SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

15,682 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a laptop configuration that targets a specific niche: high-end graphics performance with a modest, efficient CPU. The data shows a system built around the GPU, where the processor is designed to handle the workload without overshadowing the primary component. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, component characteristics, and the practical implications for various use cases, drawing exclusively from the provided data.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix2 codename. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.00 GHz, which can boost up to 4.70 GHz under load. With a TDP of 28 W, it is clearly designed for power-constrained mobile environments, prioritizing efficiency over raw multi-core throughput.

Benchmark results confirm this positioning. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11042 points in multi-core and 1558 points in single-core tests. The single-core score is respectable, indicating solid responsiveness for everyday tasks and applications that rely on a few fast threads. However, the multi-core score reflects the physical limitation of 4 cores; tasks that scale across many threads will not see the same level of performance as higher-core-count parts. The Geekbench scores of 5806 (multi-core) and 2003 (single-core) align with this narrative.

The CPU's overall percentile rank is 69, meaning it performs better than 69% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score is 15682. The nearest rival data shows it is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-11400H, which has an average score of 15749 and a deltaPct of -0.4. This suggests that despite the newer architecture, the 7440U is in the same performance class as a previous-generation 6-core mobile processor in aggregate benchmarks. The deltaPct values for other rivals (AMD EPYC 9254, EPYC 9354P, EPYC 75F3) are all within -0.5 to -1.1, indicating a cluster of similar average performance levels for these specific tests, despite the EPYC parts being server-class chips with vastly different power envelopes.

For real workloads, this means the CPU is well-suited for general productivity, office suites, web browsing, and light coding. The single-thread performance ensures snappy UI interactions. For heavier multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the 4-core/8-thread configuration will be a limiting factor, but it will still complete these tasks at a usable, if not blistering, pace. The PassMark scores illustrate this further: Integer Math (36758) and Floating Point Math (20291) are decent for a mobile chip, but the Find Prime Numbers score of 40 is notably low, highlighting the CPU's relative weakness in specific, highly parallel workloads. The 8 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth are adequate to feed the cores without severe bottlenecks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the clear star of this configuration. Based on the Ada Lovelace architecture (chip AD107) on TSMC's 5 nm process, it features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. It is equipped with 24 dedicated RT cores and 96 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features. The GPU clock speeds are listed as a base of 1545 MHz and a boost of 1890 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This is a common configuration for mobile 4060-class parts. The FP32 performance is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU's TDP is 115 W, which is substantial for a laptop and confirms it is a full-power implementation rather than a Max-Q variant.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 4060 Mobile achieves a PassMark G3D score of 17469 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420. Its percentile rank is 67, placing it ahead of 67% of all GPUs. The average benchmark score is 22729. The nearest rivals provide context: it is nearly identical in performance to the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avgScore 22895, deltaPct -0.7) and the Intel Arc B580 (avgScore 23021, deltaPct -1.3). It is also slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (deltaPct 0.8) and the newer RTX 5060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.3) in these specific aggregate tests.

This performance level indicates the GPU is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid 1440p gaming in most titles. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is a consideration; it is sufficient for many projects but may be limiting for very large textures or complex 3D scenes. The presence of 96 tensor cores means AI-accelerated features and apps will run efficiently. The RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, which will be usable but may require upscaling technologies to maintain high frame rates in demanding ray-traced games. The pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s and texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s are healthy figures that support the expected gaming performance.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU performance sufficient for modern gaming?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 3 7440U has a single-core Geekbench score of 2003 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1558, which are strong figures for gaming. Many games are dependent on single-thread performance, and this CPU should not be a significant bottleneck in most titles, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to a desktop RTX 2080?

A: The data shows they are essentially tied in aggregate performance. The RTX 2080 has an average benchmark score of 22895, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has an average score of 22729, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.7. This means the mobile 4060 delivers desktop-class performance of a previous high-end generation.

Q: Can this laptop handle 1440p gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's performance percentile (67th) and its similarity to a desktop RTX 2080, it is well-equipped for 1440p gaming. While exact frame rates are not available, the raw compute power (11.61 TFLOPS FP32) and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can manage high settings in many games at that resolution.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The RTX 4060 Mobile is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and includes 24 dedicated RT cores. This hardware support allows for real-time ray-traced effects in compatible games.

Q: What are the memory specifications for this system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU good for content creation?

A: It is adequate for light content creation. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 11042 is moderate. It will handle photo editing and 1080p video editing, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration will make rendering and exporting times longer than a higher-core-count CPU.

Q: How does this system compare to one with an RTX 5060 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile is slightly ahead in these aggregate benchmarks. The RTX 5060 Mobile has an average score of 22435, while the 4060 Mobile scores 22729, giving the 4060 a deltaPct of 1.3. The performance difference is marginal in the data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance characteristics of this pairing are heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RTX 4060 Mobile sits at the 67th GPU percentile, while the Ryzen 3 7440U sits at the 69th CPU percentile. While their percentiles are similar, the nature of their workloads differs significantly. In gaming, the GPU is almost always the primary constraint, especially at higher resolutions and with demanding graphical settings.

Benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant component in most scenarios. Its high G3D score (17469) and compute capability (6816 in PassMark GPU Compute) are designed for heavy graphical lifting. The CPU, with a PassMark multithread score of 12991 and a single-thread score of 2614, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most cases. The bottleneck will shift to the CPU in specific scenarios, such as high-frame-rate esports titles at 1080p where the CPU's single-thread performance (1558 in Cinebench R23 single-core) might limit the maximum FPS the GPU can produce. In CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games that rely heavily on physics and AI, the 4-core CPU will be the limiting factor.

For productivity tasks, the balance is more nuanced. In applications that utilize the GPU for acceleration (e.g., video encoding with NVENC, GPU-accelerated rendering), the system will perform well. In purely CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or heavy multitasking, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The data suggests a system that is very capable in GPU-accelerated workflows and gaming, but a mid-range performer in pure CPU workloads. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this overall positioning.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for users who prioritize graphics performance in a laptop form factor. The target audience includes:

  • Gamers: Those who want to play modern titles at 1080p with maximum settings or 1440p with high settings. The GPU's performance, comparable to a desktop RTX 2080, ensures a smooth experience in most games. The CPU is sufficient for gaming, ensuring the GPU is the primary workhorse.
  • Content Creators: Video editors and digital artists who use GPU-accelerated software will benefit from the RTX 4060 Mobile's 3072 shading units and 96 tensor cores. Tasks like rendering previews, applying effects, and exporting videos will be swift.
  • Developers: Programmers working with AI/ML frameworks can leverage the CUDA cores and tensor cores for local model training and inference. The CPU is adequate for code compilation and running development environments.
  • Students: Those in engineering, architecture, or design programs requiring powerful GPU capabilities for CAD, 3D modeling, or simulation software will find this system capable.
  • Small Business Workstations: For tasks like graphic design, video production, or light 3D visualization, this pairing offers a strong performance-per-watt profile, suitable for professional mobile workstations.

It is not intended for users whose primary workload is CPU-bound multi-threaded rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles CPU rendering) or large-scale data processing, where the 4-core CPU will be a significant bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following analysis frames expectations based on the benchmark scores and is an estimate, not measured results.

The gaming performance of this system is dictated by the RTX 4060 Mobile. Given its benchmark scores (PassMark G3D 17469, Geekbench Vulkan 89569) and its close alignment with a desktop RTX 2080, expectations are high.

  • 1080p Ultra: This is the sweet spot. The GPU should handle the vast majority of titles at maximum settings with high frame rates. The CPU's strong single-core performance (2614 PassMark single-thread) is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks in most games.
  • 1440p High/Ultra: The system is capable here as well. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will allow for high settings, though users might need to lower a few demanding options in the most graphically intensive AAA titles to maintain a locked 60 FPS.
  • Esports Titles: For games like CS:GO, Valorant, or Overwatch 2, frame rates will be exceptionally high, likely in the hundreds, even at 1440p. In these scenarios, the CPU's single-core performance will be the limiting factor, but it is fast enough to deliver a competitive experience.

Ray tracing performance will be usable due to the 24 RT cores. However, enabling ray tracing at high resolutions will significantly impact frame rates. Users will likely need to utilize DLSS (which is supported by the 96 tensor cores) to recover performance while maintaining visual fidelity.

Overall, this is a high-performance gaming laptop. Users can expect a smooth, high-fidelity experience at standard resolutions. The primary compromise is the CPU, which may prevent the GPU from reaching its absolute maximum potential in CPU-bound scenarios, but it will not ruin the gaming experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FP7 for the CPU. This is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is likely soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The system's memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, which is the current standard and offers a good upgrade path in terms of capacity.

The GPU is also an integrated part of the laptop, so it cannot be upgraded. Therefore, the upgrade path for this system is limited to what the laptop chassis supports. Users can typically upgrade:

  • Storage: This is the most straightforward upgrade. The system likely supports PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSDs. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, so users can install a fast, high-capacity drive.
  • Memory: If the laptop has SODIMM slots, users can upgrade to more RAM or faster DDR5 modules. If the RAM is soldered, this is not an option.
  • Peripherals: The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has display outputs that are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the connectivity depends on the specific laptop model.

For a "sensible next upgrade," the focus should be on maximizing the existing platform. Adding more RAM and a larger, faster SSD will improve the overall system responsiveness and capacity for games and creative projects. The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and the CPU's is 28 W, so the system's power delivery is designed for this configuration. The data does not list a suggested PSU, as this is a laptop, and power is managed by the included AC adapter. There is no headroom for upgrading the core components.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a high-end, mobile GPU with a mid-range, efficient CPU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the defining component, offering desktop-class performance from a previous generation. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a capable partner, providing sufficient power for gaming and general productivity without drawing excessive power or generating excessive heat.

The combined percentile rank is 68, placing this system ahead of 68% of all configurations in the database. It is a desktop-class GPU performance tier in a mobile form factor. This pairing is a prime example of a "GPU-first" laptop design, where the primary goal is to deliver a superior gaming and graphics experience, and the CPU is chosen to complement that goal with adequate performance and efficiency. The overall tier is solidly mid-to-high-end for a gaming laptop, capable of handling the most demanding tasks in its class.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate performance is defined by an average benchmark score of 15682, placing it in the 69th percentile. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11042 and a single-core score of 1558. In Geekbench, it scores 5806 multi-core and 2003 single-core. It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-11400H, with a negligible performance delta of -0.4%.

The GPU is the stronger component, with an average benchmark score of 22729, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its PassMark G3D score is 17469, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 89420. It performs on par with the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, trailing by only -0.7%. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8% and the newer RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3% in these aggregate tests.

The combined picture is clear: a system with a GPU that punches above its class, paired with a CPU that provides a solid baseline. The GPU is the clear performance leader, and the CPU is sufficient to support its capabilities. The combined percentile of 68 reflects the balance between the high-performing GPU and the mid-tier CPU. This is a configuration where the graphics card will be the primary driver of performance in most applications, making it an excellent choice for graphics-intensive work and gaming.