SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300G + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8300G

18,169 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300G paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop combination that juxtaposes a modest four-core Zen 4 processor with a top-percentile workstation graphics card. The data shows a CPU sitting at the 72nd percentile against all CPUs and a GPU at the 95th percentile against all GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 84. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame-rate discussion below is framed as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured. The result is an unusual but coherent build profile: GPU-heavy workloads scale with the RTX 4000 Ada's compute and memory resources, while CPU-bound tasks are bounded by a four-core, eight-thread part whose multi-thread results cluster around a specific, well-defined performance tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 20 GB of GDDR6, and 95th-percentile standing indicate that raw graphics rendering is not the limiter in this pairing. Estimates derived from the benchmark scores suggest that at higher resolutions the GPU can drive high frame counts in most titles, but at lower resolutions where the CPU does more work per frame, the 8300G's PassMark single-thread score of 3778 and physics score of 755 become the ceiling. High-refresh play is therefore plausible at 1440p-and-above style workloads, and constrained at settings that shift load onto the CPU.

Streaming. Streaming adds video encoding and compositing on top of gaming load, and that work is CPU-heavy. With four cores and eight threads, a PassMark multithread score of 14018, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12217, the 8300G can handle a single stream with a game running, but the data indicates limited headroom for simultaneous multi-app work. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could absorb some acceleration work, which relieves the CPU of a portion of the pipeline.

Video editing. Editing performance splits along the same line. Timeline scrubbing, effects playback, and GPU-accelerated export lean on the RTX 4000 Ada — its Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 point to strong compute throughput — while codec decode, proxy generation, and final CPU-side render stages depend on the 8300G's multi-core numbers, which sit at the tier of an Intel Core i7-9700 per the nearestRivals data. The result is a machine that feels fast in the GPU-accelerated stages and average in the CPU-bound ones.

3D rendering. Viewport work benefits directly from the GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, and its 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate. Final renders that use the GPU will complete quickly; final renders that use the CPU will be limited by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12217. Renderer choice matters more in this pairing than in a balanced one.

Software development. Compilation is multi-threaded, and the 8300G's four cores and 14018 PassMark multithread score place it at the level of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Intel Core i7-1365U in the rivals list — serviceable for small-to-medium projects, slower on large codebases. Single-thread responsiveness is a strength: a 724 Cinebench R20 single-core score and 173 in R15 indicate snappy editor and interpreter behavior. ECC memory support adds a reliability angle for long builds and test runs.

Student and office work. For documents, browsing, video calls, and courseware, the single-thread numbers are more relevant than the multi-thread ones, and they are healthy. The integrated Radeon 740M provides display output even without the discrete card, and the 65 W TDP keeps the platform quiet. This scenario is comfortably within the build's capability, with the GPU largely idle.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS figures exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database — measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Everything in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores.

The GPU side of the ledger is strong: a 95th-percentile ranking against all GPUs, 26.73 TFLOPS FP32, 6144 shading units, a 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth on a 160-bit bus. That raw profile suggests the RTX 4000 Ada can render demanding titles at high resolutions and ultra settings without the graphics pipeline being the constraint. The 20 GB of GDDR6 means texture-heavy modern games will not spill into system memory.

The CPU side is where estimates must be tempered. The 8300G's four cores and eight threads, with a PassMark physics score of 755 and single-thread score of 3778, indicate that simulation-heavy, draw-call-heavy games — large open worlds, competitive multiplayer titles — will be limited by processor throughput rather than the GPU. Estimated frame rates in such titles will plateau at CPU-determined levels regardless of resolution. In less CPU-intensive games, the GPU's percentile position suggests high, smooth frame counts at ultra settings, particularly as resolution climbs and the load shifts to the graphics card.

The practical estimate, then: GPU-bound scenarios perform in line with a 95th-percentile card; CPU-bound scenarios perform in line with a 72nd-percentile four-core processor. Ray tracing is well supported on paper — 48 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support — but enabling RT raises per-frame CPU submission cost in many engines, which narrows the gap to the CPU ceiling.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 8300G compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 18169 sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (18176, 0% delta), Intel Core i7-1365U (18177, 0% delta), Intel Core i7-9700 (18180, 0.1% behind), and Intel Core i5-1334U (18154, 0.1% ahead). In practice the four are statistically tied.

Q: Is this a good combination for gaming?

A: It is an asymmetric one. The RTX 4000 Ada ranks in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, while the 8300G ranks 72nd among CPUs with four cores and eight threads. Estimated frame rates will be high in GPU-bound titles and capped by the CPU in CPU-bound ones.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU carries a suggested PSU figure of 300 W, with a GPU TDP of 130 W and a CPU TDP of 65 W. The 300 W suggested figure is the reference point for the graphics card; the CPU adds its own 65 W on top in platform planning.

Q: Does the 8300G support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, so frequency tuning is not available. Boost tops out at 4.90 GHz from a 3.40 GHz base.

Q: How much memory can this platform use, and what type?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — a useful feature for workstation-adjacent use.

Q: Is the RTX 4000 Ada a gaming card?

A: It is a workstation card — the generation field lists it as "Workstation Ada (x000A)" — but its raw specs (6144 shading units, 48 RT cores, 20 GB GDDR6) give it strong rendering capability, and its API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What integrated graphics does the CPU have, and does it matter here?

A: The 8300G includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU. In this pairing it is largely redundant for performance but provides a fallback display path and basic output independent of the discrete card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support on a dual-channel bus, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC supported. AM5 is the key forward-compatibility element: the same board that hosts this 65 W Ryzen 3 can host higher-core-count AM5 processors, which is the single most impactful upgrade available to this build given that the CPU is the weaker of the two components in the pairing.

PCIe connectivity is a nuance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU alone, while the GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU will therefore run at Gen 4 speeds, matching its interface specification; lane availability beyond the primary slot is limited by the 14-lane CPU allocation, which matters for builders planning multiple NVMe drives or add-in cards.

Power planning is straightforward. The GPU specifies a 300 W suggested PSU and draws power through a single 16-pin connector; the CPU adds 65 W of TDP. A builder should treat the 300 W figure as the GPU's requirement and size the total system around the combination of both components. The card's single-slot width and 245 mm length make physical fitment easy in most desktop chassis, and its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation layouts.

A sensible next upgrade, per the data, is a higher-core-count AM5 CPU: the 8300G's multi-thread scores (12217 in Cinebench R23, 14018 in PassMark multithread) are the binding constraint in the pairing, and the AM5 socket preserves the option to address that without touching the GPU, which already sits in the 95th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is consistent across suites. Cinebench R15 multi-core: 1231. R20 multi-core: 5131. R23 multi-core: 12217. Single-core follows the same tier: 173 in R15, 724 in R20, 1724 in R23. The PassMark suite fills in workload-specific detail — 14018 multithread, 3778 single-thread, 755 physics, 40534 integer math, 25336 floating point math, 158952 data compression, 9115 encryption, 12354 extended instructions, 47 find-prime-numbers, and 19013 string sorting. The average benchmark score is 18169, placing the CPU in the 72nd percentile against all CPUs.

The GPU's recorded scores are 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 135218 and landing in the 95th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the NVIDIA A10M (135230, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396, 0.1% behind), Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135774, 0.4% behind), and Radeon PRO V620 (136472, 0.9% behind) — are all professional-grade parts, confirming the card's workstation tier.

The combined picture is a build percentile of 84. Read against the individual numbers, that combination is pulled up strongly by the GPU and held back by the CPU: the 95th-percentile GPU delivers far more rendering throughput than the 72nd-percentile, four-core CPU can fully feed in processor-bound scenarios, while in GPU-bound scenarios the pairing performs like the graphics card alone.

Who Should Build It

Content creators with GPU-accelerated workflows. Editors, 3D artists, and designers whose software leans on OpenCL, CUDA-adjacent compute, or viewport rendering get the most from this pairing. The GPU's 146593 OpenCL score, 20 GB VRAM, and 192 tensor cores make it well suited to professional creative applications, while the CPU handles scheduling and OS-level tasks adequately.

Developers and students. The single-thread scores (1724 in R23 single-core, 3778 PassMark single-thread) deliver responsive everyday computing, and ECC DDR5 support suits long-running, stability-sensitive work. Students in particular get a platform — AM5, DDR5 — that outlives the entry CPU.

Small business workstations. The workstation-class GPU, ECC support, quad DisplayPort outputs, and single-slot card format align with compact professional machines for CAD-adjacent visualization, multi-monitor office setups, and light rendering duty.

Gamers at higher resolutions. Players targeting higher-resolution, ultra-settings play where the GPU does the heavy lifting will find the 95th-percentile card well used. Competitive players targeting very high refresh rates at low settings should note the CPU-bound ceiling described above.

Who should not. Anyone whose workload is dominated by CPU multi-threading — heavy code compilation, CPU rendering, many-stream local streaming — will hit the four-core limit quickly, and the rivals list shows that limit is real: the 8300G ties laptop-class parts like the Ryzen 7 5700U rather than desktop eight-core processors.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 3 8300G is a four-core, eight-thread Zen 4 processor on the Phoenix2 codename, built on TSMC's 4 nm node. It carries 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, runs a 3.40 GHz base with a 4.90 GHz boost, and holds a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. It launched at a launch MSRP of $176 and remains in active production.

What the scores mean for real workloads is straightforward. The single-core results — 173/724/1724 across R15/R20/R23 — reflect the per-core efficiency of Zen 4 at this clock range, and they translate into snappy interactive performance: application launches, browser responsiveness, and lightly threaded tasks feel quick. The multi-core results — 1231/5131/12217 across the same three suites — show what four cores deliver when fully loaded. That is a mid-tier throughput level, statistically identical to the Ryzen 7 5700U, Core i7-1365U, and Core i7-9700 in the rivals table.

The memory subsystem supports the CPU well for its class: dual-channel DDR5 at 83.2 GB/s is generous bandwidth for four cores, meaning the processor is less likely to be starved in bandwidth-sensitive workloads than in thread-count-limited ones. The locked multiplier means the 4.90 GHz boost ceiling is fixed. The integrated Radeon 740M rounds out the package as a lightweight display solution.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build — buildClass is desktop — pairing an entry-tier AM5 desktop processor with a professional-tier workstation graphics card. The tier math is the story: CPU at the 72nd percentile, GPU at the 95th, combined at the 84th. That combined figure sits well above what the CPU alone would suggest and below what the GPU alone would suggest, which is exactly the arithmetic signature of an unbalanced pairing.

As a class of machine, it reads as a compact workstation: a single-slot, 245 mm graphics card with four DisplayPort outputs, a 65 W processor on a current-generation socket with ECC-capable DDR5, and professional GPU drivers implied by the card's workstation positioning. It is not a balanced enthusiast gaming rig, and it is not a CPU-bound rendering box. It is a GPU-forward desktop whose identity is defined by the RTX 4000 Ada's compute and memory, with the 8300G acting as a capable but modest host processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck structure is one-directional and clear from the percentiles: the GPU (95th percentile) substantially outranks the CPU (72nd percentile), so in any workload where both components matter, the CPU is the limiting factor.

The evidence is in the numbers. The 8300G's PassMark physics score of 755 and single-thread score of 3778 define its game-simulation throughput; when a game's frame rate is determined by those figures, the RTX 4000 Ada's 26.73 TFLOPS and 139.2 GPixel/s sit partially idle. In GPU-bound scenarios — higher resolutions, ultra settings, heavy shader and ray tracing load — the frame rate scales with the card's 95th-percentile capability, and the four-core CPU's role shrinks to submission and draw-call work it can generally sustain.

Workload by workload: rendering and compute tilt GPU-bound and perform at the card's tier; compilation, streaming, simulation, and physics tilt CPU-bound and perform at the tier defined by the rivals list; memory bandwidth is not a meaningful constraint for the CPU at 83.2 GB/s dual-channel, and the GPU's own 360.0 GB/s over its 160-bit bus is proportionate to its compute. The one caveat on the interconnect: the CPU exposes 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, so the x16 GPU slot plus additional NVMe storage will consume the allocation quickly, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface matches the CPU's generation exactly.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is an Ada Lovelace workstation card built on the AD104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die at a density of 121.8M transistors per mm². It packs 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1500 MHz base to a 2175 MHz boost, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory configuration is a defining strength: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus delivers 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads, that capacity accommodates large scenes, high-resolution textures, and professional datasets without spilling to system RAM — a capacity tier well beyond typical gaming cards and appropriate to the card's workstation classification, echoed by its rivals (A10M, PRO W6800, W6800X Duo, PRO V620) all being professional parts.

Throughput figures frame the performance story: 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 (with FP16 at 1:1), 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate. The 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, and the 192 tensor cores provide the acceleration used in AI-assisted rendering and denoising features common in professional 3D pipelines. API coverage — Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6 — spans modern cross-platform frameworks.

The benchmark scores translate directly: 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Vulkan indicate strong GPU-compute throughput for general compute workloads, and the 95th-percentile ranking places the card among the top sliver of all GPUs in the database. In this pairing, that capability is the build's greatest asset — and, given the four-core host, its most underutilized one.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8300G + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 8300G

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds