SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Radeon RX 7600 pairing delivers a cohesive desktop experience, with the CPU landing in the 73rd percentile of all processors and the GPU in the 57th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined percentile sits at 65, placing this build firmly in the mid-range tier of the benchmark database. Measured frame rates across dozens of titles reveal a platform that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming, handles 1440p competently, and struggles at 4K in demanding titles.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The data package includes measured ultra-settings FPS for 55 games across three resolutions, and the pattern is clear: this system is a 1080p powerhouse with diminishing returns at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all tested games is 103.5, which is respectable for ultra settings. Esports and light titles show exceptional performance. Valorant hits 357 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 344.3 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X manages 185.8 FPS. Minecraft runs at 151.5 FPS, and Roblox achieves 200 FPS. These numbers indicate the pairing can easily saturate high-refresh monitors in competitive titles.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are consistent but not catastrophic. Valorant still maintains 305 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 101.6 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone shows robust scaling at 106 FPS, suggesting the GPU has headroom in optimized titles. However, heavier games begin to show strain. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 33.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 28.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended plummets to 15.3 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1440p ultra gaming is only viable for less demanding or well-optimized titles.

At 3840x2160, the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors. Only Valorant (243 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (143.4 FPS) remain highly playable. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 90 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 sits at 22.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 7.1 FPS. The Medium runs at 22 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator reaches 30.6 FPS. The data strongly suggests 4K gaming is not a realistic expectation for this pairing beyond esports or older titles.

The pair rank is 2551 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 103.5 across all games. This places it in the upper half of recorded pairs, though the percentile ranking indicates there are many faster combinations. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average drop of roughly 35-40% across most titles, while the jump to 4K typically halves the 1440p number again. This consistent degradation points to the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Ryzen 5 5500's average benchmark score is 19593, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 19617 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723 (0.7% higher). The Intel Core i7-10700F trails slightly at 19499 (0.5% lower). This clustering indicates the 5500 is well-positioned in its segment, trading blows with newer and older competitors.

In single-thread performance, the 5500 scores 836 in 3dmark_single_thread, 2319 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 1730 in Geekbench single-core. These numbers suggest adequate per-core performance for everyday tasks. Multi-threaded scores are more impressive: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 16429, Geekbench multicore hits 7976, and Passmark multithread scores 19330. The 3dmark tests show scaling from 1645 (2 threads) to 5411 (max threads), indicating good thread utilization.

The RX 7600's average benchmark score is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, 0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, 0.7% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, 0.6% lower). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 and Passmark G3D score of 16634 confirm its mid-range positioning. Geekbench OpenCL scores 88051, while Vulkan scores 34401.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its percentile expectation relative to the GPU. The CPU's 73rd percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. This asymmetry is reflected in the gaming data, where CPU-bound titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike perform exceptionally well, while GPU-bound titles at higher resolutions show sharper declines.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this pairing excels. Valorant hits 357 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 344.3 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X manages 185.8 FPS. These numbers comfortably support 144Hz and even 240Hz monitors in esports titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 836 in 3dmark and 2319 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures the processor won't bottleneck high frame rates in these scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded performance provides a foundation for encoding while gaming. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 16429, and Passmark multithread reaches 19330, indicating sufficient parallel processing capability. However, the lack of integrated graphics means streaming must rely on the GPU or CPU encoding, which could impact gaming performance in CPU-intensive titles.

Video editing: The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 16 MB L3 cache handles editing workloads reasonably. Passmark data compression scores 245533, and integer math reaches 65001. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects and timeline rendering. The 3dmark max threads score of 5411 suggests good scaling for render tasks, though professional editors would likely want more cores.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6900 and R23 score of 16429 indicate competent CPU rendering. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads. However, the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU rendering applications.

Software development: The Passmark extended instructions score of 17236 and data encryption score of 14851 suggest strong performance for compilation and cryptographic tasks. The single-thread score of 3058 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 12 threads handle parallel builds effectively, as evidenced by the 3dmark 8-thread score of 4593.

Student and office work: The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's G2D score of 984 handles 2D acceleration effortlessly. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 165W TDP of the GPU keep power requirements modest, making this suitable for dorm rooms or small offices.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers at 1920x1080 are the primary audience for this build. The measured FPS across 55 games shows most titles achieving 60+ FPS at ultra settings, with esports titles exceeding 150 FPS. Users with 144Hz monitors will find this pairing ideal for competitive games like Valorant (357 FPS), Counter-Strike 2 (157.4 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege X (185.8 FPS). For 1440p gaming, the audience narrows to those playing less demanding or well-optimized titles, as evidenced by Call of Duty: Warzone (106 FPS) versus Cyberpunk 2077 (33.4 FPS).

Content creators working with 1080p video or light 3D work will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 16429) and GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute 8790) sufficient for entry-level workflows. The 8 GB VRAM and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 are adequate for 1080p rendering tasks.

Software developers compiling code and running virtual machines will benefit from the 12 threads and Passmark multithread score of 19330. The data compression score of 245533 suggests efficient handling of large codebases. Students and office workers need no more than what this system delivers, as the 73rd percentile CPU ranking handles everyday applications with ease.

Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for accounting, database management, or design software would find this pairing capable. The CPU's 73rd percentile and GPU's 57th percentile provide a balanced foundation for productivity suites. The build's desktop class and active production status for both components ensure ongoing availability.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The 7 nm process node from TSMC houses 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3 shared. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

In real workloads, the 3dmark scores show thread scaling from 1645 (2 threads) to 5411 (max threads). This indicates the processor effectively utilizes its 12 threads for parallel tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 places it competitively against its nearest rivals, with the Intel Core i5-12500 just 0.4% ahead. The single-core score of 2319 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive performance in lightly-threaded applications.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math scores 65001, floating point math reaches 36815, and extended instructions hit 17236. These numbers translate to strong performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and data analysis. The data encryption score of 14851 indicates hardware-accelerated AES capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 56 is modest, suggesting this is not the ideal choice for heavily integer-bound workloads.

The 65W TDP keeps thermal and power requirements low, making this an efficient choice for budget-conscious builders. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom, though the boost clock of 4.20 GHz already provides solid out-of-box performance. The 3dmark max threads score of 5411 versus 8-thread score of 4593 shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, indicating the 6-core/12-thread configuration hits a sweet spot for most consumer workloads.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 65, placing this build in the mid-range tier of all recorded pairings in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12500?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 scores 19593 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-12500's 19668.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games is 103.5, with the pair ranking 2551 out of 3732 recorded pairs.

Q: What memory type does the Ryzen 5 5500 support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7600 is 450 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 165 W with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The RX 7600 scores 15171 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the RTX 3050 OEM's 15199.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 73rd percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a clear hierarchy: the processor is the stronger component. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (836 in 3dmark single-thread) allows frame rates to soar — Valorant hits 357 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 344.3 FPS. Here, the GPU is not the limiting factor.

As resolution increases, the bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU. At 1440p, games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 33.4 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15.3 FPS. The 4K numbers are even more telling: Cyberpunk 2077 at 22.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.9 FPS. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM become the primary constraints, while the CPU continues to have headroom.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average decrease of approximately 35-40% across most titles. This is larger than what would be expected if the CPU were the bottleneck, confirming the GPU's role as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. Conversely, the jump from 1440p to 4K shows even sharper declines in demanding titles, with Ark: Survival Ascended dropping from 15.3 to 7.1 FPS and Control from 51.6 to 31.6 FPS.

For multi-threaded workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling, the CPU's 12 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16429 provide adequate performance. However, the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute 8790) may limit GPU-accelerated rendering tasks. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 indicates the GPU handles modern graphics APIs competently, but its 57th percentile suggests it is not a workstation-class compute device.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is from the 5000 series on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 7000 series based on RDNA 3.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 65 places this pairing in the upper-mid tier of the database, outperforming roughly two-thirds of recorded CPU+GPU combinations.

The build's overall tier is defined by the discrepancy between components: the CPU's 73rd percentile is notably stronger than the GPU's 57th percentile. This creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and games while being more modest in GPU-heavy scenarios. The pair rank of 2551 out of 3732 indicates there are many faster combinations, but the average FPS of 103.5 shows this is still a capable gaming system.

The desktop class means this is designed for stationary use, with the CPU's 65W TDP and GPU's 165W TDP requiring a 450W PSU. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, making it suitable for most mid-tower cases. The CPU's 7 nm process and GPU's 6 nm process indicate modern manufacturing, and both components are in active production.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory. The platform uses PCIe Gen 3, which is a limitation compared to newer platforms but adequate for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface — the GPU will operate at PCIe 3.0 speeds on this motherboard.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W. This leaves headroom for upgrades, as the total system power draw is well below the 450 W recommendation. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the dual-slot design means case compatibility is straightforward.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth, as the current 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU's 73rd percentile suggests it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming the limiting factor. Alternatively, the CPU could be upgraded to a higher-core-count AM4 processor, though the PCIe Gen 3 limitation would persist.

The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is modest by modern standards, and the dual-channel DDR4 support means upgrades are limited to faster DDR4 modules rather than moving to DDR5. The 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some AM4 counterparts, which could impact gaming performance in cache-sensitive titles. The platform's active production status ensures continued BIOS support and part availability.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Radeon RX 7600 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process from TSMC. It houses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1720 MHz, boost clock reaches 2655 MHz, and the game clock is 2250 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It has 32 RT cores for ray tracing, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 indicates competent DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 shows solid compute capabilities, while the Vulkan score of 34401 demonstrates good API efficiency. Passmark G3D scores 16634, with DirectX 11 scoring 172 and DirectX 12 scoring 58 — these lower DirectX scores may reflect driver overhead or benchmark methodology.

The GPU's 57th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 3050 OEM (0.2% higher) and Radeon 680M (0.7% higher), showing tight competition in this segment. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and most 1440p gaming, but the 128-bit bus limits memory bandwidth, which becomes evident in 4K scenarios. The RT cores handle ray tracing at entry-level quality, but the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 suggests rasterization remains the primary strength.