SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that combines a 6-core Zen 3 processor with a workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU, based on the Cezanne die and built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, presents a strong 73rd percentile standing among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at a commanding 95th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 84, indicating a configuration where the graphics card is the dominant performance contributor. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than empirical game testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3. The processor is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and was released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $159.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that is clearly stronger in multi-threaded work than in single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 16429 versus a single-core score of 2319, a ratio of roughly 7:1 that reflects the 6-core/12-thread design scaling well. The 3DMark thread scaling test shows a similar pattern: 836 in single-thread, 1645 in 2-threads, 3151 in 4-threads, 4593 in 8-threads, and 5411 in max-threads. The jump from 8-threads to max-threads is modest (4593 to 5411), indicating that the 12-thread configuration provides diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, typical of a 6-core part with simultaneous multithreading.

The average benchmark score of 19593 places the Ryzen 5 5500 at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 19617 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668 (-0.4%), the Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499 (+0.5%), and the Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723 (-0.7%). This means the Ryzen 5 5500 sits in a tightly contested performance band where all four rivals are within 0.7% of its average score. The practical implication is that the choice between these processors is unlikely to be decided by raw compute differences, but rather by platform features and price.

PassMark results provide additional workload-specific detail. Integer math scores 65001, floating-point math scores 36815, and extended instructions score 17236. Data encryption scores 14851, while data compression scores a much higher 245533. The single-thread PassMark score is 3058, and the multithread score is 19330. The physics score of 896 and the prime number finding score of 56 are relatively low, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for highly latency-sensitive or branch-heavy integer loops. For real workloads, this processor is well-suited to compilation, office productivity, and moderately parallel rendering tasks, but it will lag behind higher-core-count parts in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature ecosystem that supports DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 connectivity. The memory bus is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The socket has been used across multiple Ryzen generations, so there is a broad range of compatible motherboards available, though the PCIe Gen 3 limitation means that the latest Gen 4 or Gen 5 SSDs and GPUs will not run at their full interface speed. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, so a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management, and power delivery requirements on motherboards are not demanding.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. This is a low power draw for a workstation GPU with this level of performance, allowing the combined CPU+GPU system to run on a power supply that is relatively modest by workstation standards. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a single-slot design, measuring 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height. This compact form factor makes it suitable for smaller workstations or multi-GPU configurations where space is at a premium. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation ahead of the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 support; the GPU will still function correctly on a Gen 3 slot, but the bandwidth is halved compared to its full capability.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would be to move to a higher-core-count AM4 CPU within the same 5000 series, which would improve multi-threaded performance without requiring a motherboard change. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier Ada Lovelace part for increased rendering throughput, though the PCIe Gen 3 interface of the CPU could slightly bottleneck a very fast GPU in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 300 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for the 65 W CPU and 130 W GPU, meaning there is approximately 105 W of margin for other components like drives and fans before hitting the PSU limit.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU with a 95th percentile standing, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 indicates strong compute throughput. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread score of 836 in 3DMark and 2319 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames at moderate rates, but the GPU’s workstation-oriented drivers and 20 GB memory buffer are not optimized for low-latency frame delivery. Expect high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU may limit performance in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which can accelerate encoding and AI-based features. The CPU’s 12 threads provide enough headroom for a software encoder at 1080p, but the GPU can offload encoding to free up CPU resources. The combined 65 W CPU and 130 W GPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial for a streaming setup where acoustic noise is a concern.

Video editing: The GPU’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for holding large video buffers and effect layers. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 provides adequate performance for timeline scrubbing and export encoding, though it is not a top-tier encoding chip. The 7:1 multicore-to-single-core ratio means that rendering and export tasks will scale reasonably with the 12 threads, but editors working with 4K timelines may find the CPU to be the limiting factor.

3D rendering: This is where the pairing excels. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS and fp16 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1) deliver substantial compute power for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The CPU’s 6 cores can handle scene management and physics simulation while the GPU handles the heavy lifting, resulting in a balanced rendering workstation that is far faster than CPU-only rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 65001 and data compression score of 245533 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis tasks. The 12 threads allow parallel builds, and the 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments. The GPU is largely idle during development, meaning it can be used for other compute tasks or display output without contention.

Student and office work: The Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread PassMark score of 3058 is ample for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU’s 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow multiple monitors for productivity, and the low 65 W CPU TDP means the system draws minimal power during light workloads. The 20 GB VRAM is far more than needed for office tasks, but it does not hurt and provides future headroom for more demanding applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 95th percentile GPU standing, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 123842 suggests strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread 3DMark score of 836 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2319 indicate it can sustain reasonable frame pacing in most games.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in esports titles and competitive shooters, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. In AAA titles with heavy graphics effects, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor, though the 20 GB VRAM ensures that texture quality and draw distances can be maxed out without hitting memory limits. The CPU’s 6 cores may cause frame rate dips in games that are heavily single-threaded, but the 12 threads provide enough parallelism for modern titles that use multiple cores.

At 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and the 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes more relevant. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation should maintain high frame rates at this resolution, with the CPU becoming less of a bottleneck as the GPU takes on more rendering work. At 4K, the GPU is the clear performance driver, and the CPU’s role diminishes to that of feeding the GPU with draw calls and physics updates. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for 4K textures, and the 160-bit memory bus, while narrower than some competitors, is compensated by the high 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

It should be noted that workstation GPUs like the RTX 4000 Ada Generation are not specifically tuned for gaming performance, and their drivers prioritize compute and rendering stability over game-specific optimizations. As such, gaming frame rates may be slightly lower than a comparable GeForce gaming card would achieve, despite the high compute scores.

Who Should Build It

The primary target users for this pairing are professionals in GPU-accelerated rendering and compute workloads. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 GB VRAM make it well-suited for 3D artists, architects, and product designers who use GPU renderers. The CPU’s 6 cores provide enough processing power for scene management and non-GPU tasks, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system cool in an office environment.

Content creators working with video editing and motion graphics will benefit from the GPU’s compute power and the CPU’s multi-threaded encoding capabilities. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large compositions and high-resolution previews without swapping to system memory. Software developers will find the CPU’s integer math and compression scores sufficient for build pipelines, and the GPU can be used for CUDA-accelerated testing or machine learning inference.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this system for coursework that involves 3D modeling, simulation, or data processing. The GPU’s 4x DisplayPort outputs support multi-monitor setups for code and documentation side-by-side. Small business workstations that require reliable rendering or CAD performance will find this pairing adequate, with the 300 W suggested PSU keeping power costs low.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K who also do content creation as a hobby would benefit from this system, as the GPU can handle modern games at high settings while also accelerating video exports. However, gamers who prioritize maximum FPS in competitive titles would be better served by a gaming-focused GPU with higher clock speeds and lower latency memory.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile standing of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, indicating it outperforms 84% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 with an average score of 19617, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 5 5500’s 19593.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 5500 does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation users who require error-correcting memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 300 W, which is modest given the GPU’s 130 W TDP.

Q: What are the GPU’s nearest rivals and their performance deltas?

A: The NVIDIA A10M scores 135230 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472 (-0.9%).

Q: Is the CPU’s multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5500 has an unlocked multiplier, allowing users to overclock beyond the 4.20 GHz boost clock.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a system where the GPU is the clear performance leader. The GPU’s 95th percentile standing versus the CPU’s 73rd percentile means that in GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation will be the primary performance driver, while the CPU may become the bottleneck in lightly threaded tasks. The 3DMark thread scaling shows that the CPU’s single-thread score of 836 is relatively low, so any workload that relies heavily on a single thread will be limited by the CPU.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19593 is within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, meaning the CPU is not a weak link in absolute terms, but the GPU’s average score of 135218 is far above the CPU’s score. This imbalance suggests that in workloads where both are active, such as a game with physics and rendering, the GPU will finish its rendering tasks faster than the CPU can supply new frames. The FPS scaling, though not measured, would show this as the GPU waiting for the CPU in CPU-limited scenes.

The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth of the GPU mean that memory capacity and bandwidth are unlikely to be bottlenecks in most workloads. The CPU’s 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is much lower, but for CPU tasks like compilation and office work, this is adequate. The PCIe Gen 3 interface of the CPU versus the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 support is a potential bottleneck for data transfer between the two, but in practice, most workloads do not saturate the PCIe link.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is a workstation-grade Ada Lovelace part with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper tier of all configurations, though it is not at the very top. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and the GPU’s 95th percentile create an asymmetric pairing where the GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU.

The system is best described as a workstation-class GPU with a mid-range CPU that is sufficient for most compute tasks but not the strongest available. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP keep power consumption manageable, and the 300 W suggested PSU means the system can be built in a compact case with a modest power supply. The GPU’s single-slot design and 245 mm length allow for installation in smaller chassis, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor professional setups.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19593, with a percentile ranking of 73 among all CPUs. Its best scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 and a single-core score of 2319, a Geekbench multicore score of 7976 and single-core of 1730, and a 3DMark max-threads score of 5411. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 135218, with a percentile ranking of 95 among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 146593 and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 123842.

The combined picture is one of a high-performing GPU paired with a competent but not exceptional CPU. The GPU is within 0.9% of its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO V620, and its 95th percentile means it outperforms 95% of all GPUs. The CPU is within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, and its 73rd percentile means it outperforms 73% of all CPUs. The GPU’s percentile is 22 points higher than the CPU’s, confirming that the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The architecture is Ada Lovelace, and the GPU is classified as a workstation part in the GeForce 40-series family. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz, and the memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for a workstation GPU, enabling large datasets and high-resolution rendering. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, both of which are strong figures for a single-slot card. The FP32 throughput is 26.73 TFLOPS, and the FP16 throughput is also 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for AI and compute workloads that use half precision.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its position in the market. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 place it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M with a score of 135230 (0% delta), indicating that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is essentially tied with that part. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 (-0.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 (-0.4%), showing that the top workstation GPUs are all within 1% of each other in average benchmark scores.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS, though the workstation driver focus means these are more likely to be used for rendering and compute than gaming. The single-slot design, 130 W TDP, and 300 W suggested PSU make it one of the more power-efficient high-performance workstation GPUs available.