SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 5 5500's position relative to other CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19593. It trades blows with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (19617, 0.1% faster), Intel Core i5-12500 (19668, 0.4% faster), and Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, 0.5% slower), while trailing the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723, 0.7% faster) by the largest margin in its immediate rival group.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7600 XT ranks at the 60th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 17083. It sits nearly level with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 0.3% behind), AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 0.4% behind), and NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932, 0.9% behind), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (17208) is 0.7% faster.

Q: What is the pair's combined performance ranking?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 + RX 7600 XT pairing holds a combined percentile of 67. In FPS-based ranking across 3732 total pairs, this combination ranks 2371st, with an average FPS of 106.9 across all measured games. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all CPU+GPU pairings.

Q: What memory type and PCIe generation does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it uses PCIe Gen 3. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, so the CPU's Gen 3 support will constrain the GPU's effective bandwidth on this platform.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures for esports titles?

A: At 1920x1080, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 360 FPS, Valorant at 374 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS. At 2560x1440, these drop to 248, 319, and 127 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, they remain playable at 146, 255, and 70 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's power draw and what PSU is suggested for the GPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has a TDP of 65 W. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot in width.

Q: What is the release timing for these components?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 launched on April 3, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $159. The RX 7600 XT launched on January 23, 2024, with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. Both are currently in active production.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 5500 and RX 7600 XT favors the CPU in most gaming scenarios, but the gap narrows at higher resolutions. The CPU's percentile (73) is notably higher than the GPU's (60), suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in this pairing. In practical terms, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution scales up.

Looking at the FPS scaling pattern across resolutions, the bottleneck shifts clearly. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all measured games is 106.9, but this drops substantially at 2560x1440 and further at 3840x2160. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 159.8 FPS at 1080p to 106.1 FPS at 1440p (a 33.6% reduction), then to 57.6 FPS at 4K (a further 45.7% cut). This pattern indicates that the GPU is increasingly the constraint as pixel count rises.

The CPU's single-threaded performance, measured at 836 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2319 in Cinebench R23 single-core, is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p in many titles. In games like Valorant (374 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (360 FPS at 1080p), the CPU demonstrates it can push very high frame rates without becoming the bottleneck.

However, in heavily threaded workloads that stress all 12 threads simultaneously, the CPU's limits become apparent. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 5386 and max_threads score of 5411 are close, indicating that scaling beyond 8 threads yields diminishing returns. This suggests that in games that use more than 8 threads effectively, the CPU could become a limiting factor even at 1080p.

For productivity tasks, the balance depends on the workload. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 19330 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 show it can handle multithreaded workloads, but the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 8987) mean that GPU-accelerated tasks will be dominated by the graphics card's performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 versus the CPU's Geekbench multicore of 7976 illustrates this divide clearly.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It uses a 7nm TSMC process node with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is typical for mid-range Zen 3 parts, and the 16 MB L3 is sufficient for gaming workloads that benefit from fast access to working sets. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory.

In benchmark tests, the CPU shows a clear scaling pattern. The 3dmark scores progress from 836 in single-thread to 1645 in 2-thread, 3151 in 4-thread, 4593 in 8-thread, and 5411 in max-thread tests. This indicates that scaling is strong from 1 to 8 threads but flattens significantly beyond that, which is expected for a 6-core/12-thread part where the last 4 threads (from the second thread per core) provide less incremental performance.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score of 16429 versus the single-core score of 2319 gives a multi-to-single ratio of approximately 7.1x, which is reasonable for 12 threads but below the theoretical maximum due to simultaneous multithreading overhead. The R20 scores (6900 multicore, 973 single-core) and R15 scores (1656 multicore, 233 single-core) follow the same pattern.

For real-world workloads, the Passmark suite provides context. The CPU scores 65001 in integer math and 36815 in floating-point math, indicating strong general-purpose computation. Data compression through Passmark scores 245533, while data encryption scores 14851. The extended instructions score of 17236 shows the AVX2 and related instruction set capabilities are functional but not exceptional. The physics score of 896 and prime number finding score of 56 are lower, suggesting that certain specialized workloads will not perform as strongly.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19593 places it in the 73rd percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its score, indicating that this processor is positioned in a highly competitive performance band where small differences separate the contenders. The Intel Core i5-12500 and i5-11600KF are marginally faster, while the Intel Core i7-10700F is marginally slower.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which has been one of the longest-lived sockets in modern desktop computing. This provides a significant upgrade path within the same motherboard, as the AM4 socket supports a wide range of Ryzen processors from the 3000, 5000, and even some 4000 series parts. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, and the platform does not support ECC memory.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 3 support is a notable consideration. The RX 7600 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, meaning it will run at PCIe 3.0 x8 speeds when paired with this CPU. This can reduce available bandwidth to the GPU, though the practical impact on gaming performance is typically modest. For users planning to upgrade the GPU in the future, this could become more significant with higher-end cards that rely on PCIe 4.0 bandwidth.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that power delivery is not a concern for most AM4 motherboards. Even entry-level boards with modest VRM cooling can handle this processor comfortably. The RX 7600 XT has a 190 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 450 W, which is a modest requirement for a modern gaming system. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, so users upgrading from an older system need only ensure their PSU has this connector available.

The CPU's release date of April 2022 and the GPU's January 2024 release mean this is a pairing of a mature CPU with a newer GPU. The CPU's production status is active, as is the GPU's, so both components remain available for new builds. The platform's longevity means that users could potentially upgrade to a higher-end Zen 3 processor (like an 8-core or 12-core part) without changing motherboards, though the specific models available depend on the motherboard's BIOS support.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU first. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 60th percentile means the CPU has more relative headroom. A GPU upgrade would provide more immediate gains in gaming performance, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck. However, the PCIe Gen 3 limitation of the CPU would remain, so any future GPU must be chosen with this in mind.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 5500 delivers an average benchmark score of 19593, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 19617 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668 (0.4% faster), the Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499 (0.5% slower), and the Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723 (0.7% faster). This clustering means the Ryzen 5 5500 is effectively performance-equivalent to its direct competitors, with differences that would be imperceptible in real-world use.

The RX 7600 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 17083, placing it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are similarly close: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019 (0.4% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208 (0.7% faster), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932 (0.9% slower). The comparison to the RTX 3070 is particularly notable, as that GPU is from a higher performance tier but the RX 7600 XT nearly matches it in this benchmark aggregate.

In GPU-specific benchmarks, the RX 7600 XT scores 2348 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 92426 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 48366 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 17132 and a GPU compute score of 8987. The DirectX tests show variation: DirectX 11 scores 167, DirectX 12 scores 65, DirectX 10 scores 85, and DirectX 9 scores 228. The G2D score of 1030 indicates solid 2D performance for desktop use.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores provide a detailed picture of its capabilities. The 3dmark suite shows 836 in single-thread, 1645 in 2-thread, 3151 in 4-thread, 4593 in 8-thread, 5386 in 16-thread, and 5411 in max-thread tests. Cinebench R23 scores are 2319 single-core and 16429 multicore. Geekbench scores are 1730 single-core and 7976 multicore. Passmark multithread scores 19330, with single-thread at 3058.

The combined CPU+GPU pairing has a combined percentile of 67, which is between the individual CPU and GPU percentiles. The pair ranks 2371st out of 3732 total pairs in FPS-based ranking, with an average FPS of 106.9 across all measured games. This places the pairing in the upper-middle portion of the database, reflecting that while neither component is top-tier, together they provide solid overall performance.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this pairing shows a wide range of gaming performance depending on the title and resolution. At 1920x1080, the most demanding games struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43.6 FPS, and The Medium at 34.1 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding at 26.8 FPS. These titles will require settings adjustments or upscaling to achieve smooth gameplay.

Mid-range titles at 1080p perform adequately. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 120.8 FPS, Control at 68.1 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 58.8 FPS. Assetto Corsa achieves 95.5 FPS, and Doom runs at 121.1 FPS. Fortnite runs at 75.2 FPS, and Grand Theft Auto V at 73.2 FPS. These are playable to smooth framerates, with many titles exceeding 60 FPS.

Esports and lighter titles at 1080p are where this pairing excels. Valorant runs at 374 FPS, CS:GO at 360 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 159.8 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 194 FPS, with the X version at 191.2 FPS. Roblox runs at 208.6 FPS, Minecraft at 161 FPS, and To The Core at 163 FPS. Barony achieves 138 FPS, and Dave The Diver runs at 137 FPS. These framerates are well beyond what most high-refresh monitors can display.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable in many titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 37.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.3 FPS, and The Medium to 25.3 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains strong at 107.4 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 106.1 FPS. Valorant continues to excel at 319 FPS, with CS:GO at 248 FPS. Assetto Corsa runs at 67.2 FPS, and Control at 50.3 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator drops to 50 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 7.4 FPS. The Medium is at 20.5 FPS, and Allods Online at 22.7 FPS. Valorant remains playable at 255 FPS, and CS:GO at 146 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 88.8 FPS, but most demanding titles fall below 40 FPS. This resolution is only suitable for lighter or older games.

The average FPS across all games and resolutions for this pair is 106.9, but this number is skewed upward by esports titles. For a more representative picture, the demanding titles at 1080p show that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, or 1440p with adjusted settings. At 4K, only esports and older titles will provide satisfactory performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing excels in competitive titles. At 1080p, Valorant delivers 374 FPS, CS:GO achieves 360 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege runs at 194 FPS. These framerates are more than sufficient for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. Even Counter-Strike 2 at 159.8 FPS exceeds 144Hz refresh rates. At 1440p, Valorant still delivers 319 FPS, keeping high-refresh gaming viable at that resolution.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a Passmark multithread score of 19330 can handle encoding overhead, but the GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware means CPU-based encoding is the primary option. Games like Call of Duty: Warzone at 120.8 FPS (1080p) leave headroom for encoding workloads. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 46.6 FPS would make streaming challenging without quality compromises.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 and Passmark multithread score of 19330 indicate solid performance for video encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 shows it can accelerate certain effects and exports. For 1080p editing workflows, this pairing is capable. 4K editing will work but with longer render times compared to higher-end parts.

3D rendering: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide reasonable performance for CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 16429. The GPU's FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU-based renderers. However, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature here, allowing larger scenes and textures to fit in memory. This is a capable entry-level rendering workstation.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 65001 and data compression score of 245533 indicate strong performance for compilation and data processing tasks. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The 16 GB GPU memory is not directly relevant to development, but the high single-thread score of 836 (3dmark) helps with IDE responsiveness and code analysis.

Student and office work: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1730 and Passmark single-thread score of 3058 ensure snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The GPU's G2D score of 1030 indicates solid 2D performance for desktop compositing. Power consumption is modest with a 65 W CPU and 190 W GPU, making this a reasonable system for daily use, though the GPU is overkill for pure office tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

The combined percentile of 67 places this build in the upper-middle tier of all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 60th percentile, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The FPS-based ranking of 2371 out of 3732 pairs (with an average of 106.9 FPS) confirms this mid-to-upper positioning.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP (with a 450 W suggested PSU) make this a relatively power-efficient build. The GPU requires only a single 8-pin power connector, simplifying installation. The dual-slot GPU design with 204 mm length fits in most mid-tower cases.

The platform is based on the mature AM4 socket with DDR4 memory support. While the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 limits the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, practical performance impact is modest. This build represents a solid mid-range desktop configuration that balances CPU and GPU capabilities effectively.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers are the primary audience for this pairing. The measured FPS data shows that most titles run at playable framerates at 1920x1080 with ultra settings, with esports titles reaching extremely high framerates. Gamers with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors will find this build capable in competitive titles, though demanding single-player games will require settings adjustments.

1440p gamers can use this build with adjusted settings. Many titles run at 50-70 FPS at 2560x1440, which is acceptable for casual play. Esports titles like Valorant (319 FPS) and CS:GO (248 FPS) remain highly playable. Gamers who prioritize competitive play over maximum visual fidelity will find this resolution viable.

Content creators working with 1080p or light 4K workloads will benefit from the 16 GB GPU memory for texture-heavy work. The CPU's 12 threads handle multitasking between creative applications. This is not a professional-grade workstation, but it can handle entry-level video editing, graphic design, and 3D modeling.

Software developers who need a system for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines will find the 6-core/12-thread CPU adequate. The Passmark integer and data compression scores indicate solid performance for build processes. The GPU's memory capacity is useful for testing GPU-accelerated applications.

Students building a versatile system for coursework, light gaming, and general use will find this pairing more powerful than needed for most academic tasks. The power efficiency and modest PSU requirement (450 W) make it economical to run. The CPU's 65 W TDP means even stock coolers handle it well.

Small business workstations that occasionally game or run GPU-accelerated applications can use this build effectively. The 16 GB GPU memory supports larger datasets and multiple displays (with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs). The CPU's reliability and active production status ensure ongoing availability for system maintenance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds