SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

17,614 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation creates a striking asymmetry that defines every workload discussion. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 98th percentile among all graphics cards. That 27-point percentile gap is the single most important structural fact about this build. The data suggests a system where the graphics card is operating at a fundamentally higher performance tier than the processor driving it.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the 8300GE's benchmark results reveal its limits. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,705 places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i3-14100T (avg score 17,648) and Intel Core i3-13100F (avg score 17,653), meaning the Ryzen chip is essentially trading blows with entry-level Intel desktop parts. Single-thread performance tells a similar story: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,652 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,644 indicate a capable but not exceptional per-core performer. When a game or application relies on a few threads, this CPU will deliver results in line with its 71st percentile standing, not the 98th percentile of the GPU.

Conversely, GPU-bound workloads are where this pairing shines. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 place it just 0.5% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (avg score 183,725) and 1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (avg score 182,109). The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth means that once data reaches the graphics card, the processing headroom is enormous. The bottleneck in any graphics-intensive task will almost never be the GPU itself.

The practical consequence is a system that feels imbalanced in both directions depending on the workload. For 3D rendering or GPU compute tasks, the RTX 5000 Ada will be underutilized waiting on the CPU to feed it geometry and draw calls. For office productivity or web browsing, the CPU is more than adequate, and the GPU idles. The data implies a build that is purpose-built for GPU-heavy professional work, where the CPU's role is secondary, rather than a balanced gaming or general-purpose machine. The 35W TDP of the CPU versus the 250W TDP of the GPU reinforces this: the system is designed around the graphics card's appetite, not the processor's.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 17,614, placing it at the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-14100T, scores 17,648, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 8300GE is statistically indistinguishable from that part. The same -0.2% delta applies against the Intel Core i3-13100F (17,653) and Intel Core i7-1255U (17,656). The 8300GE is 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F (17,693), a server-class processor that costs dramatically more. These narrow margins show that the Ryzen 3 8300GE is a competent entry-level desktop chip whose performance is tightly clustered with other low-power and mainstream parts.

Breaking down the CPU's individual benchmarks reveals its character. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 11,705 versus single-core of 1,652 yields a ratio of roughly 7.1:1, typical for a 4-core/8-thread processor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 13,507 and integer math score of 39,163 indicate solid general compute, while the floating-point math score of 24,681 and extended instructions score of 11,923 show reasonable SIMD throughput. Data compression at 155,164 and random string sorting at 18,010 are strong for the class. The find prime numbers score of 44 is notably low, suggesting the architecture trades some integer-heavy workloads for efficiency elsewhere.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 is its stronger result, while OpenCL comes in at 175,286. Against rivals, the RTX 5000 Ada is 0.5% ahead of the A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725), 1.3% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147), 1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109), and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050). This places the card in elite company, trading blows with data-center accelerators and the fastest consumer gaming GPU of the previous generation.

The combined picture is a desktop build at the 85th percentile overall. The CPU is a middle-tier performer, the GPU is near the top of the hierarchy, and the sum is a system that excels at GPU-accelerated tasks while remaining merely adequate for CPU-heavy workloads. The data shows a machine that is 27 percentile points stronger on the graphics side, a disparity that any buyer must consciously accept.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It operates on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, packing 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is just 35W, making it an energy-efficient part in the AM5 ecosystem. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is not officially available.

The cache hierarchy is modest: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a small amount of L3 compared to higher-end Zen 4 parts, which explains why the multi-core scores are not class-leading. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported, which is a professional-oriented feature. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is limited for a desktop platform but sufficient for a single GPU and one NVMe drive.

In real workloads, the benchmark scores translate into specific expectations. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 4,916 and R15 multi-core score of 1,179 show a processor that can handle moderate multi-threaded tasks like compiling code or rendering a single image, but will struggle with prolonged heavy loads. The PassMark physics score of 750 is low, indicating that simulation-heavy games or physics-based applications will be CPU-limited. The data encryption score of 8,603 and data compression score of 155,164 are respectable, so file archiving and encryption tasks are within reach.

The single-thread performance is the CPU's saving grace. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,652 and PassMark single-thread of 3,644 mean that everyday responsiveness, light gaming, and single-threaded applications will feel snappy. The 4.90 GHz boost clock is high, and Zen 4's IPC advantage shows in the 71st percentile overall ranking. However, the nearest rivals include mobile and desktop i3 parts with similar scores, so the 8300GE does not stand out in any single dimension. It is a balanced, efficient, and competent entry-level CPU that is outclassed by the GPU it is paired with in this build.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a 98th percentile GPU that can drive extremely high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the CPU's 71st percentile standing will cap performance in CPU-bound titles. The 8300GE's single-thread score of 3,644 in PassMark suggests decent per-core speed, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration and small 8 MB L3 cache will limit minimum frame rates in modern games that use more than four threads. Expect high average FPS with occasional stutters in CPU-intensive scenes.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide hardware encoding capabilities that can offload streaming work from the CPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 indicates strong compute throughput for encoding tasks. The CPU's 8 threads can handle a game plus encoding overhead, but the 35W TDP suggests thermal headroom is limited. Streaming at high bitrates will be smoother than on a system without GPU encoding support.

Video editing: In applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve that leverage GPU acceleration, the RTX 5000 Ada's 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 4K and 8K timelines with ease. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,705 is sufficient for export tasks, but the 8300GE will be the slower partner during rendering. Proxy editing and GPU-accelerated effects will shine; pure CPU exports will be average.

3D rendering: This is the most GPU-favorable scenario. The RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 100 RT cores make it a rendering beast for ray-traced workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 shows strong compute API performance. The CPU will prepare scenes and handle physics, but the render time will be dominated by the GPU, so the 8300GE's modest multi-core score of 11,705 in Cinebench R23 is less of a bottleneck.

Software development: Compilation is a CPU-bound task, and the 8300GE's PassMark multi-thread score of 13,507 is adequate for small to medium projects. The data encryption score of 8,603 and integer math of 39,163 indicate reasonable throughput for build tools. Larger codebases with many parallel compilation units will expose the 4-core limit. The GPU's compute power is irrelevant here, so developers will feel the CPU's 71st percentile more acutely.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 3,644 in PassMark makes everyday tasks like browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets feel responsive. The 35W TDP means low power draw and quiet operation. The GPU is massively overkill for this scenario, but the ECC memory support on the CPU side and the overall system stability make it a reliable workstation. Students or office workers who also do occasional GPU-accelerated tasks will find the system responsive and fast.

# Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional who needs extreme GPU compute power in a desktop form factor but does not require high-end CPU throughput. This includes 3D artists and animators using ray-traced rendering, video editors working with high-resolution timelines, and data scientists running GPU-accelerated machine learning inference or training workloads where the 32 GB of VRAM is essential. The GPU's 98th percentile standing and its proximity to the A100 SXM4 (0.5% ahead) make it a compelling choice for those who need data-center-class compute without the server platform.

Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's raw power, but the CPU's 71st percentile will limit frame rates in esports or CPU-bound titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck in most modern games, so the CPU's weakness is less exposed. Content creators who work in GPU-accelerated applications like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender will see near-best-in-class render times, provided their scenes fit within the 32 GB VRAM budget.

Developers building CUDA-accelerated applications will appreciate the 400 tensor cores and the DirectX 12 Ultimate API support. Students in engineering or computer science programs who need a workstation for both coursework and research compute will find the ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers valuable. Small business workstations running CAD, simulation, or AI inference software will perform well, as long as the CPU's 4 cores are not the primary workload. The build is not for budget-conscious buyers or those who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance; it is for GPU-first professionals.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The card has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

The compute resources are substantial: 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. There are 100 RT cores for ray tracing and 400 tensor cores for AI workloads. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no consumer-style half-rate penalty. The card consumes 250W with a suggested 600W PSU, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and is dual-slot.

In benchmark terms, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 place it at the 98th percentile. The 0.5% lead over the A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725) is notable because the A100 is a data-center accelerator with significantly more memory bandwidth. The 3.7% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050) shows that this workstation card outperforms the fastest consumer gaming GPU in compute workloads. The 1.3% deficit to the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147) is minor and likely workload-dependent.

The 32 GB of VRAM is the defining feature for professional use. It allows large 3D scenes, high-resolution texture sets, and big machine learning models to reside entirely in GPU memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data movement is not a bottleneck for most tasks. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI inference. This is a GPU that can handle virtually any graphics or compute task a desktop professional throws at it, and the benchmark data confirms it is in the top 2% of all GPUs.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 8300GE compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 17,614, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i3-14100T (17,648) and Intel Core i3-13100F (17,653), and 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F (17,693). It is essentially tied with these parts.

Q: What is the GPU's performance ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600W.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this desktop build is in the top 15% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: Are there any measured FPS values for this exact combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussion must be treated as estimates based on the benchmark scores.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 4 part from AMD's 8000 series, released on 2024-04-15, with a 35W TDP and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card from NVIDIA, released on 2023-08-08, with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 250W TDP. The CPU occupies the 71st percentile of all CPUs, the GPU occupies the 98th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined system sits at the 85th percentile.

The pairing is intentionally skewed toward GPU compute. The RTX 5000 Ada is a top-tier professional card that rivals data-center accelerators like the A100 SXM4, while the 8300GE is an efficient entry-level desktop chip that matches the Intel Core i3-14100T. The system is best described as a GPU workstation with a modest CPU attached, rather than a balanced general-purpose PC. The 85th combined percentile reflects the GPU's dominance in the overall score, masking the CPU's relative weakness.

The build class is desktop, and the production status is active for both components. Neither component has a launch MSRP listed in the data. This is a niche configuration for users who prioritize GPU rendering, AI inference, or large VRAM capacity over CPU multi-threading. The data clearly shows a system that is near the top of the graphics hierarchy but only slightly above average in processor performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket from AMD. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC memory. The platform provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for one x16 GPU and a couple of NVMe drives. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will not be bandwidth-limited by the CPU's lane allocation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 7 part from the same 8000 series, to better match the GPU's performance tier. The 35W TDP of the current CPU leaves significant thermal and power headroom on the AM5 platform, which is designed for processors up to 170W or more. The PSU is not a constraint for a CPU upgrade since the GPU's suggested PSU is 600W, and the current CPU draws only 35W. The memory and storage are already modern (DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4), so no platform changes are needed.

For the GPU side, the RTX 5000 Ada is already near the top of the stack, so an upgrade would only be warranted for future Blackwell or newer workstation cards. The 250W TDP and 600W suggested PSU mean that a more power-hungry GPU would require a PSU upgrade. The 32 GB of VRAM is generous, but if workloads exceed that, a card with more memory would be the next step. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is backward and forward compatible, so the GPU can be carried over to a future platform. The primary upgrade path is the CPU, which is the clear bottleneck in this system.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Any specific FPS numbers would be speculative and are not provided here.

Estimating from the scores, the RTX 5000 Ada's 98th percentile standing and 3.7% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050) in average benchmark score suggest that it can deliver extremely high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most games. The 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate are more than sufficient for ultra settings. However, the CPU's 71st percentile and 4-core/8-thread configuration will be the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles.

At 1080p, the CPU will likely cap frame rates in many games, especially esports titles that rely on high single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,644 is decent, but not top-tier. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a factor, and at 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the primary bottleneck, allowing the CPU to keep up more often. The 32 GB of VRAM ensures that high-resolution texture packs will never cause memory overflow. For gamers, this is a 4K-capable GPU paired with a 1080p-class CPU, so the experience will vary dramatically by resolution and game type. The estimates point to a system that can play anything at high settings, but with potential stutters or frame dips in CPU-heavy scenes at lower resolutions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds