SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

17,614 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D represent a pairing of a low-power, 4-core desktop processor with a flagship, 32 GB graphics card. This combination is unusual, as the CPU is positioned at the entry-level of AMD's AM5 platform, while the GPU is a top-tier Blackwell architecture part. The benchmark data indicates the GPU is in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 71st percentile, creating a significant performance gap that defines the system's behavior.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a massive graphics card. Its memory subsystem alone is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The base clock is 2017 MHz, boosting up to 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective. This configuration provides a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The raw compute throughput includes 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at 1:1 ratio), which is a strong indicator of its capability in both traditional rendering and compute-heavy tasks.

The GPU is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process. It contains 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, alongside 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. These resources enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and professional applications that rely on these interfaces.

Benchmark scores for this GPU are consistent with its high-end positioning. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 14326 points. Geekbench results show 310674 in OpenCL and 376915 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 44065, with a GPU Compute score of 28396. These figures place the RTX 5090 D in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 77712 is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, indicating it performs in a similar tier to those mobile parts despite being a desktop flagship. For rendering workloads, the combination of high FP32 throughput, massive VRAM capacity, and dedicated RT cores means the GPU can handle complex scenes, high-resolution textures, and ray-traced effects without running into memory or compute bottlenecks. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is particularly critical for feeding the 21760 shading units in high-resolution rendering scenarios.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 82, indicating the pairing outperforms 82% of all tracked desktop builds. However, this is a case where the whole is defined by its parts. The GPU averages 77712 across all its benchmarks, sitting in the 92nd percentile. The CPU averages 17614, sitting in the 71st percentile. The width of this gap—21 percentile points—suggests the CPU will frequently be the limiting factor in GPU-bound tasks.

Looking at the CPU scores, the Ryzen 3 8300GE achieves 11705 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1652 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 4916 multi-core and 693 single-core, and in R15, 1179 multi-core and 166 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 13507 and a single-thread score of 3644. Its nearest rivals in average score are the Intel Core i3-14100T, Intel Core i3-13100F, and Intel Core i7-1255U, all within 0.2% of its score, along with the AMD EPYC 9374F at 0.4% lower. This places the 8300GE in the same performance class as those chips, which are all mainstream or low-power parts.

The GPU scores, by contrast, are stratospheric in comparison. The PassMark G3D score of 44065 is more than triple the CPU's entire average benchmark score. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14326 reflects a GPU that is designed for 4K and high-refresh gaming, whereas the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 reflects a chip that is adequate for light productivity. The combined picture is a system with extraordinary graphics potential that is balanced by a modest processor. In tasks that are purely GPU-bound, such as high-resolution gaming with ray tracing, the system will perform exceptionally. In CPU-bound tasks, such as physics simulations or certain strategy game frames, the CPU will cap performance well below what the GPU could otherwise deliver.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix2 codename. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it has a 35 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a modest amount of cache for a modern CPU, which can impact performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

The memory controller supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It also includes integrated graphics in the form of the Radeon 740M, which is a capable iGPU for basic display output but irrelevant when paired with a discrete GPU. The production status is active, with a release date of April 2024, and the multiplier is locked, meaning it cannot be overclocked.

Benchmark results show this CPU performs as expected for a 4-core part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 1652, which is normal for a chip with 4 cores and 8 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 39163 and floating point math score of 24681 indicate solid arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 155164 and encryption score of 8603 show it can handle compression and encryption tasks at a moderate pace. The physics score of 750 and find prime numbers score of 44 are lower, reflecting the limited core count. For real-world workloads, this CPU is adequate for office productivity, web browsing, and light coding. It will struggle with heavy multi-threaded rendering or video encoding where more cores are beneficial. The 4.90 GHz boost clock helps single-threaded performance, which is why it trades blows with the Intel Core i3-14100T and i3-13100F, both of which are also 4-core parts. The 35 W TDP makes it very power-efficient, which is a key advantage for small form factor or low-noise builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU's memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which is a feature for professional workstations. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single graphics card and one or two NVMe drives. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 4 lanes, but this means the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. For the RTX 5090 D, this is unlikely to be a significant bottleneck in most workloads, but it is a consideration for bandwidth-sensitive tasks.

The power situation is starkly different between the two components. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is extremely low. The GPU has a TDP of 575 W, which is high, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. This means the system requires a robust power supply to handle the GPU, while the CPU contributes almost nothing to the power budget. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Ryzen CPU on the AM5 socket. The 8300GE is the entry point, so moving to a 6-core or 8-core Zen 4 part would immediately improve multi-threaded performance in CPU-bound scenarios, better matching the GPU's capability. Memory can also be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules, as the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a baseline. The 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are a limitation for multi-GPU setups or many expansion cards, but for a single-GPU gaming or workstation build, they are adequate. The main constraint is the GPU's power requirement, which mandates a 950 W PSU, so any future upgrades must account for this power draw. The platform itself is current and active, so there is a clear path to a more balanced system without changing the motherboard.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5090 D is the primary driver. Its 92nd percentile standing and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 indicate it can push frame rates well beyond 144 Hz at 1440p or 4K in most titles. However, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 means that in CPU-intensive games, the frame rate may be capped by the 4-core processor, especially in scenes with many objects or physics calculations.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The GPU has 680 tensor cores, which can offload encoding and AI tasks, and its 32 GB of VRAM can handle the memory overhead of streaming software. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 13507 is low for simultaneous gaming and encoding, so relying on the GPU's NVENC encoder is the correct strategy. The system will stream effectively if the encode workload is on the GPU, but CPU-based encoding would struggle.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits heavily from the GPU. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering. The CPU's single-core score of 1652 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for timeline scrubbing, but the 8 MB of L3 cache may slow down previews of complex sequences. Export times will be GPU-accelerated, making this a strong system for editing, though the CPU could become a bottleneck for non-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya is where the GPU shines. The 170 RT cores and 21760 shading units provide massive parallel throughput, and the 32 GB VRAM allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11705 is adequate for scene setup and physics, but final frame rendering will be GPU-bound, which is excellent. This is one of the best-case scenarios for this pairing.

Software development is a mixed workload. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 39163 and data encryption score of 8603 handle compilation and cryptography reasonably well, but the 4 cores may slow down parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks, but the 32 GB VRAM and tensor cores can accelerate machine learning workloads. For general development, the system is workable, but a higher-core CPU would improve build times.

Student and office work is where the CPU's efficiency shines. The 35 W TDP means low power consumption and heat, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in web browsers and document editors. The PassMark single-thread score of 3644 is strong for everyday tasks. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but the system will handle any office workload with ease, and the ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in academic research.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The primary audience is a user who prioritizes GPU-accelerated workloads over CPU-bound tasks. This includes 3D artists and animators who work with large scenes, where the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are critical. The 92nd percentile GPU performance means it can handle 4K texture sets and complex ray-traced renders without swapping to system memory. Video editors who use GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will also benefit, as the 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute handles effects in real time.

For gamers at 4K resolution, this is a viable system. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in most titles, and the CPU's 71st percentile standing is less of a limitation. The RTX 5090 D's 3DMark score of 14326 suggests it can maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra settings. However, gamers at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates (240 Hz or more) may find the CPU limiting, as the 4-core processor will struggle to feed the GPU enough frames in CPU-bound titles.

Content creators who work with AI tools will find the 680 tensor cores useful for tasks like AI upscaling and denoising. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 310674 indicates strong compute performance for these tasks. Students in engineering or science fields who run simulations that are GPU-accelerated, such as finite element analysis or molecular dynamics, will also benefit. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that appeals to professionals who require data integrity over long computation runs.

Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated applications, such as CAD software with real-time ray tracing, would benefit from the GPU's RT cores. The CPU's low TDP means lower cooling requirements, which can reduce noise in an office environment. However, for tasks that are purely CPU-bound, like spreadsheet calculations or database queries, the 8300GE is the limiting factor, and a business with such needs would be better served by a higher-core CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system is heavily GPU-balanced, with the GPU at the 92nd percentile and the CPU at the 71st percentile. This 21-point gap means that in workloads where both components are active, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. In gaming, this manifests at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1652 may not be enough to drive frame rates above 200 FPS in esports titles, even though the GPU could easily render more. At 4K, the GPU's rendering load becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's lower performance is masked.

In productivity, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. For GPU compute, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the GPU is the dominant component, and the CPU's 4 cores are sufficient to feed it. The PassMark multithread score of 13507 is low, but if the rendering is done on the GPU, the CPU only needs to manage the scene data, which it does adequately. For CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or file compression, the CPU is the sole limiter. The PassMark data compression score of 155164 is modest, and the 4 cores will take longer to compress large files than a 6-core or 8-core chip.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect, as no measured FPS data exists for this pair. However, the benchmark scores suggest that at 4K Ultra settings, the GPU's 44065 PassMark G3D score will dominate, and the CPU's impact on average FPS will be minimal, perhaps 5-10% below what a faster CPU would achieve. At 1080p, the CPU's 71st percentile standing could reduce FPS by 20-30% relative to a top-tier CPU, as the GPU sits idle waiting for draw calls. This is a classic case of a high-end GPU being paired with a low-end CPU, which is acceptable for resolution-constrained workloads but suboptimal for high-refresh esports.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the build class. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The combined percentile is 82, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop systems. The GPU is the defining component, ranking in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, which places it among the fastest graphics cards available. The CPU, in the 71st percentile, is a mainstream part that is adequate for general use but not a performance leader.

The system is a desktop workstation or gaming rig that is overwhelmingly GPU-centric. The 32 GB of VRAM and 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth make it suitable for high-end creative work, while the 104.8 TFLOPS of compute power ensures it can handle the most demanding rendering tasks. The CPU's 35 W TDP is a contrast to the GPU's 575 W, making this a system with a high power draw overall, necessitating a 950 W PSU. The overall tier is high, but it is an unbalanced build. A user who selects this pairing is making a deliberate choice to maximize graphics performance while accepting a modest CPU, likely because their primary workloads are GPU-bound. The system would perform admirably in 4K gaming and GPU rendering, but it would be limited in CPU-heavy multitasking or high-refresh 1080p gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 D have, and what is its memory type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile ranking?

A: The combined system percentile is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all tracked desktop builds.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 8300GE supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5090 D is 950 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The GPU scores 14326 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-14100T?

A: The Ryzen 3 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 17614, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i3-14100T's average score of 17648.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The data is flagged as not measured, so these are analytical projections.

With that caveat, the benchmark scores allow for reasonable estimates. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 and PassMark G3D score of 44065 are indicative of a card that can handle 4K Ultra settings in most modern games. At 4K, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth will prevent memory-related stuttering, and the 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will drive high frame rates. Estimated performance at 4K Ultra would be in the range of 60-120 FPS for AAA titles, depending on the game's optimization, with lighter esports titles exceeding 144 FPS.

At 1440p, the GPU will be less stressed, and estimated frame rates would increase to 120-200 FPS on average, with the CPU potentially limiting the upper end in CPU-bound scenes. At 1080p, the CPU's 4 cores and 71st percentile standing become the primary constraint. Estimated FPS at 1080p Ultra would be high, but the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1652 may cap frame rates around 200 FPS in esports titles, while AAA games would run at 150-200 FPS. Ray tracing performance is supported by the 170 RT cores, but the CPU may struggle to manage the increased draw calls associated with ray-traced scenes, potentially reducing frame rates by 10-20% in those titles. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds