SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
74%
VS
GPU
96%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7330U

3,958 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a low-power 4-core mobile CPU with a flagship-class laptop GPU. The result is a system where the graphics processor vastly outclasses the processor in raw compute, and benchmark data reflects that imbalance clearly.

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². This is a high-end mobile GPU in terms of raw silicon, and the memory subsystem reflects that: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is significant for 4K texture streaming and for large compute buffers in rendering workloads — the data indicates the GPU can move data faster than most desktop cards from a generation ago.

Clock speeds are listed with a base of 1335 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz, while memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The GPU packs 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. For ray tracing, there are 76 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, 304 tensor cores. These are large numbers for a mobile part; the pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 515.3 GTexel/s confirm that this GPU can fill frames at high resolutions without texture-rate bottlenecks. FP32 throughput is 32.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which means compute-heavy tasks like AI inference or physics simulation do not lose half-rate performance when using half precision.

Benchmark scores put this GPU at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 180831, and in Vulkan 170774. The Passmark suite shows G3D at 27212, G2D at 984, and GPU compute at 12347. DirectX-specific Passmark tests are lower: DX9 at 310, DX10 at 173, DX11 at 262, and DX12 at 107 — these legacy API scores are less indicative of modern rendering performance than the G3D or compute figures. Compared to nearest rivals, the RTX 4090 Mobile sits close to the NVIDIA RTX A6000, with a delta of -0.9% (the A6000 scores 44075 vs 43667 average). It is also within 0.8% of the Quadro M6000 (43301) and 0.9% of the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268). For rendering workloads, the data suggests this GPU handles heavy rasterization and ray tracing with headroom, but the CPU in this pairing may limit how fast scenes can be prepared.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data set contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than verified results.

Given the GPU’s 84th percentile standing and its 16 GB VRAM, this GPU is capable of running modern titles at high settings. The gap between the CPU and GPU is the key constraint. The Ryzen 3 7330U’s Geekbench single-core score of 1514 and multi-core of 4131 suggest that at 1080p, where CPU-bound scenarios are common, frame rates may be limited by the processor in titles with heavy draw-call or physics workloads. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and the RTX 4090 Mobile’s bandwidth and shader count would allow high ultra settings. However, without measured FPS data, any specific frame rate claim would be speculative. The data supports a qualitative conclusion: the GPU is far more capable than the CPU, so gaming performance will scale with resolution and with how well a title leverages multiple cores. For esports titles at low settings, the CPU could bottleneck; for graphically intensive AAA games at high resolutions, the GPU should dominate the frame time budget.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo-R. It is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock is 2.30 GHz, boosting to 4.30 GHz. This is a mobile part with a 15 W TDP, which explains its modest core count and clock strategy — it is designed for efficiency, not sustained multi-threaded throughput.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel access, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), which is a generation behind the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface; this mismatch could slightly limit data transfer between CPU and GPU in bandwidth-heavy workloads, though gaming typically does not saturate PCIe Gen 3 x16.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6230, Geekbench multi-core of 4131, and single-core of 1514. The CPU sits at the 57th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3958. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (avg 3959, delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-6900K (avg 3970, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (avg 3971, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G (avg 3977, delta -0.5%). The data shows this CPU performs nearly identically to those older desktop and mobile parts — all within 0.5% of each other. For real workloads, this means the 7330U is a capable entry-level processor for everyday tasks, light coding, and office productivity, but it will struggle with heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering where more cores would help. The single-core score of 1514 is adequate for responsive UI and single-threaded applications, but it is not competitive with modern high-end desktop CPUs.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, which sits between the CPU’s 57th and the GPU’s 84th percentile. This gap — 27 percentile points — is the clearest evidence of imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation, AI logic, or spreadsheet-style number crunching, the Ryzen 3 7330U will be the limiting factor. Its 4 cores and 8 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6230, which is modest by modern standards. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution rendering or ray tracing, the RTX 4090 Mobile’s 32.98 TFLOPS and 576 GB/s bandwidth will dominate the performance picture, and the CPU will have little impact on frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but telling. With no measured FPS data, we rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 27212 versus the CPU’s Geekbench multi-core of 4131 suggests that in 3D scenes, the GPU will finish rendering far faster than the CPU can feed it with draw calls and game logic. At 1080p, this mismatch often manifests as CPU-bound frame rates in titles with complex scenes. At 4K, the GPU’s fill rate becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU’s slower single-core performance (1514) may still cause stutters in games that require strong per-thread performance. For compute-heavy tasks like AI training or 3D rendering, the GPU will complete iterations much faster than the CPU can prepare data, leading to idle GPU time. The data indicates this is not a balanced system; it is a GPU-centric build with a CPU that is adequate for basic tasks but not for feeding a flagship GPU in every scenario.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark scores are: Cinebench R23 multi-core 6230, Geekbench multi-core 4131, Geekbench single-core 1514, with an average benchmark score of 3958. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 57, meaning it outperforms just over half of all processors in the database. The GPU’s scores are: Geekbench OpenCL 180831, Geekbench Vulkan 170774, Passmark G3D 27212, Passmark G2D 984, Passmark GPU compute 12347, and Passmark DirectX scores of 173 (DX10), 262 (DX11), 107 (DX12), and 310 (DX9). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43667, with a percentile vs all GPUs of 84. The combined percentile for the pairing is 71.

The nearest rival data for the CPU shows it is statistically tied with the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-6900K (delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G (delta -0.5%). This means the 7330U is not a performance outlier; it sits in a well-trodden performance band. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (delta 0.8%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (delta 0.9%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (delta 0.9%), and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (delta -0.9%). The GPU is essentially on par with these professional cards, which is notable because the RTX A6000 is a workstation-class product. The combined picture is a system where the GPU provides professional-grade compute and rendering capability, while the CPU provides only entry-level processing power. In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU will outscore the CPU by a factor of roughly 10 in raw compute (43667 vs 3958 average), which quantifies the imbalance.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile is at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43667.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 3 7330U has an average benchmark score of 3958, which is within 0.5% of the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3, Intel Core i7-6900K, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U, and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so frame rates are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which reflects the GPU’s high standing (84th) pulling up the CPU’s lower score (57th).

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel access, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with a high-refresh display, the CPU’s single-core score of 1514 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 32.98 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM ensure that visually demanding games run smoothly at high settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear driver of performance, and the CPU will have less impact.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture are well-suited for encoding, but the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to handle game logic and encoding simultaneously without dropping frames. The Geekbench multi-core score of 4131 suggests limited headroom for background tasks.

Video editing: The GPU’s 84th percentile and 576 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6230 will slow timeline scrubbing and export times for long projects. This is a GPU-accelerated workflow with a CPU bottleneck.

3D rendering: The RTX 4090 Mobile’s 76 RT cores and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 make it excellent for GPU rendering, but the CPU will delay scene preparation and simulation steps. The Passmark GPU compute score of 12347 indicates strong compute performance, but the CPU will idle between GPU tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s 57th percentile and 4 cores are adequate for compiling small projects, but large builds will be slow. The GPU’s compute capability is irrelevant for most coding tasks, so the CPU is the sole driver here.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 15 W TDP and 4-core design are efficient for everyday tasks like document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is massively overkill for this use case, but it does not hurt performance; the system will be responsive for these workloads.

# Build Overview

This pairing consists of an AMD Ryzen 3 7330U (4 cores, 8 threads, Zen 3, 15 W TDP) and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (16 GB GDDR6, Ada Lovelace, 120 W TDP). The build class is laptop, and the combined percentile is 71. The GPU is a flagship mobile part, sitting at the 84th percentile, while the CPU is a low-power entry-level part at the 57th percentile. This is a laptop config that prioritizes graphics performance over CPU throughput, making it suitable for GPU-heavy tasks but not for CPU-bound workloads. The GPU’s performance is on par with professional cards like the RTX A6000, while the CPU’s performance is comparable to older desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-6900K.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers who play at 1440p or 4K and prioritize visual fidelity will benefit from the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth, though they should expect CPU limitations at lower resolutions. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering or AI inference will find the RTX 4090 Mobile’s tensor cores and compute scores useful, but they should not rely on the CPU for heavy multi-threaded tasks. Developers who write GPU-optimized code, such as CUDA or Vulkan applications, will appreciate the GPU’s OpenCL score of 180831 and Vulkan score of 170774. Students and office workers who need a laptop for standard tasks will find the CPU adequate, but the GPU is unnecessary for their workloads. Small business workstations that require GPU compute for tasks like CAD or data visualization could use this pairing, but the CPU’s 4 cores may limit productivity in multi-tasking environments.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP6, supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, and has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is a generation newer than the CPU’s PCIe lanes; this mismatch could reduce peak transfer rates in some workloads. The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W, so the total system power draw is modest by desktop standards, but in a laptop, this is constrained by the chassis cooling and battery. The suggested PSU is not listed, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count Ryzen processor on the same FP6 socket, if the laptop’s BIOS and cooling allow it, to better balance the system. Alternatively, the GPU could be paired with a stronger CPU in a future laptop build, but the current pairing is what it is — a GPU-heavy configuration where the CPU is the clear weak link.