SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, backed by a strong generational GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part running at a 3.60 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clock, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with a 65 W TDP. Its benchmark scores place it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19593. The GPU, meanwhile, is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 5888 shading units, 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, and a 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. It sits in the 81st percentile for all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648. Together, this build achieves a combined percentile of 77, and the measured average FPS across a broad game suite is 156.6 at ultra settings. The data indicates a system where the GPU clearly outclasses the CPU in raw compute potential, but the CPU still holds its own for most gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture and the Cezanne codename. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, using a dual-channel DDR4 memory interface with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing for overclocking, and it uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform with PCIe Gen 3 support.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales predictably with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the score climbs from 836 in single-thread to 1645 in 2-thread, 3151 in 4-thread, 4593 in 8-thread, and 5411 in max-thread scenarios. This scaling indicates that the CPU gains meaningful performance from additional threads up to 8, but the jump from 8 to 12 threads is modest, suggesting that the extra threads provide diminishing returns for the workloads tested. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: R23 multicore scores 16429, while single-core is 2319, a ratio of about 7.1x, which is typical for a 6-core/12-thread part without extreme boost behavior.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (score 19617, delta -0.1%), Intel Core i5-12500 (score 19668, delta -0.4%), Intel Core i7-10700F (score 19499, delta +0.5%), and Intel Core i5-11600KF (score 19723, delta -0.7%). These deltas are all within 0.7% of the Ryzen 5 5500, meaning the performance difference between these parts is essentially negligible in aggregate. The data shows that this CPU is positioned at a competitive midpoint: it matches older 10th and 11th gen Intel i7/i5 parts and newer hybrid designs, but it does not pull ahead in any meaningful way. For real workloads, this means that the CPU will handle everyday multitasking, office productivity, and moderate content creation without being the limiting factor, but it will not provide the headroom seen in higher-core-count or newer-architecture parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 836 and PassMark single-thread score of 3058 indicate competent per-core performance, which is critical for high-FPS titles. Measured FPS data supports this: Counter-Strike 2 hits 257.1 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant reaches 384.6 FPS at 1080p. These numbers show that the CPU can feed the GPU well enough for esports titles at high refresh rates, though the GPU does most of the heavy lifting.

Streaming: With 6 cores and 12 threads, the CPU has enough parallelism to handle encoding alongside gaming, but the data does not include specific streaming benchmarks. The 3DMark max-thread score of 5411 suggests that the CPU can manage background tasks, but the modest scaling from 8 to 12 threads implies that heavy multitasking (like game capture and encode) may strain it. The GPU’s NVENC hardware (not detailed in the pack) would likely offload this work, but the CPU alone is adequate for light streaming.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 indicates the CPU can handle 1080p and light 4K video editing timelines, but it is not a powerhouse for long renders. PassMark integer math score of 65001 and floating-point math score of 36815 show solid number-crunching, but the CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s will bottleneck heavy multi-track projects. The data suggests it is sufficient for hobbyist editing, not professional workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6900 and R15 multicore score of 1656 place it in the mid-range for rendering. Compared to rivals, it is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-12500 and i5-11600KF, meaning it will produce frames at a similar rate. For single-frame renders or small scenes, it is fine, but for complex scenes or animation, the CPU will lag behind 8-core or higher parts.

Software development: PassMark data compression score of 245533 and encryption score of 14851 show strong performance for build tools and code compilation, which are often multi-threaded. The CPU’s 73rd percentile among all CPUs indicates it is above average for compilation tasks. The 12 threads help with parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3058 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 1730 and multi-core score of 7976 are more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 65 W TDP means it runs cool and quiet, and the 7 nm process keeps power draw low. Office applications will rarely stress the CPU beyond a fraction of its capacity, making this an overkill but smooth experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing. The RTX 4070 sits in the 81st percentile for all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 73rd percentile. In gaming, the GPU’s compute power is the main driver of frame rates, but the CPU must keep up. The measured FPS data shows the system does not achieve the GPU’s maximum potential in all cases. For example, at 1080p ultra settings, the system achieves 150 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 188.7 FPS in Doom, but in CPU-bound titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, it drops to 38.6 FPS, indicating a scenario where neither component is fully utilized due to optimization issues.

The bottleneck analysis comes down to resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in high-FPS scenarios. For instance, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system reaches 558.5 FPS at 1080p, but this drops to 385.7 FPS at 1440p and 225.7 FPS at 4K. This scaling is GPU-driven, but the CPU’s single-thread performance (836 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient to drive those high frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 where 1080p yields 74.1 FPS, 1440p yields 56.3 FPS, and 4K yields 35.9 FPS. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is sufficient for 1440p but is stressed at 4K, as indicated by the steep drop-off.

The pairRankByFps data shows this build ranks 1022 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 156.6 across games. This puts it in the top 27% of all CPU+GPU pairings, suggesting that the balance is good for most users, but not optimal. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 interface (vs the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 bus) could theoretically limit data transfer, but the benchmark data does not show a significant penalty. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: for esports and competitive shooters at 1080p, the CPU is the limiter; for AAA titles at 1440p and 4K, the GPU is the limiter.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p high-refresh: This build is ideal for players who want to push 240Hz or 360Hz monitors in esports titles. The measured 257.1 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 384.6 FPS in Valorant at 1080p show that the CPU+GPU combo can drive these frame rates, though the CPU’s single-thread performance is the ceiling.

Gamers at 1440p: The system is well-suited for 1440p gaming at high settings. Data shows 106 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 80 FPS in Control, and 121.2 FPS in Doom at 1440p. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most titles, but the CPU may occasionally bottleneck in less-optimized games.

Content creators (hobbyist level): The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 and PassMark multithread score of 19330 are sufficient for light video editing and photo work. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 184 tensor cores accelerate rendering in compatible applications, making this a capable entry-level creator machine.

Developers: Software engineers compiling code will benefit from the 12 threads and high integer math score of 65001. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking ensures it outperforms the average desktop CPU for build tasks. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with repeated compilation tasks.

Students and office workers: This is overkill for word processing and spreadsheet work, but the 65 W TDP and dual-slot GPU (with 200 W TDP) mean it is a quiet, efficient system for a dorm room or small office. The 12 GB VRAM and modern GPU architecture also make it future-proof for any graphics-accelerated tasks.

Small business workstations: The system can handle accounting software, database management, and light 3D modeling. The PassMark data encryption score of 14851 ensures secure transactions, and the multi-threaded performance supports multitasking across multiple monitors.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its nearest rivals in CPU performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19593. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, scores 19617 (0.1% higher), while the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668 (0.4% higher). The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723 (0.7% higher). All deltas are within 0.7%, meaning performance is effectively identical.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 is in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms 73% of all CPUs in the benchmark database, placing it comfortably in the upper-mid range for desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) and a total bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming and light 4K.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which means it outperforms 77% of all measured desktop and laptop builds. The average FPS across the tested game suite is 156.6 at ultra settings.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and what PSU is recommended?

A: The RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 550 W. This power supply recommendation is based on the GPU’s power draw and system headroom.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 5500 does not support ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR4 memory with a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status and when was it released?

A: The RTX 4070 is marked as end-of-life. It was released on 2023-04-11, with the GeForce 30 as its predecessor and GeForce 50 as its successor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports the Ryzen 5 5500. The CPU uses DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU’s PCIe interface is Gen 3, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This mismatch means the GPU can run at PCIe 4.0 speeds on a motherboard that supports it, but the CPU’s lanes are limited to Gen 3. In practice, the benchmark data does not show a significant penalty, as the average FPS across games is 156.6.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low, meaning the system does not require a high-end cooler. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. This leaves headroom for additional drives and peripherals, but not for a significantly more powerful GPU. The upgrade path on the AM4 platform is limited to other AM4 CPUs, which include higher-core-count Zen 3 parts, but the data does not specify which ones are compatible. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and the card is a dual-slot design with dimensions of 240 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, if the motherboard supports it, but the current CPU already sits within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, so the gains would be modest. For the GPU, the RTX 4070 is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. Upgrading the GPU would require a more powerful PSU, as the current 550 W suggestion is matched to the 200 W TDP of the 4070. The memory is DDR4, which is an older standard; upgrading to DDR5 would require a platform change.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent across multiple test suites. In 3DMark, the max-thread score is 5411, single-thread is 836, 2-thread is 1645, 4-thread is 3151, and 8-thread is 4593. Cinebench R23 multicore is 16429, single-core is 2319. Geekbench multicore is 7976, single-core is 1730. PassMark multithread is 19330, single-thread is 3058. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 19593, placing it in the 73rd percentile.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are higher in absolute terms. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 3854. Geekbench OpenCL scores 154858, Vulkan scores 174152. PassMark G3D scores 26927, G2D scores 1164, and GPU Compute scores 14720. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 37648, placing it in the 81st percentile. The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (score 37628, delta 0.1%), followed by AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (score 37507, delta 0.4%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (score 38135, delta -1.3%), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (score 37157, delta 1.3%). These deltas are all within 1.3%, showing that the 4070 is closely matched to these parts in aggregate, though its real-world gaming performance is often better due to driver optimizations.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is 0.4% slower than the Intel Core i5-12500 and a GPU that is 1.3% slower than the RTX 4080 Mobile, but the system achieves a combined percentile of 77. The measured FPS data shows strong performance in esports (558.5 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p) and competent performance in AAA titles (74.1 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p). The average FPS across all tested games is 156.6, which is higher than the 144Hz refresh rate target for most monitors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 (6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 CPU) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (Ada Lovelace GPU). The CPU is a 2022 release with a launch MSRP of $159, while the GPU is a 2023 release with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The build class is explicitly marked as desktop. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all measured CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

In terms of performance tier, the CPU is in the 73rd percentile (upper-mid range), and the GPU is in the 81st percentile (high range). The pairRankByFps data shows this build ranks 1022 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 27% of all pairings. This indicates that the system is well-balanced for gaming, with the GPU providing most of the performance headroom. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 1440p gaming, while the CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate but not exceptional. The build is best described as a high-refresh 1080p machine that can handle 1440p with ease, and it is capable of 4K in less demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is based on the AD104 chip and Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The GPU’s base clock is 1920 MHz, with a boost clock of 2475 MHz. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS (with FP16 at the same rate).

The GPU’s benchmark scores are strong. PassMark G3D score of 26927 places it in the 81st percentile. Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 and OpenCL score of 154858 show excellent compute performance, which is relevant for rendering and AI workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The GPU’s RT cores (46) and tensor cores (184) accelerate ray tracing and DLSS, though the benchmark data does not include specific RT or DLSS tests.

For real-world rendering, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p textures, but the 192-bit bus may limit performance at 4K. The measured FPS data shows 35.9 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K, which is playable but not ideal. The GPU’s 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p, as seen in the 80 FPS in Control and 106 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at that resolution. The nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile, scores 1.3% higher in average benchmark score, but the desktop 4070 has higher clock speeds and a larger power budget. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production, but its performance remains competitive, as shown by its 81st percentile ranking.