SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

16,827 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + AMD Radeon 8050S: A High-Performance Laptop Pairing with a Clear Divide

This laptop build pairs a modest 4-core CPU with a top-tier integrated GPU, resulting in a system that is heavily skewed toward graphics-intensive work. The combined percentile of 80 out of 100 places this configuration above most systems, but the CPU’s 70th percentile and the GPU’s 89th percentile reveal a significant performance gap. The Radeon 8050S is the dominant component, and benchmark results indicate that the Ryzen 3 7335U will be the limiting factor in most demanding workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 8050S delivers strong raw performance, but the CPU is a bottleneck. With an average benchmark score of 62,108 and an 89th percentile ranking, the GPU is capable of high frame rates, but the Ryzen 3 7335U’s single-thread score of 1,511 in Cinebench R23 suggests that CPU-bound scenes will see lower FPS than the GPU alone could deliver. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, expect good but not elite performance, with frame rates likely limited by the processor in less GPU-intensive titles.

Streaming: The combination of 8 threads and a strong iGPU makes this a viable entry-level streaming setup. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 12,592 indicates it can handle encoding at modest bitrates, while the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance offloads rendering. However, the 4-core/8-thread design will struggle with simultaneous game encoding and heavy background tasks, so streamers should expect to lower in-game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: This workload benefits most from the GPU’s compute power. The Radeon 8050S scores 65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 2.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.7% ahead of the RX 9060 XT LP. For 4K timeline scrubbing and effects rendering, the GPU accelerates processing, but the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 MB of L3 cache will slow export times in CPU-bound codecs. The data suggests a system that handles previews well but takes longer on final renders.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 2,048 shading units provide strong acceleration for GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58,398 is only 7.6% below the OpenCL score, indicating solid cross-API performance. The CPU’s 10,703 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is serviceable for CPU rendering but places it only 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i3-12100E, meaning rendering times will be moderate for complex scenes.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis rely on single-thread performance. The Ryzen 3 7335U’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,511 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,053 put it in the 70th percentile of all CPUs, which is adequate for everyday development tasks. The 8 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well, and the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking accelerates shader compilation and GPU debugging, but the 4-core limit will slow large project builds compared to 6-core or 8-core rivals.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 146,309 and integer math score of 42,493 indicate smooth handling of spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU’s high performance is unused in these tasks, but the system’s 80th combined percentile ensures no lag in multitasking, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports fast data access for large files.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 16,827, placing it in the 70th percentile of all CPUs. This is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i3-12100E, which scores 16,853, a delta of -0.2%. The Ryzen 3 7335U also sits just 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-1235U (16,770) and 0.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (16,753), while being 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS (16,902). These sub-1% deltas indicate that the 7335U is a mainstream performer, not a standout.

The GPU is a different story. With an average benchmark score of 62,108, the Radeon 8050S lands in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896) and 2.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693), but 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (63,775) and 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830). The GPU’s individual scores are strong: 65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing a 12.7% gap between the two APIs.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by a wide margin. The CPU sits at the 70th percentile while the GPU sits at the 89th, and the overall build lands at the 80th percentile. This indicates that the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting, and the CPU is holding back the system’s full potential in GPU-bound tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.30 GHz, with a 28W TDP. Built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm², this is a power-efficient mobile chip, but its core count is modest by modern standards.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. This 8 MB L3 is small compared to many desktop processors, which can limit performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth is adequate, and ECC memory support is a notable feature for data integrity in professional use.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competent but not exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,703 and single-core score of 1,511 indicate a 7.08x multi-thread scaling, which is reasonable for 4 cores with SMT. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,053 is in line with other mid-range mobile chips, while the multithread score of 12,592 shows that the 8 threads provide a solid boost for parallel tasks.

The CPU’s real-world behavior is defined by its 70th percentile ranking. In single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding, it performs adequately. In multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, it is competitive with the Intel Core i3-12100E (delta -0.2%) and the Core i5-1235U (delta 0.3%), but it cannot match higher-core-count processors. The PassMark physics score of 647 is low, indicating that gaming physics simulations will be a bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The data clearly indicates that gaming performance will be dictated by the GPU, with the CPU acting as a secondary constraint.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Radeon 8050S’s 89th percentile ranking suggests strong performance in most titles. The GPU’s 2,048 shading units and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are comparable to dedicated mid-range graphics cards, and the 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,511 will limit frame rates in games that rely heavily on single-threaded physics or AI.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the CPU bottleneck lessens. The GPU’s pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are sufficient for high-resolution rendering, but the system-shared memory bandwidth, which is system dependent, may cause stuttering in textures-heavy games. At 4K, the GPU will be stressed, and the CPU’s 4 cores will be less of a factor, but frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU’s 3,053 PassMark single-thread score and 4.30 GHz boost clock should support high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU’s performance will still be the limiting factor in most cases. The data suggests a system that excels at 1080p high-refresh gaming, is capable at 1440p, and struggles at 4K.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit most, as the Radeon 8050S’s 89th percentile ranking delivers smooth gameplay in most titles. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated effects, such as video editors using OpenCL or Vulkan, will find the 65,818 OpenCL score valuable for previews and effects, but they should expect slower CPU-bound exports.

Software developers will appreciate the 8 threads for parallel builds and the GPU for shader compilation, but the 4-core limit will slow large projects. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for their needs, but the 80th combined percentile ensures no lag in multitasking. Small business workstations handling data processing will benefit from the CPU’s 146,309 PassMark data compression score and ECC memory support.

The system is less suitable for professional 3D rendering or heavy video production, where the CPU’s 70th percentile ranking will bottleneck GPU performance. Users requiring high single-thread performance for tasks like complex simulations should look elsewhere, as the 7335U’s single-core score of 1,511 is only average.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a powerful integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm². It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,295 MHz and boosts up to 2,800 MHz, with a 55W TDP.

Memory is system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR5 RAM as the CPU. This results in bandwidth that is system dependent, which is a significant limitation compared to dedicated GPUs with their own VRAM. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is shared, and in practice, the GPU will see less than that, potentially impacting high-resolution textures.

Compute performance is strong: the GPU delivers 11.47 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is excellent for an integrated solution. The pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are competitive with mid-range discrete GPUs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it future-proof for modern APIs.

Benchmark results confirm its high tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 places it in the 89th percentile, 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.5% ahead of the Radeon Pro Vega 56. The Vulkan score of 58,398 is 12.7% lower, indicating that OpenCL is the more optimized path for this GPU. For rendering workloads, the 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration, but the system-shared memory may limit ray tracing performance in complex scenes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance is stark: the GPU sits at the 89th percentile while the CPU sits at the 70th. This 19-percentage-point gap means the CPU is the clear bottleneck in most workloads. The GPU’s average score of 62,108 is 3.69x higher than the CPU’s 16,827, and the combined percentile of 80 is pulled down by the CPU’s lower ranking.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance will limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, while the GPU handles the graphics load. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,511 and PassMark physics score of 647 indicate that games with complex physics or AI will see frame drops. The GPU’s high pixel rate and shading units will push high frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios, but the CPU will cap performance in lighter titles.

In productivity, the CPU is the sole bottleneck for single-threaded tasks, while the GPU accelerates parallel workloads. The CPU’s 4 cores limit multi-threaded performance, as shown by its 10,703 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which is only 0.2% ahead of the i3-12100E. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS can offload some work, but tasks that are inherently serial will run at CPU speed.

The memory system is another potential bottleneck. The system-shared memory architecture means the GPU and CPU compete for bandwidth, and the 76.8 GB/s limit is shared. This can cause performance dips in memory-intensive games or rendering tasks, though the exact impact depends on the workload.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a mainstream 4-core CPU with a high-end integrated GPU. The overall tier, based on the 80th combined percentile, is above average, but the system is not a top-tier performer. The CPU’s 70th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile create a lopsided configuration where the GPU is the star.

The pairing is unusual: the Ryzen 3 7335U is a power-efficient mobile chip with 8 threads, while the Radeon 8050S is a powerful iGPU that rivals discrete graphics. This makes sense for users who want GPU performance without the size and power of a discrete card, but it sacrifices CPU performance for that GPU capability. The system is best suited for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, not CPU-heavy tasks.

The 80th combined percentile places this build above most systems, but the CPU’s low score relative to the GPU means it is not a balanced high-end machine. For users who need both strong CPU and GPU performance, this pairing will disappoint; for those who prioritize graphics, it is a compelling choice.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7335U compare to the Intel Core i3-12100E?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U has an average benchmark score of 16,827, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i3-12100E’s 16,853. They are effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62,108. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M.

Q: Is this build good for 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU’s 89th percentile and the CPU’s 70th percentile, 4K gaming is possible but likely to produce frame rates below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The system-shared memory bandwidth further limits high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional and server-oriented platforms.

Q: What architecture is the GPU based on?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm².

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 32 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games and rendering applications.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U scores 10,703 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i3-12100E and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 115U.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds