SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing represents a coherent, balanced desktop build that targets 1080p gaming and everyday productivity with clear strengths and identifiable limitations. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU, an RDNA 2.0 based card, provides solid 1080p frame rates in most titles. The benchmark data shows a system that excels in esports and lighter titles, handles demanding AAA games at 1080p with adjustments, and struggles at 4K resolution, where the GPU becomes the primary constraint. This is a platform with a defined ceiling, but within that ceiling, it offers a consistent and reliable experience for its target audience.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture using TSMC's 7 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a 16 MB L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 cache per core. This configuration places it in the mid-range desktop segment, and its benchmark scores confirm its position.

In multi-threaded workloads, the data shows a capable performer. The CPU scores 16,429 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,900 points in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its PassMark multithread score is 19,330, and Geekbench multicore reaches 7,976 points. These figures indicate solid performance for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all 12 threads can be utilized. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,386 and max-thread score of 5,411 reinforce this, showing that scaling beyond 8 threads yields a modest gain, from 4,593 at 8 threads to 5,411 at max threads. The CPU sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, placing it ahead of most processors on the market.

Single-thread performance is adequate, though not class-leading. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,319, and Geekbench single-core is 1,730 points. The PassMark single-thread score is 3,058. These numbers are sufficient for everyday responsiveness and gaming, but the architecture's age is apparent when compared to newer designs. The Ryzen 5 5500's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, which scores 19,617 (a -0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-12500, which scores 19,668 (a -0.4% delta). The Ryzen 5 5500's average benchmark score of 19,593 places it essentially on par with these competitors, with the Intel Core i7-10700F scoring 19,499 (a +0.5% delta). This indicates that despite being an older design, it remains competitive in overall processing capability.

For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle multitasking with many browser tabs, office applications, and coding environments without issue. It can also handle moderate video editing and 3D modeling tasks, where its multi-threaded scores shine. The PassMark data encryption score of 14,851 and data compression score of 245,533 suggest it can handle file archiving and encryption tasks efficiently. The floating-point math score of 36,815 and integer math score of 65,001 indicate strong computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The CPU is not a top-tier performer, but it is a well-rounded option that will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 5500 and the RX 6600 is well-matched, with the data showing that neither component consistently dominates the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck. The pair ranks 2,900 out of 3,732 pairs in the database, placing it in the 22nd percentile of pair rankings by FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 94.4. This suggests that while the system is capable, it does not deliver top-tier frame rates, but it is far from the bottom of the pack.

The GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, frame rates drop significantly. For instance, in Cyberpunk 2077, the game runs at 43.7 FPS at 1080p, drops to 29.8 FPS at 1440p, and falls to 18.6 FPS at 4K. This pattern is consistent across titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, which goes from 36 FPS at 1080p to 20.1 FPS at 4K. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is adequate for 1080p but becomes strained at higher resolutions and with larger textures.

The CPU's performance is less of a concern in gaming. Its single-thread score of 836 in 3DMark and 2,319 in Cinebench R23 are sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. In esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 313.5 FPS at 1080p, and in Valorant it hits 327.4 FPS at 1080p. These high frame rates indicate the CPU can handle high-refresh-rate gaming without becoming a bottleneck. However, in CPU-intensive simulation games, the balance shifts. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the system produces 53 FPS at 1080p, which is a playable but not exceptional result. The pair's performance in Ark: Survival Ascended is notably poor, at 20.9 FPS at 1080p, suggesting the combination struggles with highly demanding, poorly optimized titles.

The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the limiting component for most modern, graphically intensive games. The CPU's percentile rank of 73 is higher than the GPU's percentile rank of 63, suggesting the processor has more headroom relative to its peers. In practice, this means users will likely need to lower graphical settings or resolution to maintain smooth frame rates in AAA titles, while the CPU will not be the cause of frame drops in these scenarios. In contrast, the CPU can become a limiting factor in heavily threaded workloads, but this is less relevant for gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature and well-supported socket. The Ryzen 5 5500 supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and the system does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 connectivity, which is a potential limitation for future GPU upgrades, as newer graphics cards are designed for PCIe Gen 4. However, the RX 6600 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and when paired with this CPU, it will run at PCIe 3.0 speeds, which can slightly impact performance in some scenarios.

The GPU has a TDP of 132 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the system is 300 W, which is a modest requirement. This means the build can be powered by a wide range of power supplies, and there is headroom for minor upgrades without changing the PSU. The CPU's 65 W TDP is also low, contributing to an overall power-efficient system.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model, as the CPU has enough performance to support a faster graphics card in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's multi-threaded scores, such as 16,429 in Cinebench R23, suggest it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a significant bottleneck at 1080p. However, the PCIe Gen 3 limitation is a caveat, as a PCIe Gen 4 GPU may not reach its full potential in this system. Alternatively, users could upgrade the CPU to a higher-end AM4 processor, as the socket is still supported, but the platform is at the end of its life. The memory support is limited to DDR4, which is older technology, but it is still widely available and cost-effective.

The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract more performance. The 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for overclocking with a capable air cooler. The GPU is a dual-slot card, 190 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, which will fit in most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple monitors.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 resolution and are comfortable with medium to high settings in modern titles. The data supports this: the system achieves 60 FPS or above in many games at 1080p, including Counter-Strike 2 (145.1 FPS), Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (169 FPS), and Minecraft (140 FPS). For users who prioritize high-refresh-rate gaming in esports titles, this system is particularly well-suited, as it delivers over 300 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Valorant at 1080p.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance adequate for entry-level and mid-range tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,429 indicates it can handle 1080p video editing and basic 3D modeling. However, professionals who require faster rendering times or work with complex scenes may find the system lacking. Software developers will benefit from the 6 cores and 12 threads, which can handle compilation tasks and running virtual machines. The PassMark integer math score of 65,001 suggests strong performance in code compilation.

Students and small business workstations will find this system more than capable for office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for responsive daily use, and the GPU provides acceleration for tasks like photo editing or light video rendering. However, the system is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the measured FPS data shows most titles drop below 30 FPS at 3840x2160. Users who plan to game at 4K or use the system for heavy compute workloads should look at more powerful options.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is an excellent choice for high-refresh 1080p gaming, particularly in competitive titles. The measured FPS in Valorant is 327.4 at 1080p, and in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive it reaches 313.5 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 169 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 145.1 FPS. These scores are well above the 144 Hz threshold, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience in esports.

Streaming: While the CPU can handle game capture and encoding, its performance is moderate. The multi-threaded score of 16,429 in Cinebench R23 provides enough headroom for x264 encoding at a reasonable preset, but users may need to use GPU encoding to maintain high frame rates. The GPU's compute score of 6,554 in PassMark suggests it can handle encoding tasks, but the overall system may struggle when running a game and streaming simultaneously in demanding titles.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-core performance is sufficient for 1080p video editing. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,900 and Geekbench multicore score of 7,976 indicate it can handle timelines with multiple clips and effects. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for GPU-accelerated effects, but rendering times will be longer than with more powerful processors.

3D Rendering: This is a viable, though not fast, option for 3D rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,429 shows it can complete renders, but users will wait longer compared to higher-end CPUs. The GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate viewport rendering, but final frame renders will rely heavily on the CPU.

Software Development: The 12 threads and strong integer performance make this a good system for development. The PassMark integer math score of 65,001 indicates fast compilation times for codebases of moderate size. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the system can easily handle running an IDE, a database server, and multiple browser tabs simultaneously.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, providing smooth performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The single-thread score of 3,058 in PassMark ensures quick application loading and responsive multitasking. The system is quiet and power-efficient, with a combined TDP of 197 W, making it a low-cost machine to run.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19,593. This is essentially on par with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (19,617, -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12500 (19,668, -0.4% delta). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19,499, +0.5% delta) and slightly behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19,723, -0.7% delta).

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming on this system?

A: The data clearly indicates that 1920x1080 is the target resolution. The average FPS across all tested games is 94.4, but performance drops significantly at higher resolutions. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43.7 FPS at 1080p but only 29.8 FPS at 1440p and 18.6 FPS at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the primary limiting factor for gaming performance. The GPU's percentile rank is 63, lower than the CPU's 73rd percentile. This is evidenced by the FPS drops at higher resolutions, which are typical of GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: Can this system handle VR gaming?

A: The measured FPS data does not include VR-specific benchmarks. However, the system can run many games at over 60 FPS at 1080p, which is a common requirement for VR. Titles like Assetto Corsa run at 87.1 FPS at 1080p, which is a positive indicator, but the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit bus may limit performance in more demanding VR titles.

Q: What kind of power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 132 W TDP, resulting in a combined draw of 197 W. This leaves significant headroom for other components, and a standard 300 W power supply should be sufficient.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5500 good for overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which allows for overclocking. Its 65 W TDP and the potential for a capable air cooler provide thermal headroom for increasing clock speeds beyond the 4.20 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system has a percentile rank of 68. This places it in the upper half of all builds, indicating it is a solid mid-range performer.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 demonstrates strong synthetic benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16,429 points in multi-core and 2,319 points in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 7,976 in multi-core and 1,730 in single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 19,330, with a single-thread score of 3,058. The CPU's average benchmark score is 19,593, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, scores 19,617, a negligible -0.1% difference.

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 shows capable performance in GPU benchmarks. It scores 15,096 in PassMark G3D, and 6,554 in PassMark GPU Compute. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 67,623, and the OpenCL score is 28,850. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1,492. The GPU's average benchmark score is 19,036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, scores 19,030, a 0% delta, showing they are statistically identical in performance.

The combined picture shows a balanced system. The CPU is a stronger performer relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers. This means the system is more CPU-heavy in its capabilities, but the GPU is sufficient to provide a good gaming experience at 1080p. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,645 and 4-thread score of 3,151 indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming. The GPU's pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p rendering.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 GPU. The CPU is based on the Zen 3 architecture and is part of the 5000 series, while the GPU is based on RDNA 2.0 and is part of the Radeon RX 6000 series. The combined system has a percentile rank of 68, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all builds.

The CPU, released in April 2022, is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. It is a capable multi-threaded performer, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,429. The GPU, released in October 2021, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 1,792 shading units. Its performance is adequate for 1080p gaming, with a PassMark G3D score of 15,096.

This pairing is a classic mid-range combination that prioritizes gaming at 1080p and general productivity. The system is not designed for 4K gaming or heavy compute workloads, but it offers a good balance of performance and power efficiency. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 132 W TDP make it an energy-conscious build.

Gaming Performance

The gaming performance data is measured, as indicated by the dataIsMeasured field. At 1920x1080, the system delivers a wide range of frame rates depending on the title. For esports titles, performance is exceptional. Valorant runs at 327.4 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 313.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 169 FPS. These are ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

In well-optimized AAA titles, the system performs well at 1080p. Assetto Corsa runs at 87.1 FPS, Doom at 108.2 FPS, and Dave The Diver at 117.4 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 119 FPS, and Ready Or Not hits 114.7 FPS. These games are playable with high settings.

However, in demanding or poorly optimized titles, performance drops. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 20.9 FPS. These games will require lower settings to achieve smooth frame rates. The system struggles with 4K resolution, with most titles falling below 30 FPS. For example, Control runs at 30.2 FPS at 4K, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 27.9 FPS. The system's pair rank of 2,900 out of 3,732 pairs and average FPS of 94.4 confirms it is a solid 1080p performer but not a high-end gaming machine.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds