SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

15,682 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and AMD Radeon 860M represent a modern, efficient pairing for a thin-and-light laptop. This combination targets users who need solid all-around performance for productivity and light creative work without the power draw of a dedicated GPU. The data shows a balanced system that sits in the 71st percentile overall, indicating it outperforms the majority of laptop configurations while remaining accessible. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, offering a practical look at what this hardware can achieve.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix2 die. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, which contributes to its efficiency. The base clock is 3.00 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.70 GHz. This is a mobile processor with a TDP of 28 W, designed for laptops where thermal and power constraints are a priority. The CPU features 8 MB of shared L3 cache, with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 KB of L1 cache per core.

Benchmark results show a strong single-threaded performance for its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1558 points in single-core and 11042 points in multi-core. The Geekbench results are similarly solid, with 2003 points single-core and 5806 points multi-core. The single-core scores are particularly important for everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications, where responsiveness is key. The 4.70 GHz boost clock enables this snappy behavior.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 4-core/8-thread configuration provides a decent baseline. The PassMark multithread score of 12991 and the integer math score of 36758 indicate that it can handle compilation tasks and other parallel workloads, though it will not compete with higher-core-count workstation chips. The data shows the CPU sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15682. This places it in a competitive position, performing nearly identically to the Intel Core i5-11400H, which has an average score of 15749, a delta of just -0.4%. It also trades blows with several server-class AMD EPYC processors, which reflects its efficiency and IPC, despite having far fewer cores.

The FP32 performance in PassMark floating point math is 20291, which is useful for scientific and engineering applications. The data encryption score of 9215 and data compression score of 153689 show that the CPU has capable hardware acceleration for these tasks. The processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and an 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which helps feed both the CPU and the integrated GPU. ECC memory support is also present, a feature often found in professional mobile workstations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the upgrade path is limited to what is available on the motherboard, typically meaning there is no CPU upgrade path in a laptop. The platform supports DDR5 memory, which is a current standard, ensuring compatibility with modern memory modules. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, offering fast connectivity for NVMe SSDs and other peripherals.

The integrated graphics is the Radeon 740M, which shares system memory. The system’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a critical factor for the iGPU’s performance. The TDP of the CPU is 28 W, which is a reasonable power envelope for a mobile processor. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the system does not list a suggested PSU, as the power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power adapter and battery.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the primary bottleneck in this system will be the integrated GPU for gaming and graphics workloads. A user looking for more performance would need to consider a different laptop with a discrete GPU. From a platform perspective, the 4 nm process and Zen 4 architecture ensure this CPU will remain relevant for several years. The support for modern I/O like PCIe Gen 4 and DDR5 means that the system is not immediately outdated. The lack of a physical upgrade path is inherent to the laptop form factor, so the focus should be on maximizing the current configuration’s potential, such as ensuring dual-channel memory is used.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU, and the data shows it performs at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. While there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, the GPU’s benchmark scores suggest it can handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates. However, it is not designed for high-refresh gaming at high settings in modern AAA titles. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (1558 in Cinebench R23) will not be the limiting factor here; the GPU will be.

Streaming: The CPU has 8 threads, which can handle the encoding overhead for a stream, but it will compete with the game for resources. The dedicated video encoding hardware on the RDNA 3.5 GPU is not detailed in the provided data, but the overall performance of the system is likely sufficient for light streaming at lower resolutions and bitrates. The PassMark multithread score of 12991 indicates that the CPU has enough headroom for encoding tasks alongside basic productivity, but gaming and streaming simultaneously will stress the system.

Video Editing: For light video editing, this system is viable. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11042 shows it can handle 1080p timeline editing and rendering. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 suggests it can accelerate effects and exports in supported software. However, for 4K multi-layer projects or complex color grading, the 4-core CPU and shared-memory GPU will likely become a bottleneck, leading to slower render times compared to dedicated hardware.

3D Rendering: This workload is heavily multi-threaded, and the 4-core/8-thread CPU will be the main constraint. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11042 is adequate for basic modeling and occasional renders, but for professional or frequent rendering tasks, a system with more cores is necessary. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 30043 indicates it can assist in viewport rendering, but final frame renders will rely heavily on the CPU, where performance is mid-range.

Software Development: The CPU is well-suited for this task. The high single-core performance (2003 in Geekbench) ensures a responsive IDE. The multi-core score of 5806 in Geekbench and the PassMark integer math score of 36758 will handle code compilation reasonably well for smaller projects. The 8 threads allow for parallel compilation tasks, and the 8 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity during long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: This is where the system shines. The combination of a strong single-core CPU and a capable iGPU handles web browsing, document editing, spreadsheets, and video conferencing with ease. The 28 W TDP ensures long battery life, and the performance is more than adequate for these tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 2614 indicates that the system will feel quick and responsive in daily use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a system where the CPU and GPU are relatively well-balanced, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. The CPU sits at the 69th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile. This close percentile ranking indicates that for general tasks, neither component will severely hold back the other.

For gaming, the GPU will be the primary limiting factor. The Radeon 860M’s performance is comparable to a discrete NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (delta of -0.1%), which is an entry-level discrete GPU. This means that in modern 3D games, the GPU will be the first to reach its limits, and the CPU will have spare capacity. The CPU’s high single-core score will ensure that frame times are stable, but the overall FPS will be dictated by the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

For CPU-bound tasks like video rendering or software compilation, the CPU will be the bottleneck. The 4-core design will limit the throughput in heavily threaded workloads, even though the GPU has performance to spare. The PassMark physics score of 939 is relatively low, further indicating that complex physics simulations in games or professional applications will be CPU-limited.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between the CPU and GPU, which can be a bottleneck for GPU-intensive tasks. Since the GPU uses system memory, games that require high memory bandwidth may suffer. The system's combined percentile of 71 reflects this balance, showing it is a solid, but not exceptional, performer across the board.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, specifically the Krackan Point chip. It is manufactured on the same 4 nm process as the CPU. The GPU has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. Crucially, it includes 8 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games.

The GPU’s memory is system shared, meaning it uses the system’s DDR5 memory. The bandwidth is listed as system dependent, but the CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the ceiling. This shared memory setup means that the GPU performance can be affected by the amount and speed of the system RAM. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W, which is separate from the CPU’s 28 W TDP, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show a capable iGPU. It scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 26401. This places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a discrete entry-level GPU, with a score of 26421, a delta of -0.1%. This is a significant achievement for an integrated part, essentially matching a discrete GPU. It is also close to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (delta -0.6%) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (delta -1.1%), though these are discrete cards with different power requirements.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, which is the raw compute power for general-purpose shaders. The FP16 performance is also 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1), which is unusual and may help with certain compute workloads. For rendering, this GPU can handle lightweight 3D modeling and viewport work, but the lack of dedicated VRAM will limit its performance in large, complex scenes.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at users who need a versatile laptop for daily tasks and light creative work. The data indicates it is a strong choice for students, as the performance is more than sufficient for research, writing, and coding assignments. The excellent single-thread performance (2003 Geekbench) ensures a responsive system, and the long battery life implied by the 28 W TDP is ideal for campus use.

Small business workstations would benefit from this setup. The CPU’s ECC memory support provides data integrity, and the multi-threaded performance (11042 in Cinebench R23) can handle spreadsheet analysis, presentations, and light database work. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 can accelerate certain business applications that use GPU compute.

Content creators who work with 1080p video or casual photo editing will find this system usable. The CPU can handle the encoding, and the GPU can accelerate effects. However, professionals working with 4K footage or complex 3D scenes should look for a system with more cores and a discrete GPU.

Mobile gamers who primarily play esports titles or older games will be satisfied. The GPU’s performance, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, can push high frame rates in games like CS:GO or League of Legends. For modern AAA games, the user will need to lower settings and resolution to achieve playable frame rates.

The system is not intended for high-end 3D rendering or professional video editing. The 4-core CPU will be a significant bottleneck, leading to long render times. The shared memory GPU will also struggle with large textures and complex models. Users with these needs should consider a laptop with a high-core-count CPU and a dedicated GPU with its own VRAM.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance of the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U compared to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The Ryzen 3 7440U has an average benchmark score of 15682, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-11400H’s score of 15749, showing a performance difference of just -0.4%.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to a discrete entry-level GPU?

A: The Radeon 860M’s average benchmark score of 26401 is essentially on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550’s score of 26421, a delta of -0.1%. This indicates the integrated GPU delivers performance comparable to a low-end discrete option.

Q: Does this CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses system shared memory, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared."

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined system sits at the 71st percentile among all configurations.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU pairing?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion is estimated based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system powered by the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U processor and the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 4 part with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with a 15 W TDP. This pairing is designed for efficient, everyday computing in a portable form factor.

The overall tier of this system, based on its combined percentile of 71, is upper-mid-range. It is not a high-end performance machine, but it significantly outperforms the majority of laptops on the market. The CPU’s 69th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking show that both components are well-matched, with neither being a glaring weak point. This is a competent all-rounder that excels at productivity and can handle light gaming and creative tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are strong for its class. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11042 and a single-core score of 1558. In Geekbench, it scores 5806 multi-core and 2003 single-core. Its average benchmark score is 15682, placing it at the 69th percentile of all CPUs. These scores show that the CPU is highly capable in single-threaded tasks, with multi-threaded performance that is adequate for moderate workloads. It closely matches the Intel Core i5-11400H, a previous-generation mobile processor with a higher TDP.

The GPU’s performance is remarkably good for an integrated part. It scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 26401. This places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The score is virtually identical to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a discrete GPU, meaning the 860M can handle similar gaming and graphics tasks. The combined picture is a system that offers balanced performance, with the CPU’s strong single-core speed and the GPU’s unexpected capability creating a versatile laptop that can handle a wide range of tasks without major compromises.