SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Radeon RX 9070 pairing is a desktop combination that lands in the 71st percentile overall, indicating a system that delivers solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance while retaining a balanced architecture. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part, sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, a Navi 48-based RDNA 4.0 card, holds the 69th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing yields an average measured FPS of 151.9 across the tested game suite, ranking 1143rd out of 3732 tracked pairs. The data shows a system that is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p, comfortable 60+ FPS at 1440p in most titles, and is measurably limited at 4K by both the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's absolute throughput.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 7 nm desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The benchmark data reveals a processor that is competitive with several Intel and AMD rivals, sitting just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-12500 in average score. It edges out the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.5% and trails the Intel Core i5-11600KF by 0.7%.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates strong scaling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 reflects a capable 12-thread performer for productivity tasks, while the single-core score of 2319 indicates that the Zen 3 architecture still delivers competitive per-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 and single-core score of 1730 reinforce this picture. The 3DMark results show a progression from 836 in single-thread to 5386 in 16-thread tests, with a maximum thread score of 5411, indicating that the processor scales well across its 12 threads but does not gain much beyond that point.

For real workloads, the data suggests that the Ryzen 5 5500 is a versatile mid-range part. The Passmark integer math score of 65001 and floating-point math score of 36815 demonstrate solid number-crunching ability for code compilation and scientific calculations. The data compression score of 245533 and encryption score of 14851 indicate good performance for file archiving and secure communications. With a 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support at 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, this CPU is well-matched to its 73rd percentile ranking, offering a balanced mix of single-thread and multi-thread capabilities that positions it as a strong value in the mid-range segment.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured rather than estimated, shows that this pairing excels at 1080p and remains playable at 1440p, with 4K being the clear limitation. At 1920x1080, the system achieves elite esports performance, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 530 FPS and Valorant reaching 385.5 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege delivers 285 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 achieves 239 FPS, demonstrating that the CPU does not bottleneck high-refresh competitive gaming at this resolution.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the results are strong. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 66.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 120.5 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 87.8 FPS, and Control reaches 99.3 FPS. The system handles the vast majority of the tested library above 60 FPS at 1080p, with only Ark: Survival Ascended (36.6 FPS) and The Medium (50.6 FPS) falling below that threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more stressed but remains capable. Call of Duty: Warzone still delivers 106.2 FPS, and Overpower hits 86 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 maintains 158 FPS, and Valorant stays high at 364.2 FPS. The heavier titles show the strain: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 53 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 48.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended becomes nearly unplayable at 21.2 FPS. The average across games at this resolution remains respectable, with titles like Assetto Corsa at 99 FPS and Doom at 117 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the limits become apparent. Only a handful of games maintain 60+ FPS, including Assetto Corsa at 60 FPS, Overpower at 70.5 FPS, and Undisputed at 60.7 FPS. Most demanding titles fall into the 30-50 FPS range, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 35 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 31.2 FPS, and Control at 50 FPS. The data clearly indicates that this build is optimized for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p high-detail gaming, with 4K being a stretch goal for less demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19593 places it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals all sit within a 1.2% band: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 19617 (-0.1%), the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668 (-0.4%), the Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499 (+0.5%), and the Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723 (-0.7%). This clustering shows that the Ryzen 5 5500 is a mature, well-balanced design that competes directly with recent and previous-generation mid-range parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 23877 places it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similar competitive landscape: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23736 (+0.6%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063 (-0.8%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628 (+1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170 (-1.2%). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290, combined with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 and Vulkan score of 58705, positions the RX 9070 as a capable 1440p performer with modern feature support.

The combined percentile of 71 for the pairing, along with the pair rank of 1143 out of 3732 and an average FPS of 151.9 across games, tells the story of a system that is greater than the sum of its parts. The CPU is not holding the GPU back at 1080p, but the GPU's performance ceiling is reached at 1440p, and the CPU's single-thread performance limits frame rates in highly CPU-bound titles. This is a balanced mid-range pairing that delivers consistent performance across a wide range of workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gameplay. The measured FPS data shows that esports titles like Valorant (385.5 FPS at 1080p), CS:GO (530 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (285 FPS) run at levels that exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, making this an ideal system for competitive players. For AAA gamers, the ability to run Cyberpunk 2077 at 71 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 120.5 FPS at 1080p means that modern titles are fully playable at high settings.

Content creators and developers will find the 6-core, 12-thread CPU adequate for moderate workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 indicate that video editing and 3D rendering are feasible, though not at professional levels. Students and small business users undertaking office work, web development, and light programming will find the system responsive, with the Passmark single-thread score of 3058 ensuring snappy application performance.

The system is less suited for 4K gaming enthusiasts or heavy computational professionals. The FPS data at 3840x2160 shows that most demanding games fall below 50 FPS, and the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier productivity part. However, for the target audience of 1080p and 1440p gamers who also need a functional workstation, this pairing offers a compelling balance of gaming and general-purpose performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a nuanced bottleneck picture. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the limiting factor for most AAA titles, as evidenced by the frame rates that scale with GPU demand. However, in esports titles like Valorant (385.5 FPS) and CS:GO (530 FPS), the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the constraint, as these frame rates approach the limits of what the 4.20 GHz boost clock can deliver. The single-thread benchmark score of 836 in 3DMark and 2319 in Cinebench R23 indicates that this is not a top-tier single-thread performer, capping maximum frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck in demanding games. The FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p in Cyberpunk 2077 (71 to 53 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (66.9 to 48.7 FPS) is consistent with GPU-bound scaling. The GPU's 69th percentile ranking and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate that it is a mid-range part that cannot maintain 60+ FPS in the most demanding titles at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, both components contribute to the performance limit. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s and 16 GB capacity are sufficient, but the raw compute power is insufficient for 4K gaming. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, while adequate, does not provide enough headroom to compensate. The result is that most games fall into the 30-40 FPS range at 4K, indicating that this resolution is beyond the intended scope of the build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the primary strength of the build. At 1080p, the system delivers 530 FPS in CS:GO, 385.5 FPS in Valorant, and 285 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, all well above the 144Hz or 240Hz refresh rates common in competitive monitors. The 142 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 178.6 FPS in Doom further confirm the high-refresh capability.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 can handle software encoding while gaming at 1080p. Evidence from the FPS data shows that CPU-bound titles like Valorant still maintain 385.5 FPS, leaving headroom for encoding overhead. The Passmark multi-thread score of 19330 supports this moderate multitasking capability.

Video editing: The CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's compute capability provide a functional editing system. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 indicates good 1080p timeline performance, while the GPU's 14737 Passmark compute score accelerates effects and exports. This is a capable but not professional-grade setup.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and the GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance allow for moderate rendering workloads. The system can handle single-image renders and small scenes, but large production renders will be slow. The 16 GB GPU memory is beneficial for texture-heavy scenes.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 65001 and data compression score of 245533 indicate strong performance for code compilation and build processes. The single-thread score of 3058 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. This is a solid developer machine for web, application, and game development.

Student and office work: The Passmark single-thread score of 3058 and the 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide snappy performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 73rd CPU percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of office machines, making it a high-performance choice for academic and business tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 71, indicating it outperforms 71% of tracked CPU+GPU pairings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to the Intel Core i5-12500?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 trails the Core i5-12500 by 0.4% in average benchmark score, with scores of 19593 and 19668 respectively.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across the measured game suite is 151.9, ranking the pair 1143rd out of 3732 tracked pairs.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 60 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS. At 2560x1440, it drops to 53 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 35 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

A: The RX 9070 trails the RTX 2080 SUPER by 1.2% in average benchmark score, with scores of 23877 and 24170 respectively.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has a 65W TDP, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPU. The CPU, a 6-core 12-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, holds the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, a Navi 48 RDNA 4.0 card, holds the 69th percentile among all GPUs. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 71, placing this system in the upper-mid tier of tracked builds.

The measured FPS data confirms that this is a 1080p-focused gaming system that extends well into 1440p. The average 151.9 FPS across games, with peaks exceeding 500 FPS in esports titles, positions it as a strong choice for high-refresh gaming. The 4K performance, while present, is limited to less demanding titles, making this a 1080p/1440p build rather than a 4K powerhouse.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5500 is built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform, supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory at 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 3. The CPU has a 65W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and requires a 550W suggested PSU, with dual 8-pin power connectors.

The upgrade path for this system is constrained by the AM4 platform, which is a mature socket. A sensible next step would be upgrading to a higher-core-count AM4 CPU that maintains the same socket and DDR4 memory support, providing a multi-threaded performance boost without a platform change. The GPU, however, has more headroom: the PCIe 5.0 interface and 550W PSU recommendation mean that a future GPU upgrade within the same power envelope would be straightforward.

For storage and expansion, the PCIe Gen 3 support on the CPU limits NVMe speeds, but the GPU's PCIe 5.0 interface is fully supported. The 16 GB GPU memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy workloads. The system's DDR4 memory support, while not the latest standard, remains adequate for the CPU's 73rd percentile performance, and the 65W CPU TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future.