SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
83%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

17,614 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pairing presents a distinct asymmetry in workload characteristics. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 71 against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards. This modest gap suggests the two components are broadly compatible in overall tier, but the nature of their respective strengths creates situational bottlenecks.

The Ryzen 3 8300GE is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a 35 W TDP, indicating a power-constrained design. Its multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 11705 places it just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i3-14100T and 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F, making it competitive with entry-level desktop chips. However, its Passmark single-thread score of 3644 shows strong per-core efficiency, which benefits lightly threaded workloads. The data suggests the CPU will limit performance in heavily threaded scenarios, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, where its 4-core configuration may struggle to feed the GPU's compute capabilities.

Conversely, the Quadro RTX 5000 offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, a substantial memory pool that exceeds what most consumer GPUs provide. Its Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it 1% behind the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and 1.2% ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile, indicating it competes with mid-range GPUs from a gaming perspective but offers workstation-class memory capacity. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and 384 tensor cores suggest compute-heavy tasks will be well-served, but the CPU's modest multi-threaded throughput could bottleneck data preparation and asset streaming in professional workloads.

For gaming, the balance tilts toward the GPU being the primary performance driver. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3644 is respectable for modern game engines, which typically rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 64 ROPs provide adequate pixel throughput for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the CPU's limitations are less pronounced. At 1080p, however, the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenes, given its 4-core design and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The power envelope disparity is notable: the CPU draws 35 W while the GPU consumes 230 W, with a suggested 550 W PSU for the system. This imbalance suggests the GPU is the dominant power consumer and likely the primary source of heat, while the CPU remains thermally efficient. In compute workloads that stress both components simultaneously, the GPU's higher power budget allows it to sustain peak performance longer, whereas the CPU may throttle under sustained multi-threaded load due to its low TDP design.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3644 provides adequate frame pacing for most titles, but the 4-core design may cause stuttering in games that utilize more than four threads. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests modern API overhead is handled, though this is a low absolute score that may reflect workstation-oriented drivers. Estimated frame rates would favor 1440p over 1080p for consistency, as the GPU's 16 GB memory pool handles large textures without swapping.

Streaming: The CPU lacks a dedicated encoder, but the GPU's Turing architecture includes NVENC hardware that offloads video encoding from the CPU. The Passmark data compression score of 155164 on the CPU indicates reasonable throughput for scene compositing, though the 4-core limit may cause dropped frames when gaming and encoding simultaneously. The GPU's 384 tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding enhancements, but the overall streaming experience would be better suited to 1440p at moderate bitrates.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth enable smooth timeline scrubbing and effect previews for 4K footage. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 handles export encoding, but the 4-core configuration will extend render times compared to 6- or 8-core parts. Passmark integer math of 39163 and floating-point math of 24681 indicate competent codec processing, though the 8 MB L3 cache may cause slower random access patterns in complex project files.

3D rendering: The Quadro RTX 5000's 48 RT cores and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate ray-traced rendering significantly. However, the CPU's Passmark physics score of 750 is low, suggesting that physics simulations and scene graph updates will be slow. The 4-core CPU with 8 threads will bottleneck the GPU in viewport rendering and final-frame production, making this pairing more suitable for GPU-accelerated renderers like those that offload most computation to the graphics card.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 8603 and extended instructions score of 11923 provide adequate performance for compilation and cryptographic operations. The 4-core design with 8 threads handles parallel builds, but large codebases will compile slower than on higher-core-count alternatives. The GPU's compute capabilities are underutilized in typical development workloads, making this a balanced but not optimized setup for coders.

Student and office work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3644 delivers responsive application switching and document processing. The 35 W TDP keeps system power consumption low, and the integrated Radeon 740M provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is excessive for office tasks, but it enables smooth 4K display output across multiple monitors via the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It integrates 20,900 million transistors across a 137 mm² die, reflecting the density of the 4 nm process. The CPU base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, operating within a 35 W TDP that targets energy-efficient desktop builds.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This modest L3 capacity, combined with dual-channel DDR5 memory support carrying 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, positions the CPU for low-latency single-threaded tasks rather than high-bandwidth multi-threaded workloads. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface with 14 CPU lanes provides adequate connectivity for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results confirm this profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i3-14100T and 0.4% of the AMD EPYC 9374F, indicating comparable multi-threaded performance to entry-level rivals. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1652, alongside a Passmark single-thread score of 3644, demonstrates strong per-thread efficiency that benefits gaming and responsive desktop use. The Passmark multi-thread score of 13507 and average benchmark score of 17614 place the CPU at the 71st percentile of all processors, a solid mid-tier position.

The Passmark sub-scores reveal specific strengths: integer math at 39163 and floating-point math at 24681 show balanced arithmetic capability, while data compression at 155164 and random string sorting at 18010 indicate competent data manipulation. The extended instructions score of 11923 supports modern SIMD workloads, and encryption at 8603 provides adequate security performance. The find prime numbers score of 44 is notably low, reflecting the CPU's limited multi-threaded scaling in this specific workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 17614 is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i3-14100T, 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i3-13100F, 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-1255U, and 0.4% lower than the AMD EPYC 9374F.

Q: What memory and expansion support does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. It also features integrated Radeon 740M graphics.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the GPU perform relative to its rivals?

A: The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15616 is 1% lower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, 1.2% higher than the RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% higher than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL.

Q: What is the GPU's compute capability?

A: The GPU delivers 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio), with 3072 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with current gaming and professional applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation-class GPU based on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz, consuming 230 W through a dual-slot cooler with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU capacity is 550 W.

Memory capacity is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for large datasets in professional visualization and machine learning applications. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, providing ample headroom for high-resolution textures and complex 3D scenes. The GPU's pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s enable high-throughput rasterization, while the 3072 shading units handle general compute with 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The inclusion of 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores positions the GPU for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads. The FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) supports mixed-precision computation, which is valuable for deep learning inference and training. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 6525 indicating moderate compute throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 reflect strong cross-platform performance.

The GPU's display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multi-monitor professional setups. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while older than PCIe 4.0, provides sufficient bandwidth for most workloads. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor in Workstation Ampere, but its 16 GB VRAM remains relevant for memory-intensive tasks. The launch MSRP of 2,299 USD reflects its workstation positioning, though current availability may vary.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results.

The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 is low in absolute terms, but this metric often underrepresents real-world gaming performance for workstation-class GPUs. The DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 10 score of 113 suggest better performance in older APIs, while the DirectX 9 score of 195 indicates strong legacy compatibility. The Passmark G2D score of 709 reflects 2D acceleration capability, which is less relevant for modern gaming.

Based on the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, estimated performance at 1440p ultra settings would be smooth for most titles, with the large memory pool preventing texture pop-in and stuttering. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance would deliver playable frame rates in less demanding games, while heavier titles may require settings reductions. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3644 should sustain 60+ FPS in most games at 1440p, though 1080p high-refresh scenarios may see CPU-limited frame rates in multi-threaded titles.

The GPU's nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, is a known 1080p gaming card, and the Quadro RTX 5000 scores 1% lower in Passmark G3D. This suggests similar raw gaming performance, but the Quadro's 16 GB VRAM provides a significant advantage for texture-heavy games and future titles. The RTX A4000 Mobile, which scores 1.2% lower, is a laptop GPU, indicating the Quadro RTX 5000 holds desktop-class performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a CPU at the 71st percentile and a GPU at the 67th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 69. The CPU's average benchmark score is 17614, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i3-14100T at 17648 (0.2% higher). The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, with its nearest rival being the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB at 21856 (1% higher).

The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1179 and single-core score of 166 indicate modest multi-threaded performance relative to modern processors, while the R20 scores of 4916 multi-core and 693 single-core show scaling. The R23 multi-core score of 11705 and single-core score of 1652 are the most relevant for modern workload comparisons. Passmark results include a single-thread score of 3644, multi-thread score of 13507, and an average benchmark score of 17614.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 demonstrate strong compute and graphics API performance. Passmark DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. The G3D score of 15616 and GPU compute score of 6525 round out the performance profile. The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 places it in the upper-middle tier of all GPUs.

The combined picture indicates a balanced system where the CPU and GPU are within 4 percentile points of each other, suggesting neither component dramatically outperforms the other. The CPU's strength in single-threaded tasks complements the GPU's compute-heavy capabilities, though multi-threaded CPU workloads will lag behind the GPU's prowess.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE, a 4-core Zen 4 processor with a 35 W TDP, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 230 W TDP. The combination targets a specific niche: energy-efficient CPU performance paired with professional-grade GPU memory and compute capabilities.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 69 indicates a mid-to-upper-tier system overall. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 67th percentile among all graphics cards show that this is not a flagship configuration, but rather a competent mid-range workstation. The CPU's 4-core design limits multi-threaded performance, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 48 RT cores provide workstation-class rendering and compute features.

The power envelope is unbalanced: the CPU draws only 35 W, while the GPU consumes 230 W, making the system's total power draw around 265 W plus other components. The suggested 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom. The GPU's dual-slot cooler and 267 mm length require a mid-tower case, and the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes, though at reduced bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize GPU memory capacity and compute features over CPU multi-threaded performance. Gamers targeting 1440p with high texture settings will benefit from the 16 GB VRAM, which prevents memory-related stuttering in modern titles. At 4K, the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles less demanding games, while the CPU's 3644 single-thread score maintains playable frame rates.

Content creators working with large video files or complex 3D scenes will appreciate the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 48 RT cores for accelerated rendering. The CPU's 8 MB L3 cache and DDR5 support provide adequate data throughput, though export times will be longer than with higher-core-count CPUs. Video editors editing 4K footage will find smooth timeline performance with GPU-accelerated effects, while the 35 W CPU keeps system thermals manageable.

Software developers compiling code will find the CPU's 4-core, 8-thread configuration sufficient for moderate projects, with the Passmark encryption score of 8603 supporting secure development workflows. The integrated Radeon 740M provides a fallback display output, though the Quadro RTX 5000's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor development setups.

Students and office workers requiring a reliable workstation for coursework or productivity will benefit from the system's energy efficiency and low CPU power draw. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is excessive for typical office tasks, but it future-proofs the system for AI-assisted applications or data visualization. Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or data analysis will gain from the GPU's compute capabilities, provided the CPU's multi-threaded limitations are acceptable for their specific workloads.