is the main driver, and it is below the 5.0+ GHz clocks of newer flagship parts. At 4K resolution, the GPU's rendering time per frame increases, and the CPU has more time to prepare frames, which reduces the bottleneck effect.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. For GPU-accelerated rendering (like Blender or V-Ray), the RTX 5000 Ada will dominate, and the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with geometry and scene data. The CPU's multicore score of 15,848 in Cinebench R23 is decent, but for complex scenes with heavy physics simulation, the CPU could be the limiting factor. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding (x264/x265), the 6-core/12-thread configuration will be the constraint, and the GPU will be largely idle. The data shows that the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 19,000 is respectable, but it is not in the same league as the GPU's compute power.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent (no measured data), but the percentile gap is the key indicator. In a balanced system, the CPU and GPU percentiles would be closer. Here, the 19-point gap means the CPU is the bottleneck in most gaming and many productivity scenarios. This does not mean the pairing is bad; it means that the user must be aware of the CPU's limits. For a user who primarily games at 4K, the bottleneck is less severe. For a user who plays esports at 1080p with a 240 Hz monitor, the CPU will hold back the GPU significantly. The PCIe interface is also a factor: the CPU supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x16 card. The bandwidth difference between Gen 3 and Gen 4 is unlikely to cause a major bottleneck in gaming, but in data-heavy compute workloads that stream large datasets to the GPU, the Gen 3 link could introduce a small performance penalty.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT is based on the AM4 socket, which is one of the longest-lived platforms in recent history. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for certain workstation tasks. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, which is the primary interface for a discrete GPU. The integrated graphics is Radeon Vega 7, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output without a dedicated GPU.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited to AM4-compatible processors, which include the Ryzen 5000 series (including the X3D parts with 3D V-Cache) and some Ryzen 4000 series part. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking provided the motherboard supports it. The RTX 5000 Ada has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. This combined system TDP is approximately 315 W, leaving significant headroom for a 600 W PSU, but a higher-wattage PSU would be advisable for overclocking or additional peripherals. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, which requires an adapter or a native 16-pin PSU cable. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 267 mm (10.5 inches) in length and 112 mm (4.4 inches) in height, so case compatibility is a factor for smaller chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to move to a newer platform (like AM5) if the user wants a significant CPU performance boost, but that would require new memory (DDR5) and a new motherboard. Alternatively, within the AM4 platform, upgrading to an 8-core or 12-core Ryzen 5000 series processor would alleviate the CPU bottleneck and better balance the system with the RTX 5000 Ada. The GPU is already at the top of its class, so upgrading it would not yield much benefit unless the user needs more VRAM than 32 GB, which is unlikely. The PCIe Gen 3 link could be a minor bottleneck for the GPU in compute workloads, but it is not a critical issue for gaming.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada is capable of very high frame rates, but the CPU will limit performance at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 98th percentile suggests it can hit 144+ FPS in many titles at 1440p, but the CPU's 79th percentile may cap that at lower levels in CPU-bound games. The system is better suited for 4K high-refresh gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for streaming with a hardware encoder (NVENC) on the RTX 5000 Ada. The GPU's tensor cores and NVENC support will handle encoding with minimal impact on gaming performance. The CPU can handle the game and streaming software simultaneously, but the 65 W TDP and 4.40 GHz boost limit headroom for heavy multitasking while streaming.

Video editing: The combination of a 6-core CPU and a top-tier GPU is strong for video editing. The GPU accelerates effects, color grading, and rendering in software like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro. The 32 GB VRAM is excellent for 4K and 8K footage, and the FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS speeds up GPU-accelerated effects. The CPU's multicore score of 15,848 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for timeline editing and export, but it is not a powerhouse for all-CPU rendering.

3D rendering: This is a primary use case for the RTX 5000 Ada. The 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 make it a strong choice for real-time ray tracing and final-frame rendering in Blender, Maya, and similar software. The 32 GB VRAM allows for large scenes and texture sets. The CPU will be a secondary factor, but for interactive viewport performance, the CPU's single-threaded score of 2237 in Cinebench R23 is important for scene manipulation.

Software development: The CPU is adequate for compilation and general development tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 64,218 and multithread score of 19,000 indicate good performance for code compilation and running virtual machines. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but it can be used for CUDA-based development or machine learning model training, where the 400 tensor cores are valuable.

Student and office work: The system is vastly overqualified for office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread performance is more than enough, and the integrated Radeon Vega 7 could even handle basic tasks without the discrete GPU. This is a high-cost setup for such workloads, but it would handle any academic task, including data analysis in MATLAB or Python, without issue.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme GPU compute power but are working within a moderate CPU budget. The primary audience is 3D artists, video editors, and researchers who rely on GPU-accelerated rendering, simulation, and AI workloads. The 32 GB VRAM is a key selling point for professionals handling large datasets or high-resolution textures. Gamers at 4K resolution who want maximum settings and high frame rates will benefit from the GPU, but they should be aware of the CPU's limitations at lower resolutions. Content creators who work in Adobe Creative Cloud or DaVinci Resolve will see significant acceleration in effects and exports. Software developers working on CUDA-based projects or machine learning will find the tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance highly useful. Students in engineering or computer science fields who need a workstation-class GPU for coursework would find this system capable, though it may be overkill for general student use. Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD, simulation, or data visualization would also be well-served. The CPU, while not top-tier, is a solid mid-range part that will not embarrass itself in these workloads, but the GPU is clearly the star of the show.

# FAQ

Q: What is the VRAM capacity of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada compare to the A100 SXM4 80 GB in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has an average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's score of 183,725.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz and a base clock of 3.60 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500GT is at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,748.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W. The GPU's TDP is 250 W.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an FP32 compute throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 65.28 TFLOPS.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing shows a clear performance hierarchy. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT, achieves an average benchmark score of 26,748 and sits at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15,848 in multicore and 2,237 in single-core. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900K, scores 26,639, which is only 0.4% lower. The GPU, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, achieves an average benchmark score of 184,664 and sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286 and Vulkan score is 194,041. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183,725, just 0.5% lower.

The combined percentile of the system is 89, which is a strong overall position. The GPU's dominance is the primary driver of this high percentile, while the CPU's 79th percentile pulls the combined score down slightly. The gap between the CPU's 79th and GPU's 98th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build. In a combined picture, the system is exceptionally strong for GPU-accelerated tasks, such as rendering, machine learning, and high-resolution gaming. The CPU's performance is adequate for most tasks, but it is not in the same league as the GPU. The data shows that the system is unbalanced, but the imbalance is in favor of the component that matters most for graphics-intensive and compute-intensive workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 19,000 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 175,286 illustrate the scale of the difference in compute capability.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build consisting of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3 architecture, with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The GPU is a workstation-class card from NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace generation, with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, 100 RT cores, and 400 tensor cores, running at a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile of this pairing is 89, placing it in the upper echelon of systems. The GPU is at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is at the 79th percentile of all CPUs.

This pairing is a workstation or high-end gaming system where the GPU is the clear centerpiece. It is designed for users who need professional-grade graphics performance for rendering, simulation, and AI workloads, or for gamers who want to play at 4K with maximum settings. The CPU is a capable mid-range part that supports the GPU without being a major bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios. The system's class is desktop, and its overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 89, is high. It is not a budget build, but rather a performance-focused system that prioritizes GPU compute over CPU throughput. The 32 GB VRAM is a defining feature, making it suitable for large-scale projects that would exceed the memory capacity of consumer GPUs. This build is a statement of GPU power, with a CPU that is sufficient but not extravagant.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds