SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

17,614 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop combination with one dominant trait: the GPU is far stronger than the CPU. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 17614, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 135218. Together, this combination lands at the 83rd percentile among desktop builds. That split defines the system: a GPU-first workstation with a modest four-core processor in front of a large workstation accelerator.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC 5 nm with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It carries 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, producing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are 1500 MHz base and 2175 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz / 18 Gbps effective. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. Pixel fill rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, texture fill rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1).

Benchmark results from the FACT PACK show Geekbench OpenCL at 146593 and Geekbench Vulkan at 123842. The GPU average benchmark score is 135218, which places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Looking at the nearest rivals, this GPU is essentially tied with the NVIDIA A10M, which scores 135230 with a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.1% below the AMD Radeon PRO W6800, which scores 135396, 0.4% below the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, which scores 135774, and 0.9% below the Radeon PRO V620, which scores 136472. The near-parity with those cards confirms that this is an upper-tier workstation GPU rather than an outlier.

For rendering, the important package is 20 GB VRAM, 360.0 GB/s bandwidth, 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32/FP16 throughput. That combination gives large scenes room to breathe, gives ray-traced workloads dedicated hardware, and gives compute-heavy rendering tasks substantial raw throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 both indicate that the GPU responds well to general compute and modern graphics workloads. Display output is handled by 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, and the API support list includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark data includes Cinebench R15 multicore 1179 and singlecore 166, Cinebench R20 multicore 4916 and singlecore 693, and Cinebench R23 multicore 11705 and singlecore 1652. Passmark results include multithread 13507, single thread 3644, integer math 39163, floating point math 24681, extended instructions 11923, data compression 155164, data encryption 8603, physics 750, find prime numbers 44, and random string sorting 18010.

The GPU benchmark data is simpler: Geekbench OpenCL 146593 and Geekbench Vulkan 123842.

The CPU average benchmark score is 17614, placing it at the 71st percentile. The GPU average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 83. Those three percentiles are the fastest way to summarize the system: the CPU is a mid-pack part, while the GPU is close to top-tier.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all close. The Intel Core i3-14100T has an average score of 17648 and a deltaPct of -0.2, the Intel Core i3-13100F scores 17653 with a deltaPct of -0.2, the Intel Core i7-1255U scores 17656 with a deltaPct of -0.2, and the AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693 with a deltaPct of -0.4. The Ryzen 3 8300GE is 0.2% to 0.4% behind those parts, so its CPU-level standing is competitive with its immediate peers.

The GPU's nearest rivals also cluster tightly. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135230 with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396 with -0.1, the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 with -0.4, and the Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472 with -0.9. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is never more than 0.9% away from those cards. Combined, these scores say the build's heavy lifting should be assigned to the GPU.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; dataIsMeasured is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. All frame-rate discussion on this page is therefore estimated from benchmark scores, not measured results.

With the GPU at the 95th percentile, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 123842 suggests the graphics side has strong frame throughput potential. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3644 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1652 are the more limiting numbers. Games that push mostly on the GPU should see solid performance, especially with 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth to keep large textures resident. Games that put heavy load on the CPU's four cores and eight threads will be held back by the processor.

At higher graphics settings, the GPU becomes the main factor. At lower graphics settings, the CPU's single-thread performance will matter more. Because no measured FPS rows exist, exact figures for specific games or resolutions cannot be given. Treat all gaming expectations here as score-derived estimates, not observed frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark percentiles define the balance: CPU 71, GPU 95, combined 83. The gap between those two percentiles means the GPU is much closer to the top of its field than the CPU is to the top of its field. In GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation will not be the limiting component. In CPU-bound workloads, the Ryzen 3 8300GE will be the bottleneck.

The CPU's multithread score of 13507 in Passmark and 11705 in Cinebench R23 are respectable for a 35W 4-core part, but they do not lift the CPU above the 71st percentile. The GPU, by contrast, scores 135218 on average and sits at the 95th percentile. Memory bandwidth also separates the two: the CPU connects to dual-channel DDR5 at 83.2 GB/s, while the GPU has 360.0 GB/s of GDDR6 bandwidth. That difference reinforces the same conclusion: large data movement and parallel compute favor the GPU, while per-thread CPU work is the smaller resource.

FPS scaling follows the same pattern. Raising resolution and detail increases GPU load, which is where this system has headroom. Lowering graphics settings shifts weight onto the CPU, and the 4-core/8-thread chip will show its limits. Since no measured FPS data exists, this is a benchmark-score inference rather than a measured scaling test.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is an 8000-series desktop processor on AMD Socket AM5. It uses Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename and is manufactured on TSMC 4 nm with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. TDP is 35W. Cache is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3 shared. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel at 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is enabled. The CPU also includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU only, and it does not have an unlocked multiplier.

Single-thread performance is the CPU's strongest point relative to its power envelope. Passmark single thread scores 3644, and Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1652. Multithread scores are more modest: Passmark multithread 13507 and Cinebench R23 multicore 11705. Passmark integer math 39163, floating point math 24681, extended instructions 11923, and encryption 8603 point to a chip that handles everyday productivity and moderately threaded workloads without difficulty. The low physics score of 750 and prime numbers score of 44 show that heavily parallel number-crunching is not where this CPU shines.

In real workloads, the 8300GE is best treated as a responsive general-purpose processor. It will handle desktop multitasking, office applications, software compilation for smaller projects, and light threading well. It should not be expected to match high-core-count workstation CPUs in large multithreaded tasks, and its nearest rivals all score between 17648 and 17693, while this CPU averages 17614.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is modern and upgradeable. The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 dual-channel memory and ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so the graphics card has a full x16 link available.

Power requirements are modest. The CPU TDP is 35W, the GPU TDP is 130W, and the suggested PSU is 300W. That leaves room for the CPU and GPU as configured, but a significantly more powerful CPU or GPU would need more PSU headroom than the suggested 300W.

The GPU's physical design helps with pairing in compact systems. It is a single-slot card, 245 mm / 9.6 inches long and 112 mm / 4.4 inches high, with one 16-pin power connector and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. It is currently marked Active in production, as is the CPU. The data lists the GPU's predecessor as Workstation Ampere and its successor as Blackwell PRO W.

The sensible next upgrade is a higher-core AM5 CPU to close the gap between the CPU's 71st percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile. The socket and memory platform do not need to change for that move. The GPU can stay in place as the system’s strongest component.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for users who need workstation-class GPU compute without high-core CPU performance. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM, 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32/FP16 make it suitable for content creators doing 3D rendering, video work, and GPU-accelerated effects. The CPU’s 4 cores, 8 threads, and 71st percentile keep it useful for general desktop work, office software, and smaller development tasks.

Students and small business workstations are a strong fit because of the power profile: 35W CPU, 130W GPU, and a 300W suggested PSU. The single-slot GPU also keeps the system physically compact. Developers can use this as a GPU-compute workstation, with the CPU providing enough responsiveness for code editing and lighter builds. Gamers should choose this system if their games lean heavily on GPU rendering; CPU-bound games will expose the 8300GE’s limits. Since no measured FPS data exists, gaming guidance is based on the benchmark percentiles and compute scores.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE use?

A: AMD Socket AM5. It supports DDR5 dual-channel memory and ECC memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation have?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU and GPU performance percentiles?

A: The CPU is at the 71st percentile of all CPUs, the GPU is at the 95th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined desktop build is at the 83rd percentile.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300W. The GPU TDP is 130W, and the CPU TDP is 35W.

Q: What are the nearest CPU rivals to the Ryzen 3 8300GE?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T scores 17648, the Intel Core i3-13100F scores 17653, the Intel Core i7-1255U scores 17656, and the AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693. The Ryzen 3 8300GE averages 17614, placing it 0.2% to 0.4% behind those parts.

Q: What rendering hardware does the GPU include?

A: It includes 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. FP32 throughput is 26.73 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is also 26.73 TFLOPS.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU only.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The 95th-percentile GPU and Vulkan score of 123842 point to strong frame-rate potential in GPU-bound titles. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3644 and 4-core/8-thread setup cap performance in CPU-heavy scenes, so high-refresh gaming will be smoother when the GPU carries most of the load. The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-quality texture loads.

Streaming: Streaming while gaming adds background CPU and memory pressure. The 8300GE has 8 threads and a 71st CPU percentile, which is enough for lighter background tasks but not a large multi-threaded workload. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 192 tensor cores keep the game rendering side strong. With a 35W CPU and 130W GPU, total system power stays moderate, but the CPU will still be the constraint for stream-side processing.

Video editing: GPU acceleration is the strong point here. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, 192 tensor cores, 20 GB VRAM, and a 95th GPU percentile. CPU-side export and processing use the Ryzen 3 8300GE’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11705, which is workable but not a high-core-count match for serious CPU-based rendering.

3D rendering: The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores give ray-traced rendering and GPU compute dedicated hardware support. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 confirm strong compute output. The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth fit large scenes, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11705 handles scene preparation and file parsing at a moderate level.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 39163 and extended instructions score of 11923 indicate decent code compilation for smaller projects. The 8 threads and 71st CPU percentile are not high-core-count territory, so large parallel builds will not be the system’s main strength. The GPU’s compute resources provide a strong secondary engine for GPU-based development workloads.

Student and office work: The 35W CPU TDP, 300W suggested PSU, and single-slot GPU make the system practical for desk setups. Passmark single-thread score 3644 and Cinebench R23 single-core score 1652 give responsive everyday performance. The Radeon 740M integrated GPU is present, while the discrete RTX 4000 Ada Generation is available for heavier tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds