SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

15,682 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + AMD Radeon 8050S: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's efficient Zen 4 mobile processor with a high-end RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU delivers solid multi-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU's benchmark scores place it in the top tier of all graphics processors. Together, they form a system designed for balanced 1080p gaming and productivity work, with the GPU clearly being the stronger component relative to its peers.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile versus all CPU and GPU combinations is 79, indicating this system outperforms roughly four out of five comparable laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7440U compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11400H?

A: The Ryzen 3 7440U has an average benchmark score of 15,682, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-11400H's 15,749. This places the two processors within statistical noise of each other.

Q: What is the Radeon 8050S's GPU percentile ranking?

A: The Radeon 8050S sits at the 89th percentile versus all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 89% of graphics processors in the benchmark database.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The Ryzen 3 7440U scores 11,042 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,558 points in single-core tests.

Q: Does the Radeon 8050S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory for both its frame buffer and bandwidth, with memory size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared."

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 55 watts. The GPU is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors required.

Q: Is the CPU's memory controller capable of ECC support?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 7440U supports ECC memory in addition to standard DDR5, with dual-channel memory bus providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy in this pairing. The Radeon 8050S ranks at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 3 7440U sits at the 69th percentile among CPUs. This 20-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the dominant component, capable of outpacing the CPU's ability to feed it in many scenarios.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,558 suggests adequate per-thread performance for most titles, but the GPU's raw compute advantage — 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 — means frame rates will often be constrained by CPU physics and game logic threads rather than pixel throughput. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 2,614 reinforces this, as it falls short of what would be needed to fully saturate a GPU at this performance tier in CPU-bound titles.

Multi-threaded workloads tell a similar story. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,042 is respectable for a 28-watt mobile part, but the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 dwarfs the CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 5,806 by more than 11 times. For GPU-accelerated rendering or compute tasks, the Radeon 8050S will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it provides the vast majority of raw throughput; the CPU's role is primarily to feed data and manage threads.

The memory subsystem introduces another potential bottleneck. With the GPU relying on system shared memory, the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU workloads. This is a common constraint for integrated graphics, and the data suggests that memory bandwidth contention could limit the GPU's effective performance in memory-intensive scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where frame buffers grow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 3 7440U uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile platform. This socket is not user-upgradeable in the traditional desktop sense; the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and ECC capability, which is notable for a mobile part. PCIe connectivity comes in the form of Gen 4 with 14 lanes available from the CPU, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

The Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU built on the Strix Halo chip, using the RDNA 3.5 architecture. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 internally, though as an IGP it does not occupy a physical slot. The GPU's TDP of 55 watts, combined with the CPU's 28 watts, suggests a total processor package power of around 83 watts before accounting for other system components. There is no suggested PSU listed for this GPU, and it requires no power connectors, indicating that the system uses a single power delivery path typical of laptop designs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to memory capacity and bandwidth as the most impactful change. Since the GPU shares system memory, increasing to higher-speed DDR5 modules or populating all available channels would directly improve GPU bandwidth headroom. The CPU's 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, already represent a modern manufacturing node, so architectural improvements would require a full platform change. The integrated GPU's performance tier, however, means that users seeking substantially higher frame rates would need to consider a system with a discrete GPU, as the 8050S is already near the top of what integrated graphics can achieve.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop users who need strong GPU performance without a discrete graphics card. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings are the primary audience, given the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the absence of measured FPS data for higher resolutions. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated effects in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which outperforms the CPU's compute capabilities by a wide margin.

Students and small business users who require a single machine for both productivity and occasional gaming will find the balance suitable. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2,003 handles everyday office tasks, web browsing, and document processing with ease, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 58,398 ensures smooth hardware acceleration for browser rendering and light creative applications. Software developers compiling code will see reasonable performance from the 4-core, 8-thread configuration, with PassMark integer math score of 36,758 indicating competent integer throughput.

Users who primarily play esports titles or older games will find this system particularly well-suited, as those games are typically CPU-bound and the Ryzen 3 7440U's single-core performance is adequate. For users demanding 1440p or 4K gaming, the shared memory architecture and 55-watt GPU envelope suggest that performance will drop off significantly beyond 1080p, making this a poor choice for high-resolution enthusiasts.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of just 28 watts. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results position this CPU as a mid-range mobile part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,042 represents strong sustained throughput for a 28-watt processor, while the single-core score of 1,558 indicates good per-thread performance. Geekbench scores of 5,806 multi-core and 2,003 single-core corroborate this assessment. The CPU's percentile rank of 69 against all CPUs places it above the median but below high-performance desktop parts.

The nearest rivals in the database are interesting for context. The Intel Core i5-11400H scores 15,749 on average, a mere 0.4% higher than the 7440U's 15,682. This near-parity with a previous-generation 6-core mobile chip suggests that the 7440U's higher IPC and boost clock compensate for its lower core count. The other rivals — AMD EPYC 9254, EPYC 9354P, and EPYC 75F3 — are server processors that score within 1.1% of the 7440U, which is notable given their vastly different power envelopes and core counts. This indicates that the 7440U's architecture is highly efficient for its class.

PassMark results provide additional granularity. The floating-point math score of 20,291 and integer math score of 36,758 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data encryption at 9,215 and extended instructions at 10,356 indicate competent AES and SIMD throughput. The physics score of 939 is modest, suggesting that the CPU may struggle with complex physics simulations in games. The average benchmark score of 15,682 across all tests provides a composite view that aligns with the percentile ranking.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the Strix Halo chip and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm². It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,295 MHz and boosts to 2,800 MHz, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and an equal 11.47 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Memory is entirely system shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The bus width, type, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning the GPU's memory performance depends entirely on the host system's DDR5 configuration. Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, which are respectable figures for an integrated part. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern gaming APIs and ray tracing workloads.

Benchmark performance is strong for an IGP. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 places the GPU at the 89th percentile overall, and the Vulkan score of 58,398 is similarly impressive. The average benchmark score of 62,108 compares favorably with its nearest rivals: the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896 (0.3% lower), while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693 (2.5% higher), the RX 7600M scores 63,775 (2.6% higher), and the RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830 (2.7% higher). This places the 8050S in a tightly contested performance band, just below some discrete mobile GPUs.

The GPU's TDP of 55 watts is substantial for an integrated part, explaining its high performance but also indicating that the system will generate more heat than typical ultrabooks. The lack of power connectors and IGP slot width confirms this is not a discrete solution. For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs, making this suitable for GPU-accelerated effects in video editing and 3D rendering at moderate settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 8050S's 89th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at competitive frame rates in most titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,558 is sufficient for maintaining 60+ FPS in well-optimized games, though high-refresh 144Hz+ monitors may expose CPU limitations in CPU-bound scenes. Frame rates are estimates, as no measured FPS data exists for this combination.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads and PassMark data encryption score of 9,215 provide adequate headroom for software encoding at modest bitrates. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58,398 supports hardware-accelerated encoding and compositing, though the shared memory architecture may introduce latency when simultaneously gaming and encoding. The 55-watt GPU TDP suggests thermal headroom is limited.

Video editing: GPU acceleration is the dominant factor here. The Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects, transitions, and export rendering dramatically compared to CPU-only workflows. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,042 handles timeline scrubbing and proxy generation adequately. The shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s may bottleneck 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 provides strong compute performance for GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 32 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the shared memory architecture may limit complex scenes. The CPU's 4 cores will be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 11,042 indicating moderate throughput.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 36,758 supports compilation and code analysis. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration with 4.70 GHz boost clock handles single-threaded build tools effectively. The GPU's compute capability accelerates shader compilation and parallel test execution. The 28-watt CPU TDP means sustained all-core loads will run at reduced clocks.

Student and office work: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2,003 handles document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with minimal latency. The GPU's acceleration ensures smooth UI rendering and video playback. The 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 with ECC support provide data integrity for academic research and long-running computations. The 69th percentile CPU ranking indicates comfortable headroom for multitasking.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U CPU with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the Zen 4 family, running at 3.00 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost with a 28-watt TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 2,048 shaders and a 55-watt TDP, built on the Strix Halo chip. Both components use TSMC's 4 nm process, indicating a modern, power-efficient design.

The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper quartile of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The GPU is the standout component at the 89th percentile, while the CPU at the 69th percentile is more modest. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a GPU-first build where graphics performance exceeds processing performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 15,682 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11400H, differing by just 0.4%.

The integrated nature of the GPU eliminates the need for discrete graphics, making this a compact and power-efficient solution. The 83 watts combined TDP, while higher than typical ultrabook processors, is still far below what a discrete GPU would demand. This build occupies a unique niche: it offers discrete-class graphics performance in an integrated form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of solid mid-range performance. Cinebench R15 scores are 1,112 multi-core and 156 single-core; R20 scores are 4,637 multi-core and 654 single-core; R23 scores are 11,042 multi-core and 1,558 single-core. Geekbench scores are 5,806 multi-core and 2,003 single-core. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 15,682, placing the CPU at the 69th percentile versus all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark results are substantially stronger. Geekbench OpenCL scores 65,818, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 58,398. The average benchmark score is 62,108, placing the GPU at the 89th percentile versus all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, is just 0.3% behind, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead.

The combined picture shows a system where GPU compute capability is roughly four times greater than CPU compute capability in raw throughput terms. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 12,991 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818 illustrate this disparity clearly. For workloads that can leverage the GPU, this system punches well above its weight class; for CPU-bound tasks, it performs at a level consistent with its 69th percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical results.

Based on the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute, this system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58,398 suggests strong API-level performance, while the 2,048 shading units and 64 ROPs provide adequate pixel throughput for 1080p resolutions. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s will limit RT performance in demanding scenes.

The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,558, should not bottleneck the GPU in most games at 1080p. However, CPU-intensive titles that rely heavily on physics or AI calculations may see frame rate dips, given the CPU's PassMark physics score of 939. Esports titles and older games are expected to run at high frame rates, likely exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles released in recent years, frame rates are estimated to fall between 40-70 FPS at high settings, dropping to 30-50 FPS with ray tracing enabled. These figures are estimates only and should be validated with real-world testing.